573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 9:42:50 GMT
It’s also the same Miss Saigon where the creatives didn’t employ Vietnamese leads because they figured Viennese can’t do musical theatre Can you give me a link to a girl with the same talent and who fits the role of Kim as good as Lea Salonga? They actually have Vietnamese girls in the show, sometimes even playing Kim, but luckily casting is still about a certain standard. But they might find more in the future. What exactly is your point? That other Asian people should stay locked behind the border of their own country? That one Asian person can not play a role from another Asian country? Who are you to decide they can't? Must the Engineer be born in France too? The road to equality begins where you stop drawing lines in the sand.
|
|
1,970 posts
|
Post by sf on Jun 7, 2020 10:40:07 GMT
Are we talking about the same Miss Saigon that is so respectful of the culture it represents that it ran for over a decade with lyrics in made-up Vietnamese because the authors couldn't be bothered to use the real language of the country? Or a real language at all? Exactly. CHRIS: It's pretty, but what does it mean? KIM: It means the authors and producer were so entrenched in their white colonialist arrogance that they couldn't even be bothered to go out and find a native speaker to write TWELVE SYLLABLES of Vietnamese. Even in 1989, at 16 years old, I thought that was obnoxious and indefensible (along with the truly disgusting use of footage of real children in Bui Doi - real suffering packaged up as set-dressing in a blockbuster, which was vile). There was a lot I loved about it, but there were a few things that stuck in my throat - and if a white teenager from north-west England who'd never been anywhere closer to Asia than Faulkner Street in Manchester could see it, I'm sure it must have resonated as very, very problematic indeed to some Vietnamese viewers.
|
|
1,061 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by David J on Jun 7, 2020 13:09:05 GMT
I've just watched this video on Cats by youtuber Lindsay Ellis, who makes some very insightful essay videos on musical films like Phantom. Well worth a watch but the last 5 minutes sums up why I don't want a Miss Saigon movie, or even Hamilton for that matter.
She mentions how much of the big film musicals since Moulin Rouge and Chicago have been Oscar bait films (the added unnecessary song, the casting of celebrities and so on). Except the Oscars nowadays prefer films set in realism which made Tom Hooper a shoe-in with his need to make Les Mis and Cats realistic.
Is there still a market for musical films. Sure, but if you want a film that's true to the source material then don't expect Hollywood to make one and they are certainly unable to make a Miss Saigon film
|
|
573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 16:34:01 GMT
Exactly. CHRIS: It's pretty, but what does it mean? KIM: It means the authors and producer were so entrenched in their white colonialist arrogance that they couldn't even be bothered to go out and find a native speaker to write TWELVE SYLLABLES of Vietnamese. Kim literally says they didn't know what else to sing. Where do they claim it's actually meant to be a real language? I have actually always like the fact that it was some fantasy prayer. Random beautiful sounds. Each country has that and it leaves something to the imagination. With that said, the whole show is not in Vietnamese, so that is ok but a fantasy prayer isn't?
|
|
1,970 posts
|
Post by sf on Jun 7, 2020 16:44:13 GMT
Where do they claim it's actually meant to be a real language? "It's what all the girls sing at weddings". Thank you, but I know what a straw man looks like. I also know colonialist arrogance when I hear it. The choice to use made-up words in that moment was appalling, lazy, and absolutely unjustifiable. Try to frame it whatever way you like, but some things are simply wrong.
|
|
573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 16:51:37 GMT
Thanks for that video link David, interesting!
I agree, maybe it's better to not ruin this beautiful material with an Oscar bait Hollywood adaptation. I wish there would be more directors with actual passion and vision.
In the past there have been musicalfilms that work (Moulin Rouge, Evita, Chicago) because they are stylistic and embrace the non-literal element which for example Tom Hooper completely fails to understand.
The only way they will work is indeed through hyper stylisation, to replace the non-literal form of this material. Or indeed, animation. Overcoming suspension of disbelief of the language. More like a videoclip. A fantasy element of storytelling. A non-literal world with non-literal bleating in eachothers face.
I have never understood why Hollywood does not understand this. Anyone can see that it works better. It's not like people ran out of the cinema during "A whole new world" in Aladdin in 1992. People can handle it. It's actually what they want when visiting a musical film.
The idea that a "realistic" approach means apologizing for the sung thoughts and the language of this artform needs to go.
|
|
573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 16:59:20 GMT
but some things are simply wrong. Times have changed. The whole world has changed. And yes, this causes little details here and there to be adjusted. Now it's fixed, so you can choose to applaud it, or to keep complaining about these details that once were. Same goes for yellowface casting. Once accepted. Today we live in a different world. All those things are progress. But claiming today that: "Kim shoots herself over race. This show is about "whiteness kills you". Kim chooses Chris over Thuy because of race. The casting is yellowface." Is racist and moving backwards. That's not fair and has nothing to do with the show how it is today.
|
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Jun 7, 2020 17:07:19 GMT
It’s also the same Miss Saigon where the creatives didn’t employ Vietnamese leads because they figured Viennese can’t do musical theatre This person orders pho and expects Wiener schnitzel.
|
|
1,970 posts
|
Post by sf on Jun 7, 2020 17:24:25 GMT
All those things are progress. But claiming today that: "Kim shoots herself over race. This show is about "whiteness kills you". Kim chooses Chris over Thuy because of race. The casting is yellowface." Is racist and moving backwards. That's not fair and has nothing to do with the show how it is today. It's racist for Diep Tran to complain about the way white writers chose to portray a character from her own country and culture? Please explain how. It's been a long few months and I could really use a laugh.
|
|
|
Post by danb on Jun 7, 2020 17:43:07 GMT
Is Alan Parker still active? He’d be an excellent choice. He has shown time and time again his ability to do both intimate and large stories in ‘epic’ settings, and handle a musical. Does anyone have his address?
|
|
1,061 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by David J on Jun 7, 2020 19:11:47 GMT
And if anybody mentions, La La Land had the advantage of being a call-back to the old stylistic musical films. The Oscars love call-back films like The Artist
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2020 19:22:57 GMT
Is Alan Parker still active? He’d be an excellent choice. He has shown time and time again his ability to do both intimate and large stories in ‘epic’ settings, and handle a musical. Does anyone have his address? i was about to come on here and ask if u were kidding?? hes been dead well over a decade..........!!! i wonder who iv been thinking of all this time?!?!!?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2020 19:24:32 GMT
Is Alan Parker still active? He’d be an excellent choice. He has shown time and time again his ability to do both intimate and large stories in ‘epic’ settings, and handle a musical. Does anyone have his address? i was about to come on here and ask if u were kidding?? hes been dead well over a decade..........!!! i wonder who iv been thinking of all this time?!?!!? ANTHONY MINGHELLA!!! i honestly thought they were the same person!
|
|
|
Post by danb on Jun 7, 2020 19:47:14 GMT
Ahhh Minghella....well known for his grip on a filmic Lloyd Webber and a slavishly stylish Sondheim flick 😂😂😂 Alan Parker (80 odd years old) got an actual performance out of Madonna in Evita, marshalled a load of kids with splurge guns in ‘Bugsy Malone’ and created one of my faves the creepily stylish thriller ‘Angel Heart’ with Mickey Rourke & Lisa Bonet. He could handle the scale, the romance and the tragedy.
|
|
573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 20:46:05 GMT
It's racist for Diep Tran to complain about the way white writers chose to portray a character from her own country and culture? Please explain how. It's been a long few months and I could really use a laugh. First, "white writers", is a racist and world alienated remark. This says nothing about the story, the boat people, refugees and bargirls and the story of madame butterfly this is based on. But I think you hit the nail on its head there. The writer of that article is racist and this given is her problem per definition. She just hates white people. If you really want a laugh, look at these remarks in the article: "Kim shoots herself over race. This show is about "whiteness kills you". Kim chooses Chris over Thuy because of race." Secondly, she says: "Asian women are resilient, resourceful, strong, not victims. Instead, in Miss Saigon, Kim, a woman with no last name, sings about her longing for a man to save her". If you weren't laughing loud enough I'm sure you do it now. Of course it's bizarre to hate white people and hate a show were a character is not embodying your perfect fantasy person or doesn't have the job she feels that represents her well enough, but you know, characters are not meant to represent a whole group of people or an ego. This is a story about a bargil, and many of them existed. The thing is, Kim is everything she describes (resilient, strong, not a victim) and fights till the end for her son, so she clearly hasn't seen the show. She just wants to diss white people. In reality most bargirls and boat people were probably not nearly as heroic or strong, but the writers chose to make her a strong heroine. But that's ok. It is still believable and that's what counts, even when the story is partially real and partially fiction.
|
|
1,970 posts
|
Post by sf on Jun 7, 2020 20:55:43 GMT
It's racist for Diep Tran to complain about the way white writers chose to portray a character from her own country and culture? Please explain how. It's been a long few months and I could really use a laugh. First, "white writers", is a racist and world alienated remark. This says nothing about the story, the boat people, refugees and bargirls and the story of madame butterfly this is based on. But I think you hit the nail on its head there. The writer of that article is racist and this given is her problem per definition. She just hates white people. If you really want a laugh, look at these remarks in the article: "Kim shoots herself over race. This show is about "whiteness kills you". Kim chooses Chris over Thuy because of race." Secondly, she says: "Asian women are resilient, resourceful, strong, not victims. Instead, in Miss Saigon, Kim, a woman with no last name, sings about her longing for a man to save her". If you weren't laughing loud enough I'm sure you do it now. Of course it's bizarre to hate white people and hate a show were a character is not embodying your perfect fantasy person or doesn't have the job she feels that represents her well enough, but you know, characters are not meant to represent a country or an ego. This is a story about a bargil, and many of them existed. The thing is, Kim is everything she describes (resilient, strong, not a victim) and fights till the end for her son, so she clearly hasn't seen the show. She just wants to diss white people. In reality most bargirls and boat people were probably not nearly as heroic or strong, but the writers chose to make her a strong heroine. But that's ok. It is still believable and that's what counts, even when the story is partially real and partially fiction. Mmm. Word salad. Was any of that supposed to make sense?
|
|
573 posts
|
Post by Dave25 on Jun 7, 2020 21:03:32 GMT
Nope, it doesn't make any sense at all. We have spent too much time and attention on that racist article.
Let's contribute to the movie director discussion and other Miss Saigon stuff.
|
|
1,970 posts
|
Post by sf on Jun 7, 2020 21:24:13 GMT
We have spent too much time and attention on that racist article. Since nobody in this thread has posted a link to a racist article, I'm at a loss to understand what you're talking about.
|
|
5,056 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Phantom of London on Jun 7, 2020 21:40:09 GMT
Whilst talking about racism in this thread it is also worth noting that;
American Soldiers were sent to the Vietnamese villages to win the locals hearts and minds, unfortunately it was the Vietnamese that won the heart and minds through prostitution and opium, essentially what Miss Saigon is about. The American soldiers were conscripted and were mainly not like Chris but John, by being black as a lot of white Americans avoided the draft, just as the current President did.
What Miss Saigon did well and that was make America finally take ownership of the problems they left behind and that was the Bui Doi children the ‘dust of life,’ who were despised and abhorred in Vietnam, ‘conceived by a pig,’ It made the president At the time of Miss Saigon and I believe it to be George Bush Senior, to allow the Bui Doi generation to settle in America and start a life a new, one that is free, peaceful and not judged..
|
|
211 posts
|
Post by justsaying113 on Jun 22, 2020 7:39:34 GMT
The lungs on this fella:
Saw him do 'Kristina' at Carnegie Hall and Royal Albert Hall - he really should be a huge star!
|
|
4,207 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Jun 22, 2020 7:53:01 GMT
The lungs on this fella: Saw him do 'Kristina' at Carnegie Hall and Royal Albert Hall - he really should be a huge star! I too saw in in Kristina at the Royal Albert Hall singing the part of Robert, Kristina's brother and I agree, an incredible voice. Oh Kristina, gold can turn to sand
|
|
|
Post by cjamess on Jun 23, 2020 13:13:48 GMT
It's racist for Diep Tran to complain about the way white writers chose to portray a character from her own country and culture? Please explain how. It's been a long few months and I could really use a laugh. First, "white writers", is a racist and world alienated remark. This says nothing about the story, the boat people, refugees and bargirls and the story of madame butterfly this is based on. But I think you hit the nail on its head there. The writer of that article is racist and this given is her problem per definition. She just hates white people. If you really want a laugh, look at these remarks in the article: "Kim shoots herself over race. This show is about "whiteness kills you". Kim chooses Chris over Thuy because of race." Secondly, she says: "Asian women are resilient, resourceful, strong, not victims. Instead, in Miss Saigon, Kim, a woman with no last name, sings about her longing for a man to save her". If you weren't laughing loud enough I'm sure you do it now. Of course it's bizarre to hate white people and hate a show were a character is not embodying your perfect fantasy person or doesn't have the job she feels that represents her well enough, but you know, characters are not meant to represent a whole group of people or an ego. This is a story about a bargil, and many of them existed. The thing is, Kim is everything she describes (resilient, strong, not a victim) and fights till the end for her son, so she clearly hasn't seen the show. She just wants to diss white people. In reality most bargirls and boat people were probably not nearly as heroic or strong, but the writers chose to make her a strong heroine. But that's ok. It is still believable and that's what counts, even when the story is partially real and partially fiction. Saying they are white writers is not racist at all. It is stating the truth. The writer is not racist at all as I will describe below. The problem discussed is similar with that of the Book of Mormon, the white saviour complex of the writing. Kim and the other prostitutes are disposable to Chris and the GI's are portrayed as going to help them when in reality they cause more damage than good. Similar to BOM where the whites are hailed as heroes and saving the village where in reality they do nothing to change the issues at hand. The issue with the writers comes due to the fact there was no Asian person on the creative team - nor an expert in the war: how can you accurately show a group of people if you don't have someone representing them on the creative team. However, the inclusion of Bui Doi children for context shows how damaging the racism and war was at the time so it does to some extent represent the struggles of race but not to a good extent. I believe if the musical was written today there would be several changes in the writing such as the use of the term 'slits' in Heat is On and the use of a white actor initially as the Engineer (which if I remember Cameron threatened to axe the Broadway prod. as they insisted on having an Asian actor.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2021 16:37:49 GMT
Miss Saigon is coming to Netflix on 16th November. Assume its the filmed London revival
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Oct 21, 2021 9:22:06 GMT
I don't know why, I thought I'd already watched this on Netflix. Maybe it's been on Amazon Prime? Will be good to have another watch of this anyway, can't remember if it has the gala ending with Lea, etc. included? Hope so.
|
|
2,261 posts
|
Post by richey on Oct 21, 2021 12:07:59 GMT
I don't know why, I thought I'd already watched this on Netflix. Maybe it's been on Amazon Prime? Will be good to have another watch of this anyway, can't remember if it has the gala ending with Lea, etc. included? Hope so. it's been on Sky Arts I think
|
|