1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Jun 12, 2020 14:33:48 GMT
There’s no reason why something based on Shakespeare in the Squares concept could not be performed over the summer especially if they produce Classic plays with small casts. They are all outside, never really busy and there is always plenty of space to spread out and could comply with the Beer Garden solution for pubs that is being mooted.
The NT could also find a more access restricted space to put on their River Stage, make them more theatrical, performed in a similarly spaced out environment and sell tickets alongside the refreshments.
As we move into the summer I have always enjoyed the small scale al-fresco productions I have seen over the years including the Lord Chamberlain’s Men’s Midsummer Nights Dream in a brief thunderstorm last year which added to the Atmosphere.
|
|
|
Post by baguette on Jun 12, 2020 15:01:54 GMT
There’s no reason why something based on Shakespeare in the Squares concept could not be performed over the summer especially if they produce Classic plays with small casts. They are all outside, never really busy and there is always plenty of space to spread out and could comply with the Beer Garden solution for pubs that is being mooted. The NT could also find a more access restricted space to put on their River Stage, make them more theatrical, performed in a similarly spaced out environment and sell tickets alongside the refreshments. As we move into the summer I have always enjoyed the small scale al-fresco productions I have seen over the years including the Lord Chamberlain’s Men’s Midsummer Nights Dream in a brief thunderstorm last year which added to the Atmosphere. Italy is currently allowing 200 spectators for indoor seated events (concerts, plays) and 1,000 for outdoors (also seated). A summary of their guidelines: www.italia.it/es/informacion-util/linee-guida-per-la-riapertura-delle-attivita-economiche-e-produttive/cinema-e-spettacoli-dal-vivo.htmlSo I can't see why UK can't permit seated outdoor events against similar guidelines but they'll have to get a move on to catch the summer weather.
|
|
7,183 posts
|
Post by Jon on Jun 12, 2020 16:20:18 GMT
It's a shame the Open Air Theatre couldn't do a series of one-off events to test the waters like stand up comedy or a concert.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 12, 2020 16:26:02 GMT
I suspect part of the answer is that reserves of cash are so low that they just haven’t got the money they’d need to get the experiments up and running, so unless they can be profitable enough to tempt an investor it’s not feasible.
Which is why they need government investment - to be repaid later, in the Mendes ‘Angel’ Scheme, once productions are profitable again.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 12, 2020 16:39:12 GMT
If Burbage could throw up a theatre overnight then I think we could probably manage it on the South Bank where they perform most summers anyway. Of course restrict the numbers seated but plenty of scope for using the balconies of the NT itself and charging accordingly. I think in Stratford the RSC is not allowed to use the outside space or erect a temporary seating area. Silly people, the council there. Always have been fighting the main source of income post cattle market. Covent Garden, plenty of space. Get the health and safety on board and we’re off for the summer. Other cities follow suit. I’m an idealist at heart and an optimist. Sue me.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Jun 12, 2020 16:54:55 GMT
I realise this post will go down poorly, but I am taken aback by the posts here. What on earth have we done, as an industry, to create such distrust? So many statements based on negative and unfounded assumptions.
Please remember that "theatre" is not a monolith. Theatre is made up of many dozens of buildings, all run by human beings, who all have different opinions and approaches and different attitudes towards risk. Some artistic directors (for example who have lost parents to COVID, and who run theatres with an older audience demographic) are extremely cautious and are determined to put lives above profit. On the flipside I know one artistic director who has declared intention to open their building the second they are legally allowed to, and one AD who nearly re-opened illegally and had to be talked out of it. There is no consensus and there won't be any consensus. If I repeated some of the things I've heard in AD Zooms this week it would shock you and would silence all the "why are you sitting back waiting to be told what to do" critics instantly.
It honestly breaks my heart seeing posters talking about "lack of ambition" or "innovation has dried up" or "need to stop mourning and start doing". Do posters genuinely believe that artistic directors and other industry leaders and taskforce members are lazy and that we're all sitting on our arses with our hands stuck out passively waiting for the government to tell us what to do? Why the three taskforces then? I look at my colleagues and friends, and I can honestly say industry leader I know is working themselves to death using "innovation" and "ambition" and "creativity" to come up with the proposals and action plans you're castigating us for not doing. Do you really think there's a single suggestion that's been made here that theatres haven't been discussing for weeks?
Every single theatre that I know of has at least three detailed proposals (with financial breakdowns, risk assessments, etc. etc.) for re-opening, and probably half a dozen more creative or outlandish ideas for re-opening. Two of my closest friends have more or less halted all their own work and are now working more than 12 hours a day, seven days a week, writing the financial proposal and having meetings with the Treasury. I bet in a year when fans find out their favourite TV shows have been delayed those same friends will be called lazy. Not lazy, spending every waking minute trying to save the industry that birthed their careers. Important too to note that the financial proposal the group of individuals (representing one of the three taskforces set up in May to represent the theatre industry to the government) are preparing to submit to the Treasury is an investment, and not a bailout.
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Jun 12, 2020 17:19:04 GMT
samuelwhiskers admirable job and a little of what I was hoping for in response. But do riddle me this; the Jermyn St Beckett triple bill with three players and five staff, inc. lighting personage and box office. Why can't that type of production go ahead now with social distancing?
|
|
|
Post by jakobo on Jun 12, 2020 17:30:41 GMT
samuelwhiskers admirable job and a little of what I was hoping for in response. But do riddle me this; the Jermyn St Beckett triple bill with three players and five staff, inc. lighting personage and box office. Why can't that type of production go ahead now with social distancing? It can, but it wouldn't save the industry. Every West End theatre has tens of workers and vast majority of them will be made redundant by the end of July without the support from government. Theatre is literally on its knees at the moment and everyone who loves it should support it in every possible way.
|
|
|
Post by clair on Jun 12, 2020 17:39:20 GMT
At the moment I don't think theatres are legally allowed to open are they - whether with a two hander or a cast of fifty? I know that where I work we do not have legal permission to open so have no options no matter how many people ask why aren't we open. Also the first one that is brave enough to open will be the only opportunity for others to see if there really is enough of an audience to make it financially viable. I would imagine most places will be wanting to cover costs and accepting that there will be nothing extra for a while but as long as they don't lose even more than they have already will open as soon as they are able to do so. Sadly this is a game of patience which needs to be approached with optimism, resignation and acceptance in equal measures right now.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 12, 2020 17:52:08 GMT
[quote author=" londonpostie" source="/post/351820/thread" timestamp= Why can't that type of production go ahead now with social distancing?[/quote] Because it’s still illegal. Currently it’s illegal for non-essential shops to open and to invite non-household members into your house. The ‘bubble’ rules are not in effect until next week, and that’s only for one single-adult household to mix with another household. It’d be illegal even to put people from separate households into a rehearsal space together.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2020 18:05:53 GMT
Thanks for your post samuelwhiskers, most heartfelt. Great to hear there is stuff going on behind the scenes. I guess then, the issue from the fan's perspective (not involved in the industry) is that the passion for re-opening you describe is really not coming across via the usual channels. From the TV, newspapers, interviews, social media etc etc, the public are drowned in how desperate football is to get going, how desperate planes are to start flying, how desperate shops are to open, how desperate hairdressers are to cut hair. As the non involved public we are not getting that from the theatre industry. Endless interviews and articles are just laded with doom and gloom. Cam Mac telling us that he won't do anything until 2021 or until there is no social distancing - it doesn't help. So many articles about how money is needed (we know, we agree) - just add a paragraph at the end about how you may start up again! Those that are doing the wonderful things you describe, should tell us more about them! It is great to hear. But in stark contrast to other sectors - that fire isn't visible to the GBP.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2020 18:08:58 GMT
Sorry, couldn't get the quote function to work!
Indeed opening up is still not allowed - but it will be reviewed on 4th July.
No one expects them to be able to open on the 5th.
But the feel you get is that the review date is 2021, not 3 weeks time!
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Jun 12, 2020 19:05:42 GMT
ah, thank you both for that. I have long since lost the will to follow Gov developments.
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jun 12, 2020 19:50:50 GMT
It’d be illegal even to put people from separate households into a rehearsal space together. I'm not sure this is entirely the case. The ROH has had several social media posts, and an article in the Times, about the preparation of a new pas de deux for the performance they're livestreaming tomorrow evening. While the 2 dancers, Francesca Hayward & Cesar Corrales, are a couple the choreographer, Wayne McGregor, is from another household & it appears that him rehearsing them is allowed, as long as he stays distanced from them in the room.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 12, 2020 20:32:05 GMT
Huh. There really is no consistency in the rules, is there?!
I can’t even invite my parents in for a cup of tea, but it’s ok for a choreographer to be in a room with a couple of dancers working at peak exertion for hours.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2020 21:10:23 GMT
It’d be illegal even to put people from separate households into a rehearsal space together. Tell that to the Old Vic, Claire Foy and Matt Smith! Using rehearsal space has never been illegal as it is work that arguably cannot be done from home.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2020 21:10:55 GMT
Huh. There really is no consistency in the rules, is there?! I can’t even invite my parents in for a cup of tea, but it’s ok for a choreographer to be in a room with a couple of dancers working at peak exertion for hours. I don't know the age and health of your parents, but they are probably higher risk than incredibly fit young dancers. There is literally nothing stopping you inviting your parents round - police are open about the fact that they are not enforcing social distancing rules. It's up to us all to make sensible decisions based on a realistic assessment of the risks. I personally would not be worried about having tea with my healthy active 75 year old mum at this point.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 12, 2020 21:36:30 GMT
Ok, so they can rehearse, but they still can’t open the theatre.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 12, 2020 21:38:52 GMT
It’d be illegal even to put people from separate households into a rehearsal space together. Tell that to the Old Vic, Claire Foy and Matt Smith! Using rehearsal space has never been illegal as it is work that arguably cannot be done from home. I’d assumed - since it’s a live-streamed production - that they’d been rehearsing that using video link. After all it needs to come across on camera, not to an audience in the same room, and need to socially distance the performance anyway.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Jun 12, 2020 21:47:24 GMT
Huh. There really is no consistency in the rules, is there?! I can’t even invite my parents in for a cup of tea, but it’s ok for a choreographer to be in a room with a couple of dancers working at peak exertion for hours. And you can also see your parents as long as you sit next to them on Stealth at Thorpe Park
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2020 22:03:09 GMT
Tell that to the Old Vic, Claire Foy and Matt Smith! Using rehearsal space has never been illegal as it is work that arguably cannot be done from home. I’d assumed - since it’s a live-streamed production - that they’d been rehearsing that using video link. After all it needs to come across on camera, not to an audience in the same room, and need to socially distance the performance anyway. They'll have to rehearse in the theatre so they can ensure the camera is set up properly, and I thought the whole point was to have the camera positioned as if you were sitting in the theatre? I know they've done the play before but they'll still need to re-familarise themselves with the space.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Jun 12, 2020 22:03:35 GMT
Thanks for the kind and thoughtful comments. Travelling for work that cannot be done from home has been allowed from the start of lockdown, so ROH are probably using that as a loophole. I'd guess most theatres don't want to risk endangering actors and crew while it's still illegal to open for audiences. Theatre leaders are painfully aware that there's PR mountain to climb to convince the general public that theatre is a worthy investment, and not some boring elitist thing their posh aunt Ethel once dragged them to. Hence the decision to portray theatre as being in dire peril, and the hammering of the "£5 for every £1 investment not bailout" point. Plus everyone's terrified their production will be the one to infect people. All it takes is one infected person lowering their mask to sneeze because sneeze droplets can travel much further than 2m. It's not just the human cost, but we have to be pragmatic and think about PR too. We've all seen the headlines about Devon beaches, we don't want headlines about how selfish theatre bosses are endangering the public by selfishly re-opening too soon, and god can you imagine if we re-opened and someone did get infected? There are other issues at play here too. If the Treasury rejects the financial proposal or doesn't extend furlough then theatre as an industry might recover, but an awful lot of smaller and more niche companies will die, there'll be less willingness to take risks or take a chance on unknown writers and directors, and an awful lot of talented artists from less financially privileged backgrounds will be forced out. It might be fine in the immediate future, but what about in ten years when an entire generation of emerging talent has been throttled? I don't want a theatre landscape where your only choices are Macbeth, the Mousetrap, or Mamma Mia and you have to travel to London because the regional theatres had to close. When you see industry leaders on TV making dire warnings that theatre will die without help, they don't literally think the UK will never stage another theatre production. But that the theatre industry as we know it will die, and be replaced with one that's aggressively commercial and homogeneous. samuelwhiskers admirable job and a little of what I was hoping for in response. But do riddle me this; the Jermyn St Beckett triple bill with three players and five staff, inc. lighting personage and box office. Why can't that type of production go ahead now with social distancing? Thank you. The Old Vic's socially distanced Lungs is probably a step towards this. Other theatres are watching with interest to see if the OV manage to pull off rehearsing and staging a performance using social distancing. If they do, I predict more socially distanced performances. But that needs to be tested first. Getting audiences in will be the last step.
|
|
3,577 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jun 13, 2020 11:16:59 GMT
Thank you samuelwhiskers for these insights. The theatre situation has been a terrible sadness. Not getting to see anything and reading the gloomy articles and the apparent lack of Government will to sort it out, despite the task forces, has been awfully depressing. Your posts have given hope and it's always one of the things I like most from this forum, to get the insider view of what's actually happening. Never more important than at this time.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 13, 2020 11:35:33 GMT
Yes, really appreciate the insight and everyone’s hard work.
I think we’re all just chomping at the bit to get back to the theatre. The streamed stuff is great, but it really makes me miss actually being there!
|
|
848 posts
|
Post by duncan on Jun 14, 2020 6:59:22 GMT
C4 haven't been able to find anyone who will insure this years filming of Bake Off because of Prue Leith, she is classed as vulnerable and within the at risk categories so nobody wants to take the chance.
This will likely impact on theatre going forward, we're not going to be seeing over 70s in any productions anytime soon.
4 by the way are apparently quarantining the entire crew for 6 weeks to actually make the series and keep Prue as a judge.
A spokesman for the show said: 'Filming will take place in line with production guidelines and the entire team, cast and crew have agreed to go into quarantine in order to make the show safely.'
|
|