|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 22:08:34 GMT
I have to say that my immediate association with the word now is not as a slur, but as a movement. Perhaps this is due to me having to write and read about 'queer literature' and so on in university for the last six years. It does seem like the word has taken a sharp turn in what it is generally accepted to mean as I definitely remember it being widely used as a slur when I was a child, but then again I would imagine the world in general is kinder to gay people now than it was even 15 years ago. Having said that, it's not my place to use it to describe someone or to address someone, at least not without them saying that's how they wish to be described and addressed. The reclamation of a term doesn't take away the history, and it's the same as the n word in that regard. I feel like it's similar to women affectionately calling each other bitches, but then again we haven't quite managed to stop men from calling us that yet either. Don't you worry about asking me love if/when we meet, you call me whatever you wanna call me! But funnily enough on the last part of your comment, alot of my female friends allow me to use the term bitches in a jokey way all the time, they don't care at all about it. And I know alot of gay guys who do this also. So I wonder if it is a thing of females being ok with gay guys saying it but not straight guys?* *this isn't me criticing your point love, just making the point for discussion.
|
|
19,650 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 28, 2017 22:11:34 GMT
Burly Bear when you say things like "Ouch. Not that old thankyou." aren't you being a little insensitive to those of us who are? Age racism is up there with a lot of other things gays have to tolerate. Not that offended because I am quite comfortable with my age but give a thought to those who are offended. I'll certainly bear that in mind @buddyvlc, thank you for the note.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 22:13:19 GMT
I have to say that my immediate association with the word now is not as a slur, but as a movement. Perhaps this is due to me having to write and read about 'queer literature' and so on in university for the last six years. It does seem like the word has taken a sharp turn in what it is generally accepted to mean as I definitely remember it being widely used as a slur when I was a child, but then again I would imagine the world in general is kinder to gay people now than it was even 15 years ago. Having said that, it's not my place to use it to describe someone or to address someone, at least not without them saying that's how they wish to be described and addressed. The reclamation of a term doesn't take away the history, and it's the same as the n word in that regard. I feel like it's similar to women affectionately calling each other bitches, but then again we haven't quite managed to stop men from calling us that yet either. Don't you worry about asking me love if/when we meet, you call me whatever you wanna call me! But funnily enough on the last part of your comment, alot of my female friends allow me to use the term bitches in a jokey way all the time, they don't care at all about it. And I know alot of gay guys who do this also. So I wonder if it is a thing of females being ok with gay guys saying it but not straight guys?* *this isn't me criticing your point love, just making the point for discussion. I think it's an individual thing. I wouldn't have an issue with a gay man (that I was friendly with) calling me bitch, but I probably would have an issue with him calling women as a whole bitches. I know a lot of gay men use it to refer to each other as well. Straight men, it's a no either way as they are the ones that for the most part have used it to attack and diminish women. Should always check though, gay men are still men after all.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 22:14:54 GMT
This thread has really taken many different turns in the last day, fascinating!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 22:16:43 GMT
Don't you worry about asking me love if/when we meet, you call me whatever you wanna call me! But funnily enough on the last part of your comment, alot of my female friends allow me to use the term bitches in a jokey way all the time, they don't care at all about it. And I know alot of gay guys who do this also. So I wonder if it is a thing of females being ok with gay guys saying it but not straight guys?* *this isn't me criticing your point love, just making the point for discussion. I think it's an individual thing. I wouldn't have an issue with a gay man (that I was friendly with) calling me bitch, but I probably would have an issue with him calling women as a whole bitches. I know a lot of gay men use it to refer to each other as well. Straight men, it's a no either way as they are the ones that for the most part have used it to attack and diminish women. Should always check though, gay men are still men after all. Oh I completely agree, its always right to check no matter who you are referring too. I personally would only use terms like that if the person was ok with it or encouraged it. Sadly some don't, which is depressing in this day and age that some don't ask, they just do.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 22:23:43 GMT
Someone called me a bitch once in bed. I punched him in the nose...
... we ended up together for six months. You win some, you lose some. 😅
|
|
2,051 posts
|
Post by infofreako on Aug 28, 2017 23:34:23 GMT
Someone called me a bitch once in bed. I punched him in the nose... ... we ended up together for six months. You win some, you lose some. 😅 You come across as such an innocent soul
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 23:44:35 GMT
Really do you need to use any term? You don't say, Christopher over there, by the way he is straight? So why would you do the same for a Gay/Lesbian person. Attitudes move on you look at Fawlty Towers the Germen episode and Major and Basil both used to use the 'N' word, so gather people back then found it hilarious, oddly the BBC don't repeat this anymore, I wonder why? You wouldn't use the same humour now and for very good reason. I think that bit of the Fawlty Towers episode is cut out. If it's the part I'm thinking of, the Major describes taking a lady to see India. But it was a Cricket Test Match at Lords probably India's first test match in 1932. The Major we assume was born circa 1900, so may well have had fairly racist attitudes. Basil Fawlty likewise you would consider being narrow minded and having no regard what he said to whom. Rather like the Alf Garnett character, I assume it was written as being ironic and to show that the characters were stupid not to condone racist language to get cheap laughs along the lines of the working man's club type comedians.
|
|
1,120 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Aug 29, 2017 0:08:19 GMT
Basil doesn't use the N word. The Major does in one scene and it's supposed to be an example of how backwards and out of touch he is (Basil seems fairly taken aback at this speech). It's worth pointing out that the Major is not using the word as a slur or term or abuse, but in a matter of fact way, like he genuinely believes that is the correct terminology for a person of African descent. Obviously attitudes have changed and you wouldn't get that now (the BBC decided to edit that line out of repeats a few years ago, to predictable Daily Mail outrage) but in the uncut episode it's not presented as a perfectly acceptable every day word to use.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2017 7:50:41 GMT
I think, with respect unless you are a person from the groups in question it's not fair to say 'you don't need labels' coming out is a constant process across your life and sometimes instead of explaining an entire sexual or gender identity history to a complete stranger, yes a label is easier. (it's a lovely thought that we'd move 'beyond' labels but we're pretty far from that yet)
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Aug 29, 2017 9:14:19 GMT
I just say "well hello gorgeous" to everyone. I haven't had anyone object......yet!
|
|
5,688 posts
|
Post by lynette on Aug 29, 2017 15:32:13 GMT
I just say "well hello gorgeous" to everyone. I haven't had anyone object......yet! Like Dickie Attenborough who called everyone darling or dear was it? Cos he couldn't remember their names. I do that now. I'm gonna try 'gorgeous' from now on.
|
|
4,020 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Aug 29, 2017 16:17:43 GMT
I feel like it's similar to women affectionately calling each other bitches, but then again we haven't quite managed to stop men from calling us that yet either. I've never come across that usage. If another woman called me a bitch I'd assume she was doing it perjoratively. I wouldn't object to it, given I know I'm an unpleasant bitch most of the time, but I certainly would not view it as affectionate. Likewise, if I refer to someone as a bitch (not to her face, I'm not that rude) I'm certainly not being affectionate. I just say "well hello gorgeous" to everyone. I haven't had anyone object......yet! I'd find it deeply embarassing if anyone ever greeted me like that. As I am fairly plain it would not be the truth anyway. I find it embarassing enough if I'm visiting somewhere up north & get every get called "love" by shop assistants or train conductors.
|
|
721 posts
|
Post by hulmeman on Aug 29, 2017 16:23:24 GMT
Danieljohnson14 - you confuse me in this post! At one point you tell snutte he/she can call you what they like, then you tell us you punched someone in the face for calling you "bitch"!!!!
Is the location of the calling important? We need to know!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2017 19:23:23 GMT
Let's adopt the Nottingham/Midlands affectation of 'Duck' regardless of age, gender or anything else. Look lads I know I waddle a bit but come on...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2017 19:45:26 GMT
I think the reclaiming of the word queer has been going on for quite some time, I personally think that it's brilliant that LGBT+ people are flipping on its head something that was used to marginalise them not so long ago. If you call yourself the name, it suddenly removes the motivation for someone else to call you it as an insult. Not all derogatory terms were even intended to be such, sometimes a generally accepted phrase will be abused and therefore quickly replaced by a new one. This sounds made up but the word "spastic" used to be the official term to refer to a person with cerebral palsy. The CP charity Scope was actually called the Spastic Society up until 1994. It was only when kids starting saying to one another "you're a spastic" in the playground and imitating the condition that it was phased out and something a little less catchy took its place. I mean it doesn't stop you being a tw*t if you call someone that, but it hasn't always been such an off-limits word. I'm not sure how many of you know but I'm transgender and am starting my hormones this autumn. I remember being with a group of friends and we were talking about which Friends character we were each most like, and I said "probably Chandler if he was a bit more of a tranny" and everything suddenly went very silent. Someone looked at me and said "I can't believe you just said that" to which I replied "why not? I am one!" The difference of course is when I say that the word "tranny" it's seen as liberating and brave (please stop calling everything I do brave, I'm not brave) and when someone else says it then they're a transphobe and should surrender themselves for re-education immediately. The fewer words that we allow to be taboo, the less we can be hurt by. I don't feel the need to spend my life permanently offended because someone stumbled over their words and accidentally said "normal" when referring to someone who isn't transgender. Statistically we're less than 1% of the population so normal is probably a more accurate description than "gender non-variant aligning with assigned birth anatomy" or whatever it is the authoritarian powers that be have decided the only non-oppressive term is this week. I'm queer and I'm proud, so let's shout that word from the rooftops so that Fred from Hastings who thinks that gay people are a plague sent by God to punish us needs to find himself a new slur
|
|
4,361 posts
|
Post by shady23 on Aug 29, 2017 19:59:20 GMT
That story reminds me of when a black friend of mine at work was accused to being racist because they made a joke about not getting a tan when they were on holiday.
Absolutely ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2017 22:16:54 GMT
It's like Craig Revel Horwood calling men darling on Strictly, the late great Freddie Mercury used to call people darling too I've heard.
As regards tranny for many years that word was associated with transvestite its only been in more recent years that it has been included in LGBT and the transexual meaning has come to the fore.
Some women didn't like being called Love when the feminist movement was getting going, I've known older women who will call people Love as a greeting to younger people so it is all about how people perceive it.
I hate racism yet I am often very politically incorrect.
|
|
1,120 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Aug 30, 2017 0:09:58 GMT
I'm a terrible luvvie. I was with an actress friend recently and we spent a good few minutes taking the piss out of people who call each other "darling" then as we were saying goodbye she pointed out I had non-ironically called her "darling" without even realising it.
It's a terrible addiction, being a luvvie. There should be a support group. On the other hand there are worse things to be called than darling.
To try to bring this back to topic, the artist who made the Bush's recent play 'Hir' (about trans* issues) uses the personal pronoun judy, which is rather fabulous.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 7:46:09 GMT
Some really good points above. I recently finished Eddie Izzard's book and he talks a lot about both gender identity and the words to describe it- he used transvestite for much of his life, as that was both the 'acceptable' and for him most 'appropriate' word (for Eddie, personally at those points in time) and he talks about 'upgrading' to 'transgender' when that became the 'correct' word. But if you see his stand up he still uses 'transvestite' to talk about himself, because he's so used to it. It's hard when the outside world is telling you that you can't use a word you're used to as much as the other way around is I think my point.
But also as above words are used with the best of intentions. My parents both born in the 40s long used words to describe race, religion and sexuality with the very best of intentions, because they'd been told at a certain point these were the 'correct' words. But until someone tells you different (and in the pre-internet age as well) it's hard to realise what you say with the best of intentions is actually offensive.
The latter is what annoys me with the internet's social justice warriors- there's an assumption everything is done through malice, whereas actually the majority of people just aren't aware.
eta: I have a terrible habit of saying 'sweetie' or 'dear' ironically which I just KNOW is going to start slipping into conversation non-ironically.
|
|
4,153 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Aug 30, 2017 8:29:53 GMT
I know that a lot of people get very het up when people explain that they didn't intend to offend someone by using a 'wrong' word - the phrase 'intent is not f***ing magic' gets thrown around a lot. It's absolutely true that not intending to hurt someone doesn't mean that you didn't hurt them. On the other hand it should be a lot easier to understand and forgive when someone explains that they made a mistake, and had no malice, surely?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 8:38:15 GMT
I know that a lot of people get very het up when people explain that they didn't intend to offend someone by using a 'wrong' word - the phrase 'intent is not f***ing magic' gets thrown around a lot. It's absolutely true that not intending to hurt someone doesn't mean that you didn't hurt them. On the other hand it should be a lot easier to understand and forgive when someone explains that they made a mistake, and had no malice, surely? Yes exactly that- obviously it isn't a 'get out of jail free' card that you 'didn't realise' and some things/words by now people should obviously realise not to use. BUT if someone is genuinely apologetic, and willing to be educated- a simple 'hey I wasn't aware of that, but I am now, sorry for any offence' should be acceptable. However the legions of the internet are so quick to pounce on someone as a pariah for simple mis-using a word or similar...seems very short sighted in a world full of actual racists and the like. Sigh, people etc.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 12:35:22 GMT
My mum was born in mid 1940's so is the same generation as Emi's parents and she uses some terms that I find uncomfortable but she certainly wouldn't be considered a racist IMO.
What say a child is taught in school today cannot always expect to filter down to an older generation.
At work a few weeks back we were trying to decide something and a colleague in her early 30's suggested we do "Eeny, meeny, miny, moe" jokingly and was horrified to discover there was a racist version of that when a couple of us said don't say that whatever you do and she asked why.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 15:12:27 GMT
There will never be a word or label to satisfy everyone as we are all individuals. Its important to remember that people dont give offence, people take offence, and only you can decide what you want to take.
Terms have changed so much over the years that i can no longer keep up, and before anyone lectures me about it, the term 'cis' just baffles me.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2017 15:47:27 GMT
the term 'cis' just baffles me Having studied chemistry I can't help interpreting it as "What? You mean your groups are on the same side of your double bond?"
|
|