95 posts
|
Post by theatre on Oct 25, 2021 17:17:30 GMT
Perhaps the logistics of space in the Gillian Lynne is the issue here that is restricting the size of the orchestra? They’re currently on a small-ish platform above SL, so maybe there just isn’t space/availability of an orchestra pit to have a large, lush sounding orchestra with full brass/wind + percussion. I'd be surprised, this will be down to budget only. Cats in the same theatre had a 16-piece.
|
|
352 posts
|
Post by properjob on Oct 25, 2021 17:40:33 GMT
Perhaps the logistics of space in the Gillian Lynne is the issue here that is restricting the size of the orchestra? They’re currently on a small-ish platform above SL, so maybe there just isn’t space/availability of an orchestra pit to have a large, lush sounding orchestra with full brass/wind + percussion. I'd be surprised, this will be down to budget only. Cats in the same theatre had a 16-piece. Where did they put the band for cats? I'm not that familiar with the orginal production of cats but I didn't think there was much set that entered and exited the stage and therefore needed somewhere to be stored off stage?
|
|
287 posts
|
Post by singingbird on Oct 25, 2021 17:48:03 GMT
I'm so happy that there is a decent discussion about this, as I thought the sound of this show, the number of instruments in the band, and the use of MIDI files for things like trumpets, bass and drums was utterly shameful and sounded tinny and lifeless. I can't believe it's down to Covid. Bedknobs and Broomsticks has just opened - on tour, not in a static location - and they can afford a harpist! I know ALW is a stickler, so this MUST have been the sound he wanted. Perhaps he thinks it sounds 'contemporary' and will appear to the 'youth' - the way JCS genuinely sounded contemporary in 1970?
I remember when I first heard Bad Cinderella. I was really interested to hear how an actual live band would re-interpret/play it in the show. I still think it'd sound great played by a Variations-style virtuoso rock band. I never expected it'd just be the exact same backing track from the record played in the theatre.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 25, 2021 18:17:25 GMT
I'm so happy that there is a decent discussion about this, as I thought the sound of this show, the number of instruments in the band, and the use of MIDI files for things like trumpets, bass and drums was utterly shameful and sounded tinny and lifeless. I can't believe it's down to Covid. Bedknobs and Broomsticks has just opened - on tour, not in a static location - and they can afford a harpist! I know ALW is a stickler, so this MUST have been the sound he wanted. Perhaps he thinks it sounds 'contemporary' and will appear to the 'youth' - the way JCS genuinely sounded contemporary in 1970? I remember when I first heard Bad Cinderella. I was really interested to hear how an actual live band would re-interpret/play it in the show. I still think it'd sound great played by a Variations-style virtuoso rock band. I never expected it'd just be the exact same backing track from the record played in the theatre. Bedknobs and Broomsticks is a revival of a hit show so it is much easier to get big investments from backers. These things, as I mentioned earlier, are going to be judged on a case by case basis. The amount of investment is always going to be proportional to the investment risk. ALW would of course prefer to have a larger orchestra to work with, what composer wouldn't?
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Oct 25, 2021 18:31:15 GMT
Bedknobs is not a revival of a hit show. It is an adaptation of a relatively little known film with one song that became better known.
It is far from a guaranteed success.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 25, 2021 18:39:24 GMT
Bedknobs is not a revival of a hit show. It is an adaptation of a relatively little known film with one song that became better known. It is far from a guaranteed success. Perhaps not, but it was a Disney movie, Sherman brother songs, it's a family musical, famous name if not movie, so while not a guaranteed success, as no musical is, it's a pretty safe bet for investment.
|
|
|
Post by h86 on Oct 25, 2021 18:52:10 GMT
Investment and a big musical name doesn’t necessarily mean that the production will invest in the band/orchestra, the new beauty and the beast tour only has 10 musicians
|
|
|
Post by danb on Oct 25, 2021 19:24:28 GMT
I think perhaps that a lot of our disappointment with Cinderella lies with the scale of ALW’s previous output, and our expectation that this would be the same. It is an anomaly because it isn’t the same. It is cheap and synthetic sounding when it doesn’t have to be.
|
|
287 posts
|
Post by singingbird on Oct 25, 2021 19:37:33 GMT
I think perhaps that a lot of our disappointment with Cinderella lies with the scale of ALW’s previous output, and our expectation that this would be the same. It is an anomaly because it isn’t the same. It is cheap and synthetic sounding when it doesn’t have to be. You've hit the nail on the head. And I feel that about so many aspects of the production (e.g. the set design, the cast recording packaging, even the advertising). It all feels a bit cheap.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 25, 2021 19:49:21 GMT
I think perhaps that a lot of our disappointment with Cinderella lies with the scale of ALW’s previous output, and our expectation that this would be the same. It is an anomaly because it isn’t the same. It is cheap and synthetic sounding when it doesn’t have to be. How do you know it doesn't have to be? What information do you have about the investments? It's not an anomaly at all, the only recent show of his (well, relatively recent) to feature a larger ensemble was Love Never Dies, a sequel to his megahit musical Phantom. Even Whistle Down the Wind had a very small ensemble with keyboards standing in for acoustic instruments and terrible sounding synthesized strings. I don't think Cinderella sounds cheap because the orchestrations are so clever that they more than compensate for the shortcomings of sound production. Stephen Ward, on the other hand, did sound cheap and synthetic in some respects.
|
|
|
Post by danb on Oct 25, 2021 19:57:13 GMT
Ok, great.
Edit: I have now taken time to read your reply rather than just roll my eyes in exasperation. Are you suggesting that the only way this production has got to the stage is by cutting the orchestra budget? That he SET OUT to write the piece for a bontempi keyboard, a triangle and a marimba? That his recent lack of form until ‘School of Rock’ has reduced the amount of willing investors in his work? You seem to want to justify that it sounds like this on purpose? A stylistic choice rather than a cost cutting and simplifying exercise? When you continually use the word ensemble, do you mean the orchestra or the chorus on stage who don’t have named parts? Why needlessly point out that ‘LND’ is the sequel to Phantom, like the people on this board wouldn’t know that? Please chill out a bit.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2021 20:07:01 GMT
I'd be surprised, this will be down to budget only. Cats in the same theatre had a 16-piece. Where did they put the band for cats? I'm not that familiar with the orginal production of cats but I didn't think there was much set that entered and exited the stage and therefore needed somewhere to be stored off stage? IIRC they were upstage right behind the set. The part of the set for Cats that wasn't on the revolve followed the curve of the revolve so it cut off the upstage corners of the stage and the band were back there.
|
|
134 posts
|
Post by magnificentdonkey on Oct 25, 2021 20:11:00 GMT
It's not an anomaly at all, the only recent show of his (well, relatively recent) to feature a larger ensemble was Love Never Dies, a sequel to his megahit musical Phantom. I'd love to hear Cinderella orchestrated LND-style...
|
|
622 posts
|
Post by chernjam on Oct 25, 2021 20:45:59 GMT
It is interesting reading everyone's comments about the orchestra size/ orchestrations. Over here in NYC, the Phantom just re-opened and I have to say I was amazed at the amount of PR surrounding it and ALW making thinly veiled comments at his joy that this production was reopening the way it was with the orchestra that it has (is it the only one around the globe with a full orchestra now?) He didn't go so far as to say it's better than London, which I couldn't imagine him doing after they just reopened. But you got the sense from the PR before the London reopen and this one, that he was far more excited. And from the looks online Phantom is sold out through the end of this year (at least when I was trying to find tickets it seemed that way) My point - I never thought that the West End would go cheaper on productions than NY. And if it really is a union thing, I'm really curious how Cinderella would make out transferring here with a larger orchestra. Having only heard the score on the recording (which I have listened through many times) there's a lot of beautiful melodies - this morning randomly Far too late was an ear worm even though I haven't listened in over a week But I agree that even the recording sounds sub-par compared to Sunset or any of ALW's musicals.
|
|
287 posts
|
Post by singingbird on Oct 25, 2021 21:47:04 GMT
I think perhaps that a lot of our disappointment with Cinderella lies with the scale of ALW’s previous output, and our expectation that this would be the same. It is an anomaly because it isn’t the same. It is cheap and synthetic sounding when it doesn’t have to be. How do you know it doesn't have to be? What information do you have about the investments? It's not an anomaly at all, the only recent show of his (well, relatively recent) to feature a larger ensemble was Love Never Dies, a sequel to his megahit musical Phantom. Even Whistle Down the Wind had a very small ensemble with keyboards standing in for acoustic instruments and terrible sounding synthesized strings. I don't think Cinderella sounds cheap because the orchestrations are so clever that they more than compensate for the shortcomings of sound production. Stephen Ward, on the other hand, did sound cheap and synthetic in some respects. Orchestra size isn't synonymous with a good sound per se. I would never expect Cinderella to be orchestrated for the same number of musicians as LND (although I am very surprised that the full orchestra wasn't utilised more on the recording... albums that have sold far fewer copies than this probably will have spent far longer in the studio than the Cinderella team did). Cinderella would probably sound great simply with a decent rhythm section, string quartet, percussion and a couple of woodwind and brass players. What sounds terrible (and always has done, as far as I'm concerned, although I know that's personal taste) is samples or synth parts trying to replicate other instruments, especially when they dominate so thoroughly. Synth parts that are supposed to sound like electronic music are fine. Synth parts directly replacing other instruments just sounds awful on anything other than a demo, unless it's done very subtly and carefully. Stephen Ward was also guilty of having Cinderella's dreadful synth brass, but it was far less integral to the score than in Cinderella, so I could overlook it somewhat (although I did think, why not just bring in a trumpet player?!?). Personally, I think Whistle sounded great, both in the theatre and on the recording.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 25, 2021 22:26:13 GMT
How do you know it doesn't have to be? What information do you have about the investments? It's not an anomaly at all, the only recent show of his (well, relatively recent) to feature a larger ensemble was Love Never Dies, a sequel to his megahit musical Phantom. Even Whistle Down the Wind had a very small ensemble with keyboards standing in for acoustic instruments and terrible sounding synthesized strings. I don't think Cinderella sounds cheap because the orchestrations are so clever that they more than compensate for the shortcomings of sound production. Stephen Ward, on the other hand, did sound cheap and synthetic in some respects. Orchestra size isn't synonymous with a good sound per se. I would never expect Cinderella to be orchestrated for the same number of musicians as LND (although I am very surprised that the full orchestra wasn't utilised more on the recording... albums that have sold far fewer copies than this probably will have spent far longer in the studio than the Cinderella team did). Cinderella would probably sound great simply with a decent rhythm section, string quartet, percussion and a couple of woodwind and brass players. What sounds terrible (and always has done, as far as I'm concerned, although I know that's personal taste) is samples or synth parts trying to replicate other instruments, especially when they dominate so thoroughly. Synth parts that are supposed to sound like electronic music are fine. Synth parts directly replacing other instruments just sounds awful on anything other than a demo, unless it's done very subtly and carefully. Stephen Ward was also guilty of having Cinderella's dreadful synth brass, but it was far less integral to the score than in Cinderella, so I could overlook it somewhat (although I did think, why not just bring in a trumpet player?!?). Personally, I think Whistle sounded great, both in the theatre and on the recording. I agree with you about Whistle Down The Wind, I have no complaints about that either. However, the point I was making is that Whistle Down The Wind didn't have a string section and, objectively speaking, the string sound is not reproduced all that well by synths, whether I mind that or not. It also had synth parts representing acoustic instruments for the same reason as in Cinderella. However, it was a larger ensemble, that's true. ALW would have a larger ensemble if he could. The point I was also making is that synth parts replacing other instruments has nothing to do with the orchestration itself, the part writing. With the right investment, you could simply do a revival of Cinderella in which the synth parts are all transcribed for the acoustic instruments they represent without changing the orchestration.
|
|
254 posts
|
Post by lolalou on Oct 26, 2021 0:25:29 GMT
|
|
19,752 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Oct 26, 2021 6:19:41 GMT
“it fancies itself a musical comedy, like “Guys and Dolls” or “Hairspray.” But at the matinee I attended, the silent crowd might as well have been watching Ibsen.”
😮
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Oct 26, 2021 6:24:08 GMT
That's an interesting review (and is it notable that they saw Georgina and not Carrie?) and I think fair - there's a good show in there with a lot to like, but there are problems. I am surprised they essentially found it emotional but not funny though - I had the opposite take. Plenty of comedy but I'd maybe like a little more emotion.
|
|
19,752 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Oct 26, 2021 6:28:47 GMT
I wonder if CHF heard that the New York Post was going to be in and removed herself from the proceedings 😁
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 26, 2021 8:28:39 GMT
That's about the worst review I have ever seen on the show, could hardly call it a review even. It adds no weight to what people have been saying on the forum since the posts on this forum have argued the case more persuasively. I've never said that the show is perfect or that it couldn't be improved and I'm sure that yes, it could do with work in some areas prior to a Broadway transfer. However, his arguments about what they should do are poor, assertions nothing more. This guy calls the worst song in the show 'I know I have a heart' one of the highlights. That already says a lot.
|
|
|
Post by danb on Oct 26, 2021 9:13:08 GMT
As my therapist often says…”is it a fact or an opinion?”.
|
|
|
Post by scarpia on Oct 26, 2021 9:45:33 GMT
It's not a terrible review and won't kill off the show. I agree a lot with its sentiments. There probably is a satisfying show down there somewhere but to work they need to ditch the director and hire someone capable and rethink the design and production values. The melodies are great but the score and book are both in need of some editing and rewrites. There was way too much telling rather than showing, and you could spot a song coming from a mile off.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Oct 26, 2021 10:13:39 GMT
I take back what I said about the review. I only read the first part of the review and thought it ended there, that's why I had such a negative opinion of it. It made the review seem like nothing more than a set of assertions. I now see he does go on to provide a detailed account of his reasons for not liking the show overall. I am in agreement with him about the music (except 'I Know I Have a Heart').
|
|
287 posts
|
Post by singingbird on Oct 26, 2021 10:35:21 GMT
The point I was also making is that synth parts replacing other instruments has nothing to do with the orchestration itself, the part writing. With the right investment, you could simply do a revival of Cinderella in which the synth parts are all transcribed for the acoustic instruments they represent without changing the orchestration. Absolutely agree, although in a sense this is purely a case of semantics - how one defines the word 'orchestration.' I think it's a worrying trend, though, that people increasingly think synth parts (however they are produced) are viable substitutes for acoustic instruments. Even the best samples in the world don't sound the same as the real thing - they have a fundamentally different tonal quality. This quality can be useful to an orchestrator. If I was orchestrating a fairy tale set in a dystopian future ruled by computers then the Cinderella-style fanfares, with the sampled trumpets, would be exactly the sound I was looking for. For a fairy tale set in a perfect, sunny, fairy tale world, where everything is pristine, then you really need real trumpets.
|
|