|
Post by Jan on Nov 28, 2016 7:38:42 GMT
Bit perplexed at some on the left, who are horrified by Trump, rushing to praise Castro. The latter actually did send gays to concentration camps, just one of a legion of human rights abuses during his reign.
|
|
19,778 posts
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 7:48:14 GMT
Post by BurlyBeaR on Nov 28, 2016 7:48:14 GMT
Corbyn even going to the funeral. Showing his true colours.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 9:51:08 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 9:51:08 GMT
Isn't this standard behaviour? Unless you started a world war or ate the hearts of your enemies, for a week or two after the moment of your death the international community agrees to ignore everything negative and praise you to the skies. The cynic in me suspects this is less a matter of respect for the dead and more an opportunity for influential people to have some informal discussions while politely ignoring the now-irrelevant mouldering corpse in the corner.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on Nov 28, 2016 11:03:49 GMT
Castro is the most important world figure to die since... I don't know who. Whatever you think of him, the man played a huge role in the 20th century. There's nothing cynical about making it a big deal - it IS a big deal.
|
|
111 posts
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 11:09:30 GMT
Post by andromedadench on Nov 28, 2016 11:09:30 GMT
Castro is the most important world figure to die since... I don't know who. Whatever you think of him, the man played a huge role in the 20th century. There's nothing cynical about making it a big deal - it IS a big deal. And once again, mallardo voices my exact thoughts, only more concisely and to the point, and in much better English.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Snow on Nov 28, 2016 11:33:17 GMT
Castro is the most important world figure to die since... I don't know who. Whatever you think of him, the man played a huge role in the 20th century. There's nothing cynical about making it a big deal - it IS a big deal. I love Cuba and the Cubans so on their behalf I ask where is the evidence for what you say? The main international role he played was to bring us closer to all out nuclear war than at any other time and urged Khruschev to be the first to push the button. Cuba was a corrupt dictatorship that killed and tortured their people when he took over from Battista and it remained so when he died. The rest of the world improved their living standards immeasurably more than Cuba managed during that same period. HE relied on handouts from Russia and Venezuela. He was a windbag and exploiter of women too. The youth of the country, including his Children, have looked abroad to live. He has not built a legacy that is sustainable by anything other than keeping the strict police state that exists today. RIP
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 11:38:11 GMT
Post by mallardo on Nov 28, 2016 11:38:11 GMT
Evidence for what? I said he was a HUGE world figure - and he was. And, btw, I love your disclaimer.
|
|
950 posts
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 11:47:50 GMT
Post by vdcni on Nov 28, 2016 11:47:50 GMT
I think it's fair to mark his impact on history and I can understand why some have been keen to appreciate that he held out against the US despite all the pressure over the years but yes some of them have been too keen to overlook the negatives of his time in power. I would say I was disappointed in Corbyn but there's no more respect for him to lose after this last year.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 11:50:53 GMT
Post by Mr Snow on Nov 28, 2016 11:50:53 GMT
Evidence for what? I said he was a HUGE world figure - and he was. And, btw, I love your disclaimer. You said he "played a HUGE role". Yes he got a lot of press, but history will only remember him for the bay of pigs and Cubans will want to forget him ASAP. His influence on others is Zero. So unless I've missed it please tell me what this HUGE role involved. It’s also amusing to note that the style of music that Ry Cooder drew our attention to is from the early part of the 20th C. The actual Buena Vista Social Club closed in the 1940’s. i.e. What everyone thinks of a Cuban Music was brought to us by an American. God knows how many tourists have been there because of it and the people are thankful for them. I would wager that most young Cubans listen to Gloria Estefan and her ilk.
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 12:06:45 GMT
Post by mallardo on Nov 28, 2016 12:06:45 GMT
How history remembers him will depend on how history evolves from here. But I guess your crystal ball knows better.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 14:12:09 GMT
Post by Jan on Nov 28, 2016 14:12:09 GMT
Here's what Corbyn said:
“Fidel Castro was a massive figure in the history of the whole planet, ever since the revolution in 1959. There are stories of his heroism while living in Mexico in exile and then the boat to Cuba, the march to Havana… For all his flaws, Castro’s support for Angola played a crucial role in bringing an end to Apartheid in South Africa and he will be remembered both as an internationalist and a champion of social justice.”
Sending gay people to concentration camps must have been one of the "flaws".
Justin Trudeau, PM of Canada was even more positive:
“It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President. Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation. While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.
Deep sorrow. Right.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 14:20:14 GMT
It's customary to reflect on people's best achievements when they die.
Neither of those two tributes praises anything that might be considered a flaw.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Nov 28, 2016 17:50:31 GMT
It's customary to reflect on people's best achievements when they die. Neither of those two tributes praises anything that might be considered a flaw. Neither of these tributes even mentions anything that might be considered a flaw - jailing people for having HIV for example. Sometimes the bad outweighs the good, when Peter Sutcliffe dies I would expect the "tributes" to at least mention he had been a murderer, though not on the scale of Castro of course.
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Nov 28, 2016 19:06:56 GMT
He was a massive figure in history, but so was Hitler.
You can mark the passing of an important historical figure without praising them or making it sound like you condone their actions.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 20:24:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jan on Nov 28, 2016 20:24:29 GMT
He was a massive figure in history, but so was Hitler. You can mark the passing of an important historical figure without praising them or making it sound like you condone their actions. It would be better to also condemn them and point out their crimes.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 20:38:10 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 20:38:10 GMT
Active politicians must be diplomatic so as to aid the best future outcomes.
This is why we are worried about the President Elect of the USA.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 28, 2016 20:51:35 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2016 20:51:35 GMT
He was a massive figure in history, but so was Hitler. You can mark the passing of an important historical figure without praising them or making it sound like you condone their actions. It would be better to also condemn them and point out their crimes. I think it's generally assumed that most people haven't been living under a rock and that everyone will understand that every bit of praise carries an implied "Shame he undermined it by being a total ****".
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Nov 29, 2016 8:41:00 GMT
It would be better to also condemn them and point out their crimes. I think it's generally assumed that most people haven't been living under a rock and that everyone will understand that every bit of praise carries an implied "Shame he undermined it by being a total ****". But why does that have to be only implied rather than explicitly stated ? In the case of some who have commented in the media it is simply due to the well-known psychological condition of self-serving bias. This can affect both sides of course - Pinochet and Castro were equivalent dictators in terms of their crimes but the general coverage of their deaths was largely polarised based on the commenter's own political stance.
|
|
|
Castro
Nov 29, 2016 10:29:06 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2016 10:29:06 GMT
I think it's generally assumed that most people haven't been living under a rock and that everyone will understand that every bit of praise carries an implied "Shame he undermined it by being a total ****". But why does that have to be only implied rather than explicitly stated ? In the case of some who have commented in the media it is simply due to the well-known psychological condition of self-serving bias. This can affect both sides of course - Pinochet and Castro were equivalent dictators in terms of their crimes but the general coverage of their deaths was largely polarised based on the commenter's own political stance. Castro wasn't just a brutal dictator. There are also people to whom he was a friend or family, and for them this is a time of genuine sadness and grieving. It's a bit tasteless to turn up at a funeral and go on about how happy everyone should be now he's dead, no matter how true it may be. Nothing can be gained by repeating what everyone already knows, and the only thing that can be achieved by it is to cause unnecessary pain to the mourners.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Nov 29, 2016 13:45:19 GMT
But why does that have to be only implied rather than explicitly stated ? In the case of some who have commented in the media it is simply due to the well-known psychological condition of self-serving bias. This can affect both sides of course - Pinochet and Castro were equivalent dictators in terms of their crimes but the general coverage of their deaths was largely polarised based on the commenter's own political stance. Castro wasn't just a brutal dictator. There are also people to whom he was a friend or family, and for them this is a time of genuine sadness and grieving. It's a bit tasteless to turn up at a funeral and go on about how happy everyone should be now he's dead, no matter how true it may be. Nothing can be gained by repeating what everyone already knows, and the only thing that can be achieved by it is to cause unnecessary pain to the mourners. I am not suggesting that, I'm suggesting that people shouldn't turn up at the funeral of this particular tyrant at all (that's how his daughter described him incidentally)
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Nov 29, 2016 19:31:47 GMT
Well maybe his family are sad but then they can hold a private ceremony. Expecting the leaders of the world to attend this guys' funeral on our behalf and sit thorough any eulogy whiffs to high heaven.
|
|