|
Fleabag
Mar 4, 2019 19:00:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by talkingheads on Mar 4, 2019 19:00:47 GMT
Anybody else here a fan? For my money Phoebe Waller Bridge is one of the best writers working in television at the moment. Laughs, gasps and unbearable tension, every line laced with subtext.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 19:12:44 GMT
Ah. I just did a post on this in the unpopular opinions thread - the writing is good and the cast is amazing (which is why I watched the first series) but I don't find the character or the incredibly privileged, Trinny and Suzannah world she inhabits remotely relatable.
|
|
|
Fleabag
Mar 4, 2019 21:35:27 GMT
via mobile
peggs likes this
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2019 21:35:27 GMT
Love it, it's hilarious and heartbreaking. PWB is a genius.
|
|
|
Fleabag
Mar 4, 2019 22:12:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2019 22:12:18 GMT
I loved this. Everyone’s still so completely awful. I really hope it’s as good as season 1.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Mar 5, 2019 20:21:54 GMT
Oh she's clever! That really was something rather special.
|
|
|
Fleabag
Mar 5, 2019 21:06:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2019 21:06:02 GMT
So theories on the Andrew Scott character? I’m thinking 100% not a priest, right?
|
|
3,321 posts
|
Post by david on Mar 5, 2019 22:23:39 GMT
With the positive reviews posted about the programme, I thought I’d give S1 a watch tonight. Having watched episodes 1 and 2, Phoebe Waller Bridge written a really great show so far with some really witty and at times brutal one liners and plenty laugh out loud moments. I’ll definitely continue with it as it’s a nice short show so I can binge watch it in the evening.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2019 22:30:36 GMT
Ah. I just did a post on this in the unpopular opinions thread - the writing is good and the cast is amazing (which is why I watched the first series) but I don't find the character or the incredibly privileged, Trinny and Suzannah world she inhabits remotely relatable. I don't mind that. I always like seeing into other people's lives and, for me, although this is totally different to my own social background, she makes it pretty universal. There's also fun to be had in watching people behave so awfully.
|
|
999 posts
|
Fleabag
Mar 5, 2019 23:01:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 5, 2019 23:01:10 GMT
I agree with the above. If I only watched stuff I found relatable I'd barely watch anything.
I enjoyed series 1 and enjoyed the start of the second, very promising.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 6, 2019 0:10:37 GMT
If I only watched stuff I found relatable I'd barely watch anything. There's plenty of stuff I watch set in worlds I do not inhabit, but, particularly in the current political climate the "oh poor me"-ing of a spoiled overgrown brat in designer frocks is hard to take. Posy Simmonds writes about a similar rich London / home counties world but her characters have more depth, warmth and nuance - you really believe they exist. In Fleabag, so much praise (for example, in the Guardian review) is given to the construction, the performances, and that's also part of my problem - I can see the cogs moving. The worst thing for me was the fawning waitress, the only 'working class' character, who ends up kneeling injured at Fleabag's feet on a toilet floor, the grateful recipient of her used, bloody snotrag. Which I think we were supposed to find amusing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2019 9:24:39 GMT
So theories on the Andrew Scott character? I’m thinking 100% not a priest, right? He is a priest, and he's going to leave the priesthood to be with our anti-heroine, but she's going to reject him leaving him lost without either his calling or a relationship to make up for it. I admit I stole the idea from It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia but it would just fit SO neatly. (I did have another theory but it got superseded in my brain by this one and now I can't even remember what it was. I think it is important that he's a Catholic priest though, as they're the ones who are meant to be celibate, and this is Fleabag.)
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 6, 2019 9:57:55 GMT
So theories on the Andrew Scott character? I’m thinking 100% not a priest, right? Don't know but I really enjoyed his performance.
|
|
|
Fleabag
Mar 6, 2019 15:12:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2019 15:12:43 GMT
Ah. I just did a post on this in the unpopular opinions thread - the writing is good and the cast is amazing (which is why I watched the first series) but I don't find the character or the incredibly privileged, Trinny and Suzannah world she inhabits remotely relatable. Interesting view. I never thought the purpose of the show was for us to relate to her (or any of them, really.) I’ve recently given up on Discovery (Star Trek prequel on Netflix) because i’ve decided it’s not actually very good. I realised that what had kept me watching was how much I related to Saru, a male alien with ‘threat ganglia’ (an appendage that twitches when he feels danger) which evolved because the Kelpians are a prey species on their home planet. If you had ever told me that I would relate to a Star Trek character, I would have laughed in your face. He basically kept me watching for 1.5 seasons. Made me realise that ‘relatable’ is a moveable construct (for me.)
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 6, 2019 16:13:19 GMT
I never thought the purpose of the show was for us to relate to her (or any of them, really.) I got the impression from the fourth-wall-breaking, Miranda-ish looks to camera, and the number of people in the media and online saying how much they relate to her. I really don't, but feel that the series really wants me to: a sort of "we" feeling being projected to camera, and I'm "nope". Maybe it's also a Northern thing? I'm from Liverpool, and I think the family/social dynamics are very different. I feel that way about Pinter too - that maybe it's a middle class London sensibility, one where people have these sort of tight bubbles of personal space around them and communicate in a more stilted, prickly, buttoned-up way. We don't really do passive-agressive here, we just come out and say it or do it. One of my relatives has 'gone native' (if that's still ok to say!) after 20 years there and he's horrified when I try talking to people when I visit, and says we all talk too much and too freely and quickly when he comes back home.
|
|
999 posts
|
Fleabag
Mar 7, 2019 0:08:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 7, 2019 0:08:53 GMT
Maybe it's also a Northern thing? I'm from Liverpool, and I think the family/social dynamics are very different. I feel that way about Pinter too - that maybe it's a middle class London sensibility, one where people have these sort of tight bubbles of personal space around them and communicate in a more stilted, prickly, buttoned-up way. We don't really do passive-agressive here, we just come out and say it or do it. One of my relatives has 'gone native' (if that's still ok to say!) after 20 years there and he's horrified when I try talking to people when I visit, and says we all talk too much and too freely and quickly when he comes back home. Isn't that all a bit sweeping? I'm from London and don't recognise your characterisation of it, though I'm sure that dynamic does exist there. And anyway how do you put "London" families in any sort of pigeonhole? I mean, what even is London? It could be Harringay, Enfield, Richmond, Greenford, Kensington, Rotherhithe.... I always imagine the kinds of family dynamics you mentioned can be found pretty much anywhere in the UK. I personally don't feel the buttoned-up middle class thing about Pinter's work in general, maybe some. The stilted rhythms it often has actually seemed to me closer to natural speech in some ways, plus it seems to fit with the sort of other-worldly timeless placeless quality his work often has. His work plays successfully in many countries and languages which might suggest it's not tied to a certain kind of London dynamic. But anyway, Fleabag. It might be interesting to see how its appreciation index varies in different UK regions. All I can for myself is, I'm a man who doesn't move in the circles it depicts and I find it very entertaining.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 7, 2019 8:51:01 GMT
The stilted rhythms it often has actually seemed to me closer to natural speech Which is my point - coming from the North West, with Liverpool / Irish / Welsh/ Lancashire speech patterns, it doesn't to me. It does remind me of a posh or certain section of middle-class Southerner, though (I've lived a chunk of my life down there). Travelling up and down for theatre trips and listening to conversations in theatre bars and intervals - which you can't help because they talk about their Saab troubles and climbing Maccu Picchu so loudly - you really see it.
|
|
999 posts
|
Fleabag
Mar 7, 2019 9:23:28 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 7, 2019 9:23:28 GMT
The stilted rhythms it often has actually seemed to me closer to natural speech Which is my point - coming from the North West, with Liverpool / Irish / Welsh/ Lancashire speech patterns, it doesn't to me. It does remind me of a posh or certain section of middle-class Southerner, though (I've lived a chunk of my life down there). Travelling up and down for theatre trips and listening to conversations in theatre bars and intervals - which you can't help because they talk about their Saab troubles and climbing Maccu Picchu so loudly - you really see it. And my point is that I too travel around the UK and hear that stilted speech pattern, in among other kinds of speech, from people with different accents not talking about Saabs etc. I don't agree it's something specific to "posh" Londoners and southerners.
|
|
999 posts
|
Fleabag
Mar 7, 2019 9:47:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 7, 2019 9:47:48 GMT
I've been meaning to say how much I always like Bill Paterson so he's another reason I like this show. Yes I realise his faltering can't-complete-a-sentence persona is a bit thin, and you could argue the role doesn't give him much to do, but I see that as part of the general cartoony nature of the show and he's such a comforting presence I'm just happy he's there.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 7, 2019 10:19:50 GMT
that stilted speech pattern Not limited to, I'm sure - but feels very alien to me in the region I live, but when I'm in a theatre bar or stalls in London I recognise it from university, my Etonian London landlord and his dinner party circle or the Hampstead friends-of-friends. I lived in many parts of London but the only bit I felt really comfortable in was Brixton, pre-gentrificaion. Friends who grew up in then-bohemian Notting Hill told me they felt a similar uncomfortable prickliness when that area changed. Anyway, whatever. [quote author=" Backdrifter" source="/post/271536/thread" timestamp="1551952068"]how much I always like Bill Paterson[/quote] Yes, I lurked behind him in a theatre foyer a few months ago just to hear him speak ill of 'corn dogs' in that wonderful voice.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2019 10:33:16 GMT
I'm not sure that Pinter reminds me of Etonians, dinner parties or Hampstead to be honest . . .
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 7, 2019 10:45:23 GMT
On the basis of this thread, I thought I would give the first series a try. And I just don't get it.
It has some good people in it - but the style of the writing does nothing for me at all. I wanted to like it - but I don't think I can.
|
|
|
Fleabag
Mar 7, 2019 10:49:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by danb on Mar 7, 2019 10:49:04 GMT
I watched the first episode of the 2nd series yesterday, my first exposure to Fleabag and was not disappointed at all. I knew that I loved her writing style from Killing Eve, but I’m going to have to watch the first series now. I thought it wonderful and awful and hilarious and devastating all rolled up into one. Just my bag!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2019 11:12:55 GMT
I watched the first episode of the 2nd series yesterday, my first exposure to Fleabag and was not disappointed at all. I knew that I loved her writing style from Killing Eve, but I’m going to have to watch the first series now. I thought it wonderful and awful and hilarious and devastating all rolled up into one. Just my bag! Oh, you must watch the first series. It will put so much of the second one into context, particularly the behaviour of the characters.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Mar 7, 2019 11:18:24 GMT
I've been meaning to say how much I always like Bill Paterson so he's another reason I like this show. Yes I realise his faltering can't-complete-a-sentence persona is a bit thin, and you could argue the role doesn't give him much to do, but I see that as part of the general cartoony nature of the show and he's such a comforting presence I'm just happy he's there. Me too, his greatest performance for me is Comfort and Joy, I love everything about that film, all those little moments.
|
|
999 posts
|
Fleabag
Mar 7, 2019 11:36:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 7, 2019 11:36:23 GMT
I've been meaning to say how much I always like Bill Paterson so he's another reason I like this show. Yes I realise his faltering can't-complete-a-sentence persona is a bit thin, and you could argue the role doesn't give him much to do, but I see that as part of the general cartoony nature of the show and he's such a comforting presence I'm just happy he's there. Me too, his greatest performance for me is Comfort and Joy, I love everything about that film, all those little moments. "Hello, folks!" That little glockenspiel jingle is etched in my memory. Yes I love that film too and agree about the little touches that make it so human, such as finding his ex-partner's left-behind clothes and holding them to his face 😢 I also love the argument about who gets the kunzel cake. (And oh my word I'd hand over a big old chunk of change for one of those right now! That shiny, snappy, solid chocolate casing....). But it absolutely had to be him as that character.
|
|