4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Sept 9, 2022 19:27:23 GMT
That was announced a while ago. To be honest that was probably the first sign that the Queen’s health was on the decline and that the Firm were preparing for Charles to succeed her. I know the Queen announced that was what she wanted to happen but I was still worried in case it didn't happen. During the King's address this evening I was just about holding it together until he started talking about his wife & that she would be Queen consort & then I was properly crying. How long are they gonna keep up this nonsense of referring to Camilla as “Queen Consort”? I don’t remember ever hearing King George VI’s wife referred to as “Queen Consort” in any old newsreel footage before she became “Queen Mother”. They were “The King & Queen”. I know it’s the correct definition of Camilla’s position, but it’s not a natural way of speaking. I'm hoping they're only doing it at the moment because they don't want any mix ups between references to the just-deceased Queen regnant & references to the new Queen consort & that they'll stop once the funeral & mourning period are over. If not then yes it will get annoying. I'm open to them using Queen Camilla for a while if they're still worried about any mix ups with Queen Elizabeth. That's how references were done in the 1910s when Queen Mary & Queen Alexandra were both in the public eye, although from what I've read Queen Mary was still referred to as just the Queen when there weren't any possible confusion issues.
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Sept 9, 2022 19:29:46 GMT
They were saying on the news that they are calling her that for now to differentiate between her and THE QUEEN, who to most of us is Elizabeth II. I think they'll start to drop the Consort bit more and more as time goes by and as context makes it obvious which queen they are talking about.
One of my old lady neighbours hated Camilla. She thinks she's responsible for Diana's death. And being Catholic and divorced is also bad, and I suspect the latter informed the former. I remember her having a rant about how she couldn't understand how William could put up with her at his wedding after she'd 'killed his mother ...'
I said in the other thread that a slimmed down monarchy is easier said than done. It's a good idea in theory, and I do think it's necessary, but it comes with reducing the overall amount of hand shaking and ribbon cutting, and then what do you do with the spares? I'm sure I read something about minor royals in other royal families having proper jobs, like being a nurse or architect or similar. Those jobs work well because they require a qualification, not a surname or a PR team to progress, so it removes concerns about milking the brand.
Hopefully Anne can play a prominent role, and I've warmed to Edward and Sophie. Andrew to become a hermit please.
|
|
1,483 posts
|
Post by steve10086 on Sept 9, 2022 19:37:17 GMT
Thanks Dawnstar and jojo - yes, to differentiate them makes total sense.
|
|
7,179 posts
|
Post by Jon on Sept 9, 2022 20:10:36 GMT
Until George, Charlotte and Louie are old enough, I imagine the Wessexes will handle a lot of their duties but given George is only 9, that is still over a decade and a half at least
|
|
|
Post by FairyGodmother on Sept 9, 2022 22:07:55 GMT
I'm sure I read something about minor royals in other royal families having proper jobs, like being a nurse or architect or similar. Those jobs work well because they require a qualification, not a surname or a PR team to progress, so it removes concerns about milking the brand.. The Dutch King used to fly for KLM. I think he might still do on occasion so he can keep his licence.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 10, 2022 7:45:43 GMT
I'm sure I read something about minor royals in other royal families having proper jobs, like being a nurse or architect or similar. Those jobs work well because they require a qualification, not a surname or a PR team to progress, so it removes concerns about milking the brand.. The Dutch King used to fly for KLM. I think he might still do on occasion so he can keep his licence. Yes. But European Royals have been much lower profile for decades. The British (and Commonwealth) public expect much more from them. They must Do Philanthropy - they can’t just have a normal life and pop up at the odd official event from time to time.
|
|
914 posts
|
Post by karloscar on Sept 10, 2022 8:04:14 GMT
The Dutch King used to fly for KLM. I think he might still do on occasion so he can keep his licence. Yes. But European Royals have been much lower profile for decades. The British (and Commonwealth) public expect much more from them. They must Do Philanthropy - they can’t just have a normal life and pop up at the odd official event from time to time. Do we really expect much more from the Royals? I suspect that a monarchy similar in scale to the Danish or Swedish royal families would be perfectly acceptable and far less expensive. (Or better still it's a great opportunity to abolish the House of Lords and Royal Family and become a modern democracy with a proper constitution)
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 10, 2022 9:10:03 GMT
There are people still throwing tantrums about Meghan and Harry not posing on the hospital steps with Archie or spending August in Balmoral. And I mean *tantrums* - spiteful invective. Because they didn’t exactly follow ‘tradition’ (completely optional, non- constitutional, trivial things) to the letter.
Some people just Do Not Like change of any form. They regard the Royal Family and its pettiest, most inconsequential traditions, customs and ceremonies as signs of stability and continuity, and they have some kind of weird psychological need for that.
Yes, people expect more. They feel a sense of ownership.
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Sept 10, 2022 10:01:19 GMT
Yes. But European Royals have been much lower profile for decades. The British (and Commonwealth) public expect much more from them. They must Do Philanthropy - they can’t just have a normal life and pop up at the odd official event from time to time. Do we really expect much more from the Royals? I suspect that a monarchy similar in scale to the Danish or Swedish royal families would be perfectly acceptable and far less expensive. (Or better still it's a great opportunity to abolish the House of Lords and Royal Family and become a modern democracy with a proper constitution) We need to reform and slim the Lords, not abolish it. They do a lot of important work there, and somewhat ironically, on a political level at least, they are more representative of the public than the House of Commons. Which is presumably why Johnson seemed so keen to stuff the place with a string of his own allies. That's the bit that needs changing - and to stop replacing the hereditary peers of course. But so long as the Commons is elected by undemocratic First Past the Post, complaining about the Lords or the Monarchy is a distraction. It may be that we missed the easier windows for change of the Monarchy. It must be easier to make smaller changes with each new monarch when changes are more frequent and to have moved onto that path before rolling news and the internet. The rise of celebrity culture plays a role. The newspapers love to fill their pages with stories about them, making mountains out of molehills and a bit of strife sells. It's easy and cheap reporting, and they are known across all demographics. If the royals don't give them the access they want, they'll push back and make another story. I recall there being some kind of agreement between Charles and the press about William and Harry while they were still at school and while William was at university. It was along the lines of leave them alone most of the time and we'll provide you with a certain amount of arranged photo opportunities. This may have been done after Diana's death when there was push back against intrusive photography, so he had a bit more power over them at that time. However, it still angers me that the tabloids pushed the idea that the Queen should leave Balmoral (and her grandchildren) to be with her people at Buckingham Palace. They just wanted the photos. I've heard of pop stars and actors being similarly 'blackmailed' into giving exclusive interviews to avoid bad press. I could be wrong, but I doubt the Danes or Swedes have the same celebrity obsession as we do. Nevertheless, Charles did announce his intentions a long, long time ago, and most of the public were on board, so I think it will happen.
|
|
19,778 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 10, 2022 10:15:58 GMT
The ascension ceremony we just saw was screened around the world. I watched along with my friend in Madrid. I don’t think I recall the last time we had the crowning of a Danish monarch screened and commented on across the globe. Maybe if Denmark had hung on to what some describe as “petty” or “inconsequential” or “unnecessary” tradition we would?
This tradition is what makes our country what it is. I’m all for it.
|
|
914 posts
|
Post by karloscar on Sept 10, 2022 13:39:49 GMT
The ascension ceremony we just saw was screened around the world. I watched along with my friend in Madrid. I don’t think I recall the last time we had the crowning of a Danish monarch screened and commented on across the globe. Maybe if Denmark had hung on to what some describe as “petty” or “inconsequential” or “unnecessary” tradition we would? This tradition is what makes our country what it is. I’m all for it. Well it's Queen Margarethe's golden jubilee, so no surprise they haven't had a coronation recently!
|
|
2,702 posts
|
Post by viserys on Sept 10, 2022 13:57:50 GMT
It was on German television, too. They made a big to-do in the last days about the Germanic roots of the Royal Family. I think it's because we don't have a monarchy of our own, that we obsess with yours (and to a smaller extent the Swedish one due to Sylvia's German background). We get some of the pomp, the tradition and the drama, but don't have to foot the bill
|
|
19,778 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 10, 2022 14:59:20 GMT
The ascension ceremony we just saw was screened around the world. I watched along with my friend in Madrid. I don’t think I recall the last time we had the crowning of a Danish monarch screened and commented on across the globe. Maybe if Denmark had hung on to what some describe as “petty” or “inconsequential” or “unnecessary” tradition we would? This tradition is what makes our country what it is. I’m all for it. Well it's Queen Margarethe's golden jubilee, so no surprise they haven't had a coronation recently! How lovely for her 🙂
|
|
914 posts
|
Post by karloscar on Sept 10, 2022 18:45:05 GMT
Well it's Queen Margarethe's golden jubilee, so no surprise they haven't had a coronation recently! How lovely for her 🙂 They've had to scale back the celebrations planned for this weekend out of respect for our Queen.
|
|
19,778 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 10, 2022 19:15:08 GMT
They've had to scale back the celebrations planned for this weekend out of respect for our Queen. That’s a shame. But the point I was making was that we wouldn’t have known about it anyway. Because not many people, globally, care very much about Denmark’s monarchy whilst very many people care about ours. Despite some peoples assertions that it’s irrelevant it really isn’t.
|
|
|
Post by FairyGodmother on Sept 10, 2022 20:11:51 GMT
Oh I like Queen Daisy. But I agree that more people will know the British royal family.
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Sept 10, 2022 20:58:42 GMT
That’s a shame. But the point I was making was that we wouldn’t have known about it anyway. Because not many people, globally, care very much about Denmark’s monarchy whilst very many people care about ours. Despite some peoples assertions that it’s irrelevant it really isn’t. We had a day in Copenhagen in 2015, while on a cruise, and when we got to their royal palace we were told that it was the state opening of parliament & Queen Margarethe would be exiting shortly. So of course we went round to the door indicated to try to see her, expecting there'd be huge crowds like at our state opening of parliament. To our considerable surprise there were hardly enough people there to even be called a crowd, more a huddle. I don't know if that's typical for Denmark but if it is then it'd seem even the locals don't care very much about their monarchy!
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on Sept 11, 2022 9:08:24 GMT
but it comes with reducing the overall amount of hand shaking and ribbon cutting As an American (with Cornish grandparents on my mother's side), I think having a non-partisan/non-political living representation of your country is one of the major benefits of the monarchy. And if you cut back on the ribbon cutting and handshaking, you risk severing that sense of personal connection with the royal family, rendering it increasingly isolated and therefore obsolete. Watching the interviews on tv, it's clear that people love recounting the time they saw the Queen in person, or Princess Diana visited their care home, etc. (Heck, I was thrilled to see the Queen at Royal Ascot, let alone winning some money betting on the color of her outfit!)
|
|
2,339 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Sept 11, 2022 9:46:50 GMT
but it comes with reducing the overall amount of hand shaking and ribbon cutting As an American (with Cornish grandparents on my mother's side), I think having a non-partisan/non-political living representation of your country is one of the major benefits of the monarchy. And if you cut back on the ribbon cutting and handshaking, you risk severing that sense of personal connection with the royal family, rendering it increasingly isolated and therefore obsolete. Watching the interviews on tv, it's clear that people love recounting the time they saw the Queen in person, or Princess Diana visited their care home, etc. (Heck, I was thrilled to see the Queen at Royal Ascot, let alone winning some money betting on the color of her outfit!) Someone will take a bet on the colour of the Queens dress? Surely open to insider trading??
|
|
1,482 posts
|
Post by mkb on Sept 11, 2022 10:32:45 GMT
Mike Bartlett was spot on about Charlie immediately getting involved in politics, what with him allowing Truss to partner him on a tour of the UK. No separation of state and government then, and not as set out in London Bridge apparently.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Sept 11, 2022 10:53:22 GMT
There’s tradition and tradition, though. Much of the spectacle of monarchy are traditions going back centuries.
However, Meghan has been widely slammed for not following “traditions” invented by Diana which are at most 40 years old.
|
|
7,179 posts
|
Post by Jon on Sept 11, 2022 11:17:58 GMT
I think Charles recognises that the Monarchy needs to modernise and I wonder if the era of opening fetes and minor events might end or at least dramatically reduced?
|
|
5,158 posts
|
Post by TallPaul on Sept 11, 2022 11:32:03 GMT
I've just arrived in the city centre ready to hear the County Proclamation at 1pm. There's a good number here already, which will only grow over the next 30 minutes.
Because of the limited numbers allowed outside St James's Palace, far more people will hear the Proclamation outwith London, than were able to hear it 'live' yesterday.
|
|
2,760 posts
|
Post by n1david on Sept 11, 2022 11:42:49 GMT
It's interesting to see the proclamations fan out over the country.
I can understand that the news doesn't reach Abergavenny until 3pm today, given that it was only announced in Cardiff at noon; what I don't understand is that Islington's proclamation was at 11am this morning, I'd have thought the news would have reached there from St James's Palace more quickly given it's only 4 miles away...
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Sept 11, 2022 11:46:05 GMT
Some people just Do Not Like change of any form. They regard the Royal Family and its pettiest, most inconsequential traditions, customs and ceremonies as signs of stability and continuity, and they have some kind of weird psychological need for that. There's nothing even slightly weird about wanting stability and continuity. There are literally hundreds of psychological studies which say that those are beneficial human needs and none saying the opposite.
|
|