19,650 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 30, 2017 16:25:17 GMT
I looked after a Co-op Insurance Services contract for years so that's what I get when I see CIS.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 16:32:44 GMT
There will never be a word or label to satisfy everyone as we are all individuals. Its important to remember that people dont give offence, people take offence, and only you can decide what you want to take. Terms have changed so much over the years that i can no longer keep up, and before anyone lectures me about it, the term 'cis' just baffles me. I hate the word "cis" too, I think it was first used by a German sexologist (yup, that's a thing) in the late 90s but really gained traction when the gender studies crowd picked it up around 2010. Even when you lump in all of the male to female / female to male transitionees and people who are gender fluid / variant / non-conforming, they still make up less than 1% of the population, so why is it necessary to have a term at all? For all the talk of "we have more in common than that which divides us" we aren't half desperate to categorise everyone into their individual groups and harp on about how nobody else understands what we're going through. Ahhh f**k off.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 16:43:09 GMT
Cis is just the most pointless word to me. So you were born male and consider yourself male and so you are a cis male. Why cant you just be male?? As you so eloquently put it, F*** off!
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 30, 2017 17:08:23 GMT
I think the idea is to make cis people feel guilty for their cis privilege. Or at least that is how I keep seeing it being used.
|
|
4,153 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Aug 30, 2017 17:50:59 GMT
I think Cis is a useful term for people talking about trans issues within that community, where people may well need to make the distinction because trans people would normally be the majority. It's less useful for talking to people outside that community because you have to stop and explain/justify it every time for the very large number of people who have never had cause to encounter it before.
Edit: Though I think oxfordsimon has probably got the nail on the head - it *is* used in practice to point out the privilege that non-trans people have, as a form of activism. Anyone remember Eddie Redmayne on the Danish Girl press tour? That guy had seriously done his research and really did have all the terminology and talking points down, and yet he still had interviewers asking him about his gender identity as if it was something he should be ashamed of. He declined to comment on it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 19:55:23 GMT
I hadn't heard of CIS before today, it sounds like something you'd treat with natural yogurt to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 30, 2017 20:14:13 GMT
No-one should be ashamed of their gender identity. No-one should be forced to issue an apology because of how they were born.
However there is a growing fetishisation around trans-identity and gender-otherness which has little to do with the deep-rooted issues that those who are struggling with gender dysphoria. By creating many new sub-categories of gender identity, we are risking diverting attention and resources from those in real need of help by celebrating a group of people who are just playing at dress-up.
By wishing to appear as liberal as possible in accepting people who wish to identify and live their lives in an 'other' way, we are not always helping those who really need support.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 20:44:34 GMT
No-one should be ashamed of their gender identity. No-one should be forced to issue an apology because of how they were born. However there is a growing fetishisation around trans-identity and gender-otherness which has little to do with the deep-rooted issues that those who are struggling with gender dysphoria. By creating many new sub-categories of gender identity, we are risking diverting attention and resources from those in real need of help by celebrating a group of people who are just playing at dress-up. By wishing to appear as liberal as possible in accepting people who wish to identify and live their lives in an 'other' way, we are not always helping those who really need support. Amen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 21:33:54 GMT
There certainly seems to be more transgender people around today than say 25 or 30 years ago. Maybe it is publicised more, it's not like people are more comfortable to come out today and be open about their sexuality, transgender people would have been around regardless.
I am referring to people who were born transgender mainly not those who may have felt uncomfortable in their body and who have opted for gender reassignment - the later has clearly increased in recent years but that is due to more openness and surgical advances etc.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 21:52:17 GMT
I don't think of it as creating many new sub-categories of gender identity though, we're just naming them now. I had a conversation with my dad recently; he thought it strange that there are so many transgender people around now and that they just didn't happen historically, but all it really is is that people are more able to talk about it as it becomes more normalised and we develop the vocabulary to do so.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 30, 2017 22:00:05 GMT
There is certainly a greater awareness of trans issues. This is largely due to the internet age - people have a greater ability to find out information which helps them understand how they are feeling, a greater ability to find a community of others who are experiencing similar things.
There have been a number of significant legislative changes which have been aimed at helping trans people - so that has also contributed to the apparent 'growth' in numbers.
However there has also been an increase in early years diagnoses of gender dysphoria which has raised a number of issues as to how pre-teens can really be said to be aware of the issues of gender and their identity. Should hormones be given before the onset of puberty? Is surgery at an early age the best option? I don't think there is consensus around these issues in the medical community at present and we should tread carefully.
It is a very complex set of issues and it is very difficult to know what is for the best - especially when you don't have personal insight of living as a trans individual.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 30, 2017 22:07:44 GMT
I don't think of it as creating many new sub-categories of gender identity though, we're just naming them now. I had a conversation with my dad recently; he thought it strange that there are so many transgender people around now and that they just didn't happen historically, but all it really is is that people are more able to talk about it as it becomes more normalised and we develop the vocabulary to do so. It is when I see lists like this: genderfluidsupport.tumblr.com/gender - that I really do question how far things should be allowed to go. (as far as I can tell, that link is a genuine, sincere posting aimed at helping people - even though it does, in places, read like a parody)
|
|
19,650 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 30, 2017 22:18:00 GMT
I don't think of it as creating many new sub-categories of gender identity though, we're just naming them now. I had a conversation with my dad recently; he thought it strange that there are so many transgender people around now and that they just didn't happen historically, but all it really is is that people are more able to talk about it as it becomes more normalised and we develop the vocabulary to do so. It is when I see lists like this: genderfluidsupport.tumblr.com/gender - that I really do question how far things should be allowed to go. I'm starting to feel better about 'queer' 😐
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 30, 2017 22:24:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 22:55:42 GMT
Cis is just the most pointless word to me. So you were born male and consider yourself male and so you are a cis male. Why cant you just be male?? You can just be male. But you are also either cis male or transgender male. You may prefer not to say which you are. (Hello, Admin ...).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 8:03:03 GMT
The idea behind having cis-male and trans-male as options is that it sets them up equally, whereas if we don't have cis-male and just use plain ol' "male" as the default, then someone who is trans-male is automatically othered, made to feel less valid and like an outsider. And, okay, there are way fewer trans-male people than cis-male people, but that doesn't mean they're not normal. There are more dogs than pandas in the world, but the panda is still valid.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 8:04:06 GMT
Related to all the above, I saw an interesting documentary last night 'Britain on Film LGBT Britain' (https://www.chapter.org/britain-film-lgbt-britain-pg) the link has the full list of documentaries it included clips from, but it was a perfect example of 'well meaning but now unacceptable' in terms of the way interviewers questioned gay and trans people. But a fascinating collection of clips, if it's showing near any of you do check it out.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Aug 31, 2017 8:22:58 GMT
The idea behind having cis-male and trans-male as options is that it sets them up equally, whereas if we don't have cis-male and just use plain ol' "male" as the default, then someone who is trans-male is automatically othered, made to feel less valid and like an outsider. And, okay, there are way fewer trans-male people than cis-male people, but that doesn't mean they're not normal. There are more dogs than pandas in the world, but the panda is still valid. Whilst I can see that, the desire of many people who transition is to live as their new gender not to be something other. There are those who also wish to constantly proclaim their otherness by putting the focus on the trans part of their identity. Cis is being overused by a very small but very vocal minority of academics and activists to create division where most people want to see unity. As I said earlier, no one should be blamed for how they were born. Cis is being used for exactly that purpose and that, to my mind, diminishes any positive intent behind the creation of that label.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 8:43:50 GMT
Okay, so some people don't like the reason they perceive that some other people use "cis".
But other people will continue to use the word as a descriptive term, thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 10:25:57 GMT
There certainly seems to be more transgender people around today than say 25 or 30 years ago. Maybe it is publicised more, it's not like people are more comfortable to come out today and be open about their sexuality, transgender people would have been around regardless. I am referring to people who were born transgender mainly not those who may have felt uncomfortable in their body and who have opted for gender reassignment - the later has clearly increased in recent years but that is due to more openness and surgical advances etc. I'm pretty sure there is no difference between those two things. By "born transgender" do you mean intersex? That's an anatomical problem where you're born with a chromosome imbalance or more notoriously with genitalia that doesn't correspond to your biological sex. I think there are definitely people who use transgender-ism (not a word) as a trend. They're usually the ones who want to shout the loudest about how oppressed they are. As someone who experienced debilitating gender dysphoria all through my childhood and teenage years, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. It's like a toothache that at its best is a dull nagging pain and its worst is like someone clamping your face into a vice and inserting a small chainsaw into your mouth. It's completely counter intuitive because my brain is as female as could be, but I have a male body, and it's like both are constantly fighting against one another. It's not a social trend, it's not something cute to put on a T-Shirt, it is a severe mental illness. We can't even say it's a mental illness any more because that implies there's something wrong with it but there is, your brain just doesn't work properly. I don't think hormones or puberty blockers should be given to children except under very extreme circumstances. Children change. One week they like Spiderman, the next they like Batman. It is child abuse to inflict upon someone too young to even express their thoughts coherently something that is irreversible, leads to infertility, and could substantially increase their risk of various health conditions down the line. It's just wrong. In my case it would have been the right thing to do but nobody could have known that, I could have reached 13, changed my mind, and been totally screwed. I still don't like the word "cis". I also don't like the concept of "privilege". Instead of saying "this group have had a rough time of it, let's make things better for them", you're saying "this group have had it TOO good, let's remove those benefits they have". It's not privilege if you're able to walk down the street at night and notfeel threatened, it's a basic human right. It's not privilege to be able to see yourself represented on television, it's what everyone should be able to expect. The reason there is such opposition to social justice is because a) a large proportion of it is stupid and counter-productive and b) the whole concept is framed around bringing people down and not building people up. The fact that in the last few years it's become acceptable to make abhorrently rude and unsubstantiated comments about entire groups (white people, men, cisgender people, straight people) illustrates that it's completely missed the mark.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 10:44:03 GMT
The reason there is such opposition to social justice is because a) a large proportion of it is stupid and counter-productive and b) the whole concept is framed around bringing people down and not building people up. Indeed indeed. And well said in all of the above martello736
|
|
1,120 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Aug 31, 2017 11:09:07 GMT
That is not what "privilege" means, or least it's not supposed to. It simply means acknowledging the various complex ways our identities affect our treatment in the world filled with unspoken systems of oppression and power interchanges (eg a patriarchy). A person can experience privilege in one respect and dis-privilege in another respect.
"When You're Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression"
|
|
4,153 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Aug 31, 2017 11:09:32 GMT
I still don't like the word "cis". I also don't like the concept of "privilege". Instead of saying "this group have had a rough time of it, let's make things better for them", you're saying "this group have had it TOO good, let's remove those benefits they have". It's not privilege if you're able to walk down the street at night and notfeel threatened, it's a basic human right. It's not privilege to be able to see yourself represented on television, it's what everyone should be able to expect. The reason there is such opposition to social justice is because a) a large proportion of it is stupid and counter-productive and b) the whole concept is framed around bringing people down and not building people up. The fact that in the last few years it's become acceptable to make abhorrently rude and unsubstantiated comments about entire groups (white people, men, cisgender people, straight people) illustrates that it's completely missed the mark. There is much truth in this. Witness the spectacle of Iron Fist being accused of whitewashing/racism by casting a white lead, when the character in the original comic books is white. The argument being that martial arts stories that feature white protagonists are inherently racist because there's not enough Asian-American representation on screen. Or the Great Comet casting controversy - which obviously was badly handled by the producers - being cast as a race issue when it was really just a case of trying to improve ticket sales to keep the show open. After Ed Skrein decided to pull out of Hellboy because he was cast as a half Asian-American character while being white, there's now an expectation that white actors should check that any role they may be cast in is the same ethnicity as them in the source material before accepting it, and turn it down if not. I had someone on twitter tell me that part of the problem is white actors not researching roles before signing up for them, and that they have a responsibility to do so, when I suggested that it should be casting director's job.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 11:12:40 GMT
That is not remotely what "privilege" means. It simply means acknowledging that being part of a specific class of people who are the majority/power (male, heterosexual) have inherent advantages in a society predicated on, for example, patriarchy or heteronormativity. "When You're Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression" You are right- but also the use of the term by some facets of 'Social justice warriors' is often twisted and I think that's the issue Martello was talking about (and certainly I was referring to). I fully appreciate I have privilege in some aspects (being white, living in a Western country etc) but I'm not in others (Being a woman). And that's good to be aware of as a person going through life and as a person wanting to affect change. However it's not a stick to beat people with which is where some extremes of the movements fall down.
|
|
4,153 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Aug 31, 2017 11:13:00 GMT
That is not remotely what "privilege" means. It simply means acknowledging that being part of a specific class of people who are the majority/power (male, heterosexual) have inherent advantages in a society predicated on, for example, patriarchy or heteronormativity. "When You're Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression" On social media it has turned into calls for people to lose their jobs for being part of a 'privileged' group/'problematic' and therefore the 'wrong' person to do something.
|
|