3,316 posts
|
Post by david on Jan 18, 2020 13:33:51 GMT
No, next week is the period drama, which I'm really looking forward to. It's the week after that for the sets-at-90-degrees episode, which presumably is going to be like a massively extended version of the wall scene in TCAABR. (Given that's my least favourite scene in TCAABR, I'm slightly apprehensive about a whole half hour of it...) The period drama could be good fun next week. I enjoyed the 90 degrees scene when I saw it in TCAABR. It was the first time Id seen anything like that on stage. It will be interesting to see how well the idea translates onto the telly in a 30minute show.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 18, 2020 17:51:01 GMT
I enjoyed the 90 degrees scene when I saw it in TCAABR. It was the first time Id seen anything like that on stage. I probably should clarify that I did enjoy the wall scene the first few times I saw TCAABR, I've just found it hasn't stood up to repeat viewing like the rest of the show has for me.
|
|
460 posts
|
Post by pianowithsam on Jan 18, 2020 22:35:09 GMT
Just watched last nights. Thought it was quite funny. Some really stand out bits. The ending storyline was pretty random.
Was watching it with my brother. At the end during the jump scare, I didn’t actually jump. However, 10 seconds after, my brother absolutely screamed and shouted. Such a late response and scared the living daylights out of me. Holy moly.
|
|
|
Post by basi1faw1ty on Jan 19, 2020 10:59:07 GMT
I missed the courtroom? ep, and will catch up soon but the one last Friday was good. The jammed kitchen door made for some excellent moments as the story progressed, and the first time the laughing gag started, tears were streaming down my face I was laughing that hard. Then it came up again, and, dare I say it, it overstayed its welcome a little?
|
|
526 posts
|
Post by danielwhit on Jan 19, 2020 19:49:56 GMT
If there is one thing the writing trio are guilty of is a tendency to allow their individual "moments" to go on a bit too long - Dennis' PPGW speech about his line readers breaking up being one example.
I was in the audience for the horror episode, definitely think it has been the weakest of them all so far - however still a solid piece of entertainment. Laughter segment definitely did outstay welcome.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 19, 2020 21:09:09 GMT
If there is one thing the writing trio are guilty of is a tendency to allow their individual "moments" to go on a bit too long - Dennis' PPGW speech about his line readers breaking up being one example. I'd agree with you on the general tendecy but not that specific example, as I like that speech. I suppose different people find different things that go on too long for them.
|
|
353 posts
|
Post by properjob on Jan 21, 2020 6:55:17 GMT
I've been enjoying the series and if they make another one I would watch but part of me hopes they don't as I think the jokes will wear thin after a while. I think what is lacking and needed to tie the episodes together is a "backstage/rehearsal" section as they are credited as X playing Y playing Z but we don't get to see them just being Max, Chris, Sandra etc. I think it helps to have seen the previous stage shows to understand the characters relationships.
|
|
1,826 posts
|
Post by stevej678 on Jan 21, 2020 10:59:06 GMT
DVD of the series, which will include all six episodes plus a behind-the-scenes bonus feature, out 10 February.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 21, 2020 20:21:51 GMT
I think what is lacking and needed to tie the episodes together is a "backstage/rehearsal" section as they are credited as X playing Y playing Z but we don't get to see them just being Max, Chris, Sandra etc. I think it helps to have seen the previous stage shows to understand the characters relationships. I totally agree with this. I was really hoping that a series would give them more time to explore the Cornley characters than the previous single shows but unfortunately thus far it seems to be the opposite. Basically the only bits of Cornley characterisation there has been is that Robert & Chris bicker and Chris gets annoyed with Dennis. I hope Max & Sandra are still together but there's been nothing to indicate if they are or not. We've learned absolutely nothing about Vanessa; in fact I'm not sure if her name has even been mentioned on screen apart from in the credits. I'd like to know why she's decided to join Cornley when their reputation as a walking disaster zone must be well-known by now!
|
|
460 posts
|
Post by pianowithsam on Jan 21, 2020 23:19:57 GMT
Free bat with every purchase... one of the best gags last week. Really laughed at the sheer and utter stupidity of this bit. Need more humour like this.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Jan 24, 2020 22:27:28 GMT
Funniest episode since the courtroom tonight. Henry Lewis is beginning to steal every episode! Props to Bryony and Charlie for such brilliant pratfalls. And I'm not sure I've laughed as hard at anything as much as I did at the table scene!
|
|
8,152 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Jan 24, 2020 22:37:55 GMT
Another great episode and some very clever moments. The ceiling fan bit was brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2020 14:22:48 GMT
If you don't know the characters' back stories then you wouldn't get some of the jokes. The fan and the bare backside were laugh out loud moments. Henry Lewis with his stage presence and sheer size does have the ability to dominate and when I saw the initial play the sight of a man of his size doing some of the slapstick made it even funnier. In future years I can see him doing some of the great Shakespeare comedy roles on stage, he'd be a natural Falstaff with his build.
Bryony, Charlie and Nancy are always funny and willing to take their fair share of falls, looking stupid and ending up in undignified situations across the series.
With 4 plays, a couple of TV specials and now the series there will be a limit of how far they can take this especially the TV series before the jokes get too contrived or rehashed as there are only a certain amount of slapstick stunts that can be done although they can be dressed up and slightly amended. Otherwise unless you go into full Michael Crawford-Frank Spencer territory and some of the stunts just get bigger and bigger then you'd risk repeating lots of things.
But there are certainly lots of genres they could explore - just from typing this Shakespeare and Sci-Fi came to mind.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 25, 2020 14:44:30 GMT
With 4 plays, a couple of TV specials and now the series there will be a limit of how far they can take this especially the TV series before the jokes get too contrived or rehashed as there are only a certain amount of slapstick stunts that can be done although they can be dressed up and slightly amended. Otherwise unless you go into full Michael Crawford-Frank Spencer territory and some of the stunts just get bigger and bigger then you'd risk repeating lots of things. But there are certainly lots of genres they could explore - just from typing this Shakespeare and Sci-Fi came to mind. I'm already finding some of the jokes re-hashed, though that's probably because I've seen so much Mischief on stage already.
Apropos Shakespeare, once while very bored at work I worked out a complete cast for A Midsummer Night's Dream Goes Wrong. If they ever fancy doing it I probably still have the photos of my post-it notes somewhere...!
|
|
1,126 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Jan 25, 2020 18:34:35 GMT
I'd really love if any future TV series showed a bit more 'behind the scenes', so we saw more of Chris Bean and the other characters as themselves, and the relationships between them. They used moving between the actual play and the behind the scenes goings-on so brilliantly onstage, thinking of things like accidentally playing the voice recording footage in PPGW, and surely TV could do this far more effectively? It's a bit flat without it. People unfamiliar with Mischief's stage shows possibly don't even realise it's supposed to be the same group of characters putting on different 'shows' every week. The episodes still work, but it feels a bit "this is a straight up spoof of a courtroom drama" or "spoof of a period drama" and the play-within-a-play element that lets you connect emotionally to the characters.
|
|
460 posts
|
Post by pianowithsam on Jan 25, 2020 18:37:56 GMT
I'd really love if any future TV series showed a bit more 'behind the scenes', so we saw more of Chris Bean and the other characters as themselves, and the relationships between them. They used moving between the actual play and the behind the scenes goings-on so brilliantly onstage, thinking of things like accidentally playing the voice recording footage in PPGW, and surely TV could do this far more effectively? It's a bit flat without it. People unfamiliar with Mischief's stage shows possibly don't even realise it's supposed to be the same group of characters putting on different 'shows' every week. The episodes still work, but it feels a bit "this is a straight up spoof of a courtroom drama" or "spoof of a period drama" and the play-within-a-play element that lets you connect emotionally to the characters. Especially with the dropping of the Cornley Polytechnic Dramatic Society.
|
|
|
Post by marob on Jan 25, 2020 21:22:30 GMT
I enjoy this series a lot, but it is starting to feel a bit samey. It's a good few years since I saw TPTGW (when the original cast were in it) but I saw PPGW the other day and so noticed a couple of the jokes that were reworked for this episode (most obviously the stunts that end with an unconscious Trevor with his bum out.) I'd like to see it get a second series but I'm not sure how much more mileage they can get out of it after that.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 25, 2020 23:40:36 GMT
samuelwhiskers I completely agree, in fact I think I've said something similar at least twice on this thread already. After yesterday's episode I particularly want to know what's going on between Max & Sandra. Why wouldn't she let him kiss her at the end when the last we heard they were engaged? I hope they haven't split up. I've been emotionally invested in their relationship since 2014, dammit!
|
|
1,126 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Jan 26, 2020 0:17:37 GMT
Yes!! And surely character development is key to an ongoing series? It’s strange to me that TPTGW and especially PPGW had so much character development and character-led plot development (when both those plays would have been strong as pure farces without those elements), but for for ongoing TV series where such development is essential, they decided to strip it out.
The only way a second series could work is if they make it a comedy about the ongoing adventures of the members of the Cornley Polytechnic Drama Society.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 26, 2020 15:42:11 GMT
The only way a second series could work is if they make it a comedy about the ongoing adventures of the members of the Cornley Polytechnic Drama Society. Several years ago, when the writers first started saying in interviews that they'd like to do TV Goes Wrong, I envisaged a series where the Cornley characters are trying to go about their every day lives but everything Goes Wrong. For instance, at an airport trying to get a flight, at a supermarket trying to do the weekly shop, at a theatre but in the audience, etc. Obviously that's not the direction they've gone it but I still think it could be rather fun & then we'd get to see the Cornley charaters as themselves.
|
|
653 posts
|
Post by ptwest on Jan 26, 2020 16:26:12 GMT
I've just caught up on Friday's episode. The croquet mallet near the start and the cat / piano joke were definite laugh out loud moments, but found myself chuckling throughout. As others have said, it really helps knowing the actors and the characters they are trying to portray, as well as understanding the whole premise of continuing with the script no matter what happens. But after that fairly poor Christmas episode, I have been very pleasantly surprised by the rest of the series.
|
|
4,028 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 31, 2020 18:27:43 GMT
Mischief have just tweeted this. It does rather sum up the series: each Cornley character has been pretty much reduced to one trait. I'm rather surprised that they would want to draw attention to it like this though.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Jan 31, 2020 21:18:01 GMT
The angled setpieces were wonderful but the bits in between were pretty much just filler (the beer gag particularly went on far, far too long)
|
|
543 posts
|
Post by freckles on Jan 31, 2020 21:35:02 GMT
Clever though they were, I’m not sure the angled scenes worked as well as they could have. On stage you can clearly see where the actors are and where they should be; with “repositioning the cameras”, it was rather confusing viewing, I found.
|
|
8,152 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Jan 31, 2020 21:40:14 GMT
I agree. This is much better on stage as the audience can see how it works. Not the funniest but very clever.
|
|