|
Post by forevercolours on Sept 20, 2021 5:23:51 GMT
The fact they took the video down is interesting…They clearly didn’t want that video coming up on YT search results as it definitely wouldn’t make me want to go and watch it. However, multiple other shows also had sound issues and their videos are still up so clearly ALW of CHF stomped their feet and got it removed. Carrie also hasn’t returned to the show since it happened and also wrote that whole post about how she could write a book about the events of WEL. This show is literally just surrounded in drama all the time and it doesn’t help that Carrie’s online presence isn’t exactly a producer’s dream half of the time. "wrote that whole post" ? It was a one liner saying there was more to it that sent her off, but she didn't expand. I guess you're accurate in that these three sentences I've written up to this point are also "that whole post" so far. But you're making it much bigger than it is by that hyped phrasing. Where you're not accurate is that her "online presence isn't exactly a producer's dream half of the time". Please demonstrate that half of her social media output has been bad for the show. It hasn't. She's written fantastic things about her alternate, and the alternates she's played opposite, and posted videos about her make up, how the sound works for the show etc. etc. I know we're in a post-truth world now, but there's no need to give in to inaccurate hyperbole just because it spices your life up at the expense of someone else. So let's hear it - "half the time" her social media has been problematic. Evidenced argument please. Go. If Tom Fletcher needs some character work for one of his Strictly dances and pops in to see sis at 'Cinderella' for his training VT people are going to combust. I think you’re reading a little bit too deeply into my post. in regard to the whole post that she put on IG that you seem to have an issue with me phrasing in that way, she deleted it not long after, probably because of those few lines which were unnecessarily dramatic. So I think I am justified in referring to it is ‘the whole post’ in my post, I didn’t say that it was her social media output during this production, I was talking more generally. Over the years, she has constantly inserted herself into conversations that do not involve her which have caused drama. She has been known to subtweet other performers and has put theatre fans on blast publicly which has led to her gaggle of fans attacking people. If anyone here has been using ‘inaccurate hyperbole’ to ‘spice up your life’ it’s you.
|
|
|
Post by danb on Sept 20, 2021 5:43:46 GMT
The stage is a different size and shape, there isn't a revolve, the set isn't there and so it there will have to be changes to the choreography so it will be different but also really similar which I expect make it harder. I assume it also won't have had any rehearsal in Trafalgar square. What difference does the shape of the stage make? The set was a statue, a tree stump or two, none of which she had to move herself or interact with They rehearsed for weeks/months without a revolve, so she should remember that. I don't recall any cast member of Les Mis falling apart when they sang One Day More at West End Live. Say yeah, i messed up, move on. Don't try and make excuses. If anything, she should be more concerned about the people who actually pay to see it, not the screaming tweens who are there for a freebie. The scene is already a mess onstage. Awkwardly carrying and pulling her around….yes, that’s the word awkward. It looked awkward and kind of underrehearsed on stage, so trying to replicate it in a less forgiving environment could….well, did…cause problems. I guess she’s used to getting a battering, so thought she’d get in there first.
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Sept 20, 2021 7:36:45 GMT
Genuine question... if CHF (presumably?) has enough sway to get the footage pulled down from whichever channels it's come down from, can she not just say she doesn't want to do these events? Send Ivano on to do his big number next time.
|
|
1,483 posts
|
Post by steve10086 on Sept 20, 2021 7:46:16 GMT
Every aspect of this show is an absolute shambles.
|
|
4,361 posts
|
Post by shady23 on Sept 20, 2021 7:50:02 GMT
It really isn't.
I went to see it last week based purely on the great word of mouth of friends, I had no wish to see it before then but I absolutely loved it and would go back to see it again.
|
|
352 posts
|
Post by properjob on Sept 20, 2021 7:51:46 GMT
The stage is a different size and shape, there isn't a revolve, the set isn't there and so it there will have to be changes to the choreography so it will be different but also really similar which I expect make it harder. I assume it also won't have had any rehearsal in Trafalgar square. What difference does the shape of the stage make? The set was a statue, a tree stump or two, none of which she had to move herself or interact with They rehearsed for weeks/months without a revolve, so she should remember that. You ask what difference the shape of the stage makes? Well if you don't adapt (i.e. change) the choreography it will at best look weird as it won't be making best use of the stage, at worst someone will collide with the edge of the stage or with another cast member trying to avoid the edge of the stage. If you have a revolve that normally does say a half turn during a number if you don't change the choreography you will end up facing the back! You claim that she doesn't interact with the statue or the tree stump?! She starts thr number standing on one and ends it tied to the other! Does that not count as interaction to you?
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 20, 2021 9:16:30 GMT
It really isn't. I went to see it last week based purely on the great word of mouth of friends, I had no wish to see it before then but I absolutely loved it and would go back to see it again. Word of mouth outside of this board is very good, on social media at least - and not all from CHF fans btw. Did you doubt your friends' taste/recommendation when you went in, or do you usually align? There's a difference between: 'I don't like this show, and find it messy/a shambles' and 'Because I don't like this show I want to push the image that e-v-e-r-y a-s-p-e-c-t of it is a shambles'. The casting is great, the covers are actually causing a stir as a 'treat' rather than a disappointment, the promo online and in rail stations and a few TV spots looks great (better than the show many will say, so clearly not a shambolic aspect), the easy win of the revolving auditorium is exciting those who don't remember 'Cats' in that theatre, and I think the production shots are great. I think they've fallen short with the tube station posters by not using the production shots; and their single pull quote 'Totally OTT, a blast' seems an odd choice to be on every poster when there are better ones. I haven't even mentioned the writing/direction which is so 'marmite', as I haven't seen it, and I didn't love much of what I heard from the soundtrack - but that's not necessary in order to discuss the idea that "every aspect" is a shambles.
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Sept 20, 2021 9:52:37 GMT
TBH I feel like word of mouth on this board is actually pretty good for the most part. I've mainly seen positive reports from anyone on here who's actually been to see it - it played a part in me booking, anyway! The criticisms have mostly been fair, it's not perfect but it is very enjoyable with a mostly wonderful cast. WEL wasn't a great representation of the show, and regardless of how people feel about the reasons for that I'd say that's pretty much agreed on too. I happen to love the show but it's despite CHF. That's not me attacking her, before anyone starts on that, I just don't care for her as a performer. Hopefully the next time the show's being represented in some kind of concert form they'll either send Georgina or Ivano to do it. Unfortunately this all having blown up into a 'thing' will only end up putting more pressure on her for next time.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Sept 20, 2021 10:18:35 GMT
What difference does the shape of the stage make? The set was a statue, a tree stump or two, none of which she had to move herself or interact with They rehearsed for weeks/months without a revolve, so she should remember that. You ask what difference the shape of the stage makes? Well if you don't adapt (i.e. change) the choreography it will at best look weird as it won't be making best use of the stage, at worst someone will collide with the edge of the stage or with another cast member trying to avoid the edge of the stage. If you have a revolve that normally does say a half turn during a number if you don't change the choreography you will end up facing the back! You claim that she doesn't interact with the statue or the tree stump?! She starts thr number standing on one and ends it tied to the other! Does that not count as interaction to you? I am sure as professionals they are well used to adapting to a new space which, let’s face it is pretty much the same as the Gillian Lynne - a regular bog standard rectangle space. It will have been blocked out prior to the event for them, they will have known the size of the stage and adapted the choreo accordingly. They will not just have been thrown on and left to get on with it. I’ve worked with children aged 7 on productions where we have rehearsed in a dance studio for months and only had the theatre an hour beforehand and they’ve been able to adapt to the space because I have blocked them in the correct spaces so the floor space is the same. Come on, these are West End professionals who do this every day not children. Nerves are one thing - everyone gets them - but let’s not blame the space and lack of interaction with a couple of set pieces. The ensemble seemed completely at ease with what they were doing? Apart from her missing the first word she was completely in key until the part the music dropped out where she fell out of key then she recovered straight away. She’s probably mortified as she can’t control the narrative when the public are filming her and I can understand that. Who wants a mistake recorded for all eternity? But lack of a tree stump and statue she stands on for seconds at the start of the number are not to blame here.
|
|
|
Post by eggemann on Sept 20, 2021 11:11:35 GMT
It seems pretty simple, issues with tech meant she struggled near the end. It happens, and tech issues happening at West End Live isn’t uncommon. She does appear extremely insecure about the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2021 17:13:11 GMT
Problem with CHF is there are always issues and excuses, her heathers performance had something from memory too. Yes the audio isn't always that great at these events but there are still some great performances from those two days.
From following her on social media patterns quickly emerge. she doesn't take theatre performing all that seriously. She isn't that committed. From not training, not rehearsing or practicing before returning to les mis, admitting to turning down work/ignoring emails during covid. And those are just off top of my head
|
|
913 posts
|
Post by karloscar on Sept 20, 2021 17:27:24 GMT
It struck me as strange watching the bits of WEL that I've seen that the twenty odd year old choreography for Mamma Mia which I was never particularly fond of looked fresh and well disciplined from the second they entered, while the brand new (if derivative) routine for Bad Cinderella was messy, under-rehearsed and shambolic. And that was before anything went wrong...
|
|
4,361 posts
|
Post by shady23 on Sept 20, 2021 17:39:22 GMT
she doesn't take theatre performing all that seriously. She isn't that committed. From not training, not rehearsing or practicing before returning to les mis, admitting to turning down work/ignoring emails during covid. And those are just off top of my head I cannot imagine how the poor girl has anxiety with her every move scrutinised in such a way... She didn't respond to emails and turned down work during the pandemic? Is that not her choice? Had she done work she would have got criticised for that too. The pandemic was the chance to reset and have a break. Some of the stuff I read on this forum really is absolutely baffling at times. I have seen her in a few shows over the years and she has certainly put the effort in, performs well and appears to have a very good work ethic.
|
|
846 posts
|
Post by stuartmcd on Sept 20, 2021 18:15:17 GMT
Problem with CHF is there are always issues and excuses, her heathers performance had something from memory too. Yes the audio isn't always that great at these events but there are still some great performances from those two days. From following her on social media patterns quickly emerge. she doesn't take theatre performing all that seriously. She isn't that committed. From not training, not rehearsing or practicing before returning to les mis, admitting to turning down work/ignoring emails during covid. And those are just off top of my head I think the only issue she ever had during Heathers which she openly spoke about was having tonsillitis during the the run at the Haymarket. She didn’t rehearse for Les Mis? Where did you get that from? And I also don’t really see what the problem with turning down work is.
|
|
|
Post by max on Sept 20, 2021 18:23:39 GMT
I agree - baffling, that so much bile is saved up for this performer. I don't follow her closely, but have seen a video of her doing her warm-down after her performance (and she name checked the vocal coach who'd devised it for her), as well as obviously the warm-up (video with the rest of the cast on stage); she's having meetings with the resident director, and - as I keep saying - is doing a really good job as a company leader.
I mention the warm-up/warm-down, because in a radio documentary Nick Allott (who was in a company managing role) described how in the first cast of 'CATS' it was only Bonnie Langford and former Royal Ballet members who never had an injury because they came in well before curtain up and took the warm ups seriously, whereas others would bowl in more casually. Same theatre obviously, decades apart, different story.
CHF may not have come in via traditional training but there's every indication that she takes her theatre work seriously, and exercises professional discipline.
|
|
336 posts
|
Post by Roxie on Sept 21, 2021 8:11:33 GMT
she doesn't take theatre performing all that seriously. She isn't that committed. From not training, not rehearsing or practicing before returning to les mis, admitting to turning down work/ignoring emails during covid. And those are just off top of my head I cannot imagine how the poor girl has anxiety with her every move scrutinised in such a way... She didn't respond to emails and turned down work during the pandemic? Is that not her choice? Had she done work she would have got criticised for that too. The pandemic was the chance to reset and have a break. Some of the stuff I read on this forum really is absolutely baffling at times. I have seen her in a few shows over the years and she has certainly put the effort in, performs well and appears to have a very good work ethic. Agree!!! I don't understand why there is so much vitriol for Carrie on this board!! As far as I can see she mostly carries herself with dignity and has a good work ethic and attitude. Even if you don't agree with some of what she says/does - leave her alone! We all make the occasional misstep, and we all have people who disagree with us or who we disagree with. There's no need for nastiness though.
|
|
|
Post by eggemann on Sept 21, 2021 11:35:40 GMT
It struck me as strange watching the bits of WEL that I've seen that the twenty odd year old choreography for Mamma Mia which I was never particularly fond of looked fresh and well disciplined from the second they entered, while the brand new (if derivative) routine for Bad Cinderella was messy, under-rehearsed and shambolic. And that was before anything went wrong... I’ve seen Cinderella in preview and a lot of that routines relies on the revolve in the stage to move ppl around. That plus the lack of stage scenery translates to not much happening. Even the end where she is tied to a tree didn’t work in WEL when they were just tieing her up to nothing so it didn’t look like it made sense.
|
|
4,981 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Sept 21, 2021 12:08:41 GMT
Is that routine trying to sell the show? It looks terrible and I suspect the Pie Crust Players could do better.
|
|
|
Post by newyorkcityboy on Sept 21, 2021 12:53:47 GMT
It struck me as strange watching the bits of WEL that I've seen that the twenty odd year old choreography for Mamma Mia which I was never particularly fond of looked fresh and well disciplined from the second they entered, while the brand new (if derivative) routine for Bad Cinderella was messy, under-rehearsed and shambolic. And that was before anything went wrong... I’ve seen Cinderella in preview and a lot of that routines relies on the revolve in the stage to move ppl around. That plus the lack of stage scenery translates to not much happening. Even the end where she is tied to a tree didn’t work in WEL when they were just tieing her up to nothing so it didn’t look like it made sense. Ah that explains it. She should have just sung it as a solo minus all the choreography. Tying her up for no reason looked like some bizarre S&M practice…
|
|
|
Post by danb on Sept 21, 2021 13:44:25 GMT
Is that routine trying to sell the show? It looks terrible and I suspect the Pie Crust Players could do better. The PCP’s aren’t allowed near Lloyd Webber after their rather shambolic ‘Evita’ brought the Lord into disrepute by recasting Evita as a dominatrix (full gear), Peron as her pimp and Che as her best ‘customer’ (repeatedly…less gear…lets just say the director was quite keen on the lad and had no chance of seeing him singing ‘Oh What A Circus’ in a jockstrap any other way). It ran for one and a half performances at Frodsham Village Hall, until Andy’s lawyers had it shut down. They lowered the key of ‘Rainbow High’ and he had a hissy fit.
|
|
913 posts
|
Post by karloscar on Sept 21, 2021 22:14:41 GMT
It struck me as strange watching the bits of WEL that I've seen that the twenty odd year old choreography for Mamma Mia which I was never particularly fond of looked fresh and well disciplined from the second they entered, while the brand new (if derivative) routine for Bad Cinderella was messy, under-rehearsed and shambolic. And that was before anything went wrong... I’ve seen Cinderella in preview and a lot of that routines relies on the revolve in the stage to move ppl around. That plus the lack of stage scenery translates to not much happening. Even the end where she is tied to a tree didn’t work in WEL when they were just tieing her up to nothing so it didn’t look like it made sense. So why do that number? There must be others that look better out of context. Stupid error.
|
|
|
Post by marob on Sept 21, 2021 22:37:58 GMT
They’ve used that song pretty heavily in the promo for the show and I guess it’s one that gives most of the cast a chance to appear at West End Live, which they seemed pretty excited about.
From what I’ve seen of WEL though it doesn’t seem to be a very good showcase for musicals. Dodgy sound and without context some of them fall pretty flat. The better ones I’ve seen were the simpler ones like Jon Robyns singing Bring Him Home or Mazz Murray singing The Winner Takes It All. I think they’d have been better off putting her out there on her own and getting her to do I Know I Have a Heart.
|
|
4,361 posts
|
Post by shady23 on Sept 22, 2021 2:23:45 GMT
If only it was that simple... the sound was crackling constantly during Jon's performance which ruined it and Ruthie actually had to run on to hand him a mic it was so bad.
|
|
1,932 posts
|
Post by LaLuPone on Sept 22, 2021 3:03:17 GMT
she doesn't take theatre performing all that seriously. She isn't that committed. From not training, not rehearsing or practicing before returning to les mis, admitting to turning down work/ignoring emails during covid. And those are just off top of my head I cannot imagine how the poor girl has anxiety with her every move scrutinised in such a way... She didn't respond to emails and turned down work during the pandemic? Is that not her choice? Had she done work she would have got criticised for that too. The pandemic was the chance to reset and have a break. Some of the stuff I read on this forum really is absolutely baffling at times. I have seen her in a few shows over the years and she has certainly put the effort in, performs well and appears to have a very good work ethic. THIS!!!!
|
|
|
Post by eggemann on Sept 22, 2021 13:59:28 GMT
I’ve seen Cinderella in preview and a lot of that routines relies on the revolve in the stage to move ppl around. That plus the lack of stage scenery translates to not much happening. Even the end where she is tied to a tree didn’t work in WEL when they were just tieing her up to nothing so it didn’t look like it made sense. So why do that number? There must be others that look better out of context. Stupid error. I think they could do that number easily. But I don’t understand why they lifted it straight from the theatre. Plenty of other shows do more concert style performances, sometimes they aren’t even dressed as their character at all.
|
|