19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 27, 2017 22:44:55 GMT
After a weekend of 'Pride Manchester' and 'The Big Weekend' (note the absence of any reference to homosexuality in the the titles of this disgraceful display of commercialism, £32.50 a ticket please) we're now reclaiming the word 'queer'. Um, why? Nobody asked me, I'm very happy with 'gay' as it happens. Gay (happy) has a positive connotation, queer (odd) doesn't.
Who made 'queer' acceptable? Because I'd like a word.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2017 22:50:19 GMT
As I understand it, the word has been reclaimed by members of the LGBT+ community, many of whom you may notice don't actually fit under the banner "gay", and I may not have specific dates but it's definitely not a recent thing. Obviously it's understandable if individuals don't like the word and would rather not use it for themselves, but still others find it very useful and are happy to have taken back the use of it.
|
|
19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 27, 2017 22:54:42 GMT
Can I call black people the N word on that basis then?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2017 23:17:39 GMT
Can I call black people the N word on that basis then? No, not unless you are reclaiming it from being a negative term about your own ethnicity (or you're a white supremacist). Queer has radical political connotations going back thirty years or so.
|
|
19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 27, 2017 23:21:11 GMT
What utter cobblers.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2017 23:47:25 GMT
I don't like the word queer either. But I also find it difficult to keep up with the amount of different sexualities that seem to pop up all the time. I can't keep up. I am basically gay apart from when alcohol is involved. Thats fine with me.
|
|
19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 27, 2017 23:52:07 GMT
Is it ok for a straight person to call me queer?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2017 23:53:41 GMT
Is it ok for a straight person to call me queer? I think its more of a if that is your chosen pronoun then yes it is ok, but if it isn't your chosen pronoun, then no, it isn't ok.
|
|
19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 27, 2017 23:59:50 GMT
How are people supposed to know?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 0:04:14 GMT
How are people supposed to know? Well generally speaking, sexuality isn't the first thing brought up in a conversation. It usually comes up later on. But if a straight person or LGBT+ person got it wrong, its a case of just politely correcting them or politely telling them you are uncomfortable with that specific terminology.
|
|
19,787 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 28, 2017 0:08:58 GMT
I'm not talking about people talking to me face to face Daniel. If people call me Matt, which they often do initially, I'm very happy to tell them it's actually Matthew. That's quite different to the generic term 'queer' becoming accepted.
What next, Fairies?
|
|
2,452 posts
|
Post by theatremadness on Aug 28, 2017 0:17:11 GMT
As a straight person, I'd refrain from calling any gay person queer, whether I know them well or not, as it just comes across as quite a harsh word. Unless, of course, the circumstances were that where I knew that the person in question was in no doubt offended by being called queer. But even then, I don't think I'd feel particularly comfortable saying it. Like I will never, ever feel comfortable hearing the N word and have no plans to ever say it in my life. As a Jew, I detest the word Yid and I actually hold it on par with the N word, but thanks to football, there's no way it's ever going out of fashion now that it's completely normalised. I would never expect to hear a non-Jewish person call me a Yid as it's an extremely derogatory and harsh remark, but if another Jewish person were to say it, I'd be very annoyed and would try to discourage their use of it, but at the same time, it's also their choice to use a word that explicitly applies to them. They may not seem it as derogatory, but, as has been mentioned, a "reclaiming" of the word. The same may apply to the N word and may then also be extended to the use of queer, but I'm not sure.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 0:27:06 GMT
Some people moaned about Gay being used as a term when kids described things as a bit gay. But as it is openly used I'd use it in all contexts.
Queer, Fairies, Puffs are certainly old terms you don't hear much these days and the countations of queer could be considered unpleasant.
The history of the N-Word is certainly complicated and it being used in Rap could encourage people to use it without understanding the offence.
The word "Coloured" was used a lot and not considered offensive in the 1970's and 1980's but I can remember someone telling me in about 1994 that it was now considered racist, I said "Don't be stupid" but thinking about it, I stopped using that word. But I still know people who will use it quite innocently and I would not think of them as racist.
The P-Word is even more cloudy, considering the country Pakistan was only established in 1947 and a countries' name can often be shortened to denote it's people. But as long as I've known this word has always been off limits (35 years plus in my memory. I'm never sure when it became considered offensive but I'm guessing 1970's.
I can once remember watching some cricket highlights from Australia on Channel 4 with an asian friend, we were probably 14 or so at the time and Pakistan were playing and took a wicket and the Aussie commentator said "the P's are going mad" quite innocently. My friend's father started screaming at the TV and it created a very tense atmosphere.
The mention of Yid reminds me of the brilliant episode of Till Death Us Do Part when Mike - the Scouse Git calls Alf Garnett a Yid and Alf goes spare. The late great Warren Mitchell was of course Jewish so implying Alf was Jewish worked perfectly.
On a final lighter note how about reviving Honky Tonk as a saying after the old Dick Emery camp character.
|
|
2,859 posts
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Aug 28, 2017 2:59:17 GMT
Can I call black people the N word on that basis then? No, not unless you are reclaiming it from being a negative term about your own ethnicity (or you're a white supremacist). Queer has radical political connotations going back thirty years or so. Yeah, it became political during the HIV/AIDS crisis, eg Queer Nation and the slogan "we're here, we're queer, get use to it". A lot of older people don't like it (understandably), Larry Kramer has been very vocal about his opinions on the term. But it's more comprehensive that just "gay", especially since not everyone in the LIGHT community is homosexual. The whole academic field focused on LGBT issues, gender identity etc is called "queer studies", it's a great example of a world that has been reclaimed and personally I like it a lot.
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Aug 28, 2017 4:14:09 GMT
We all know this conversation would've been shut down by now if a certain admin didn't want the attention. He can say what he likes but we can't.
When this board gets shut down, remind me to set up the next one as quickly as possible so I can be exempt from any questions.
Bye guys.
|
|
950 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Aug 28, 2017 4:55:23 GMT
Surely most people get that Pride is a gay term.
And queer as a reclaimed word is 30 years old by now.
I wouldn't expect anyone to call me that but I can see it's useful as an umbrella term.
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Aug 28, 2017 5:40:06 GMT
BurlyBear, I understand you were trying to have a conversation, but obtusely saying if gays can reclaim the word queer, then can I say the N word is an asshole and purposely inflammatory thing to say. In fact, I would like to say that you WANT to say the N word and clearly take it lightly, because this wouldn't have crossed your mind otherwise. You know better. Stop being ignorant.
On to the Queer conversation, as someone else mentioned, it's for individuals or groups that don't fit into the gay/lesbian binary. You're gay, and so am I. Lucky for us. There are people who don't identify as such, and are not heterosexual either. There are other cultures or disciplines that have formerly referred to non-binary confining groups as the third sex. Call it what you will, but at this day and age, with homosexuality and "gay" being a norm in many places, certainly big cities, it's clear that gays (especially cis, white and male) forget the struggle and start exercising the same discrimination or ignorance that was inflected on them easily two decades ago, and just want their equal share of patriarchy.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 5:45:53 GMT
The thing that bothers me is when people expect that their personal opinion of what is and isn't offensive should apply to the entire world. Different cultures have different ideas of what is offensive, and it's quite ridiculous to expect that everyone should keep up to date with everyone else's feelings and restrict their language to an intersection of the entire world's opinions of the right terminology. I'm not remotely offended by someone using a word that is OK in their society, but I am offended by the belief that they have a duty to learn everything that's offensive in my society before speaking.
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Aug 28, 2017 5:52:48 GMT
So...you're basically saying if in some "culture" it's okay to use the N-word or faggot (which culture is that btw? the superior white race?), then they should go ahead and say it and the group that is offended by this has no right to be offended. Is that what you're saying? Ah, okay. Thank you clarifying. I'm glad we're using white supremacy as a benchmark.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Aug 28, 2017 6:30:55 GMT
I kind of understand where Matthew is coming from in that one. I've seen too many people be lambasted and accused of bigotry/various forms of -phobia for using terms that used to be acceptable, as the various subcultures re-define themselves. Most lay people just can't keep up with the speed of terminology change. And it is usually well-meaning allies being called out for using the wrong words, not the obvious white supremacists!
It's counter-productive, as it makes people unwilling to engage with the issues at all. Though it seems these days people don't want you to discuss issues that don't directly affect you even if you're trying to show support!
|
|
2,051 posts
|
Post by infofreako on Aug 28, 2017 6:52:29 GMT
So...you're basically saying if in some "culture" it's okay to use the N-word or faggot (which culture is that btw? the superior white race?), then they should go ahead and say it and the group that is offended by this has no right to be offended. Is that what you're saying? Ah, okay. Thank you clarifying. I'm glad we're using white supremacy as a benchmark. Not wishing to drift wildly off topic it appears to have become acceptable for the white yoots in brighton and possibly elsewhere to refer to each other as my N. Absolutely makes me cringe
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Aug 28, 2017 7:07:38 GMT
I kind of understand where Matthew is coming from in that one. I've seen too many people be lambasted and accused of bigotry/various forms of -phobia for using terms that used to be acceptable, as the various subcultures re-define themselves. Most lay people just can't keep up with the speed of terminology change. And it is usually well-meaning allies being called out for using the wrong words, not the obvious white supremacists! I think there's something to be said about those who mean well and yet not willing to put in the effort. What you're describing is complacency, and the lack of interest in one to educate and inform themselves of very important social topics. People "can't keep up" because they don't want to keep up. Considering the very accessible literature and information that is available at our reach, the only excuse for not keeping up is indifference.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 7:10:17 GMT
So...you're basically saying if in some "culture" it's okay to use the N-word or faggot (which culture is that btw? the superior white race?), then they should go ahead and say it and the group that is offended by this has no right to be offended. Is that what you're saying? Ah, okay. Thank you clarifying. I'm glad we're using white supremacy as a benchmark. Of course I'm not saying that and I'm certain you know I'm not saying that, so I really don't know why you posted something so antagonistic. I don't know where the white supremacy thing came from. I'll illustrate the point with a non-race, non-gay example. Back during a recent athletics championship a US competitor being interviewed on UK TV referred to someone or something as "spastic", prompting a subsequent apology from the presenter. In the UK that's an offensive term for someone disabled. In the US it's a non-offensive term for being over-excited. It's the same word, but the meaning is completely different. What I am saying is that people brought up to know the UK meaning of the word should stop and think "That's offensive to me but she's from the US and it's not offensive to her, and there's no reason why I should be allowed to dictate what her culture is permitted to find offensive". What they should not do is eagerly seize the chance to start berating someone for failing to study every culture and commit all their preferences to memory in order to make sure nothing that is said could possibly be interpreted as offensive by anyone. People should be tolerant and consider someone's intent, not twist words and leap at the chance to show off how outraged they are. If someone uses a word that's OK to them and then finds out that it's offensive to someone else then they should certainly try to avoid using it (although ingrained habits are hard to change), and it's obviously a very different matter if someone is told "we don't use that word over here" and then goes out of their way to use it as much as possible. But most people are reasonable and try to do the right thing, and other reasonable people should take that into account. It takes a pretty disgusting sort of person to say "I know that's not offensive to you but I'm going to pretend you were trying to be offensive so I can show off my moral rectitude".
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Aug 28, 2017 7:23:50 GMT
When I was young it was perfectly acceptable and polite to talk about "coloured people". However recently an elderly TV person was hauled over the coals and forced to apologise for using the phrase which he had not realised had changed status. However the formulation "people of colour" seems still to be acceptable because I heard it used by a US politician, however as she herself was a person of colour maybe, like rappers and the n-word, that confers a special license for her to use it. It would be useful if someone could produce a handy guide for those of us not tuned in to popular culture to prevent us being run over by the outrage bus.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 7:47:28 GMT
Is it ok for a straight person to call me queer? Is there hate in their hearts when they say it?
|
|