|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 16:57:19 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 16:57:19 GMT
Neil, the only way this can pass is with labour MPs votes. Given that 90% of labour voters in the most recent poll want to remain, that could well send labour support into a tailspin. ‘Labour votes took us out of the EU’ is a massive bonus to any other opposition party. Saying ‘we can out it right’ will never work if the riposte is ‘you made it happen.
For that reason, I doubt this will get through parliament without significant amendments. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are votes to remain in the customs union and the single market, for example.
|
|
1,863 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 17:24:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 17, 2019 17:24:26 GMT
Cardinal Pirelli, admire your confidence, subconsciously part of me wants it to be over (even though this is just the beginning) despite knowing leaving the EU is a historically bad decision.
The maths is so tight that the result in Saturday is a complete unknown with some MP’s making their decision as they go in to vote and we are still waiting for the Vote of No Confidence joker to be played which could be as early as Monday to take control of the ratification phase which will just add to the fun .
If we do vote to leave it will be interesting to see what sort of Country the younger generation create as it is them who will have to make leaving the EU a success not my generation.
Coincidentally sitting in the House of Commons right now waiting for a talk in one of the committee rooms on Brexit and the climate crisis.
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Oct 17, 2019 17:38:54 GMT
BBC managers long ago perverted the notion of 'news', as the organisation itself has perverted its Charter obligation of impartiality. It's been a fascinating experiment in societal control but I suspect too many of those obliged to pay now recognise class-orientated propaganda when it's rubbed in their noses every hour on the hour. Eh?
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 17:42:47 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 17, 2019 17:42:47 GMT
I do wish they wouldn't keep going on about the war. It's almost as if they believe their post-war world has been defined by, erm, the war. Why can't they just move on. Barnier:
|
|
754 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 18:10:50 GMT
Post by Latecomer on Oct 17, 2019 18:10:50 GMT
I think we have got to the “Elementary”stage of Brexit....Watching the TV series there is absolutely no point trying to guess the outcome as there are always lots of red herrings along the way. I now feel this way about Saturday in Houses of Parliament. Usually I trust Sherlock to solve the case in Elementary, for Brexit I am putting my trust in Kier Stammer, Dominic Grieve, Yvette Cooper and Hilary Benn....will be very nervous.
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 18:17:23 GMT
Post by theglenbucklaird on Oct 17, 2019 18:17:23 GMT
Given that non Corbynites are, in the vast majority of cases, being reselected maybe the membership might be more surprising. I’m not holding my breath on that, though. Most of the shadow cabinet that have any visibility are just a joke, Gardiner and Burgon are particularly poor. Starmer and Thornberry are decent. The Beeb has definitely annoyed the left, I know. Add them to the already foaming ‘BBC is a tax’ group and it isn’t a good position for them to be in. I think, purely on the changes happening in broadcasting, that the BBC will likely be subscription based in a decade or so. Given the cost of streaming services, extra for sports and such, there is, however, a good argument that the poorest should have access to subsidised channels at the very least. The thought of people getting even more of their news from the wild west of social media isn’t something that any government should be encouraging. It’s perverting the idea of news as it is. I disagree with you on Barry Gardiner. Team Phantom, I like Barry Gardiner. The posh Socialist
|
|
5,062 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 21:45:00 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Oct 17, 2019 21:45:00 GMT
If there was another vote to stay in the customs union, which I could stomach, that opposition only lost this by 6 votes - last year. However the parliamentary arithmetic has changed since then, with an extra Lib Dem mp in Brecon and now ex Tory government ministers that were loyal to Theresa May’s government have been brutally kicked out forum the party itself and St Theresa herself why would she want to show loyalty to the treacherous Johnson and ERG?
However Johnson’s bill may get parliamentary consent on Saturday, which I would regret, As both Labour and Conservatives won’t to put Brexit behind them and move on with other issues.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 21:47:45 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 17, 2019 21:47:45 GMT
Corbyn, like Blucher arriving at 3pm at Waterloo:
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 21:52:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 21:52:16 GMT
If we do vote to leave it will be interesting to see what sort of Country the younger generation create as it is them who will have to make leaving the EU a success not my generation. Yes, those of us who have had a result we don't want forced on us by a generation who won't be around to deal with the fall out, and we thank them very much for that. It really is the most unpalatable part of this most unpalatable of situations, and it is extremely difficult to forgive those who voted for this disaster and won't have to live with it for very long. It is extremely telling that the younger the voter the greater the probability they voted Remain...
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:00:28 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 17, 2019 22:00:28 GMT
How wonderful the Empire of Virtue must look when you have no responsibilities other than to organise your shiny new passport and plan your gap year. Bless. 2/3 of voters living in social housing voted Leave.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:03:33 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:03:33 GMT
Corbyn, like Blucher arriving at 3pm at Waterloo: More like Corbyn ‘the new Ramsay MacDonald’, other than that feasibly ‘the man who killed the Labour party’.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:03:35 GMT
Post by lynette on Oct 17, 2019 22:03:35 GMT
I’m puzzled by the above argument. In every generation the people with the vote or the government in power decides what will affect the next generation. A crass example but one we can’t forget is that the Government in 1940 decided to fight on and not treaty with Hitler. I, for one, am very grateful for that. I’m sure you can all wade in with examples that turned out not so hot. The American involvement in Vietnam which we now see as a big mistake affected the young generation there to its detriment and was decided on by men who were fearing shadows. And so so and so on. In every election a government is elected that decides on new laws which affect the next generation sometimes for ever afterwards. It isn’t being patronising or 'old', it is how it is.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:09:15 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:09:15 GMT
How wonderful the Empire of Virute must look when you have no responsibilities other than to organise your shiny new passport and plan your gap year. Bless. 2/3 of voters living in social housing voted Leave. Because they were against things like austerity. Labour is there to protect the disadvantaged, not to shaft them because they got conned by a right wing scam. Labour Brexiters are the worst of the worst, the lowest of the low.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:10:19 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 17, 2019 22:10:19 GMT
Is it Panto season already?
|
|
2,761 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:40:41 GMT
Post by n1david on Oct 17, 2019 22:40:41 GMT
How wonderful the Empire of Virtue must look when you have no responsibilities other than to organise your shiny new passport and plan your gap year. Bless. 2/3 of voters living in social housing voted Leave. I have been struck by this term "Empire of Virtue" that has been used several times in this thread. I don't think that many people regard the EU as the Empire of Virtue, even if they voted for Remain, they may just view it as a better option than being Billy NoMates. It's rather odd, considering the love of many Brexiters for British History, that the greatest use of the term Empire of Virtue was about the Hanoverian Era and the rapid growth of the British Empire during that time. I thought many Brexiters were broadly in favour of the British Empire? Or maybe we could stop using terms with which no-one would agree? Or is someone just trolling? (And it is worth pointing out that the Ashcroft poll which londonpostie is quoting shows a majority voting for Remain up to age 44. Not sure I know many 44-year olds who are planning their gap year.)
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:49:31 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:49:31 GMT
A party led by someone like Jess Phillips with a broadly centre left position would be cleaning up at the moment but apparently she’s not pure enough. Do you really have so little idea at all of Labour Party politics?
Anyway, I see the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Nicky Morgan has said today she is "open minded" when it comes to the BBC moving to a subscription service. Ministerial appointments in this Gov are temp my nature but I am reminded of a phrase that includes 'roost' and 'chickens'. BBC will have very few friends when this is all over.
That would be the ultimate vote winner, scrap TV licenses and all households save £154.50 which people could spend on essentials. Bet that wouldn't have Laura Kussenberg laughing across the other side of her face.
|
|
2,761 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:54:48 GMT
Post by n1david on Oct 17, 2019 22:54:48 GMT
I do wonder if people who support the abolition of the licence fee have ever seen US network television. The best of US television that we see over here is all stuff that you have to pay for, it doesn't come free. By the time you've paid for HBO, Showtime, Netflix, AMC, which is where most of the good stuff is, you're paying more than the licence fee. Network television in the US - the free stuff - is dire.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:56:00 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:56:00 GMT
How wonderful the Empire of Virtue must look when you have no responsibilities other than to organise your shiny new passport and plan your gap year. Bless. 2/3 of voters living in social housing voted Leave. And social housing is controlled by the EU in what respect? Try again on the insult to my intelligence. I graduated nearly a decade ago, so you've missed the mark considerably. You're right on organising the new passport though, I have every intention of being part of a country that celebrates multiculturalism and international cooperation, not one that apparently wants to hark back to 19th century imperialism.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:56:08 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:56:08 GMT
Is it Panto season already? Oh No It Isn't! Also how many MPs have been in Panto - Giles Watling must have been, Tracy Brabin possibly, Esther McVey, Anna Soubry both had TV careers so might well have done one or two - Esther in particular. Any other nominations?
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 22:58:29 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2019 22:58:29 GMT
I do wonder if people who support the abolition of the licence fee have ever seen US network television. The best of US television that we see over here is all stuff that you have to pay for, it doesn't come free. By the time you've paid for HBO, Showtime, Netflix, AMC, which is where most of the good stuff is, you're paying more than the licence fee. Network television in the US - the free stuff - is dire. The Main US Networks are probably as good or better than the British ones. I don't mind the licence fee if we get good programmes on the Beeb but they have lost most of the sport. Put BBC3 online so I could see it being a huge vote winner if one party effectively gave everyone £150 plus.
|
|
2,761 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 17, 2019 23:14:33 GMT
Post by n1david on Oct 17, 2019 23:14:33 GMT
I do wonder if people who support the abolition of the licence fee have ever seen US network television. The best of US television that we see over here is all stuff that you have to pay for, it doesn't come free. By the time you've paid for HBO, Showtime, Netflix, AMC, which is where most of the good stuff is, you're paying more than the licence fee. Network television in the US - the free stuff - is dire. The Main US Networks are probably as good or better than the British ones. I don't mind the licence fee if we get good programmes on the Beeb but they have lost most of the sport. Put BBC3 online so I could see it being a huge vote winner if one party effectively gave everyone £150 plus. Try finding something like Poldark, Fleabag, Line of Duty, Downton Abbey, Broadchurch, Killing Eve, Night Manager on US network TV. Here is USA Today's list of the best 25 TV programmes on US TV in 2018 - two of them are available on a major US network. Interestingly, five of them were made available in the UK on free TV channels. eu.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2018/12/06/2018-year-review-25-best-tv-shows/2147517002/ And yes, some of those good programmes are on ITV, which is not supported by the licence fee, but it has to raise its game to compete with BBC given that there have the same preferred access to viewers by dint of being classified as Public Service Broadcasting. Make the BBC subscription, or - worse for ITV - get it to take advertising, and watch ITV descend to the level of Channel 5. I'm absolutely not saying the BBC is perfect, not by a very long way, and I think it's lost its way somewhat over the last five years or so - probably since the Scottish referendum where it really managed that from a London perspective and managed to upset all varieties of Scots (hence the later sticking-plaster of the not-very-good BBC Scotland TV channel). But I have say that dumping the licence fee wholesale, rather than fixing the problems at the BBC, is the sort of destructive, one-way, irreversible act that destroys something fundamental to the UK, for the sake of vested interests. And that could never happen here, could it?
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 18, 2019 3:51:05 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 18, 2019 3:51:05 GMT
The Main US Networks are probably as good or better than the British ones. I don't mind the licence fee if we get good programmes on the Beeb but they have lost most of the sport. Put BBC3 online so I could see it being a huge vote winner if one party effectively gave everyone £150 plus. Try finding something like Poldark, Fleabag, Line of Duty, Downton Abbey, Broadchurch, Killing Eve, Night Manager on US network TV. The issue isn't drama production, the issue is a centre right news ad current affairs agenda reaching into every household under the decades long wheeze of 'impartiality'. If they want to watch any tv at all, the public literally have to pay for BBC propaganda.
As above, every single Chair of the BBC has been a Conservative Cabinet member, sorry a 'retired' Conservative Cabinent member. Really, not a Cabinet post in everything but name (regardless of which party is in power).
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 18, 2019 4:06:54 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 18, 2019 4:06:54 GMT
How wonderful the Empire of Virtue must look when you have no responsibilities other than to organise your shiny new passport and plan your gap year. Bless. 2/3 of voters living in social housing voted Leave. And social housing is controlled by the EU in what respect? Try again on the insult to my intelligence. You have just done that to yourself. Think instead about the kinds of insecure work championed by Brussels under 'competition', the fact of being tied to catchments, of the social needs poor environments create, of the rapid growth of self-segregation, lack of employer health cover, huge disparity in Council Tax relative to income - a hundred factors experienced by people in particular social circs. Not too many of these people long for a life on the open seas with Admiral Nelson.
|
|
951 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Oct 18, 2019 5:34:31 GMT
Sorry are we talking about the EU or the Conservative Party?
It's a nonsense to suggest Brexit is some kind of victory for the poor and vulnerable when actually all it does is enable the Tories to rip up even the minimum standards set by the EU.
In a world where companies have more and more power the EU has a much better record of opposing them than any British government.
|
|
2,761 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 18, 2019 5:54:08 GMT
Post by n1david on Oct 18, 2019 5:54:08 GMT
Try finding something like Poldark, Fleabag, Line of Duty, Downton Abbey, Broadchurch, Killing Eve, Night Manager on US network TV. The issue isn't drama production, the issue is a centre right news ad current affairs agenda reaching into every household under the decades long wheeze of 'impartiality'. If they want to watch any tv at all, the public literally have to pay for BBC propaganda.
As above, every single Chair of the BBC has been a Conservative Cabinet member, sorry a 'retired' Conservative Cabinent member. Really, not a Cabinet post in everything but name (regardless of which party is in power). And I’ve already said that there are serious concerns about the BBC in respect to news coverage. But to throw away the licence fee means throwing away all of it, and the collateral damage of that, not just to cultural life in the UK, but also to the UK’s soft power, would be incalculable. It would be absurd to throw that away for the sake of making a political point. Oh, and let’s not exaggerate about “every single Chair of the BBC has been...a ‘retired’ Conservative cabinet minister.” Yes, there was Patten in 2011-2014, but prior to that you have to go back to 1967 to get a former Tory cabinet minister in the Chair. If you look at the last 20 years, both Michael Lyons and Gavyn Davies were strong Labour supporters (although neither of them having got close to any position in a national Government). Yes, it’s an Establishment position, but maybe we can present actual facts.
|
|