|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2019 16:46:40 GMT
Some girls who sit behind me in history were talking about it today, and they were really annoyed at the government's incompetence in finding a deal, and said it should just be scrapped altogether and we can just forget this ever happened.
If only it were that easy.
As @baemax and others have mentioned upthread, people are still going to talk about it for years, so even if it IS aborted, it will still be referenced non stop in both political and pop culture.
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 13, 2019 16:55:20 GMT
sf likes this
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2019 16:55:20 GMT
This all stems from a disastrous setting up of the referendum and on the question asked.
To have any logical conclusion, the set-up of the first referendum can only be completed by a confirmation vote from the same electorate. Without it there is no agreement on anything of substance.
Part 1 - Do you want this or something else? Part 2 - Okay, so is this the something else what you wanted?
There is no sense to having part 1 without part 2, it is a complete failure of democracy. All it does is hand any decisions back to people who couldn't face making those decisions in the first place.
There was another way of doing it in one part but that didn't happen - set one thing against another thing that is of equal substance. It didn't happen. If anything, the subsequent election has become a substitute for a confirmation vote and its shoehorning into that role has screwed things up completely.
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 13, 2019 17:35:08 GMT
Post by sf on Mar 13, 2019 17:35:08 GMT
Some girls who sit behind me in history were talking about it today, and they were really annoyed at the government's incompetence in finding a deal, and said it should just be scrapped altogether and we can just forget this ever happened. If only it were that easy. As @baemax and others have mentioned upthread, people are still going to talk about it for years, so even if it IS aborted, it will still be referenced non stop in both political and pop culture.
And even if it's aborted, as I believe it still can (and certainly should) be, there's going to have to be some kind of public inquiry, because the decision-making processes that brought us to this point are catastrophically broken. There's also going to have to be a thorough examination of our electoral laws, because they very clearly are no longer adequate, and there should ideally be a criminal investigation and prosecutions too, because people have broken the law.
We are going to be talking about this for a long, long time.
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 13, 2019 17:52:49 GMT
Post by missthelma on Mar 13, 2019 17:52:49 GMT
It has been very sobering to see the absolute state of the political class in this country. I think that whatever your party affiliation or vote in the referendum, it is hard to point at anyone (in UK politics) that has emerged from this with a scrap of decency. Of course I live in a fairly liberal bubble/echo chamber so it is possible that there are people out there who think this has gone swimmingly well. But as mentioned above nobody seems to have had a plan or a clue and it's just been blunder after blunder. The fact that the majority of the media have been complicit in allowing politicians to lie, obfuscate and talk absolute nonsense is also something that needs to be addressed. If the press don't hold up accountability and just allow lies to circulate without challenge, we can only go further down in a spiral.
I voted remain and nothing has changed my mind.But if one politician had stepped forward and said, this result was a surprise, we need some time to work out an approach, I would have applauded and supported that. Instead we got 'will of the people' repeated endlessly, obviously as a slick move so no blame could be apportioned to politicians.
|
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Mar 13, 2019 18:28:13 GMT
Don’t tell viserys that someone’s nicked her photo!
|
|
2,705 posts
|
Post by viserys on Mar 13, 2019 18:46:32 GMT
That's awesome (and pretty much how I look when I watch the news from Britain...)
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 13, 2019 19:04:39 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2019 19:04:39 GMT
This all stems from a disastrous setting up of the referendum and on the question asked. To have any logical conclusion, the set-up of the first referendum can only be completed by a confirmation vote from the same electorate. Without it there is no agreement on anything of substance. Part 1 - Do you want this or something else? Part 2 - Okay, so is this the something else what you wanted? There is no sense to having part 1 without part 2, it is a complete failure of democracy. All it does is hand any decisions back to people who couldn't face making those decisions in the first place. There was another way of doing it in one part but that didn't happen - set one thing against another thing that is of equal substance. It didn't happen. If anything, the subsequent election has become a substitute for a confirmation vote and its shoehorning into that role has screwed things up completely. Absolutely. What I find incredible is these adverts that have started popping up on Bus Stops around MCR. (Oh the irony) This is information that should have been available 2 years ago, pre-referendum. Not less than 2 months prior to the alleged exit date. But hey, broken record.
|
|
5,066 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Mar 13, 2019 20:23:00 GMT
If Brexit doesn’t happen, then blame Boris Johnson.
For his hatred of David Cameron to spite him, to change allegiance at the last minute to support leave, for that farcical stunt of that Bus that gave remainers an open door to cancel article 12 or another referendum, he also by shifting allegiance knew there would be a leadership context, with him in pole position to become PM.
For his disloyalty tomTheresa May and voted against his government, when he had a glorious chance to inact Brexit last night, again to further his political ambition.
Brexit or not, I am certain that Boris the serial adulter will never be Prime Minister, which I only can say great.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2019 20:31:43 GMT
What I find incredible is these adverts that have started popping up on Bus Stops around MCR. It's disappointing that the URL in that poster actually works because there are a number of HTTP failure response codes that would be appropriate, such as... 406 - Not acceptable 409 - Conflict 417 - Expectation failed Given the general lack of sanity in the government these days, perhaps the most meaningful response would be... 418 - I'm a teapot
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 13, 2019 21:03:00 GMT
via mobile
sf likes this
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2019 21:03:00 GMT
But no attempt was made to find an agreement that the majority could support. That's because such a thing doesn't exist - there isn't anything approaching a majority for anything at the minute because too many people have their heads buried in the sand and can't recognise that the only way to avoid any Irish border issues is to at a minimum keep the same extent of customs union that we currently have. And the same with immigration, otherwise every one of the 200 or so crossing points between NI and the Republic will need a passport control booth. In other words, no Brexit is the only way to avoid the Irish border being reinstated in some formal way.
|
|
4,215 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 0:45:29 GMT
Post by anthony40 on Mar 14, 2019 0:45:29 GMT
This all stems from a disastrous setting up of the referendum and on the question asked. To have any logical conclusion, the set-up of the first referendum can only be completed by a confirmation vote from the same electorate. Without it there is no agreement on anything of substance. Part 1 - Do you want this or something else? Part 2 - Okay, so is this the something else what you wanted? There is no sense to having part 1 without part 2, it is a complete failure of democracy. All it does is hand any decisions back to people who couldn't face making those decisions in the first place. There was another way of doing it in one part but that didn't happen - set one thing against another thing that is of equal substance. It didn't happen. If anything, the subsequent election has become a substitute for a confirmation vote and its shoehorning into that role has screwed things up completely. Absolutely. What I find incredible is these adverts that have started popping up on Bus Stops around MCR. (Oh the irony) This is information that should have been available 2 years ago, pre-referendum. Not less than 2 months prior to the alleged exit date. But hey, broken record.
|
|
4,215 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 1:03:08 GMT
Post by anthony40 on Mar 14, 2019 1:03:08 GMT
So, as I have publicly stated on this forum previously, despite being Australian, I am also an EU National- I hold dual passports- so Brexit (if it still goes ahead) affects me directly.
As I type this I am in Sydney, Australia. Trying to be pro-active and in preparation for the fact that I would be away for several weeks I tried to complete my Settled Status application before I left. However to do so it must be completed via an app on your phone. However (get this) it cannot be completed using an i-Phone.
So, I emailed UK Immigration to determine if there was any other method of applying, such as via a laptop. In short, by doing so was added to their mailing list and have been updated with a regular email and told that I must wait until March 30th- the night I fly back into the UK.
So why make this process so difficult? Here is me, wanting to do the right thing legally to stay, trying to be pro-active and given what has happened over the past couple of days, my efforts- in fact the whole Brexit process- was in vain.
Again, I repeat, what a mess!
|
|
999 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 1:35:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 14, 2019 1:35:13 GMT
Let me see if I've got this right:
The PM said she did NOT want a no-deal brexit.
The no-deal motion would be a free vote.
When the motion had the Spelman amendment applied, Spelman disowned her own amendment and the government removed the free vote and whipped their MPs to vote AGAINST their OWN MOTION. ie to NOT rule out no-deal. And the PM voted as such.
We now expect the government deal to be brought back a 3rd time next week. And probably voted down again.
The government is steering us to No Deal. Unless the deal is voted through by ERG et al caving in sufficient numbers.
|
|
4,993 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 6:43:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Someone in a tree on Mar 14, 2019 6:43:20 GMT
Let me see if I've got this right: The PM said she did NOT want a no-deal brexit. The no-deal motion would be a free vote. When the motion had the Spelman amendment applied, Spelman disowned her own amendment and the government removed the free vote and whipped their MPs to vote AGAINST their OWN MOTION. ie to NOT rule out no-deal. And the PM voted as such. We now expect the government deal to be brought back a 3rd time next week. And probably voted down again. The government is steering us to No Deal. Unless the deal is voted through by ERG et al caving in sufficient numbers. What happened last night took me quite a while to understand. It was total chaos and read like a night with several bottles of tequila
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 8:24:42 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 8:24:42 GMT
So much voting today in the Commons, can't wait to see how this foolishness plays out seeing as social media is going to sh*t and there is nothing to watch on the TV.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 9:13:24 GMT
Brexit or not, I am certain that Boris the serial adulter will never be Prime Minister, which I only can say great. I don't think it will be Boris. It seems like Jacob Rees-Mogg is the one with the most power in the Tory party so I would expect him to take over after Theresa. Heaven help us and then the choice will be between him and Corbyn. It'll be like being asked which nails you want ripped out first, the fingers or the toes.
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 14, 2019 9:30:12 GMT
I don't think Johnson has the numbers in the parliamentary party. While many of the public inexplicably always refer to him chummily as 'Boris' and regard him as a sort of bluff lovable buffoon, he is actually deeply unpleasant and is hugely disliked and resented within the PP. As for JRM, I don't know how much support the ERG have across the PP. But they have increased their influence so... But whoever ends up in a Tory title race, it will essentially be like someone presenting you with bowls of their own snot, vomit and faeces and asking which one you're going to eat.
At a push I might think Rudd would be a least rubbish option.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 9:36:33 GMT
At a push I might think Rudd would be a least rubbish option. I would agree but she's got a majority of something like 5 so you wouldn't want a leader who could so easily lose their seat at the next election.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 9:36:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by samuelwhiskers on Mar 14, 2019 9:36:53 GMT
I am at the platform at the Almeida this evening with James Graham and Annie Washburn talking about writing political theatre. I have no idea what they'll find to talk about. I missed it, what was it like?
|
|
999 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 10:32:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 14, 2019 10:32:20 GMT
At a push I might think Rudd would be a least rubbish option. I would agree but she's got a majority of something like 5 so you wouldn't want a leader who could so easily lose their seat at the next election. Absolutely right, I forgot that.
|
|
5,066 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 10:37:06 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Mar 14, 2019 10:37:06 GMT
Brexit or not, I am certain that Boris the serial adulter will never be Prime Minister, which I only can say great. I don't think it will be Boris. It seems like Jacob Rees-Mogg is the one with the most power in the Tory party so I would expect him to take over after Theresa. Heaven help us and then the choice will be between him and Corbyn. It'll be like being asked which nails you want ripped out first, the fingers or the toes. Boris Johnson is the poster boy for the Conservative grass roots, he gets those Zimmer frames rattling. He is like the Max Bialystock collecting those cheques, there are a lot of old ladies out there, that vote Tory. However I don’t think he is as popular with the parliamentary party and because of his unstinting ambition he is loathed in some quarters, bit like the Julius Caesar quote ‘As he was valiant I honoured him, but as he was ambitious I slew him.’
|
|
275 posts
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 10:48:26 GMT
Post by emsworthian on Mar 14, 2019 10:48:26 GMT
I don't think it will be JRM who takes over from May. I don't feel he's coming out of this fiasco well.
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 10:50:36 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 10:50:36 GMT
I don't think it will be JRM who takes over from May. I don't feel he's coming out of this fiasco well. None of them are coming out of this fiasco well, no matter which party they're in!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 11:12:31 GMT
The government is steering us to No Deal. Unless the deal is voted through by ERG et al caving in sufficient numbers. I dont think it is trying to steer us to no deal, which many government ministers have openly admitted would be a disaster - it is steering us (or attempting to at least) to May's deal. Which in a way is sensible (can't believe I am saying that) because the alternative is leaving without a deal and that would be so stupid even a 5 year old could understand it would be wrong. So they are trying to back the Brexiteers who still seem to think no deal will somehow be a good thing into a corner whereby their exit routes are May's deal or No Brexit, and hoping they choose the former. If that doesn't work then the government does appear to want an extension for renegotiation as they know no deal would be an economic disaster, but the difficulty they face is that they will not get a better deal because there is simply no way to resolve the Irish border question to anyone's satisfaction without staying in the EU. Therefore, they have to try to push May's deal through first.
|
|
|
Brexit
Mar 14, 2019 11:29:09 GMT
Post by sparky5000 on Mar 14, 2019 11:29:09 GMT
Brexit or not, I am certain that Boris the serial adulter will never be Prime Minister, which I only can say great. I don't think it will be Boris. It seems like Jacob Rees-Mogg is the one with the most power in the Tory party so I would expect him to take over after Theresa. Heaven help us and then the choice will be between him and Corbyn. It'll be like being asked which nails you want ripped out first, the fingers or the toes. It will never be Rees-Mogg, he’s too unpalatable for too many, doesn’t live in the real world and is too extremist for his fellow MPs to put forward. The thought of a choice between Rees-Mogg or Boris and Corbyn is just too much for me. 😐
|
|