5,066 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 15, 2019 20:52:35 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Jan 15, 2019 20:52:35 GMT
The government appears to be broken. Somebody needs to turn it off and on again. Turn it completely down, like a dimmer switch.
|
|
3,321 posts
|
Post by david on Jan 15, 2019 20:57:34 GMT
It’s nice to see that strong and stable leadership in action from our PM (or maybe not).
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 15, 2019 21:18:06 GMT
Post by lynette on Jan 15, 2019 21:18:06 GMT
The only certainty is that there will never be another referendum on any other topic ( and prob not another on this one) in my lifetime. Good luck to the rest of you.
|
|
3,585 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jan 15, 2019 21:20:49 GMT
What an absolute shambles. Even worse than Dickie 2 at the Almeida.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 15, 2019 21:52:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2019 21:52:08 GMT
This country is an absolute mess, and I know I should care more, but at this point I've accepted this is The End. Fin. Curtain Call. Closing Night.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2019 22:12:43 GMT
It's very easy to criticise Theresa May, but she had a poisoned chalice to begin with, and what's the alternative? Boris Johnson or Jeremy Corban. God help us.
I have to agree I've got to the point of not caring anymore. We can't go on like this. A decision has to be made and we move forward and deal with whatever consequences are. No deal, probable chaos at least in the short term. Remain, we stop becoming a democracy and a different type of chaos ensues. Either way it's chaos
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Post by sf on Jan 15, 2019 22:23:39 GMT
This country is an absolute mess, and I know I should care more, but at this point I've accepted this is The End. Fin. Curtain Call. Closing Night.
Please don't. God knows I know as well as anyone that all of this is exhausting and tedious and painful to watch, and I've had enough too - but that's precisely when we all need to pay extremely close attention indeed to what our politicians are doing. History is littered with politicians doing things that lead to Very Bad Outcomes because the electorate took their eyes off the ball. The people behind this coup - because Brexit is a coup, it's a blatant attempt to circumvent or subvert representative democracy and in the process erode a whole long list of rights and protections - are acting in the best interests of their money, as opposed to the best interests of the UK electorate, and they are depending on a significant number of voters sitting back and letting them.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Jan 15, 2019 22:38:35 GMT
It's very easy to criticise Theresa May, but she had a poisoned chalice to begin with What the Lady in the yellow jacket said:
|
|
5,066 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 15, 2019 23:35:33 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Jan 15, 2019 23:35:33 GMT
If you are a remainder, as a lot of people on here are, I would be very upbeat, even though this deal didn’t get passed into law, as it was a deal that tried to appease everyone, but didn’t please anyone. However 196 conservatives voted for this deal, which demonstrates that 196 MPs do not want to crash out on a no deal. So me reckons a no deal Brexit is now dead in the water.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 8:15:05 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 8:15:05 GMT
Can I ask a question is the EU going to end? Has the EU taken more countries than it can chew? Should there be a more relaxed 'eu policies?
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 8:27:44 GMT
via mobile
sf likes this
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 8:27:44 GMT
So me reckons a no deal Brexit is now dead in the water. Except that it isn't, as Parliament have done nothing to stop it. None of us can sleep easy until something concrete is actually done to avoid a no deal Brexit - preferably cancelling the idiotic idea altogether, but frankly at this stage I'd take an extension of Article 50. Anything is better than the utter chaos that will inevitably ensue if there is no deal.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 8:47:36 GMT
Post by Michael on Jan 16, 2019 8:47:36 GMT
an extension of Article 50 But how is this going to help? All 27 remaining EU countries would have to agree to extending article 50, and because of the upcoming EU election in May, the longest extension could only be until end of June, as the new EU parliament will constitute itself in early July. And, IIRC, the EU27 have said that they will only consider agreeing to an extension if there is a "proper" reason like a new election or another referendum and not to give the UK a few more weeks for something it didn't achieve in 2+ years.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 8:55:55 GMT
It's very easy to criticise Theresa May Yes, she has made it very easy over the years, as both Home Secretary and Prime Minister. The "immigrants go home" vans, for instance, were a very special low point that I don't think *anyone* had anything good to say about? Indeed, VERY easy to criticise her.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 9:00:59 GMT
So me reckons a no deal Brexit is now dead in the water. But isn't a no deal Brexit the only certainty at the moment though? Unless Parliament agree on an alternative deal to go to the EU with, the UK leaves the EU on 29th March 2019 at 11pm whether there is a deal or not, no?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 9:30:46 GMT
Can I ask a question is the EU going to end? Has the EU taken more countries than it can chew? Should there be a more relaxed 'eu policies? 1. Once Britain leaves, quite possibly, over time. 2. No. 3. No. The policies are not the issue, it's the bigotry and misrepresentation in the UK media that is the issue.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 9:44:56 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 9:44:56 GMT
an extension of Article 50 But how is this going to help? All 27 remaining EU countries would have to agree to extending article 50, and because of the upcoming EU election in May, the longest extension could only be until end of June, as the new EU parliament will constitute itself in early July. And, IIRC, the EU27 have said that they will only consider agreeing to an extension if there is a "proper" reason like a new election or another referendum and not to give the UK a few more weeks for something it didn't achieve in 2+ years. I didn't say it would actually help, I said it would be better than nothing. The alternative is crashing out on 29 March with no deal whatsoever, which is just about the stupidest thing this country could ever do, particularly given that inexplicably no interim arrangements for what would happen in that situation appear to have been put in place. So any time that the government can buy to try to knock some sense into the MPs who (a) seem to think this is 1819 not 2019 and the UK still has some sort of sway over the world and the EU should therefore be coming to us on bended knee with a much more favourable deal; and (b) fail to acknowledge that what the markets hate most of all is uncertainty and therefore the failure to secure any deal, however less favourable than they (wrongly) seem to think we deserve will be disastrous at least in the short term (which frankly is all that any politician cares about as that is what determines whether they keep their job or not) is frankly better than nothing at all. Nothing will help until headline Brexiteers get their heads around the very simple concept that we are the ones resiling from international obligations that we agreed to, so the EU owes us nothing and is perfectly capable of managing without any link to us if it has to. But given they've gone 2.5 years without managing to understand that, times are now so desperate that absolutely anything in terms of time that can be bought is better than 29 March rolling around with nothing having changed.
|
|
999 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 10:35:34 GMT
Post by Backdrifter on Jan 16, 2019 10:35:34 GMT
So me reckons a no deal Brexit is now dead in the water. But isn't a no deal Brexit the only certainty at the moment though? Unless Parliament agree on an alternative deal to go to the EU with, the UK leaves the EU on 29th March 2019 at 11pm whether there is a deal or not, no? That's exactly my understanding - it's not a case of it being another option that parliament votes for or not.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 10:47:49 GMT
I feel like all the faffing about is being orchestrated by the hardcore Brexiteers and their one goal is to distract everyone for long enough that we simply run out of time and thus end up dropping out with No Deal almost without noticing. Which, at least *someone* has a plan, but also, it's a REALLY terrible plan.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 10:59:06 GMT
Post by crowblack on Jan 16, 2019 10:59:06 GMT
1. Once Britain leaves, quite possibly, over time. 2. No. 3. No. The policies are not the issue, it's the bigotry and misrepresentation in the UK media that is the issue. I have to disagree on this. Clearing out the garage last summer I found an interesting piece from pre 9/11 2001 saying it was going to fail. One of the reasons cited - along with deep-rooted cultural differences - was the political pressure when eastern Europe joined. The German economy wanted the workers, but politicians feared the wage and other pressures risked increasing populism and political unrest. Germany might avoid this by blocking the eastern workers, though it didn't feel like the sort of thing a club member should do. As it turned out, Germany did, along with several other major western EU countries, blocking eastern migrant workers who instead came in greater numbers than predicted to Britain, which stayed open. That action, by several countries, meant the pressures weren't evenly distributed across the existing EU and it wasn't a level playing field. Britain isn't a uniquely bigoted and isolationist country (and, unlike almost very other country in the EU, it doesn't control its population with ID cards either) and the system could have worked if other major EU countries hadn't opted out at this crucial time. I think this is really important, and it has been forgotten, the commentariat preferring to believe the British working class is uniquely stupid/racist/manipulated rather than responding to unexpected pressures. So yes, that policy was an issue.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 11:01:06 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 11:01:06 GMT
I wouldn't be surprised if that were true. Some of them have been very open about the fact that they aren't concerned about a no deal Brexit and they just want to unilaterally exit. And playing devil's advocate, isn't that really what many of those who voted 'Leave' actually voted for? We weren't asked about a particular deal, we were simply asked: One could argue that a no-deal (however ridiculous a result that would be) is *exactly* what the "will of the people" is and that is "Leave the European Union".
|
|
952 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 11:07:56 GMT
Post by vdcni on Jan 16, 2019 11:07:56 GMT
I agree on the bigotry point for the most part, most EU countries have that element but that's still misrepresentation from the media and the government.
They are things we could have done and could still do to control immigration within the EU but we have never done it as successive governments have seen that immigration is overall good for the economy.
Yet they then turn round and blame the EU for it when people get angry rather than make any kind of positive case for it or admit they could have done more. And none of the Brexit supporters wanted to point out these wonderful trade deals with other countries could easily lead to them to asking for less strict rules on immigration as well which we have seen be the case.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 11:23:53 GMT
Post by crowblack on Jan 16, 2019 11:23:53 GMT
they then turn round and blame the EU for it See my post above - I think the big EU countries do deserve some blame for putting individual self interest above the idea of a club where pressures are felt and and absorbed equally when several of those countries locked out poorer eastern migrant workers in 2004.
|
|
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 11:27:35 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2019 11:27:35 GMT
I agree on the bigotry point for the most part, most EU countries have that element but that's still misrepresentation from the media and the government. Exhibit A:
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jan 16, 2019 11:28:46 GMT
Ahhh, so now it's the EU's fault that the UK was the only country not to impose a transition period for immigration from new countries joining the Union.
Riiiiight...
It's amazing, what failures of domestic policy can be blamed on the rest of the EU. I don't know how the politicians will cope without that scapegoat once we've actually left!
|
|
952 posts
|
Brexit
Jan 16, 2019 11:41:09 GMT
Post by vdcni on Jan 16, 2019 11:41:09 GMT
they then turn round and blame the EU for it See my post above - I think the big EU countries do deserve some blame for putting individual self interest above the idea of a club where pressures are felt and and absorbed equally when several of those countries locked out poorer eastern migrant workers in 2004. I don't disagree, but that's not what the media or government are really blaming them for.
|
|