999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Jul 23, 2019 18:47:20 GMT
I have used a fake online birthday for years now Me too. Often the drop down menu for the year goes back to 1890 so I tend to put that. Not because I think I'm striking a blow to The Man, but because I find it amusing they allow for users who are pushing 130. When I signed up to the C4 player it asked me all the usual stuff and said it was so they could tailor recommendations to my tastes. So I signed up as 130 year old woman and awaited my helpful recommendations. The first one was for New Girl.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jul 23, 2019 23:30:23 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2019 23:30:23 GMT
Might one party consider running a manifesto idea of scrapping the licence fee - there has always been factions of the Tory Party that don't like the Beeb and the Labour Party under Corbyn is fairly anti-establishment. Promising to save people £154.50 a year would enable taxes to be put up a bit and still leave people in pocket. This money could be used on NHS, Police etc. A lot of people will wonder why they have to fund Symphony Orchestras and greedy bitches who weren't content with well over 100k per year. I think the idea was valid for its time, in the sense everyone watched the BBC, we didn't know any different and society hadn't fragmented a millions ways as it began to do in the 80s. Literally half the adult population watched Morcambe and Wise ...
Since the 80s the idea has been to offer everyone something - catering for all aspects society to some extent.
The breaking point for me has been news and current affairs, which I don't think has fragmented and we're rather left to self-medicate in a sort of Blair-ite utopia. Nothing irritates more than the mantra 'well if both sides are complaining we must be doing something right' i.e. we dismiss or cut out of te discussion ideas that aren't centrist and or a little to the right. It's a bias designed decades ago to placate the middle class sharp elbows.
As events have shown, if you marginalise and/or disengage with areas of society that aren't well, or at all, represented, it can come back to bite you in te bum.
I'm starting to rant now so it's time to stop. To respond to your point; the BBC does good, sometimes excellent, work in so many areas of the arts. I do't now what the answer is tbh.
The BBC's political department or the Addams Family as I call it now due to the weird and wonderful characters in it is still one of the best and has always been the place I go for political news. What annoyed me was the self entitled female mob many on over 150k per year before we throw in all their speaking, conference facilitating, writing books on triathlons etc complaining they weren't being paid enough.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jul 24, 2019 11:29:28 GMT
I don’t know about each woman's salary, large or small, whatever it is, but I think one is entitled to moan a bit if you as a woman or anything else for that matter, are being paid less than a bloke doing the same job.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jul 24, 2019 14:12:38 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Jul 24, 2019 14:12:38 GMT
Though they aren't paid salaries in the conventional sense of there being a salary for a job type. Each has an agent and the agent negotiates a contract on behalf of their client. If there was a set salary for the job type, paying men and women differently would be illegal under the Equal Pay Act 1970.
And then there's ... the gender pay gap, which is a whole other ballgame.
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Brexit
Jul 24, 2019 17:27:44 GMT
Post by n1david on Jul 24, 2019 17:27:44 GMT
Strong and stable.
Stability obviously the key this evening.
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Jul 24, 2019 17:35:34 GMT
I don’t know about each woman's salary, large or small, whatever it is, but I think one is entitled to moan a bit if you as a woman or anything else for that matter, are being paid less than a bloke doing the same job. Yes and you're also entitled to, aside from whatever job you hold, write books about whatever you like including strenuous endurance events, do conference speaking or indeed anything else. And you shouldn't then be expected to think "Despite my being paid less than men doing the same broadcasting job, I'm doing all these other things too do I should probably just keep quiet really. Lest I be seen as part of a, oh I don't know, mob or something."
|
|
999 posts
|
Brexit
Jul 24, 2019 19:56:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Jul 24, 2019 19:56:17 GMT
New cabinet so far looking grim. Priti Patel as Home Sec, someone previously sacked for lying. Javid, a greasy specimen who sucked up to Farage, is Chancellor. Raab, who didn't seem to know we are an island or that the Channel was significant to trade, is Foreign Sec.
But of course, brextremists one and all.
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Jul 24, 2019 20:05:38 GMT
New cabinet so far looking grim. Priti Patel as Home Sec, someone previously sacked for lying. Javid, a greasy specimen who sucked up to Farage, is Chancellor. Raab, who didn't seem to know we are an island or that the Channel was significant to trade, is Foreign Sec. But of course, brextremists one and all. Prieto Patel as Home Secretary is brextremely scary. Her views on equal marriage and the death penalty in particular.
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Brexit
Jul 31, 2019 21:45:21 GMT
Post by n1david on Jul 31, 2019 21:45:21 GMT
So... all those people who posted earlier this year (mentioning no names) saying that of course a deal would be done and the disputes were all bluster and the EU would fold. Still confident a deal will be done? No-deal Brexit plans to get £2.1bn boost www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49183324
|
|
77 posts
|
Post by adolphus on Jul 31, 2019 23:18:24 GMT
If anyone caves it will be BJ and co. The reality of the chaos a no deal will unleash is quite quickly becoming very clear to everyone including the Keystone Cabinet, hence this panic-stricken announcement. An extra £2.1 bn is a drop in the ocean when you consider it will prob take a few years to restrike new trade deals with the EU or anyone else. Nancy Pelosi and the Irish American lobby have made it quite clear a UK/US deal will never materialise if the GFA is endangered as it is will be if the UK exits without a deal.
BJ said today there would be no hard border in Ireland, but a few hours later we're being told of increased border patrols. And the most vulnerable border is always going to be in Ireland. This fool can't catch his own tail
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 1, 2019 21:44:41 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Aug 1, 2019 21:44:41 GMT
This fool isn't spending time in the north promoting a new crossrail and the northern powerhouse becasue of Brexit.
|
|
4,995 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 2, 2019 5:57:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Someone in a tree on Aug 2, 2019 5:57:18 GMT
|
|
36 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 2, 2019 8:23:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by greenice on Aug 2, 2019 8:23:34 GMT
There's a few interesting things about that result:
UKIP in last place behind the Loony Party. Despite all the disarray and chaos, the Tories could conceivably have won with a fresh candidate. Labour only just retains its deposit. Brexit party takes votes from both Labour and Tories.
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Aug 2, 2019 9:14:15 GMT
the Tories could conceivably have won with a fresh candidate It's as though they wanted to lose. I love that the expenses fabricator then complained of other parties' "dirty" campaigns.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 2, 2019 13:13:52 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2019 13:13:52 GMT
I love that the expenses fabricator then complained of other parties' "dirty" campaigns. How dare they cheat by being popular and honest.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 2, 2019 14:35:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2019 14:35:17 GMT
The Tories lost this seat at a by-election in the 1980's. The Brexit Party voters were more likely disgruntled Tory than Labour voters I'd think. Labour likely lost a fair few to Lib Dems.
The maths in the commons get very tight now, factor in the guy in Sheffield who is stepping down next month. That was Nick Clegg's old seat so I could see that going back to Lib Dems too.
Does Boris try to button down the hatches for a No Deal and then maybe have an election afterwards. That would negate Farage and once we are out then to get back in would be much harder for Remainers to demand immediately.
Any coalition between Labour and SNP would only happen if SNP got another independence referendum and minus the SNP and their own Scottish seats Labour would find it impossible to win enough seats to govern unless it was a 1997 landslide type result.
Plus I'll throw in - The Tories have been in power 9 years - will be 12 if this Parliament runs it's full term. Few parties remain in power longer than that so if Labour don't win next election, I'd say they are fairly certain to win the one after that be it 2027 or anytime before that.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 2, 2019 14:44:11 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2019 14:44:11 GMT
The Tories lost this seat at a by-election in the 1980's. The Brexit Party voters were more likely disgruntled Tory than Labour voters I'd think. Labour likely lost a fair few to Lib Dems. The maths in the commons get very tight now, factor in the guy in Sheffield who is stepping down next month. That was Nick Clegg's old seat so I could see that going back to Lib Dems too. Does Boris try to button down the hatches for a No Deal and then maybe have an election afterwards. That would negate Farage and once we are out then to get back in would be much harder for Remainers to demand immediately. Any coalition between Labour and SNP would only happen if SNP got another independence referendum and minus the SNP and their own Scottish seats Labour would find it impossible to win enough seats to govern unless it was a 1997 landslide type result. Plus I'll throw in - The Tories have been in power 9 years - will be 12 if this Parliament runs it's full term. Few parties remain in power longer than that so if Labour don't win next election, I'd say they are fairly certain to win the one after that be it 2027 or anytime before that.Oh good lord thats a depressing thought
|
|
|
Post by missthelma on Aug 7, 2019 13:00:05 GMT
So I'm guessing everyone is feeling super relaxed at the minute what with it all going so swimmingly well?
I am currently toying with buying another freezer (chest?) to fill up with food whilst we still have access.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 7, 2019 14:09:10 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2019 14:09:10 GMT
If Boris Johnson is ousted before the middle of November he'll have had the shortest time in office of any PM. Will he make it...?
As for the food situation, I expect it'll be like the petrol shortage a few years ago. There wasn't a supply problem at all but a sudden panic over the rumour that there was one drove people to make it true for a couple of days, and then everything went back to normal.
|
|
754 posts
|
Post by Latecomer on Aug 7, 2019 14:25:54 GMT
I get so frustrated at all this....it really is not worth watching the news on a regular basis as it changes so much day to day. The most sensible suggestion I can see is to revoke article 50 and then have a series of people’s assemblies throughout the country trying to establish what caused people to vote for “Brexit” and what they meant by it....seems to me we still don't even know that! Surely if this technique can be used by the Irish to tackle the most sensitive issue of abortion then it should be possible to use it to investigate this further (see Wikipedia on it, it’s fascinating how it worked). I have very little hope that that is what will actually happen....how the hell have we got to the state where it seems as though Boris will do anything to crash us out with a no deal Brexit even though parliament has shown that’s not something they would vote through? Take back control? Democracy?
|
|
952 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 7, 2019 14:43:34 GMT
Post by vdcni on Aug 7, 2019 14:43:34 GMT
Brexit means Brexit - what more do we need to know!
I've been out of the country for three weeks, it's been nice to get away from this for a while.
That does sound like something that would be useful - preferably before the referendum ever happened - particularly to counter years of lies and misinformation over the EU from the press.
Unfortunately we now a hard right British government who look determined to go for no deal come what may. We're now in a situation where any form of leaving the EU other than no deal is considered remaining by the government and a vocal minority of the population. Then they're going to take back control and hand it over to the US and any other country that throws any scraps our way.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 7, 2019 21:20:13 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Aug 7, 2019 21:20:13 GMT
Nothing 'hard right' about Johnson. He's a lot of things - possibly including incompetent - but he is most definitely not hard right.
Quite enjoying Project Fear rebooting, but this time having to resource its narrative other than from the *Treasury sources* which so well served Chancellor Osbourne and PM Cameron. The Guardian currently seems keen on 'The Food and Drink Federation' for its Brexit dramas.
Fascinating to see Cummings becoming the figure of hate. Almost intentionally drawing the sting from elsewhere ...
|
|
5,073 posts
|
Brexit
Aug 7, 2019 21:31:05 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Aug 7, 2019 21:31:05 GMT
Prime Minister Boris Johnston Leader of a party that supports businesses. So he manipulates a no deal Brexit and the pound and the stock market slide even further, what does he do then?
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 7, 2019 21:58:17 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Aug 7, 2019 21:58:17 GMT
Well, he's socially and economically liberal so after 31st October he will throw money at the NHS, schools, social care and then hold an election. Why wouldn't he. Cummings knows - believes he knows - exactly the targets to hit so as to counter McDonnell's radical manifesto.
|
|
|
Brexit
Aug 8, 2019 0:48:24 GMT
sf likes this
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2019 0:48:24 GMT
Well, he's socially and economically liberal so after 31st October he will throw money at the NHS, schools, social care and then hold an election. Why wouldn't he. Cummings knows - believes he knows - exactly the targets to hit so as to counter McDonnell's radical manifesto. Great. Spending money we don't have at a time when the major world powers are looking at a recession in the next year or so (before anyone asks, the economic indicators point to this, bond yields etc., do your own research*). When asked, polls point to people wanting lower taxes and higher spending and we rely on government to stop us going into meltdown by doing so. At this most dangerous of points in our recent history to have a government that is weak and craven enough to agree to that sort of madness, even without everything else that is going on, means that we need them out. Can we have some adults please? Ones who aren’t doing the political equivalent of plonking the kids in front of a screen and feeding them ice cream and pizza all the time? *for those who think that politics is about good things happening just because you want them to, this concept will make no sense.
|
|