1,432 posts
|
Post by BVM on Sept 20, 2023 6:32:06 GMT
It does mean staying true to the essence of what the creators intended and not seeking to impose things on a show that do not have strong roots in the text/score. Some of the most exciting theatre I have seen stays true to that approach. Always using the material as the basis for each production material and not seeking to use the material to tell another story. No one has argued that theatre should be trapped in a museum. Innovation is key. But it has to come from within and not be imposed. Maybe this production of SB will do many of those things, or maybe it won't, but we wont know for sure until it actually opens. I loved Kathryn Evans in Sunset Blvd, but that was about it for that production. It went too far the other way, a spiral staircase, some potted plants and a chaise lounge do not a palazzo make. Honour the original well, or do something different with it, like the 1996 revival of Chicago. Completely agree. Think people are looking back on the CRH version with rose tinted glasses. Was a good (one off) night out and the fabled “something different” with the actor musos and Joe playing a line on a flute or something to represent God knows what. But it didn’t compare in any way shape or form with the original. Personally I’d be gutted if the new version was like this rather than what (we think) Lloyd is going with! I think you can represent opulence better with an abstract set than a cheap as chips “realistic” stab at it (as posters in the Rebecca thread are currently alluding to!) |
|
1,432 posts
|
Post by BVM on Sept 20, 2023 6:36:17 GMT
I wonder if it would’ve get the investors if it was just another similar version with a big staircase. That’s only going to get compared, unfavourably, to the original so why bother? But there HAS to be something fabulous about it, you can’t just make the paying audience responsible for conjuring an artistic vision that you didn’t feel like presenting to them. If they do something interesting that’s we’ve never seen before which actually works the I’m ok with that. One costume though… that’s concerning. Completely agree with the first paragraph. And I think that’s why it’s best they don’t try to recreate Napier’s design as that’s exactly what would happen. If I win the lottery I’ll bring it back. God I wish there was an HD pro shot of the original! |
|
5,881 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Sept 20, 2023 8:27:43 GMT
ONE DAY TO GO
|
|
|
|
Post by danb on Sept 20, 2023 8:46:22 GMT
Whatever happens let’s manage our expectations. As long as it is THAT music ☑️ played loudly by a sizeable orchestra ☑️ sung by a decent cast ☑️ I don’t really mind what flights of fancy fill in the gaps. (edit *no graphic scenes of self harm…I even have to look away from the bandaging).
|
|
|
|
Post by A.Ham on Sept 20, 2023 8:48:56 GMT
Exactly. If those three boxes are ticked, I’ll be very happy!
|
|
8,148 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Sept 20, 2023 12:21:15 GMT
I've just seen a picture of the marquee/sineage for the show.
Not only is the musical stripped back but so is the name of it.
"Sunset Blvd.' Oh dear!
|
|
|
|
Post by Fleance on Sept 20, 2023 13:08:28 GMT
I've just seen a picture of the marquee/sineage for the show. Not only is the musical stripped back but so is the name of it. "Sunset Blvd.' Oh dear! That was the original on-screen title. It's also how the title is presented in my 1993 programme of the musical. (And also on the street signs in L.A.) |
|
8,148 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Sept 20, 2023 13:26:49 GMT
I've just seen a picture of the marquee/sineage for the show. Not only is the musical stripped back but so is the name of it. "Sunset Blvd.' Oh dear! That was the original on-screen title. It's also how the title is presented in my 1993 programme of the musical. (And also on the street signs in L.A.) Sorry, that was my poor attempt at humour but thanks for the info. 😀 |
|
|
|
Post by Fleance on Sept 20, 2023 13:31:29 GMT
That was the original on-screen title. It's also how the title is presented in my 1993 programme of the musical. (And also on the street signs in L.A.) Sorry, that was my poor attempt at humour but thanks for the info. 😀 Whatever the title, I enjoyed the show well enough with Patti LuPone and have no desire to see it again. |
|
8,148 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Sept 20, 2023 15:27:46 GMT
Sorry, that was my poor attempt at humour but thanks for the info. 😀 Whatever the title, I enjoyed the show well enough with Patti LuPone and have no desire to see it again. I saw it with Betty Buckley, Elaine Paige and more recently with Glen Close at the Coliseum. As long as the orchestra isn't stripped back, I believe there are 17, then I will be happy whatever strange things are happening in stage. |
|
2,402 posts
|
Post by theatreian on Sept 20, 2023 15:39:29 GMT
As long as the orchestra isn't stripped back, I believe there are 17, then I will be happy whatever strange things are happening in stage. Looking forward to your view on the show as it's one of my favourites and I am seeing it in Mid October. Seen it many times with Elaine, Petula, Faith and Glenn. |
|
3,571 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Rory on Sept 20, 2023 20:57:58 GMT
Maybe this is the one costume!
|
|
|
|
Post by toomasj on Sept 20, 2023 21:00:48 GMT
All I am thinking is I really hope she washed her hands thoroughly after touching that phone box door, and has had all of her inoculations before trying that kind of stunt. The stench of urine alone would have been unbearable, let alone even worse undoubtedly smeared on the walls…
|
|
3,571 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Rory on Sept 20, 2023 21:02:14 GMT
All I am thinking is I really hope she washed her hands thoroughly after touching that phone box door, and has had all of her inoculations before trying that kind of stunt. The stench of urine alone would have been unbearable, let alone even worse undoubtedly smeared on the walls… Some of the replies to that tweet! |
|
|
|
Post by toomasj on Sept 20, 2023 21:14:09 GMT
All I am thinking is I really hope she washed her hands thoroughly after touching that phone box door, and has had all of her inoculations before trying that kind of stunt. The stench of urine alone would have been unbearable, let alone even worse undoubtedly smeared on the walls… Some of the replies to that tweet! Without checking, I’m guessing there are some very unkind insinuations about business cards? 🤣 |
|
19,757 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 20, 2023 21:25:10 GMT
Maybe she nipped into the phone box for a wee, seeing as her skirt seems to be stuck inside her knickers.
|
|
8,148 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Sept 20, 2023 23:32:28 GMT
Admin. Could we have a voting button please
|
|
|
|
Post by marob on Sept 21, 2023 13:20:35 GMT
|
|
5,172 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Sept 21, 2023 13:22:26 GMT
Hahahahahahaha
|
|
540 posts
|
Post by WireHangers on Sept 21, 2023 13:26:13 GMT
WTF is this production?!
Is Lloyd inspiration from John Doyle’s Sweeney Todd and setting it in an insane asylum?
|
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Sept 21, 2023 13:28:51 GMT
It is certainly not an image to convert doubters
|
|
|
|
Post by A.Ham on Sept 21, 2023 13:31:15 GMT
So the single costume is just a skimpy black dress!
|
|
5,172 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Sept 21, 2023 13:32:37 GMT
If she turned up at Paramount in that, they'd hand her a film and an Oscar on the spot.
This is mental I'm so excited haha
|
|
118 posts
|
Post by rosscoe on Sept 21, 2023 13:40:00 GMT
I’m not sure what that photo has to do with the show, but I hope she does that onstage
|
|
1,484 posts
|
Post by theatrefan62 on Sept 21, 2023 13:47:14 GMT
Wow so she's really recreating her yoghurt ads on stage
|
|
