17 posts
|
Post by kryz1000 on Aug 21, 2019 7:08:18 GMT
Saw this last night. Theatre quite full including some rather dressy 'date night types' (which feels, for some reason, worthy of comment).
Anyhow, it felt to me as if many reviews might have been written before the reviewers had seen it. The 'too soon' brigade breaking cover and virtue signalling like fury.
It's far from great but it's certainly not 'one star' fare. It's *very* David Mamet - in your face, shouty, speechy, sweary and provocative. But surely the point of the laughs is that they catch in your throat. That you laugh, indeed, with shock and horror. That you're manipulated into feeling conflicted and confused. And in many respects it works on that level.
I thought the first half ratcheted up the tension really effectively and the situation that it portrayed was horrifyingly believable. In the interval you were left saying that this 'now needs to go somewhere' and, indeed, it did. The consequences were explored, if surreally.
On a downside it felt under-directed. JM's speeches often lacked cadence. The 'flow' of the whole piece could have benefitted from a bit of punctuation and emphasis. The end just.....arrived. You almost felt as if the cast could have got together after DM had left town and sorted it out amongst themselves.
For me - an interesting and intriguing three and a half stars.
|
|
|
Post by jennapatchell on Aug 21, 2019 11:02:32 GMT
Cant say I was a fan of this. What was it trying to be? I certainly wouldn't call it a comedy (although that is how it was advertised). The laughs were very minimal.
Then again I wouldnt call it a drama, it had very little actual 'drama', no storyline in particular and minimal tension.
I enjoyed Malkovich's performance but that was about all it had going for it.
And what on earth was the lighting between the pauses ?!!! Felt like I was in a disco, so extremely jarring and unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on Aug 24, 2019 11:46:00 GMT
On which subject I was expecting a critique of power and greed and find a mildly amusing dark comedy in the first half which then rather peters out in the second. This captures it exactly.
|
|
2,060 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Sept 1, 2019 20:58:52 GMT
Watching Untouchable: The Rise And Fall Of Harvey Weinstein on BBC 2 right now, you realise what a worthless piece of sh*t Weinstein is as a human being and how useless Bitter Wheat is as any kind of satire/social comment.
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on Sept 2, 2019 0:47:57 GMT
Watching Untouchable: The Rise And Fall Of Harvey Weinstein on BBC 2 right now, you realise what a worthless piece of sh*t Weinstein is as a human being and how useless Bitter Wheat is as any kind of satire/social comment. This is an interesting point... Bitter Wheat isn't about a 'type', it's about one very specific person. (I didn't realize how specific, but my sister-in-law informed me that some of the sexual quirks depicted were notably discussed in coverage of Weinstein.) And satire/social comment needs to be general enough to make a broader point, not be synography (the opposite, apparently, of hagiography).
|
|
923 posts
|
Post by Snciole on Sept 2, 2019 20:48:18 GMT
I think Fein could have encompassed a range of men; Weinstein, Cosby, Hitchcock, Roger Ailes etc but Mamet is one lazy man so we just get a verbatim story of what has been in the news. He should have just called it "Watch Me Shower: The Harvey Weinstein Story"
Untouchable; though a documentary, showed Weinstein's MO, showed the people who did and didn't stand up to him, the relationship with his brother (who was a sociable man, with friends and hobbies outside the industry) whereas Weinstein's who purpose was about sex and power.
None of this is in Bitter Wheat.
|
|