|
|
Post by bigredapple on Nov 5, 2024 18:24:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by parsley1 on Nov 5, 2024 22:12:19 GMT
If this is true Don’t think anyone bothered tbh |
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Nov 9, 2024 23:39:08 GMT
Would they rather have jobs and a name for a square that no one will ever use?
Or see the NT struggle financially and possibly cause staff to lose their jobs?
The public won't even truly notice the name of a Square. It won't become a rallying point for MAGA types.
Philanthropy is going to be an increasing part of the arts scene in the UK. We have seen the destruction of a number of literary festivals. We don't want that to happen to other arts venues and events.
As long as the money doesn't buy influence over programming, I am not going to be overly concerned as to how the donor votes.
|
|
7,175 posts
|
Post by Jon on Nov 10, 2024 0:03:17 GMT
Would they rather have jobs and a name for a square that no one will ever use? Or see the NT struggle financially and possibly cause staff to lose their jobs? The public won't even truly notice the name of a Square. It won't become a rallying point for MAGA types. Philanthropy is going to be an increasing part of the arts scene in the UK. We have seen the destruction of a number of literary festivals. We don't want that to happen to other arts venues and events. As long as the money doesn't buy influence over programming, I am not going to be overly concerned as to how the donor votes. Hasn't Philanthropy always been parts of the arts? I know the Old Vic was pressurised by Mark Rylance and other actors to not have Royal Bank of Canada as a sponsor because RBC have been funding fossil fuels and arms manufacturing but TBH finding a financial institution or rich benefactor that is squeaky clean is like finding a needle in a haystack. |
|
|
|
Post by aspieandy on Nov 10, 2024 0:25:59 GMT
Yo social media types .. has anyone got a link for this claim other than a deleted post on reddit? lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Nov 10, 2024 1:29:44 GMT
Would they rather have jobs and a name for a square that no one will ever use? Or see the NT struggle financially and possibly cause staff to lose their jobs? The public won't even truly notice the name of a Square. It won't become a rallying point for MAGA types. Philanthropy is going to be an increasing part of the arts scene in the UK. We have seen the destruction of a number of literary festivals. We don't want that to happen to other arts venues and events. As long as the money doesn't buy influence over programming, I am not going to be overly concerned as to how the donor votes. Hasn't Philanthropy always been parts of the arts? I know the Old Vic was pressurised by Mark Rylance and other actors to not have Royal Bank of Canada as a sponsor because RBC have been funding fossil fuels and arms manufacturing but TBH finding a financial institution or rich benefactor that is squeaky clean is like finding a needle in a haystack. Compared to the US, we are barely getting started with individual philanthropy Much as many of us dislike the Arts Council operates, we still do have public financial support for the arts. But individual giving will increase. As will corporate. It will be the only way many arts organisations will survive. And you are right in that few, if any, donors will get universal approval from every activist. |
|
4,982 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Nov 10, 2024 8:36:50 GMT
Would they rather have jobs and a name for a square that no one will ever use? Or see the NT struggle financially and possibly cause staff to lose their jobs? The public won't even truly notice the name of a Square. It won't become a rallying point for MAGA types. Philanthropy is going to be an increasing part of the arts scene in the UK. We have seen the destruction of a number of literary festivals. We don't want that to happen to other arts venues and events. As long as the money doesn't buy influence over programming, I am not going to be overly concerned as to how the donor votes. Hasn't Philanthropy always been parts of the arts? I know the Old Vic was pressurised by Mark Rylance and other actors to not have Royal Bank of Canada as a sponsor because RBC have been funding fossil fuels and arms manufacturing but TBH finding a financial institution or rich benefactor that is squeaky clean is like finding a needle in a haystack. And yet Rylance is happy for to star in Juno and that charges over 200 quid for a decent seat |
|
641 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by jek on Nov 10, 2024 8:57:15 GMT
I think we need some nuance here. Nan Goldin's activism against the Sackler Foundation, given their role in the opioid crisis, was more than justified. Shouting about every rich benefactor because you don't agree with their politics can only lead to an impoverished arts sector.
|
|
|
|
Post by thaneofglamis on Nov 12, 2024 21:51:10 GMT
Apologies if already discussed, but if a National Theatre production was filmed, but isn't part of NT Live, what is the likelihood of it being added. I’d love to have seen the Jack Thorne adaptation of After Life from 2021.
|
|
824 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Nov 13, 2024 7:49:41 GMT
Apologies if already discussed, but if a National Theatre production was filmed, but isn't part of NT Live, what is the likelihood of it being added. I’d love to have seen the Jack Thorne adaptation of After Life from 2021. Don't remmber it hapenning ever.. If in London or nearby, you can always pop into NT Archive and see it for free as they keep back catalogue for all productions. The recent filmed versons are good quality. catalogue.nationaltheatre.org.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Performance&id=PERF10940&pos=1 |
|
7,175 posts
|
Post by Jon on Nov 13, 2024 11:08:29 GMT
I think After Life can't be filmed for NTLive or NT at Home because of rights issues.
|
|
