3,927 posts
|
Evita
Aug 4, 2017 15:50:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by Dawnstar on Aug 4, 2017 15:50:47 GMT
Yes, it is a generalization. I don't have the data to support my claims, but I don't think I'm way off. I agree that the audience for "classic" shows tends to skew older. I guess it just bugs me that it is assumed that younger people prefer "contempory" shows when I don't. Ditto opera. The number of articles I've read saying how opera houses need to do all sorts of innovative productions to attract a younger audience. I've been opera going since I was 18 & I much prefer traditional productions & hate most regietheater.
|
|
6,351 posts
|
Evita
Aug 4, 2017 15:55:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by danb on Aug 4, 2017 15:55:10 GMT
Surely any business person with a brain would target the audience with the most disposable income...hence the advent of premium seats for the upwardly mobile and lazy, known quantity shows to attract coach parties and old dears. Whilst sad and lacking creativity it is obviously how the west end survived the recession, and is going into the next one.
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Evita
Aug 4, 2017 16:22:02 GMT
Post by ali973 on Aug 4, 2017 16:22:02 GMT
Surely any business person with a brain would target the audience with the most disposable income...hence the advent of premium seats for the upwardly mobile and lazy, known quantity shows to attract coach parties and old dears. Whilst sad and lacking creativity it is obviously how the west end survived the recession, and is going into the next one. I'm not so sure about that. I think the argument that older people tend to splurge more and have more to splurge is out of touch with what people do and how much income they generate. Young(er) people could and do earn a lot of money and have substantial disposable income, and are likely to spend it on entertainment. When I say younger, I mean people in their mid-20s to late 40s.
|
|
|
Evita
Aug 4, 2017 18:44:27 GMT
via mobile
ali973 likes this
Post by welsh_tenor on Aug 4, 2017 18:44:27 GMT
I'm 35 and would prefer more modern shows like BoM over the classics that have been in WE for years. But I'm also a populist and tend to follow the crowd, I saw Guys & Dolls because Rebel Wilson was in it and getting rave reviews - it had no attraction to me before her casting or the tour.
I also prefer to go to the theatre less often to have better seats, I'd sooner see a show every three months for great stall seats than a show a month in the circle.
|
|
2,566 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by viserys on Aug 5, 2017 5:25:09 GMT
Interesting discussion. I think the "blockbuster period" mid 80s-mid 90s seemed to attract more young fans and more new people taking an interest in the genre itself, whereas later trends like the jukebox musicals seemed more geared towards middle-aged/older people (who recalled the songs from their own youth). Personally I have been open towards all sorts of musicals, classics as well as modern musicals, but I guess what Ali means (maybe) is that there are a few "modern" musicals (if we use this divider) that attract a huge fan following of younger people who otherwise have no interest in the genre. Rent in the 90s, followed by Wicked, currently Hamilton and the gloriously overhyped Evan Hansen.
And these shows are important to bring fresh blood in. The current "old dears" still grew up with accessible theatre everywhere, but for many younger generations theatre is something that hardly exists. Their entertainment consists of concerts, festivals, movies or just staying in with computer games and Netflix. If you don't manage to pique their interest in theatre-going, there will be fewer and fewer theatre-goers. Yes, many of those who went to see Les Mis and Phantom 100 times in the 90s turned away from the genre some time, but I'm sure there were others like me who matured from seeing Starlight Express 40 times to seeing musicals of all sorts, straight plays, opera and ballet. So yea, I agree that London needs a few fresher shows to attract young people, stuff like Rent, Hamilton or Evan Hansen but perhaps with a more British slant. (God, you Brits do all these fantastic TV shows aimed at young people, like Misfits and Skins, surely you could do something similar on stage?)
I also think that London audiences are way more sceptic than Broadway audiences. There's moaning here that many of the recent new shows weren't great quality-wise. But I find Evan Hansen mediocre and clumsily written yet it sells like hot cakes on B'way. I thought Come From Away is a lovely little show with the heart in the right place, but it's a few people in street clothes on a single set with a few props, I'd never pay Broadway prices for this.
To finally bring this back to Evita: I can see both sides of the argument. I'd rather see something new, fresh and GOOD, but I don't mind these shows coming back either for brief runs. Rather them than stuff like Stomp and Thriller Live clogging up theatres.
|
|
2,566 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by viserys on Aug 5, 2017 11:38:18 GMT
Now that's interesting viserys. I lived through that period, and in fact it was the older crowd who went to Cats, Phantom, Miz and Saigon. The kids weren't interested. It was only the dawn of the web that brought them out for Wicked etc. Really? Maybe it was different in London/UK then. Here on the continent (well, Germany, Austria and the Netherlands are the parts I can somewhat speak for) the arrival of the big blockbusters such as Cats, Starlight Express, Phantom and Les Mis, and then home-grown shows like Elisabeth and Tanz der Vampire sparked a huge fan-following among younger people with tons of them lurking around the stage doors every day and fan clubs being founded even for the third understudy and second torch bearer to the right. To this day the commercial productions have printed photo cards of the entire cast to sign for their fans the way football clubs do elsewhere. I remember back in the days the stair case from the parking garage down to the Starlight Express theatre was completely covered in "I love you, (performer xy)!" graffiti and similar stuff, though I noticed it was gone when I re-visited in spring after a very long break. I'd get so frustrated with continental fans who announced going to London again and (again and again) to only ever see Les Mis, Phantom, etc. for the 30th to 35th time but never giving any unknown or new shows a chance or -gasp- a play. I still see it here in Germany how stuff like Tanz der Vampire seemingly keeps going forever and the awful nonsense that are Frank Wildhorn shows are revered because it's exactly the style they were weaned on (sappy love stories with big ballads). Nothing innovative, fresh or different stands a chance. Call me crazy, but I'm seeing exactly one musical in Germany this year and that's only because my mother hasn't seen it yet and wanted to go (Rebecca, the DuMaurier adaptation of ignoble Broadway disaster fame) but I have four (!) trips to London booked for the next six months with three new plays and seven new musicals so far). I can't express in words how much this British (international) community here on the board means to me since I feel so completely alienated from the German scene that both clings to 90s-style big weepy musicals and to the overblown adoration of performers and mediocre shows.
|
|
2,566 posts
Member is Online
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 11:48:36 GMT
Post by viserys on Aug 5, 2017 11:48:36 GMT
I guess all that happened a little later, too, in Germany and the rest of Europe. Also, I do agree that youth culture seemed very different from what I saw of it and remember. I rather like your account of fan culture, though. And love the thought of "team photos" for the West End, that's one for them to ponder. Also, you rather answer the number of overseas visitors at the older shows. And you are not crazy. Well, no crazier than any other board member for sure . Thanks for that And yea, I guess the audiences have now aged somewhat here too, with fewer young people discovering musicals as something new to be a fan of... but then I'm an oldbie now and don't really frequent the places where young people today convene like Twitter and FB Groups.
|
|
449 posts
|
Post by SageStageMgr on Aug 5, 2017 12:30:17 GMT
I genuinely laughed out loud when my right honourable friend said the Kenwright Evita is better than Grandage's 2006 revival. Each to their own and all... but that's just bonkers!
|
|
1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on Aug 5, 2017 14:01:06 GMT
I genuinely laughed out loud when my right honourable friend said the Kenwright Evita is better than Grandage's 2006 revival. Each to their own and all... but that's just bonkers!
In fact if you look to the top of this thread several people thought this production was a lot better than the Grandage revival. I was one of them.
|
|
449 posts
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 14:16:35 GMT
via mobile
ali973 likes this
Post by SageStageMgr on Aug 5, 2017 14:16:35 GMT
I genuinely laughed out loud when my right honourable friend said the Kenwright Evita is better than Grandage's 2006 revival. Each to their own and all... but that's just bonkers!
In fact if you look to the top of this thread several people thought this production was a lot better than the Grandage revival. I was one of them.
Remarkable!
|
|
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 14:48:44 GMT
via mobile
richey likes this
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2017 14:48:44 GMT
Yep me to, much preferred kenwrights version to the lazy and dull Grandage revival
Although i find the movie the best version ive seen so far. It just flows better from a story point of view than the stage version
|
|
2,149 posts
|
Post by richey on Aug 5, 2017 14:50:09 GMT
I genuinely laughed out loud when my right honourable friend said the Kenwright Evita is better than Grandage's 2006 revival. Each to their own and all... but that's just bonkers! Well life would be boring if we all liked the same thing 😉
|
|
449 posts
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 14:53:59 GMT
via mobile
Post by SageStageMgr on Aug 5, 2017 14:53:59 GMT
Yep me to, much preferred kenwrights version to the lazy and dull Grandage revival Although i find the movie the best version ive seen so far. It just flows better from a story point of view than the stage version Now I do love the movie...
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 16:26:37 GMT
Post by ali973 on Aug 5, 2017 16:26:37 GMT
Could it be because the Kengwright version utilizes elements from the two major productions? It's like the illegitimate child of the Prince and Grandage version without a trust fund.
|
|
449 posts
|
Evita
Aug 5, 2017 16:36:11 GMT
via mobile
ali973 likes this
Post by SageStageMgr on Aug 5, 2017 16:36:11 GMT
I don't hate the Kenwright production by any means. I reviewed it several times professionally on a previous theatre website and really enjoyed it. But when I saw it in London with Marti Pellow last time around the circuit, I loathed it. The cast was crap, it looked tired and falling to bits. As a stage manager by trade, I can tell a show which sorely needs a kick up the arse, a good tightening of the screw. It looked terrible and it had Pellow in it.
When I compare *that* to Grandage's slick, tight production it's on a different level.
I saw every cast in the tour and largely hated the casting. Mark Powell was the understudy in the Grandage, and they were selling off all the unsold Grandage 2006 production's merchandise. Before him, a talent show runner up who was way out of his depth. The brochures had embarrassing photoshop work. I didn't enjoy Louise Dearman or Rachael Wooding. Mark Heenahan was Quast's town understudy. The whole thing just felt quite literally second rate in comparison. Earl did it for a bit and he was good.
But I LOVED Abi Jaye as Eva, the best I have ever seen in any production and gives Covington a run as my absolute favourite.
Now Abi Jaye in the Grandage would be a dream.
|
|
|
Evita
Aug 6, 2017 20:35:52 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 20:35:52 GMT
Long-time lurker, first-time poster here with a burning question: why were the keys lowered in this production?
When I saw the first preview I was disappointed to discover that Eva's parts in 'A New Argentina' ('He supports you/For he loves you...') have been transposed down to (most likely) Madonna's key.
Madalena Alberto sang the score as written a few years back at the Dominion. And I know that when she used to do it on tour, the last chorus of the song would always be sung in the original key.
Why change it? Is it even legal to alter the score in a professional West End production? I wonder if Lord Andrew is aware of the changes being made.
|
|
488 posts
|
Evita
Aug 6, 2017 23:16:33 GMT
Post by AliceFearnFan2212 on Aug 6, 2017 23:16:33 GMT
Long-time lurker, first-time poster here with a burning question: why were the keys lowered in this production? When I saw the first preview I was disappointed to discover that Eva's parts in 'A New Argentina' ('He supports you/For he loves you...') have been transposed down to (most likely) Madonna's key. Madalena Alberto sang the score as written a few years back at the Dominion. And I know that when she used to do it on tour, the last chorus of the song would always be sung in the original key. Why change it? Is it even legal to alter the score in a professional West End production? I wonder if Lord Andrew is aware of the changes being made. They haven't changed it... They've just lowered it for Emma
|
|
1,037 posts
|
Evita
Aug 6, 2017 23:35:51 GMT
Post by jgblunners on Aug 6, 2017 23:35:51 GMT
When I saw the first preview I was disappointed to discover that Eva's parts in 'A New Argentina' ('He supports you/For he loves you...') have been transposed down to (most likely) Madonna's key. They haven't changed it... They've just lowered it for Emma It believe that they haven't changed the key of A New Argentina, but Emma is singing those sustained high phrases (he supports you, etc.) an octave down. I'm sure there are people who know the show and it's history better than me, but I think that it is not uncommon for actresses to do this since those phrases are some of the highest in the score.
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Evita
Aug 6, 2017 23:38:53 GMT
via mobile
ali973 likes this
Post by daniel on Aug 6, 2017 23:38:53 GMT
I hadn't noticed that they'd lowered it, but in any case lowering it is changing it. I would imagine that Kenwright would've had to seek permission from RUG before making any changes. I don't think it's massively uncommon for scores to be lowered when the lead can't sing them as written - I think Sister Act adjusted the keys for Alexandra Burke?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2017 23:54:25 GMT
Thanks for your input^^
I agree, it's not completely uncommon for scores to be lowered, I think Gavin Creel in BOM is another example of this practice. However, as far as I know, they have never lowered the score in any major American production of Evita, including the tours. And Eva is definitely a tough sing, but to me that's one of the things which make the show so thrilling. Hence, I was a bit disappointed with this revival.
|
|
68 posts
|
Evita
Aug 7, 2017 0:35:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by BGLowe on Aug 7, 2017 0:35:17 GMT
They haven't changed it... They've just lowered it for Emma It believe that they haven't changed the key of A New Argentina, but Emma is singing those sustained high phrases (he supports you, etc.) an octave down. I'm sure there are people who know the show and it's history better than me, but I think that it is not uncommon for actresses to do this since those phrases are some of the highest in the score. I saw it on Thursday with Natalie Langston and I don't think she and it sang it at the higher octave. I was quite underwhelmed with that bit tbh - think Madonna did it better (ducks for cover).
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Aug 7, 2017 4:27:14 GMT
They haven't changed it... They've just lowered it for Emma It believe that they haven't changed the key of A New Argentina, but Emma is singing those sustained high phrases (he supports you, etc.) an octave down. Oh. No. They. Did. Not. Call Seth Rudetsky PRONTO.
|
|
318 posts
|
Post by Scswp on Aug 7, 2017 5:45:16 GMT
Long-time lurker, first-time poster here with a burning question: why were the keys lowered in this production? When I saw the first preview I was disappointed to discover that Eva's parts in 'A New Argentina' ('He supports you/For he loves you...') have been transposed down to (most likely) Madonna's key. Madalena Alberto sang the score as written a few years back at the Dominion. And I know that when she used to do it on tour, the last chorus of the song would always be sung in the original key. Why change it? Is it even legal to alter the score in a professional West End production? I wonder if Lord Andrew is aware of the changes being made. I've mentioned these changes on here before, I think. The first two sections are sung a whole octave down and the whole song becomes incredibly underwhelming. It has been done this way for a long time though. Many Evas, including Abi Jaye, Rachael Wooding and even Louise Dearman did it this way. Somebody even replied to my initial post saying that Elaine Paige often did it this way back in the seventies. This song is supposed to be the stirring Act I climax, but it certainly doesn't feel that way given these changes. I'd rather them slightly lower the key for the whole song, but have Eva's lines sung upwards (perhaps matching the slightly lower key of the line 'I'm Only a Radio Star...' earlier in the act (in 'The Art of the Possible' song). I guess the change is to protect the voice of the actress playing Eva. The suggestion I made above works better musically, I think, but it probably takes time, expense and permission rights to transpose a whole song. The song is still sung as written at the moment (albeit an octave down here and there) so requires no permission rights or expense to sing it in the way that they are currently doing.
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Post by ali973 on Aug 7, 2017 5:52:25 GMT
msh- fully agreed. I'd rather they bring the entire thing down and Eva to belt it upwards. Or they can simply hire Evas who can, instead of Eva's who can't.
Now that I think of it, I recall listening to a recording of Louise sing it downwards and I was like what kind of fudgery is this? I'm going to have a field day seeing this show.
Makes me lament those good old days when our fabulous diva mothers sang Evita. Stephanie Lawrence, Siobhan McCarthy, Kathryn Evans, Patti LuPone..The recent Broadway revival hasn't been any better with their choices of Evita either. You open up an alternate Eva bio and the first credit is Glinda in Wicked. Erm, no!
|
|
18,828 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 7, 2017 6:00:23 GMT
3:00
(wasn't she fabulous?)
|
|
318 posts
|
Evita
Aug 7, 2017 6:34:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Scswp on Aug 7, 2017 6:34:18 GMT
msh- fully agreed. I'd rather they bring the entire thing down and Eva to belt it upwards. Or they can simply hire Evas who can, instead of Eva's who can't. Now that I think of it, I recall listening to a recording of Louise sing it downwards and I was like what kind of fudgery is this? I'm going to have a field day seeing this show. Makes me lament those good old days when our fabulous diva mothers sang Evita. Stephanie Lawrence, Siobhan McCarthy, Kathryn Evans, Patti LuPone..The recent Broadway revival hasn't been any better with their choices of Evita either. You open up an alternate Eva bio and the first credit is Glinda in Wicked. Erm, no! I agree about the diva mothers - including Rebecca Storm and Jacqui Scott on the UK tours - they were great too!
|
|
3,057 posts
|
Evita
Aug 7, 2017 7:17:23 GMT
Post by ali973 on Aug 7, 2017 7:17:23 GMT
I had no idea Rebecca Storm was in the tour. She sounded amazing in the Chess tour.
|
|
318 posts
|
Evita
Aug 7, 2017 7:27:24 GMT
via mobile
ali973 likes this
Post by Scswp on Aug 7, 2017 7:27:24 GMT
Rebecca Storm was in the first UK tour, I think (as was Kathryn Evans - or at least for part of it). Rebecca Storm was, indeed, very good in Chess too.
|
|
2,452 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theatremadness on Aug 7, 2017 10:32:24 GMT
Who wouldn't want 15 minutes of belting A New Argentina from a multitude of Eva's all in one video? Of course you do, you're only human!
|
|
|
Evita
Aug 7, 2017 11:03:50 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 11:03:50 GMT
Well Patti quite simply is Evita isn't she? I can imagine her as the head of a dictatorship in South America somewhere anywhere.
Woe betide anyone who tries to stop her. She'd rip your throat out.
LOVE her!
|
|