|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2016 19:13:02 GMT
Saw aw this video on youtube and, although the Charlie's accent is awful, the person playing Lauren is amazing!! So funny. This is from the Toronto production and is AJ Bridel as Lauren
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2016 12:46:22 GMT
Is Matt Henry only playing Lola until January? I wonder who will replace him if he leaves.
It'll be interesting to see if the London show does the same as Broadway and get someone fairly well know (i.e. like Todrick Hall on Broadway), however I don't think ticket sales are too bad here so would they need to?
|
|
1,013 posts
|
Post by talkstageytome on Nov 6, 2016 0:22:45 GMT
No idea, but if they do recast then I doubt they'd put a 'star' in the role. The cast change wasn't that long ago and they went with a full cast of MT talent again.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Nov 6, 2016 1:22:32 GMT
I thought Matt Henry had signed up for another year in London?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2016 4:10:44 GMT
I thought Matt Henry had signed up for another year in London? He has signed on for another year, no idea where the talk of him leaving in January has come from, don't worry!
|
|
1,570 posts
|
Post by showtoones on Nov 6, 2016 5:57:41 GMT
I heard that Matt Henry was going to Broadway to do the show with Killian...
Maybe just a rumor but there it is
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2016 8:41:23 GMT
I thought Matt Henry had signed up for another year in London? He has signed on for another year, no idea where the talk of him leaving in January has come from, don't worry! Okay sorry I just seemed to recall reading that but I was wrong. It's probably because the show was booking until January when the cast change was announced; must've got confused. I love how Kinky Boots has a full MT cast, I think it needs that MT cast rather than a star playing Charlie or Lola
|
|
352 posts
|
Post by Raven on Nov 6, 2016 12:01:40 GMT
He has signed on for another year, no idea where the talk of him leaving in January has come from, don't worry! Okay sorry I just seemed to recall reading that but I was wrong. It's probably because the show was booking until January when the cast change was announced; must've got confused. I love how Kinky Boots has a full MT cast, I think it needs that MT cast rather than a star playing Charlie or Lola Must agree with you in regards to the full MT cast. This particular show doesn't need a "star name" for the leads, just pure talent. I think it may also be the reason this show gets rave reviews night after night. Must say, I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the new cast this week. We had Paul Ayres as Charlie and I enjoyed his interpretation better than Killian's. Elena Skye also brought her own quirks to Lauren and although I enjoyed her performance I did find myself missing Amy in the role. Matt, as always, was simply brilliant as Lola and totally steals the show. He gives just the right amount of sass and flare to the role. The ensemble is also very strong and bring great energy to the show. I have no doubt I'll be back to see Kinky Boots again soon!
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Nov 9, 2016 23:22:39 GMT
Saw this for the second time tonight. There are so many holes they should call it Swiss cheese.
I've never really liked David Hunter and tonight didn't change my mind. He's got a much nicer tone than whiny Killian though.
The first half REALLY drags in places. The second half isn't fleshed out enough. The script is still too American for it to believably English.
However, overall it's still a really fun night out.
P.S. The wigs are truly terrible up close. They'd be better letting the women make terrible hairstyles with their own hair.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2016 18:21:27 GMT
Just walked past the theatre, Michael Vinsen is on as Charlie tonight, Paul Ayres has a day off as understudy it seems as Jason Winter is on for Charlies friend Harry, so anyone going tonight enjoy!
|
|
4,179 posts
|
Post by HereForTheatre on Nov 19, 2016 21:04:08 GMT
I went to the matinee today. First time seeing new cast, second time seeing the show overall.
Loved the show, as i did first time, my only thing was the same as first time around...i much preferred the first act to the second. For me i think the pace and tone drops a bit too much in the second act..there are fewer songs...it gets quite wordy instead....then where there is songs they are fraught/emotional...until the burst of joy and energy of the finale. I feel like they could do with another uptempo song somewhere in the 2nd act to lift it a bit. That's not to say i don't enjoy the second act cus i just do..just saying i think it's the weaker act for me.
I thought the new cast were great. I enjoyed Dvid Hunter, maybe not as much as Killian, i can't really decide. Elena Skye i actually thought was fantastic, again maybe not as good as Amy, not maybe milking it all quite as much, but still thought she was hilarious. The Angels seemed to have a few dodgy moments, not sure if there were some in there who weren't quite familiar with their roles, don't know, but they didn't seem as fierce and have as much personality or engergy to me as the original set of angels.
Matt Henry i think has even improved on his performance i saw during previews, which even then was fantastic, i think his acting has improved especially. His voice is fantastic and as i did the first time, loved his Not My Fathers Son. Just a powerhouse performance all round really.
So yeh, just really enjoyed it, as i did first time, some things were better, some a bit under, but all round just such a fun, funny and entertaining spectacle.
|
|
4,179 posts
|
Post by HereForTheatre on Nov 20, 2016 15:16:30 GMT
Sorry for double post but just thinking about this more, but i just feel like i need to mention the Angels again. It suddenly occurred to me that i literally can hardly even remember what most of them looked like, let alone any stand out moments. I can vaguely remember the referee angel and the one who did the splits and that's literally it. Compared to when i first saw it in previews and there just seemed, firstly striking individual looks, but also so much individual personality and energy from all of them, i can remember most of them even now, where as i've forgotten half of the ones in yesterdays show like they were just a bunch of cardboard cut out back up dancers (which they essentially are fair enough but you want something more from them don't you?) Not saying they weren't good, cus they were all great dancers and the referee had a great voice, but i just missed something from this group.
|
|
700 posts
|
Post by cheesy116 on Nov 21, 2016 17:10:46 GMT
For anyone interested, the 3rd cover for Lola, 'Jemal Felix' will be on this evening for the first time!! The original casts 3rd cover never got to go on. Originally it was Simon who is 2nd cover but for whatever reason he isn't anymore. It would be great to see for anyone who is close by!
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by alison on Nov 21, 2016 18:08:36 GMT
Ugh, why do I have to learn about these things too late to get there ... not that I'd be able to afford to anyway, since I paid peak train prices to go see Michael Vinsen as Charlie last week. Oh well, another time, I hope. I haven't seen Craig as Lola yet, although I've now see all the Charlies.
|
|
700 posts
|
Post by cheesy116 on Nov 23, 2016 19:15:49 GMT
Simon-Anthony Rhoden, who was meant to go on as Lola (2nd u/s) on Monday but backed out of it a few hours before the show, went on last night for the first time. He is also on for both shows today!
Unusually for that show, he didn't tweet about being on yesterday and neither did any other cast members, which is unusual because the cast of Kinky Boots are usually very vocal on social media about when they're on in their cover roles or when swings are on. The first of it being publicly 'advertised' was when Michael Vinsen tweeted about it after. I wonder why ? he tweeted about being on for Lola on Monday before he backed out. It could be it happened so last minute that he had no time! but he had friends in watching so I'm not so sure about that one.
On a side note, Jemal Felix who went on as Lola on Monday (3rd cover, highly unlikely he will get on again if the original cast is anything to go by) has got great reviews by a few people who managed to get tickets to see him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2016 19:23:57 GMT
Ooo I didn't know Simon backed out?? Why would he have done that?
I've heard great things about Jemal too. It's strange because when i saw the show on 2nd Nov and got a programme, it said Simon as 3rd cover? Why have they changed it and why is the original cover not performing?
|
|
700 posts
|
Post by cheesy116 on Nov 23, 2016 20:52:05 GMT
Ooo I didn't know Simon backed out?? Why would he have done that? I've heard great things about Jemal too. It's strange because when i saw the show on 2nd Nov and got a programme, it said Simon as 3rd cover? Why have they changed it and why is the original cover not performing? Maybe backed out wasn't the best choice of words by me lol as some people may read that as if he didn't want to go on as Lola, I'm more meaning that he tweeted he was on about 3pm and then at 4pm tweeted that his debut is 'on hold' for a little while. My best guess was he must have realised he wasn't feeling 100% and didn't want to be debuting while not feeling fully fit ? I know there's some hard core fans of the show on here and twitter so hopefully someone knows better than me! Still hoping someone will know why neither him nor his cast members tweeted about it yesterday when they were all tweeting about it on Monday. Jemal is great as an Angel, he has legs for days which actually looks very unusual when you first see them but it makes him stand out from the rest. It would be great to see him as Lola opposite Paul Ayres as Charlie, Paul is probably the smallest male in the cast and Jemal must be about 6ft8 in his heels. Craig is the 1st cover Lola and was on holiday last week so I'm not sure if he is still on holiday or is ill ? Matt isn't scheduled on the website to be on holiday so he must be ill. My programme lists Jemal ahead of Simon also but a friend told me that they only decided recently to make Simon 2nd cover instead of Jemal, I'm not too sure on the reasoning behind that. Simon is a slightly different swing from the others in that he doesn't cover any of the angels, only Lola and Factory Workers! Once again, I've no idea why this is the case. I could only assume its because with the original cast, when Robert Grose who plays Simon Senior, is off, they had to get one of the angels to go in his track as its fairly essential to the plot that its a person of colour who does that track, although I guess they could away with it as that part in the scene is quite dark. Simon played Simon Senior from his debut in August for 3 months straight while Robert was off ill, he had some kind of operation I believe.
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by alison on Nov 23, 2016 21:08:09 GMT
Simon is a slightly different swing from the others in that he doesn't cover any of the angels, only Lola and Factory Workers! Once again, I've no idea why this is the case. I could only assume its because with the original cast, when Robert Grose who plays Simon Senior, is off, they had to get one of the angels to go in his track as its fairly essential to the plot that its a person of colour who does that track, although I guess they could away with it as that part in the scene is quite dark. Simon played Simon Senior from his debut in August for 3 months straight while Robert was off ill, he had some kind of operation I believe. BIB - they've had to "get away with it" in the past. I saw the show in the summer while they were having issues with lots of people off and so certain ensemble members/swings playing multiple roles - one of the (white) angels had to take the Simon Sr role, as Matt and Callum were both out, and Arun was Lola. For his two appearances, he had his back to the audience, and at the end they had young Charlie and Lola hug each other rather than their fathers.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2016 22:09:36 GMT
Simon is a slightly different swing from the others in that he doesn't cover any of the angels, only Lola and Factory Workers! Once again, I've no idea why this is the case. I could only assume its because with the original cast, when Robert Grose who plays Simon Senior, is off, they had to get one of the angels to go in his track as its fairly essential to the plot that its a person of colour who does that track, although I guess they could away with it as that part in the scene is quite dark. Simon played Simon Senior from his debut in August for 3 months straight while Robert was off ill, he had some kind of operation I believe. BIB - they've had to "get away with it" in the past. I saw the show in the summer while they were having issues with lots of people off and so certain ensemble members/swings playing multiple roles - one of the (white) angels had to take the Simon Sr role, as Matt and Callum were both out, and Arun was Lola. For his two appearances, he had his back to the audience, and at the end they had young Charlie and Lola hug each other rather than their fathers. That's strange, what about Marcus? I mean it's not exactly a lot to say "take those things off your feet and get inside her, stupid boy".
|
|
700 posts
|
Post by cheesy116 on Nov 23, 2016 22:20:46 GMT
BIB - they've had to "get away with it" in the past. I saw the show in the summer while they were having issues with lots of people off and so certain ensemble members/swings playing multiple roles - one of the (white) angels had to take the Simon Sr role, as Matt and Callum were both out, and Arun was Lola. For his two appearances, he had his back to the audience, and at the end they had young Charlie and Lola hug each other rather than their fathers. That's strange, what about Marcus? I mean it's not exactly a lot to say "take those things off your feet and get inside her, stupid boy". Marcus would probably have looked way too young for that role, especially at that part in the show but he could have got away with doing the part in the nursing home after the old man make up is applied.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2016 22:31:07 GMT
That's strange, what about Marcus? I mean it's not exactly a lot to say "take those things off your feet and get inside her, stupid boy". Marcus would probably have looked way too young for that role, especially at that part in the show but he could have got away with doing the part in the nursing home after the old man make up is applied. Possibly. But if Simon/Lola is a child anyway it wouldn't really matter? Simon has played that role before and he's young.
|
|
700 posts
|
Post by cheesy116 on Nov 23, 2016 22:36:28 GMT
Marcus would probably have looked way too young for that role, especially at that part in the show but he could have got away with doing the part in the nursing home after the old man make up is applied. Possibly. But if Simon/Lola is a child anyway it wouldn't really matter? Simon has played that role before and he's young. Good point! I forgot that at that point that Lola's dad would gave been considerably younger too. He just probably wasn't rehearsed for that track then, it's a lot of time to spend rehearsing a full track that is nothing like his normal one when there's a small chance he will ever go on as him. But it obviously was needed which is why they have 5 male swings this time instead of 4.
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by alison on Nov 24, 2016 6:45:41 GMT
That's strange, what about Marcus? I mean it's not exactly a lot to say "take those things off your feet and get inside her, stupid boy". Marcus would probably have looked way too young for that role, especially at that part in the show but he could have got away with doing the part in the nursing home after the old man make up is applied. Hmmm, I can't remember exactly when it was, it might have been when Marcus was out too (I know I've seen the show once without him). Either way, they were down a male in the ensemble so Marcus would have been needed as an angel, so he'd still have had to do it backwards - Simon Sr. being in drag makeup doesn't exactly fit the character.
|
|
1,287 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Nov 24, 2016 8:21:03 GMT
Saw this yesterday with the second cover for Lola. He was ok, but I really missed Matt Henry. The show is still fun but some of the Angels looked a bit bored and they were just acting by numbers which is a pity
|
|
15 posts
|
Post by collinsk on Nov 24, 2016 8:45:38 GMT
I saw this on Monday and Wednesday Matinee. Thoughts; Jemal was great! I couldn't believe it was his first show and even more so that he was the 3rd Cover. Very strong all round. Simon (who is the 2nd cover now I believe) was just ok. Great acting but very weak vocals and dancing. For me he just wasn't a Lola.
Out of the three covers this year for me the closest to Callum last year is Jemal. That being said Craig has a great set of pipes.
|
|