1,089 posts
|
Post by tonyloco on Feb 11, 2019 15:27:47 GMT
Following on from conversations elsewhere, especially with tmesis, Dawnstar, ctas, Tibidabo and TallPaul, I thought I would set down some recollections of Dame Margot Fonteyn, a dancer with special qualities that set her apart from all other ballerinas I have ever seen. She was not a great technician, although her 32 fouettées as Odile were fine and her balances en pointe in the Rose Adagio were rock solid. No, she somehow just embodied the beauty of classical ballet dancing and was also superb at characterisation in characters as varied as Odette/Odile, Aurora, the Firebird, Juliet, Ondine and of course Marguerite. The one role in which I felt she failed was Giselle where, for some reason, she seemed like a very old lady, but others disagreed!
I first saw her in Australia in 1957 when she and Michael Somes, together with Rowena Jackson and Bryan Ashbridge, joined the excellent Australian Borovansky Ballet Company for what I think was a two-week season. For one week Fonteyn and Somes danced Act II of Swan Lake and then for a second week they danced the last act of Sleeping Beauty, into which the Rose Adagio was inserted after the first night when the public and the critics complained that the single pas de deux was hardly enough of the famous pair.
Then when I came to London in March 1960, I saw Fonteyn's Sleeping Beauty, which was incredible to see this 40-year-old ballerina being a 16-year-old girl, followed shortly afterwards with her Giselle which was awful. She seemed like an old lady and it just didn't work for me. I have to say here that my favourite Giselle has to be Svetlana Beriosova although probably the best danced was by Natalia Makarova with what was then the Kirov.
Returning to Fonteyn in 1960, she was brilliant in Ondine, a role that Ashton had created to make the best use of her particular physical qualities and was very good in Swan Lake. I also have vivid memories of Daphnis and Chloe and Cinderella. As we know, instead of retiring around that time after she reached 40, she began a completely new career dancing with Nureyev and, apart from Giselle, most of her roles opposite Nureyev were quite spectacular. Marguerite and Armand was sensational but probably the most exciting night I ever spent at the theatre was the first night of Macmillan's Romeo and Juliet in February 1965. It was three hours of thrilling excitement, with the entire company at the top of their form and Rudy and Margot being the star-crossed lovers to perfection. Again, Margot was totally convincing as a young girl falling deeply in love, and Rudy was Rudy!
One of Fonteyn's qualities was the physical expression of whatever emotion she was portraying. Her Aurora was glowing with joy, her Odette was quivering with fear at her first encounter with Siegfried, her Odile was a wicked temptress and her Firebird was also terrified to be captured by the Prince. The ultimate in this was probably Marguerite, which was mainly Fonteyn emoting and it was totally draining. In my experience, most other ballerinas tend to remain rather po-faced in ballets like Swan Lake and Sleeping Beauty and I often wondered whether Ninette de Valois had forbidden the other ballerinas in the company to imitate Fonteyn and her physical emoting. Another of her qualities was musicality. She filled every phrase of her dancing, and even when she was on stage but not actually dancing she remained inside the music in a way that very few other dancers seem to be, although I do see this quality to a certain extent in Jane Torville!
I feel particularly lucky to have seen so much of Fonteyn, albeit in the later part of her career, and while I fully appreciate that there have been and still are other very fine ballerinas, I believe Margot Fonteyn was something very special because of her matchless artistry.
|
|
379 posts
|
Post by ctas on Feb 13, 2019 14:04:24 GMT
Thank you for sharing! My mother saw Fonteyn in the 60’s I believe and the opera house programme is one of her prized possessions!
Leading on from this, what do people think of the planned Fonteyn celebrations? The ROH are doing a performance that so far includes the Firebird but I’m not sure what else. Predictions, anyone?
|
|
1,347 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Feb 16, 2019 16:01:21 GMT
I'm interested to know tonyloco how hard it was to get tickets for Fonteyn (with or without Nureyev.) I'm guessing it wasn't that hard. It was always easy enough to get tickets for Dowell/Sibley. These days it seems to be harder - it's sometimes difficult to get tickets when Vadim Muntagirov, Natalia Osipova and Marianela Nunez are performing even with a 'Friends' membership. With opera performances I never found it hard to get tickets for Sutherland, Domingo, Carreras, Te Kanawa, Caballe or even Pavarotti but now, if Pappano is conducting (even a not very distinguished cast) it's hard to get anything reasonably priced. I did manage to get something reasonably priced for La Forza, with Kaufmann/Netrebko, but there was not much left.
|
|
1,089 posts
|
Post by tonyloco on Feb 18, 2019 1:04:35 GMT
I'm interested to know tonyloco how hard it was to get tickets for Fonteyn (with or without Nureyev.) I'm guessing it wasn't that hard. It was always easy enough to get tickets for Dowell/Sibley. These days it seems to be harder - it's sometimes difficult to get tickets when Vadim Muntagirov, Natalia Osipova and Marianela Nunez are performing even with a 'Friends' membership. With opera performances I never found it hard to get tickets for Sutherland, Domingo, Carreras, Te Kanawa, Caballe or even Pavarotti but now, if Pappano is conducting (even a not very distinguished cast) it's hard to get anything reasonably priced. I did manage to get something reasonably priced for La Forza, with Kaufmann/Netrebko, but there was not much left. A few days ago, I wrote up a long post describing the way bookings at the Royal Opera House worked for ballet and opera when I first arrived in London in 1960 but decided it was too boring to post so I deleted it and now I find that you are actually asking about that very subject. Back in 1960, all tickets for every performance at the ROH was sold only to personal callers at the box office. The tickets for opera and ballet went on sale separately covering periods of about two months and those who wanted the best seats for the most popular performances went to the ROH on the first day of the new booking period. Generally a queue would form at the three separate box office windows (Gallery & Upper Slips, Amphitheatre and Lower Slips and 'Downstairs'. At something like 8.30 am 'queue tickets' were handed out to every person queuing at that time with a printed time to return to the box office later in the day after it opened at 10 am and anybody who arrived between 8.30 am and 10 am would likewise be given a queue ticket to return at a designated time. For major events people would start queueing several days in advance and there were strict rules as to how the queues worked. There was a list for each of the three queues and you signed on when you arrived. The lists were held by 'regulars' who were willing to hang around the vicinity of the box offices until relieved by other list holders. Once you had signed on you were supposed to remain somewhere in the Covent Garden area but most serious queuers went to performances at the ROH or elsewhere in the West End. You could even go home briefly if necessary but it was absolutely necessary to spend the night near the Opera House sleeping in the street although a few lucky people actually had cars in which they spent the night. I had a kit consisting of a lilo and a sleeping bag and extra warm clothing and on a couple of occasions I actually bagged one of the doorways in Floral Street. For morning ablutions etc the most popular toilets were those in the Covent Garden Plaza at the back of the Actors' Church. The longest queue I ever did was for the first complete Solti Ring when I slept out three nights (Friday, Saturday and Sunday) for tickets going on sale on Monday morning at 10 am. But despite the whole queuing performance, it was generally good enough to go to the box office on the first day of booking to get reasonable seats for everything. An early bus or tube to arrive before 8.30 am in order to get a queue tickets was best but otherwise one could just go to the box office much later in the day after the queue tickets had all been used and even for the next day or so after booking opened there would still be reasonable seats available for most things. So what happened to upset this system? Well, for the ballet it was the arrival of Nureyev and for the opera it was the Callas Tosca in 1964. People who lived outside London started to make a fuss that they wanted to see Nureyev dance and could not get to the box office weeks before the performance they wanted to attend, and wives of Members of Parliament became incensed that they could not get tickets to see Callas after they read the reviews! The result was that the Opera House had to set up a system of postal booking which meant that in theory everybody had an equal chance of getting the tickets they wanted for each new booking period but of course it was very much a lottery. Then they invented the Friends, and then on-line booking became the norm for all theatrical performances and we all know the joys of that, including electronic queuing, which of course is more comfortable sitting at home with a computer than sleeping in Floral Street but perhaps less of an adventure! But going back to your original question, tmesis, the answer is that it was not all that hard in 1960 to get to see Fonteyn or Christoff or Gobbi or Vickers or Freni or Alva or de los Angeles or Crespin or Nilsson and I had no trouble just a few days before the performance in booking a front row seat in the Stalls Circle to hear Jussi Björling and Rosanna Carteri sing La Bohème on 18 March 1960….just imagine that!
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 18, 2019 7:23:42 GMT
it was too boring to post Never. Ever. Ever. I actually bagged one of the doorways in Floral Street. I'm snorting into my coffee here. 🤣 I never had you down as a bag lady Tony! Is there anything you haven't done? Thank you for posting.
|
|
1,089 posts
|
Post by tonyloco on Feb 18, 2019 10:01:59 GMT
PS One of the benefits of queueing at the ROH back in the 1960s was that one got to know the hard-core regulars of both ballet and opera – there's nothing better for getting to know people with similar interests than sleeping with them in Floral Street for a night or two!
I guess there were probably at least 20 or so such regulars for both the opera and the ballet that I knew either by name or at least by sight and some of them had rather un-PC nicknames like 'The Seahorse' or 'The Fat Boy' or 'The Queen of the Night' or 'Mad Heather'. But we were all very friendly and supportive and there was also a practice among the regulars of selling or buying extra tickets from each other. For each new group of performances, including cast changes, the regulars would buy several tickets spread across the schedule. Then for those things that we didn't like much we would sell our extra tickets to other regulars or we could also buy extra tickets, as I did when Sutherland sang I puritani and I just had to get to every performance! This trading tickets among the regulars could take place at any time and of course the regulars would gather during the intervals to discuss the performances. I am talking now mainly about the Amphitheatre regulars, although after the old Gallery got incorporated into the Amphitheatre then it became just one group. We never knew any of the posh people who were regulars 'downstairs' although no doubt they also had a clique!
The other practice that was well established, but which the ROH put a stop to in more recent times although I don't know whether it has survived in any form, was arriving in Floral Street an hour or so before a performance and waving a ticket if one was selling or waving a pound note if one was buying! On arrival, one would firstly look out for any regulars to see if they were buying or selling and then face the general public if necessary. Over several years I don't think I ever failed either to buy or sell for any performance, although if Amphitheatre tickets were not forthcoming then I would sometimes splurge out on a seat in the Balcony Stalls or Stalls Circle or even the main Stalls, which sellers would sometimes offer at a discount!
As readers can imagine, in those days attending the ROH for both opera and ballet did become a major part of one's life and, as I said earlier in this thread, for me the climax of it all was the Macmillan Romeo and Juliet for which I attended nine out of the first twelve performances. The three that I missed were the Lynn Seymour ones because despite the fact that Seymour was Macmillan's muse and he created the role of Juliet for her, she was by far the least satisfactory of the first group of Juliets, which I think were Fonteyn (4 performances), Seymour (4 performances), Merle Park (2 performances) and Antoinette Sibley (2 performances).
|
|
1,347 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Feb 18, 2019 10:53:03 GMT
Thank you so much tonyloco for some absolutely amazing reminiscences. I remember in the 70s the ticket/dosh waving for that evening's performance. I also think when the amphitheatre had its own 'tradesman's' entrance (with a hundred or so steps!) in Floral Street there was a lot more camaraderie, since that was where the real opera/ballet lovers were. Now, of course, in these more egalitarian times, everyone goes in the same (posh) entrance.
|
|