|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2017 9:56:19 GMT
See the review for
Dessert on WOS
and compare that to the review in The Times
4 v 1 star
This sums up everything about WOS
In a nutshell
It is like Time Out
Free and good for using if you run out out paper when camping
No one takes it seriously
|
|
2,706 posts
|
Post by Cardinal Pirelli on Jul 19, 2017 10:30:24 GMT
The Times seeming directive to employ antagonistic reviewers just makes reading them pointless. There is no worth in reading the writings of people who purportedly like so little. It's usually Treneman (who is unreadable) but Maxwell seems to have ridden behind, taking that same trajectory too.
The WOS reviewers are much more interested in theatre and not themselves. I may not always agree but they aren't trying to get noticed by pushing to the extremes and crying out like spoiled brats. It's political (again), they want to be divisive and will do anything to get noticed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2017 11:00:17 GMT
Agree, the Times has become pointless for theatre reviews - they might as well get Katie Hopkins to do it. All jumping up and down for attention, no thought or insight at all.
|
|
7,570 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Jul 19, 2017 11:27:25 GMT
The Times never seems to give a musical more than 2 stars.
|
|
4,603 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Jul 20, 2017 6:26:47 GMT
I refuse to have anything to do with the Murdoch empire
|
|
4,973 posts
|
Post by TallPaul on Jul 20, 2017 12:31:55 GMT
The Times never seems to give a musical more than 2 stars. Except Fiddler, which got 4 stars. |
|
7,570 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Jul 20, 2017 12:42:36 GMT
The Times never seems to give a musical more than 2 stars. Except Fiddler, which got 4 stars. I know. What happened there? |
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Jul 20, 2017 13:35:21 GMT
I refuse to have anything to do with the Murdoch empire Exactly. I won't have the Murdoch empire in the house.
Nice to see parsley's poems again.
|
|
