5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Apr 1, 2019 2:08:17 GMT
The media are to blame for the Rees Mogg ‘thing’. They love a ‘character’ And lazy as some of them are they allowed the character to do the work and fill the time. His influence grew out of proportion. He is simply a backbench MP. He knows about procedure because hasn’t had much else to concern himself with.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 10:23:23 GMT
Post by crowblack on Apr 1, 2019 10:23:23 GMT
The media are to blame for the Rees Mogg ‘thing’. They love a ‘character’ Given that so many decision-makers in the media were at Oxford at the same time as Rees-Mogg (who was no shrinking violet - the university newspaper Cherwell was full of him), and of Boris Johnson, they knew exactly what they were like as people - not cartoon characters - and how ambitious they were. They can't claim retrospective ignorance. Yet they went ahead and presented these figures to the public as though they were entertainment. Ditto Farage and co. I have a theory - it's the only one that might put a 'positive but stupid' spin on the media's actions. After Greece, there was a strong Left-wing feeling growing against the EU, including in the Guardian, where Owen Jones wrote about 'Lexit' and media voices like Caitlin Moran joined in (she has since deleted her tweets, but Jones' piece quoting her is still online). The mainstream media may have though oo,er. let's head this off at the pass and give some ludicrous right-wingers a platform, paint the EU opposition as a bunch of comedy right-wing characters so the Left will want to disassociate itself from them. Many on the Left did indeed disassociate themselves but by prominently platforming so many right-wingers the media unleashed a beast with a momentum they couldn't stop, giving what was once marginal and dirty the gloss of credibility. The media have 'form' on this - for example, John Simpson and others believe that by giving Khomeini the platform of an interview with the BBC when he was in exile in Paris in the 70s they gave him the political credibility he needed.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Apr 1, 2019 11:15:44 GMT
Imagine the apologists for Adolf Hitler there would have been on Twitter if it had existed at the time. . I’m not comparing anyone to anyone, honestly I’m not, but I’m just pointing out how the media has changed and enabled journalism to become another branch of show business. Sad to see a profession that pursued thalidomide, Jimmy Saville, MPs' expenses and further back, revealed the horrors of the concentration camps and the Vietnam War has descended to doorstepping politicians cos it looks cool on tv and standing in front of shouting people to ask inane questions of anyone who fancies a five minutes on the telly for their mum to see.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Apr 1, 2019 11:35:09 GMT
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 11:54:22 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 11:54:22 GMT
JRM has become very prominent for a Backbench MP. Sure his father was a respected journalist and his family is wealthy but he's not from a great political line like some MPs from both major parties. He has almost played on this stuffy, upper class image and has been shown to be a fairly witty guy on some panel shows.
But he has never been offered a ministerial position or actively sought one.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 12:28:40 GMT
Post by sparky5000 on Apr 1, 2019 12:28:40 GMT
JRM has become very prominent for a Backbench MP. Sure his father was a respected journalist and his family is wealthy but he's not from a great political line like some MPs from both major parties. He has almost played on this stuffy, upper class image and has been shown to be a fairly witty guy on some panel shows. But he has never been offered a ministerial position or actively sought one. I’m no Rees-Mogg fan but I do love this moment when he completely owned David Dimbleby after highlighting his privileged Eton background 🤣 www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/video/2015/dec/18/david-dimbleby-eton-tory-mp-jacob-rees-mogg-video
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Apr 1, 2019 13:08:17 GMT
April Fools stories are very difficult to spot this year as most of the news seems to be an April Fools item and isn't!!
|
|
2,342 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Apr 1, 2019 17:17:14 GMT
Apart from the Capital Group investment funds May's Husband would be privvy to paying tax on as a result of the EU tax avoidance directive, who knows who else is taking bribes or *sorry* donations to vote, push or prevent anything. The whole last few years have exposed the lot of them as cheating, lying scum. I don't trust any of them. Jezza in it for financial gain? I'm giving up on (mainstream) politics if that is the case.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 18:42:23 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 18:42:23 GMT
JRM has become very prominent for a Backbench MP. Sure his father was a respected journalist and his family is wealthy but he's not from a great political line like some MPs from both major parties. He has almost played on this stuffy, upper class image and has been shown to be a fairly witty guy on some panel shows. But he has never been offered a ministerial position or actively sought one. I’m no Rees-Mogg fan but I do love this moment when he completely owned David Dimbleby after highlighting his privileged Eton background 🤣 www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/video/2015/dec/18/david-dimbleby-eton-tory-mp-jacob-rees-mogg-videoI agree that was funny the Dimbleby family is as much or probably more establishment than JRM's family. When that happened I wondered if there had been any history between the Dimbleby's and the Rees-Mogg's.
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 21:15:36 GMT
sf likes this
Post by n1david on Apr 1, 2019 21:15:36 GMT
Well it's all going swimmingly.
I do recall being told in this thread that everything would be OK and sorted by March 29. Still waiting...
|
|
952 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 21:41:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by vdcni on Apr 1, 2019 21:41:19 GMT
Lots of Tories voting no to all the options. They'd rather have a damaging no deal situation than compromise on something that would actually pass.
|
|
3,322 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 21:42:55 GMT
Post by david on Apr 1, 2019 21:42:55 GMT
The resignation of the Tory whip by Nick Boles tonight was quite dramatic. If your going to do it, do it in style.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 22:06:14 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 22:06:14 GMT
If I was an EU politician, this is where I would be saying that there are no more chances and it’s over.
They have been very hands off up until now but being less amenable might be just what Parliament needs to force it to actually come up with something.
EDIT: Verhofstadt has just done so.
|
|
2,412 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 22:11:59 GMT
Post by theatreian on Apr 1, 2019 22:11:59 GMT
The British Parliament must be the laughing stock of the world at the moment. It is frankly a disgrace that a decision of this magnitude cannot be made.
|
|
5,073 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Apr 1, 2019 23:03:08 GMT
April Fools stories are very difficult to spot this year as most of the news seems to be an April Fools item and isn't!! Ironically Chris Grayling was born on this very day. Make of it, what you will.
|
|
5,073 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 23:06:24 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Apr 1, 2019 23:06:24 GMT
Kenneth Clarke’s Custom Union deal came only 3 votes short.
Ironic if the newly formed Independent Group (Change) voted with this bill, it would have had an majority.
I am certain that the Independent Group would prefer a Custom Union deal, rather than a no deal.
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 23:08:08 GMT
Post by sf on Apr 1, 2019 23:08:08 GMT
Lots of Tories voting no to all the options. They'd rather have a damaging no deal situation than compromise on something that would actually pass.
And lots of Labour MPs abstaining on the only option that would definitely prevent us going over the cliff edge, which tells us a great deal about what "Labour values" mean in 2019.
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 23:10:45 GMT
Post by sf on Apr 1, 2019 23:10:45 GMT
The British Parliament must be the laughing stock of the world at the moment. It is frankly a disgrace that a decision of this magnitude cannot be made.
"Laughing stock" was when our PM triggered Article 50 without any kind of plan for what the final destination should be and then immediately called a snap election and lost her majority. The mess we're in now is a whole other dimension of stupidity.
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Post by n1david on Apr 1, 2019 23:16:48 GMT
Kenneth Clarke’s Custom Union deal came only 3 votes short. Ironic if the newly formed Independent Group (Change) voted with this bill, it would have had an majority. I am certain that the Independent Group would prefer a Custom Union deal, rather than a no deal. Kenneth Clarke’s Custom Union deal came only 3 votes short. Ironic if all of the Liberal Democrats voted with this bill, it would have had an majority. I am certain that the LibDems would prefer a Custom Union deal, rather than a no deal.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 1, 2019 23:34:35 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 23:34:35 GMT
Kenneth Clarke’s Custom Union deal came only 3 votes short. Ironic if the newly formed Independent Group (Change) voted with this bill, it would have had an majority. I am certain that the Independent Group would prefer a Custom Union deal, rather than a no deal. Ironic also that Kenneth Clarke put forward this deal given he is very Pro-EU and that stance cost him the chance to be Tory leader on a couple of occasions. But as the Father of the House, he probably realises that a deal needs to be done and being a respected senior politician on the more moderate side of the Tory party, he probably has a better chance than most to help pull some consensus together.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 2, 2019 6:23:11 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 6:23:11 GMT
If I was an EU politician, this is where I would be saying that there are no more chances and it’s over. They have been very hands off up until now but being less amenable might be just what Parliament needs to force it to actually come up with something. EDIT: Verhofstadt has just done so. Part of me wants the EU to turn round now and kick the UK out, so they get the last word. Leave us high and dry. That would really rattle the mouthy leave voters who have done nothing constructive but stomp their feet and shout loudly (not tarnishing all leave voters that way, just the ones who refuse to provide a solution to their conundrum).
|
|
952 posts
|
Brexit
Apr 2, 2019 7:11:04 GMT
Post by vdcni on Apr 2, 2019 7:11:04 GMT
Lots of Tories voting no to all the options. They'd rather have a damaging no deal situation than compromise on something that would actually pass.
And lots of Labour MPs abstaining on the only option that would definitely prevent us going over the cliff edge, which tells us a great deal about what "Labour values" mean in 2019.
Agreed those Labour MP's are a disgrace but as a whole Labour and the SNP were the most pragmatic parties last night. They voted for the referendum and the soft Brexit options and pushed them all close. I understand where the Lib Dems and TIG are coming from, focusing on the referendum and not voting for soft Brexit but this isn't two years ago when these votes should have been happening, we are staring no deal in the face and it's getting to the point where the sane end of Parliament need to rally around an option to take control of the agenda from the government. That said Ken Clarke has a bit of a cheek complaining they aren't voting for his common market when he won't vote for a referendum. The sadly diminishing rational end of the Tory party meanwhile look very isolated - I wonder if the shock from Boles last night might embolden a few more to get behind some sort of compromise. And for all the - Parliament are a disgrace calls, it's important to remember it was the government who got us here in the first place, by treating at 52/48 win as some kind of clear vote for their specific form of Brexit, refusal to engage with Parliament at any point, delaying on the deal in December so using up precious time, even last night they tried to stop the votes from happening and then banned cabinet ministers from taking part. The Commons are trying to come up with some kind of rational solution, the government are just refusing to engage.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 2, 2019 7:37:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 7:37:53 GMT
You suggest though that a victory - and it was a clear victory by over a million votes - should be ignored or reconfirmed by the public in what is a dangerous precedent. Why should there be a second vote? Because the remainers keep making a noise? Where then does it end? If we have a second one, why not another one the year after to see if the Brexiteers now have more support? Why not let Scotland have another independence vote just to see if they really meant they wanted to stay in the union? Should we start holding two votes every general election to make sure the people mean what they really said?
We voted and we decided. At the very least, we need to first leave before we discuss whether there is a public appetite for rejoining - you can’t just ignore the electorate.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 7:43:39 GMT
You suggest though that a victory - and it was a clear victory by over a million votes - should be ignored or reconfirmed by the public in what is a dangerous precedent. Why should there be a second vote? Because the remainers keep making a noise? Where then does it end? If we have a second one, why not another one the year after to see if the Brexiteers now have more support? Why not let Scotland have another independence vote just to see if they really meant they wanted to stay in the union? Should we start holding two votes every general election to make sure the people mean what they really said? We voted and we decided. At the very least, we need to first leave before we discuss whether there is a public appetite for rejoining - you can’t just ignore the electorate. People didn't vote for this, it is not the deal that leave voters were promised. It is logical to see if they want this deal as opposed to the one that they were promised.
|
|
|
Brexit
Apr 2, 2019 7:50:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 7:50:12 GMT
If you rely on politicians promises during a campaign...
All campaigns are littered with false promises. This isn’t anything new to the British public and I still think it’s highly arrogant to assume so many people were so easily manipulated.
The Referendum was clear - stay or go. We didn’t vote on anything else. Parliament not agreeing on a way to leave doesn’t mean we shouldn’t.
|
|