3,578 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Rory on Nov 13, 2018 20:20:47 GMT
Any more word on whether this is actually transferring?
|
|
5,185 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Nov 14, 2018 2:07:19 GMT
Not. From what I’ve heard
|
|
5,898 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Nov 14, 2018 23:11:13 GMT
They would be insane to transfer this terrible production.
|
|
460 posts
|
Post by pianowithsam on Nov 14, 2018 23:19:37 GMT
They would be insane to transfer this terrible production. They really should have transferred Fiddler if anything. |
|
3,578 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Rory on Nov 14, 2018 23:36:48 GMT
They would be insane to transfer this terrible production. Well, Rip It Up has managed to make the leap so ya never know! |
|
5,840 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Nov 15, 2018 1:19:54 GMT
Could they take the set and used that for the basis of a new production? From the images, it looked impressive - even if it was let down by odd casting and lacklustre direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2018 8:17:04 GMT
For me even the set was a let down. it's impressive in a way but they went for a realistic downton abbey feel and it doesn't really meet the mood of the musical. and setting 'you would if you could' in a bath was tacky
|
|
2,702 posts
|
Post by viserys on Nov 15, 2018 8:28:47 GMT
For me even the set was a let down. it's impressive in a way but they went for a realistic downton abbey feel and it doesn't really meet the mood of the musical. and setting 'you would if you could' in a bath was tacky It would have been less tacky if their Bill had been something to look at. Matt Lucas was cringeworthy. I quite liked the Downton Abbey-feel of the set and the gorgeous costumes. Cast a new decent leading man who can carry the show, sing and dance and either revert the Parchester role back to a man or stick a female performer in reasonable clothes and I think it would do well as a limited run for some months. |
|
