4,984 posts
|
HS2
Oct 4, 2023 12:19:58 GMT
Post by Someone in a tree on Oct 4, 2023 12:19:58 GMT
What an absolute mess. Announcing it's cancellation in Manchester is like something from the Thick of it
|
|
3,316 posts
|
Post by david on Oct 4, 2023 12:26:54 GMT
Sunak announces replacement to HS2 for those of us in the north -
|
|
4,984 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Oct 4, 2023 12:37:56 GMT
only thing worse than a white elephant is half of one
|
|
|
Post by marob on Oct 4, 2023 14:00:59 GMT
I’d say they couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery, but that’s the only thing they are actually good for.
By-the-by, I hadn’t heard the phrase white elephant in years, but heard it just the other day… and it was said by a train guard.
|
|
3,576 posts
|
Post by Rory on Oct 4, 2023 14:10:32 GMT
I love Joe Lycett's letter to Suella. Padam padam!
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Oct 4, 2023 17:33:19 GMT
It was a silly idea in the first place. The trains are needed in the north and locally. Undoing some of the damage of a car focused Beeching destruction would be good. They ( a Brown cabinet ) took literally ten minutes to wave this project through with no discussion at cabinet level of cost and future plans. Cameron ( let’s be honest, both the big parties supported this) liked the Japanese bullet trains he saw. Give me strength. He had no understanding of how Japan got their infrastructure going, how UK lagged behind; his understanding of history and his arrogance has almost ruined this country. But not quite. If they do really improve the transport in the northern tons and the links across the country, you never know, it might help us all. The companies making money will scream and shout, the vested interest people will yell and squark. But get these workers going in the right places, people won’t suffer lack of income.
|
|
221 posts
|
Post by Peter on Oct 4, 2023 20:45:56 GMT
Not sure it’s a great decision, and sort of misses the point. HS2 is as much about capacity as speed - get the expresses onto dedicated modern infrastructure (with associated time savings on the longer routes), freeing up massive capacity on the existing lines for more local and medium distance services. Short term-ism from a lame duck government.
|
|
1,482 posts
|
Post by mkb on Oct 5, 2023 1:15:20 GMT
Not sure it’s a great decision, and sort of misses the point. HS2 is as much about capacity as speed... It's entirely about capacity. There are virtually no paths left per hour on the West Coast Mainline for passenger services, never mind future freight increases. Getting somewhere faster is not the justification for building new tracks. The reason you want trains to go as fast as possible on new dedicated lines, is because the faster they go, the more trips per day each trainset can do, and therefore the greater the capacity. If a future government does not build new tracks, expect fare increases to be used to ration train demand. The £36bn "saving" that Sunak reckons will be invested in numerous other projects is less than the expected cost of the one proposed East-West fast trans-Pennines route he shouts about, that hasn't yet even had any consultations or planning permissions. This spending has been cut solely to enable tax cuts immediately prior to a general election. The Tories always put themselves first and business and the country last. They are the polar opposite of patriots.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Oct 5, 2023 6:57:15 GMT
The cost of building high-speed rail internationally is £32m per km. The HS2 cost is £250m per km. Why so expensive ? Here's a clue. The Lower Thames Crossing (tunnel under the Thames at Dartford) planning application alone cost £267m which is more than twice as much as it cost Norway to actually build the world's longest road tunnel. Some of the people moaning about HS2 being cancelled on the basis of cost are the same ones who would support multiple NIMBY challenges to infrastructure projects like this including MPs of every party along the route pandering to local residents and pressure groups who will oppose and attempt to delay it under all circumstances. If you want HS2, or significant new housing, or new power stations, or onshore wind, you need to support streamlined planning and approval processes which don't require "local consent". You can't have both.
|
|
|
HS2
Oct 6, 2023 0:34:31 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2023 0:34:31 GMT
I think it had to be stopped given the rising costs and the damage it would/will do to the countryside. Funnily we never heard one voice from the green lobby this week over this.
|
|
4,984 posts
|
HS2
Oct 6, 2023 6:47:59 GMT
via mobile
Post by Someone in a tree on Oct 6, 2023 6:47:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by punxsutawney on Oct 6, 2023 8:13:51 GMT
I think it had to be stopped given the rising costs and the damage it would/will do to the countryside. Funnily we never heard one voice from the green lobby this week over this. There's considerably more histrionics over this "destroying the countryside" than any road project ever proposed or built. It's just a convenient talking point, not based in reality. Those histrionics are a big reason why the costs are rising, seeing as NIMBYs meant it had to tunnel expensively through the Chilterns, rather than running at ground level...
|
|
1,088 posts
|
Post by andrew on Oct 7, 2023 17:19:11 GMT
I'm quite devastated to be honest. I don't really directly benefit from HS2 being built in any specific way, but the idea that we were actually building a high speed rail line the likes of which we should have had decades ago was such a beacon of progress. The backbone of improving rail services across the country, improve links up to Scotland, get more local passenger services onto railway lines making it more convenient and a viable transport option instead of it always being the car, more freight on rail rather than in 100 lorries. All gone, and instead complete spin and nonsense about what the money might go onto instead. The Brexit bus comes to mind. And increasingly it sounds like there's no opportunity for a future government to reverse the decision, or at least to do so will now be considerably more expensive than what the project already was going to cost. So sad.
|
|
341 posts
|
Post by adrianics on Oct 9, 2023 7:55:04 GMT
I'm quite devastated to be honest. I don't really directly benefit from HS2 being built in any specific way, but the idea that we were actually building a high speed rail line the likes of which we should have had decades ago was such a beacon of progress. The backbone of improving rail services across the country, improve links up to Scotland, get more local passenger services onto railway lines making it more convenient and a viable transport option instead of it always being the car, more freight on rail rather than in 100 lorries. All gone, and instead complete spin and nonsense about what the money might go onto instead. The Brexit bus comes to mind. And increasingly it sounds like there's no opportunity for a future government to reverse the decision, or at least to do so will now be considerably more expensive than what the project already was going to cost. So sad. This is where I am, too. As a public transport nerd, the appalling state of the UK's rail provision is mortifying and embarrassing to me. It really should not have been allowed to stagnate into its current state, where getting from one place to another by rail is a universally expensive, stressful and miserable experience and it simply is not surprising that so many people choose to travel by car. HS2 represented a step in a positive and progressive direction, a sign that maybe our government was finally capable of long-term and ambitious thinking on this particular issue, and it's all been felled by countryside NIMBYs and a flailing Prime Minister desperate for a short-term victory whilst knowing he's on the way out. We will never progress or develop as a nation as long as we're controlled by such thinking.
|
|
184 posts
|
HS2
Oct 9, 2023 21:01:15 GMT
Post by sweets7 on Oct 9, 2023 21:01:15 GMT
The train service is an embarrassment. I ride the chiltern train that goes past Wembley a lot. It’s an embarrassment. Never enough carriages to account for events in Wembley. Nearly forty quid and a useless service where you stand all the way.
I was heading up north in last few weeks and quoted 136 quid for a ticket on a train where I had to change. 4 times. I didn’t go.
I was in France in the summer. I mean please how have they managed it and it’s been there about 50 or 60 years now. Not that expensive, trains by comparison are luxury, you’re guaranteed a seat. The high speed trains get you between places in Uber time. Great contact to your mobile phones about delays etc. I mean they probably moan like anything about it. But really we are behind in so many ways. And it isn’t just France obviously it extended into neighbouring countries too.
|
|
|
HS2
Oct 11, 2023 12:26:11 GMT
Post by Mr Snow on Oct 11, 2023 12:26:11 GMT
Cameron ( let’s be honest, both the big parties supported this) liked the Japanese bullet trains he saw. Give me strength. He had no understanding of how Japan got their infrastructure going, how UK lagged behind; his understanding of history and his arrogance has almost ruined this country. Good on you. I strongly feel that in the long term it will be understood how the very weak Cameron, has been worse for this country than the cumulative effects of Corbyn, Boris and Truss together.
|
|
|
HS2
Oct 12, 2023 17:37:28 GMT
Post by Jan on Oct 12, 2023 17:37:28 GMT
Cameron ( let’s be honest, both the big parties supported this) liked the Japanese bullet trains he saw. Give me strength. He had no understanding of how Japan got their infrastructure going, how UK lagged behind; his understanding of history and his arrogance has almost ruined this country. Good on you. I strongly feel that in the long term it will be understood how the very weak Cameron, has been worse for this country than the cumulative effects of Corbyn, Boris and Truss together. HS2 was initiated by Gordon Brown. Newly converted scourge of the NIMBYs Kier Starmer campaigned against it going through his constituency in full NIMBY mode.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
HS2
Oct 12, 2023 18:16:20 GMT
Post by crowblack on Oct 12, 2023 18:16:20 GMT
I think it was the hobby horse of a man called Andrew Adonis. He's still on Twitter and comes across as detached from reality, recently tweeting that China manages to get these things done - yeah, when you're a dictatorship with poor human rights and can just order whole towns and villages out of your project's pathway.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
HS2
Oct 12, 2023 19:04:39 GMT
Post by lynette on Oct 12, 2023 19:04:39 GMT
Good on you. I strongly feel that in the long term it will be understood how the very weak Cameron, has been worse for this country than the cumulative effects of Corbyn, Boris and Truss together. HS2 was initiated by Gordon Brown. Newly converted scourge of the NIMBYs Kier Starmer campaigned against it going through his constituency in full NIMBY mode. Yes, Brown signed it off but it was in the pipeline so to speak before him. It took them ten minutes to discuss it and no projections of cost were discussed ( so I’m told)
|
|
|
HS2
Oct 12, 2023 22:42:09 GMT
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2023 22:42:09 GMT
Japan had the bullet train going back to the early 1980's minimum when they showed it on Blue Peter. HS2 would have been the sort of thing I could have seen Tony Blair really backing. Gordon Brown being more fiscally cautious I would have thought him being concerned about the cost but with possible benefits for Scotland he'd have seen the political attraction of that.
I think Phase 2 should have been scrapped totally once the pandemic cost was mounting and that was before the cost of living issues in last couple of years. It would be a nice thing to have but there are other spending priorities and more voter attractive ideas to spend the money on IMO.
|
|
|
HS2
Oct 13, 2023 7:02:38 GMT
Post by Jan on Oct 13, 2023 7:02:38 GMT
It took them ten minutes to discuss it and no projections of cost were discussed ( so I’m told) So completely different to when they passed the law in 2019 requiring UK to be Net Zero by 2050 via a statutory instrument with no debate in the Commons, no projections of cost, and no proper vote. The difference being that that took 20 minutes rather than 10. So that will fail too in exactly the same way - a total inability to manage and control the cost and schedule of infrastructure projects in the face of NIMBY local opposition to every single project at every single step.
|
|