|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 9:22:53 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 9:22:53 GMT
THere will be ongoing negotiations and I agree with Cardinal's points above. I think the Brexit Bill needs to be sorted before there is any Election. If it cannot get passed and hits stalemate then have an Election. I do wonder if there might be some consensus to get it done to nullify Mr Farage's vote at the next election. This could be beneficial to both Labour and the Tories. As regards TV political bias I've heard so many people say one side favours one party or the other I tend to discount it now. This parliament, which is supposedly so out of date now, was elected two years and four months ago, the referendum is a year older. If the latter is still current then the former must be so. There is no majority in parliament because there is no majority in the country for any option, parliament is merely reflecting the stalemate of the country. Any election would still retain that lack of majority. Wanting one now is just a displacement activity. The solution should be to now debate the bill in detail and amend it so that it reflects parliament’s position. After that would be the time to put it to the people (my preference being a referendum where you can get a straight answer, rather than an election, which is likely to be more inconclusive).
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 10:05:50 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 26, 2019 10:05:50 GMT
Anyone remember the platform most of this Parliament was elected on - the 2017 Labour and Conservative manifesto pledges?
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 10:57:29 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 10:57:29 GMT
Anyone remember the platform most of this Parliament was elected on - the 2017 Labour and Conservative manifesto pledges? You’re surely not stuck on this idea that parties which lose an election should be made to enact their losing manifestos are you? Governments enact manifestos, losers start again. Given that the government has now completely fallen apart and thrown overboard its majority through arrogance and incompetence, what was imagined two and a half years ago is, in any case, no longer practical. That is an acceptable reason for a new election, yet the likelihood of that new election also giving no majority for any option suggests it would be no more than time wasting. No way forwards there. Debate the bill, amend the bill, pass the bill. Anything else is getting us nowhere.
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 10:57:58 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 26, 2019 10:57:58 GMT
Conservatives:
We want to agree a deep and special partnership with the European Union. This partnership will benefit both the European Union and the United Kingdom: while we are leaving the European Union, we are not leaving Europe, and we want to remain committed partners and allies to our friends across the continent.
The negotiations will undoubtedly be tough, and there will be give and take on both sides, but we continue to believe that no deal is better than a bad deal for the UK. But we will enter the negotiations in a spirit of sincere cooperation and committed to getting the best deal for Britain. We will make sure we have certainty and clarity over our future, control of our own laws, and a more unified, strengthened United Kingdom.
We will control immigration and secure the entitlements of EU nationals in Britain and British nationals in the EU. We will maintain the Common Travel Area and maintain as frictionless a border as possible for people, goods and services between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Workers’ rights conferred on British citizens from our membership of the EU will remain. We will pursue free trade with European markets, and secure new trade agreements with other countries. We want to work together in the fight against crime and terrorism, collaborate in science and innovation – and secure a smooth, orderly Brexit. And we will protect the democratic freedom of the people of Gibraltar and our overseas territories to remain British, for as long as that is their wish.
The final agreement will be subject to a vote in both houses of parliament. As we leave the European Union, we will no longer be members of the single market or customs union but we will seek a deep and special partnership including a comprehensive free trade and customs agreement. There may be specific European programmes in which we might want to participate and if so, it will be reasonable that we make a contribution. We will determine a fair settlement of the UK’s rights and obligations as a departing member state, in accordance with the law and in the spirit of the UK’s continuing partnership with the EU. The principle, however, is clear: the days of Britain making vast annual contributions to the European Union will end.
We want fair, orderly negotiations, minimising disruption and giving as much certainty as possible – so both sides benefit. We believe it is necessary to agree the terms of our future partnership alongside our withdrawal, reaching agreement on both within the two years allowed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
Labour:
Labour accepts the referendum result and a Labour government will put the national interest first. We will prioritise jobs and living standards, build a close new relationship with the EU, protect workers’ rights and environmental standards, provide certainty to EU nationals and give a meaningful role to Parliament throughout negotiations.
We will end Theresa May’s reckless approach to Brexit, and seek to unite the country around a Brexit deal that works for every community in Britain.
We will scrap the Conservatives’ Brexit White Paper and replace it with fresh negotiating priorities that have a strong emphasis on retaining the benefits of the Single Market and the Customs Union – which are essential for maintaining industries, jobs and businesses in Britain. Labour will always put jobs and the economy first.
A Labour government will immediately guarantee existing rights for all EU nationals living in Britain and secure reciprocal rights for UK citizens who have chosen to make their lives in EU countries. EU nationals do not just contribute to our society: they are part of our society. And they should not be used as bargaining chips.
It is shameful that the Prime Minister rejected repeated attempts by Labour to resolve this issue before Article 50 was triggered. As a result three million EU nationals have suffered unnecessary uncertainty, as have the 1.2 million UK citizens living in the EU.
A Conservative Brexit will weaken workers’ rights, deregulate the economy, slash corporate taxes, sideline Parliament and democratic accountability, and cut Britain off from our closest allies and most important trading partners.
Labour recognises that leaving the EU with ‘no deal’ is the worst possible deal for Britain and that it would do damage to our economy and trade. We will reject ‘no deal’ as a viable option and if needs be negotiate transitional arrangements to avoid a ‘cliff-edge’ for the UK economy.
The issues that affect our continent now will continue to do so in the future – and Labour will continue to work constructively with the EU and other European nations on issues such as climate change, refugee crises and counter-terrorism. We will build a close co-operative future relationship with the EU, not as members but as partners.
A Labour government will ensure that the UK maintains our leading research role by seeking to stay part of Horizon 2020 and its successor programmes and by welcoming research staff to the UK. We will seek to maintain membership of (or equivalent relationships with) European organisations which offer benefits to the UK such as Euratom and the European Medicines Agency. We will seek to ensure that Britain remains part of the Erasmus scheme so that British students have the same educational opportunities after we leave the EU.
The EU is the UK’s single largest trading partner in agricultural produce, with the vast majority of British exports being sold to European markets. A Labour government will end the uncertainty for our farmers and food producers by securing continued EU market access allowing British farmers and food producers to continue to sell their products on the Continent.
Labour will also protect our farmers and rural economy by ensuring Britain continues to set the highest standards in food quality and welfare. We will not allow Brexit to be used as an excuse to undercut our farmers and food Britain’s food chain with cheap and inferior produce.
We will drop the Conservatives’ Great Repeal Bill, replacing it with an EU Rights and Protections Bill that will ensure there is no detrimental change to workers’ rights, equality law, consumer rights or environmental protections as a result of Brexit.
Throughout the Brexit process, we will make sure that all UK-derived laws that are of benefit – including workplace laws, consumer rights and environmental protections – are fully protected without qualifications, limitations or sunset clauses. We will work with trade unions, businesses and stakeholders to ensure there is a consensus on this vital issue. A Labour approach to Brexit will ensure there can be no rolling back of key rights and protections and that the UK does not lag behind Europe in workplace protections and environmental standards in future.
The EU has had a huge impact in securing workplace protections and environmental safeguards. But we all know that for many Brexiteers in the Tory Party, this was why they wanted to Leave – to tear up regulations and weaken hard-fought rights and protections.
A Labour government will never consider these rights a burden or accept the weakening of workers’ rights, consumer rights or environmental protections.
We will introduce legislation to ensure there are no gaps in national security and criminal justice arrangements as a result of Brexit.
Labour recognises the vital role that cross-border agencies such as Eurojust and Europol have played in making Britain safer and that European Arrest Warrants have been invaluable. A Labour government will seek to retain membership of these agencies and continue European Arrest Warrant arrangements.
Labour will seek a Brexit deal that delivers for all regions and nations of the UK. We will introduce a ‘presumption of devolution’ where devolved powers transferred from the EU will go straight to the relevant region or nation. For many people and for much of our country, power can feel just as remote and unaccountable in Westminster as it does in Brussels. So a Labour government will seek to put powers as close to communities as possible.
We will ensure there is no drop in EU Structural Funding as a result of Brexit until the end of the current EU funding round in 2019/20. As part of Labour’s plans to rebalance and rebuild the economy, we will ensure that no region or nation of the UK is affected by the withdrawal of EU funding for the remainder of this Parliament. This will also apply to the funding of peace and reconciliation projects in Northern Ireland.
We will also improve engagement and dialogue with the devolved administrations and seek to ensure the final Brexit deal addresses specific concerns. In particular Labour will ensure there is no return to a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and that there is no change in the status or sovereignty of Gibraltar. We will also protect Gibraltar’s economy and ensure that its government can continue to create jobs and prosperity in the years to come.
Where Theresa May wants to shut down scrutiny and challenge, Labour will welcome it. We will work with Parliament, not against it. On an issue of this importance the Government can’t hide from the public or Parliament.
A Labour approach to Brexit also means legislating to guarantee that Parliament has a truly meaningful vote on the final Brexit deal.
Liberal Democrats
1.1 Giving the people the final say
Liberal Democrats are open and outward-looking. We passionately believe that Britain’s relationship with its neighbours is stronger as part of the European Union.
Whatever its imperfections, the EU remains the best framework for working effectively and co-operating in the pursuit of our shared aims. It has led directly to greater prosperity, increased trade, investment and jobs, better security and a greener environment. Britain is better off in the EU.
Liberal Democrats campaigned for the UK to remain in the EU. However, we acknowledge the result of the 2016 referendum, which gave the government a mandate to start negotiations to leave. The decision Britain took, though, was simply whether to remain in or to leave the European Union. There was no option on the ballot paper to choose the shape of our future relationship with the EU on vital issues including trade, travel or security.
While much remains uncertain about Theresa May’s approach, it is now clear that the Conservatives are campaigning for a hard Brexit. This means leaving the single market, ending freedom of movement and abandoning the customs union – even though these choices will make the UK poorer and disappoint many leave voters who wanted a different outcome.
The effects of Brexit are already being felt. The value of the pound has plummeted.
Inflation has risen. Growth in the economy has slowed and the government is already borrowing billions more to fill the gap in lost tax revenue. Young people, who voted overwhelmingly to remain, are being told their voices do not matter.
Urgent problems, such as the future of the NHS, are being neglected because of the sheer scale of the challenge posed by Brexit.
A hard Brexit will make all these problems worse. It is the wrong choice for the country. Liberal Democrats will fight to prevent a hard Brexit.
At the end of negotiations there will be a decision on the deal. The Conservatives want the decision to be taken by politicians. Liberal Democrats believe the British people should have the final say.
That’s why, when the terms of our future relationship with the EU have been negotiated (over the next two years on the Government’s timetable), we will put that deal to a vote of the British people in a referendum, with the alternative option of staying in the EU on the ballot paper. We continue to believe that there is no deal as good for the UK outside the EU as the one it already has as a member.
Every vote for the Liberal Democrats in this election is a vote to give the final say to the British people.
1.2 Fighting a hard Brexit
During negotiations, we commit ourselves to use our strength in parliament to press for keeping Britain as close as possible to Europe. Our priorities will include:
Protection of rights for EU citizens and UK citizens: We will press for the UK to unilaterally guarantee the rights of EU nationals in the UK, ending their ongoing uncertainty. We will call for the overhaul and simplification of the registration process and the requirements for EU nationals to obtain permanent residence and UK citizenship, as the current system is not fit for purpose. We will urge the government, and use our influence with Liberal leaders in European countries, to secure the same rights for UK citizens living in European Union countries.
Membership of the single market and customs union: We believe that any deal negotiated for the UK outside the EU must ensure that trade can continue without customs controls at the border, and must maintain membership of the single market, which smooths trade between the UK and the continent by providing a common ‘rule book’ for businesses and a common mechanism to ensure that everyone abides by the rules.
Freedom of movement: We support the principle of freedom of movement – to abandon it would threaten Britain’s prosperity and reputation as an open, tolerant society. Any deal negotiated for the UK outside the EU must protect the right to work, travel, study and retire across the EU. Any restrictions sought by the government must take account of the vital importance of EU workers to the British economy, including public services.
Opportunities for young people: In an increasingly globalised and complex world, it is vital that our young people are afforded the same opportunities their parents enjoyed to work, study and travel abroad. To that end we will do everything we can to protect Erasmus+ and other EU-funded schemes which increase opportunities for young people.
Defending social rights and equalities: Many important protections such as the right to 52 weeks’ maternity leave and rights to annual leave are currently based on EU law, and many of these rights have been upheld at the European Court of Justice. Liberal Democrats will fight to ensure that these entitlements are not undermined.
Maintaining environmental standards: The European Union has created the highest environmental standards in the world. We have a duty to future generations to protect our environment and tackle climate change. Liberal Democrats will ensure that everything is done to maintain those high standards in UK law, including the closest possible co-operation on climate and energy policy. Law enforcement and judicial co-operation: Europol, the European Arrest Warrant and shared access to police databases have helped make Britain’s streets safer. We will fight to maintain maximum co-operation to ensure criminals are pursued quickly and effectively, and police are not frustrated by huge amounts of red tape.
British business and jobs: We must protect support for domestic industries such as farming, tourism and the creative industries, as well as regional support for deprived areas. The City of London is Europe’s financial capital and must retain its full rights in EU financial markets. Science and research funding: Research is vital for our long-term prosperity, security and wellbeing – but the Leave vote has already started to affect existing and proposed research programmes. We will campaign against any reduction in investment in UK universities and for their right to apply for EU funds on equal terms.
Travel and tourism: Britain is an outward-looking country with commercial and leisure interests around the world, particularly in Europe. We will strive to retain traveller and tourist benefits such as the European Health Insurance Card, reduced roaming charges and pet passports, all of which are at risk by leaving the European Union.
Respect for the interests of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: We will fight to ensure that the priorities and long-term interests of the nations of the UK are fully taken into account during negotiations. We will oppose any moves that threaten the political stability of Northern Ireland. We will also campaign to protect the rights of the people of Gibraltar.
On first reflection all Parties are more or less keeping to their 2017 manifestos, therefore carrying out the ‘will of their voters’, question, is this the same as the ‘will of the people’ but as there isn’t a majority Government, we voted for this stalemate and each Party have no choice to speak for their voters as all 3 can be considered as the ‘will of the people’ in a hung Parliament.
We are complicit in the stalemate as how many Leavers / Remainers voted on the Manifesto Pledges and not the full picture which is will be exactly the same in the upcoming election.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 14:09:21 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 14:09:21 GMT
Hopefully things will move on over the next couple of weeks. Still not a fan of winter elections, the weather could easily have turned by then and could affect the result. Deep into the Xmas Party season, will people bother to vote etc. So turn out will likely be lower.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 15:16:38 GMT
Post by lynette on Oct 26, 2019 15:16:38 GMT
I think everyone will make an effort to vote. This is what we have all been going on about for three years, the need to vote. I personally prefer a GE to a Ref because I don’t think a Second Ref would be valid as we didn’t do anything to honour first but I know that is contentious. But a Ref is in that muddy area of whether it is binding or not as we have - painfully - been taught. A GE is binding. And I for one will be up the road and round the corner to the Library where our voting takes place come snow, hurricane or flood.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 15:51:47 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 26, 2019 15:51:47 GMT
Anyone remember the platform most of this Parliament was elected on - the 2017 Labour and Conservative manifesto pledges? You’re surely not stuck on this idea that parties which lose an election should be made to enact their losing manifestos are you? Governments enact manifestos, losers start again. Caroline Flint and dozens of other MPs would disagree - we've been here before, you don't seem to grasp the basics, or have any experience, of constituency level politics. That's okay, but we have been here before.
This, now, probably the most directly accountable Parliament I can recall. The Parliament after the expenses scandal had about 150 new faces as so many retired or were retired, the next one won't be on that scale but there will be a decent clear out (*retired* and deselected).
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 16:43:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 26, 2019 16:43:18 GMT
With londonpostie on this. The manifesto is the contract between the Party and the Voter and remains for the full term of the Parliamentary session. In opposition they should influence and amend any legislation brought forward in line with their manifesto promises. I would be furious if my party significantly deviated from their manifesto promises mid-term e.g. Tories becoming pro-remain, Lib Dem’s becoming pro-leave. As from above in respect of Brexit, the Parties are staying true to their manifestos in line with their voters expectation. Politics is a compromise and your most significant issue should determine who or what you vote for. In a General Election with the promises so far, if your view on Brexit is leaving the EU without another referendum even though you are naturally a liberal/socialist you have to vote for the Tories or Brexit Party .The corollary is also true. Anything else will result us continuing with the current mix of Parliamentary MP’s. We may all want a General Election which by definition is ‘general’ and if we want to get out of this Brexit mess it will have to become specific, we will have to set out voting on the Brexit manifesto promise alone despite loathing their other promises which may go against your other values. Are we prepared to do this? The Tories are hoping we will, once the campaigns get going and other equally or more important issues become visible, is a Leaver on Universal Credit going to value abolishing Universal Credit or Leaving the EU as an example. Once Austerity which has allegedly killed 130,000 people, the way bosses pay has increased almost exponentially whilst most new jobs are primarily low pay positions and require support through tax credits and food banks, students burdened with a lifetime of debt etc are openly discussed is Brexit going to be the core issue? and more importantly does it deserve to be. The Tories need a General Election whilst Brexit is a live issue, anything else is a disaster, this is why they are screaming for an Election now and will do anything to stop the Withdrawal Agreement getting through Parliament and keep the threat of no-deal alive. We need an extension to give us enough time to have a General Election in March and moves are ahead to achieve this. The word on the street is that this week an SO24 motion will be raised, The Withdrawal Act will be returned to Parliament with a realistic timetable, amended with Custom Union, Workers Rights and a Referendum to take hold of the narrative and show the Tories real Brexit position. A risky move and feeling is they will bottle it when it comes to raising the SO24 and will likely go for a Benn-Act2 of some description.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 16:48:53 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 16:48:53 GMT
You’re surely not stuck on this idea that parties which lose an election should be made to enact their losing manifestos are you? Governments enact manifestos, losers start again. Caroline Flint and dozens of other MPs would disagree - we've been here before, you don't seem to grasp the basics, or have any experience, of constituency level politics. That's okay, but we have been here before.
Maybe you didn’t see my reply last time. I was involved in constituency politics a while ago and found that the real problems often originated with the sort of person who was involved, often being ideologically motivated, therefore inflexible regarding changed circumstances, and out of touch with voters (readily seen now, as ever). You appear to mistake my disdain for being uninterested. The whole premise of Labour’s manifesto revolved around it being the ones who negotiated or being part of negotiations. They haven’t been, so where we are now is a world away from the world of 2017.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 16:56:18 GMT
Neil, we have representative democracy, I don’t expect anyone I vote for to do what I want. I elect them as someone that I hope will think for themselves and react to what changes. Yes, there’s a core position but, like people such as Flint, Grieve etc., MPs shifting away know that they will be answerable to voters when that question is next posed.
On SO24, this is virtually impossible to see through as, I am led to believe, anything connected to a decision such as this has to be presented by government.
My heart says revoke now, my head says amend and pass the bill.
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 17:18:45 GMT
via mobile
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 26, 2019 17:18:45 GMT
Cardinal, agree on a personal level there is some leeway, we come back to consensus, the manifesto is the overall direction which should be adhered to unless there are exceptional circumstance.
Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view, at the moment the dissenters in the Labour Party are equally balanced by the dissenters in the Tory Party and are rightly fighting for their constituents views.
Going back to the General Election, if we do not get one in the next few months expect even more central/left policies to become Tory policy as they try to leverage support from Labour and the Lib Dem’s.
Al I would say is ‘don’t get fooled again’
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 17:47:04 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 17:47:04 GMT
Cardinal, agree on a personal level there is some leeway, we come back to consensus, the manifesto is the overall direction which should be adhered to unless there are exceptional circumstance. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view, at the moment the dissenters in the Labour Party are equally balanced by the dissenters in the Tory Party and are rightly fighting for their constituents views. Going back to the General Election, if we do not get one in the next few months expect even more central/left policies to become Tory policy as they try to leverage support from Labour and the Lib Dem’s. Al I would say is ‘don’t get fooled again’ A fair point about malcontents being equal on either side. I fervently wish for a more proportional voting system but voters voting for a person rather than a party is something I hope we could retain in some way. I have no doubt that, with a party list, we would be in a worse position than we are, as individuals can, and have, shown that they are not beholden to their party.
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 21:48:38 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 26, 2019 21:48:38 GMT
Events are moving extremely quickly.
Latest rumour, both Lib Dems and SNP are going to offer support for a simple majority motion instead of the FTPA 2/3rds majority with a Dec 9th election date which is still in the University term time maximising the student vote.
They believe that the FTPA request is a Tory bluff, knowing full well it would be rejected, it would continue the Parliament v People narrative and distract from the 31st Date being missed.
Quite a gamble but they must believe that the Tories don’t want to fight a December Brexit election, knowing that the Brexit Party is still in play along with the historical generational split of a December election being an unknown, who will stay at home, the primarily young Remainers or the primarily elderly leavers.
A 'Brexit Election’ for the Lib Dems and the SNP maximises their chances and therefore understandable.
It all comes down to turnout, initial thoughts it may be the youngsters and remainers which favours Labour and the remain Parties. (over 2 million have demonstrated in London on the Peoples Vote and Extinction Rebellion in the past few weeks and therefore the darkness/cold/wet isn’t likely to put them off)
At least this takes control away from the Government, if offered can they refuse? Would I take the Gamble, not sure as I think if they could get their supporters to vote and distort the narrative from austerity to Brexit they might just get the majority, especially if they can get a deal with the Brexit Party.
Either way, this week the Tories will potentially be forced to show us their real intentions and make a decision, allow an amended Parliamentary Bill to be enacted or go for an election, refusal of either will destroy their narrative.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 22:16:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 22:16:34 GMT
who will stay at home, the primarily young leavers or the primarily elderly remainers. The other way round surely?
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 26, 2019 22:25:42 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 26, 2019 22:25:42 GMT
Thanks, @posterj , my mistake, corrected.
|
|
5,062 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 2:30:29 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Oct 27, 2019 2:30:29 GMT
A manifesto is only as good as the majority you have to enact it. When the Conservatives lost power at the last General Election and they entered into a coalition, their manifesto effectively went into the trash bin, along with the money tree.
|
|
311 posts
|
Post by olliebean on Oct 27, 2019 6:50:31 GMT
The coalition was three elections ago. All that happened last time was a grubby bit of bribery. It shouldn't have invalidated their manifesto - but it's rather naive to take a Tory manifesto at face value, in any case.
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 7:13:44 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 27, 2019 7:13:44 GMT
Neil, we have representative democracy, I don’t expect anyone I vote for to do what I want. I elect them as someone that I hope will think for themselves and react to what changes. This is Victorian era nonsense: 'I want other people to think for me becasue I'm just a simple person'.
People died fighting for full democracy (Deptford bridge to Peterloo and a hundred places in between) and you want to give it to - increasingly - self-interested careerists 'who knows best'. What you are really doing is selling your soul for Remain - for the Empire of Virtue. FFS.
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 8:06:12 GMT
Post by theglenbucklaird on Oct 27, 2019 8:06:12 GMT
Cardinal, agree on a personal level there is some leeway, we come back to consensus, the manifesto is the overall direction which should be adhered to unless there are exceptional circumstance. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view, at the moment the dissenters in the Labour Party are equally balanced by the dissenters in the Tory Party and are rightly fighting for their constituents views. Going back to the General Election, if we do not get one in the next few months expect even more central/left policies to become Tory policy as they try to leverage support from Labour and the Lib Dem’s. Al I would say is ‘don’t get fooled again’ You better you bet
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 8:11:52 GMT
Post by theglenbucklaird on Oct 27, 2019 8:11:52 GMT
Some really good Brexit/parliamentary debate in the last 48 hours around what is democracy, our democracy.
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 9:50:49 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Oct 27, 2019 9:50:49 GMT
Labour seriously considering moving towards supporting the Lib Dem simple majority Bill with a preference of the date of the 5th Dec which will mean Parliament being suspended this week.
Conservatives allegedly still want to go for the FTPA 2/3rds majority’s and not supporting the simple majority vote.
One ‘stunt’ guaranteed to cause an election this year and one not, who’d have thought the Tories may be the Party who stopped a pre Christmas election and also stopped the progress of the Withdrawal Bill, not sure how this gets Brexit done, looking forward to hearing the spin and what their new slogan will be if the above turns out to be true.
Only thing we can be sure is a lot more will happen today but seriously hope the current rumours are true, kudos to the Lib Dems and SNP for their excellent ruse.
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Oct 27, 2019 10:03:44 GMT
One person's "ruse" is anothers stunt.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2019 10:22:49 GMT
Neil, we have representative democracy, I don’t expect anyone I vote for to do what I want. I elect them as someone that I hope will think for themselves and react to what changes. This is Victorian era nonsense: 'I want other people to think for me becasue I'm just a simple person'.
People died fighting for full democracy (Deptford bridge to Peterloo and a hundred places in between) and you want to give it to - increasingly - self-interested careerists 'who knows best'. What you are really doing is selling your soul for Remain - for the Empire of Virtue. FFS. Stalinist nonsense. People are not an ideology, you are better represented by someone who you trust to have your best interests at heart. Representative democracy makes sure that extremes are neutered, it isn’t giving away anything. We’ve suffered the last few years because we fell for the chimera of direct democracy, something which can, and was, perverted through decades of media barrages and the simplifying of ‘the answer’ into victory. This is what Cummings knows, that you can fool people long enough. It’s the lure of extremists through the ages. ’Careerists’ are those who blindly follow a party line, the party system doesn’t like those who step out of line and, if you think this is about ‘remain’ then you are way off target. This is about something much, much bigger, the soul of liberal democracy itself. Edmund Burke, once more - “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”
|
|
|
Brexit
Oct 27, 2019 10:44:06 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Oct 27, 2019 10:44:06 GMT
After last Christmas's Brexit explanation to your working class relatives, why not explain to them this year how things would be so much better if they let people who know better decide for them. It's clearly the future of Democracy - it's certainly the way the EU has operated since the Lisbon Treaty, for example.
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Oct 27, 2019 11:18:31 GMT
After last Christmas's Brexit explanation to your working class relatives, why not explain to them this year how things would be so much better if they let people who know better decide for them. It's clearly the future of Democracy - it's certainly the way the EU has operated since the Lisbon Treaty, for example. Eh?
|
|