194 posts
|
Post by thebearofwestend on Sept 1, 2016 4:32:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Sept 1, 2016 4:40:32 GMT
I've seen a lot worst in some of the West End's most recent hits. (I'm thinking of one in particular.)
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Sept 1, 2016 5:00:10 GMT
OMG NO! That's the Julie Andrews version?
|
|
194 posts
|
Post by thebearofwestend on Sept 1, 2016 5:13:32 GMT
yes its okay but was expecting a lot more
|
|
194 posts
|
Post by thebearofwestend on Sept 1, 2016 5:14:02 GMT
I've seen a lot worst in some of the West End's most recent hits. (I'm thinking of one in particular.) I am not sure I know the one you mean |
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Sept 1, 2016 5:20:15 GMT
I've seen a lot worst in some of the West End's most recent hits. (I'm thinking of one in particular.) I am not sure I know the one you mean Good. I wasn't being specific. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2016 15:27:38 GMT
I mean, it's not like it's being directed by Ivo Van Hove or anything. I really don't see an issue?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2016 20:38:48 GMT
I like the dolls house sort of style of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 0:38:06 GMT
I hadn't realised Alex Jennings had been cast in this produciton.
But I thought the purpose of this production was to almost replicate the sets and costumes from the very first version? In that way, it's no surprise the set looks a bit dated.
|
|
471 posts
|
Post by mistressjojo on Sept 2, 2016 2:33:39 GMT
I can't see anything wrong with this.
It's My Fair Lady - it was hardly going to have a radical modern staging was it?
Plus it's only running for 2 months, then touring to other states in the new year. So needs to be packable. If that makes sense.
|
|
194 posts
|
Post by thebearofwestend on Sept 3, 2016 6:24:24 GMT
but they could have done this
|
|
