2,409 posts
|
Post by theatreian on Aug 16, 2022 21:58:39 GMT
I have seen the first 2 episodes now and I am enjoying the observational quality of it.The nuanced performances and the looks etc do ring true. It is certainly different from most dramas but I am still wanting to watch the last 2 episodes which is more than can be said for other dramas this year bar a few.
|
|
460 posts
|
Post by pianowithsam on Aug 16, 2022 22:39:22 GMT
I guess so. {Spoiler - click to view} At least she didn't die or hasn't yet at least. Really looking forward to tomorrow's ep.At least she didn't die or hasn't yet at least. Really looking forward to tomorrow's ep. What a great ending. Trouble with these blockbusters, ending them well is really hard. But they nailed it. And with Jimmy and Kim, as good as we could have wished for, eh? Great series. Beautifully acted and shot. Am conflicted about the final episode and am struggling to put my thoughts into words. I'm back at the start of S1 now and am rewatching with the family, who haven't seen any of BCS before. I'll be able to make a definitive judgment once we've got to the end of S6 again. On the whole, was a really great series and is upsetting that it's over. Am looking forward to seeing what Vince & the team come up with next.
|
|
643 posts
|
Post by jek on Aug 17, 2022 9:08:45 GMT
I am enjoying Marriage - perhaps because it features a couple who have been together almost as long as my partner and I, and who are navigating that stage of life when children are in their 20s and trying to make their own way. I also like the fact that I have no idea (after watching 2 episodes) as to whether something properly dramatic is going to happen. My enjoyment is further enhanced by people getting into a fluster about the 'theme tune'. I am a huge fan of Caroline Shaw (who thankfully makes regular visits to perform in London) and the music is her Partita for 8 voices for which she won the Pulitzer Prize in 2013. The full piece can be seen here:
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 17, 2022 13:55:25 GMT
I’ve only recently found out about the run of “game changing dramas” on BBC Four, so I’ve probably missed most of them, but it was fascinating watching The Roads to Freedom. I’m really surprised how much they could get away with on BBC2 back in 1970. Bet Mary Whitehouse was livid. Argh, looks like I've missed them - I don't watch much drama in the summer because of the live sport and long daylight hours, and I was assuming they'd be up on iplayer for when the nights draw in, but they're not!
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 17, 2022 13:56:47 GMT
Btw, I think the first episode of The Great series 2 is about to go off All4 so hurry up if you haven't started it!
|
|
8,157 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Aug 17, 2022 15:20:00 GMT
I am enjoying Marriage - perhaps because it features a couple who have been together almost as long as my partner and I, and who are navigating that stage of life when children are in their 20s and trying to make their own way. I also like the fact that I have no idea (after watching 2 episodes) as to whether something properly dramatic is going to happen. My enjoyment is further enhanced by people getting into a fluster about the 'theme tune'. I am a huge fan of Caroline Shaw (who thankfully makes regular visits to perform in London) and the music is her Partita for 8 voices for which she won the Pulitzer Prize in 2013. The full piece can be seen here: Thanks for that. Just listened to some of it but, for me, it's like the TV drama, ok in small doses. When I heard it first as the theme tune I thought it was some kind of line dancing instructions.
|
|
8,157 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Aug 17, 2022 16:58:47 GMT
BBC4 is showing a repeat of The Buddah of Suburbia tonight from 1993. Well worth seeing if you missed it first time around.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 22, 2022 11:09:14 GMT
No spoilers, but glad to say the first episode of House of the Dragon is very promising! Spoiler follows: there is a death in childbirth scene that is very harrowing though there is a content warning at the start of the show
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 22, 2022 11:26:44 GMT
No spoilers, but glad to say the first episode of House of the Dragon is very promising! Spoiler follows: there is a death in childbirth scene that is very harrowing though there is a content warning at the start of the show Still not ready to jump back in after the mess made of the last series of GoT
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Aug 22, 2022 11:48:40 GMT
I've watched the first two episodes but it's not working for me so far. I read and enjoyed the comics back in the day, but on-screen fantasy storytelling has moved on by leaps and bounds in the last 30 years. This feels slow, leaden, the dialogue and characterisation simplistic and I'm just not feeling invested in the quest / threat. I'd be interested to know if those who haven't read the comics are getting into it. I watched all ten of the original episodes (the two bonus episodes are being saved for later), and I think your description is fair. I was interested in the details and world building from the start, but didn't particularly care about any of the characters until the second half of the series. I've not read the comics, and knew just a little about them, so was coming in fresh. I know the point of Dream is that he is other worldly and detached, but it's harder to connect with that kind of introverted, silent type on screen than it is in books or comics. I don't want to spoil, but that improves as the series progresses, helped by the introduction of more sympathetic characters that are easier to root for. I enjoyed the look of the whole thing. Whoever did the hair and make-up seems to have been heavily influenced by The Human League and similar 80s pop, which was both enjoyable and a bit distracting. It's hard to take a demi-god seriously when I'm expecting them to burst into a rendition of "Don't You Want Me" which is already on repeat in my head. That sounds quite negative, when overall I enjoyed it. It was something a big different and I look forward to watching more.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 22, 2022 12:31:44 GMT
No spoilers, but glad to say the first episode of House of the Dragon is very promising! Spoiler follows: there is a death in childbirth scene that is very harrowing though there is a content warning at the start of the show Still not ready to jump back in after the mess made of the last series of GoT I really liked the last series! I rewatched the battle for King's Landing episodes again on Now TV last night and they were phenomenal. If you take the White Walkers as the Black Death, then having it defeated by science - a jab - after a battle resembling Breughel's 'Triumph of Death' was historically appropriate, as was Daenerys' initially laudable social crusade descending into tyranny, with her Robespierre hair and Nazi-like following. I mostly liked where the characters ended up - especially Arya as Reepicheep! . Whether or not you liked the last series I'd say give this a go - it's tonally different, more I, Claudius-style court politics thus far, and a more Byzantine look (the 70s sword and sorcery, boobs and bums aspect of the early GoT series haven't aged well).
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 22, 2022 14:09:28 GMT
Still not ready to jump back in after the mess made of the last series of GoT I really liked the last series! I rewatched the battle for King's Landing episodes again on Now TV last night and they were phenomenal. If you take the White Walkers as the Black Death, then having it defeated by science - a jab - after a battle resembling Breughel's 'Triumph of Death' was historically appropriate, as was Daenerys' initially laudable social crusade descending into tyranny, with her Robespierre hair and Nazi-like following. I mostly liked where the characters ended up - especially Arya as Reepicheep! . Whether or not you liked the last series I'd say give this a go - it's tonally different, more I, Claudius-style court politics thus far, and a more Byzantine look (the 70s sword and sorcery, boobs and bums aspect of the early GoT series haven't aged well). I forgot how badly they messed things up, just don't need further reminders of the travesty with the prequel starting.
|
|
|
Post by marob on Aug 22, 2022 14:21:47 GMT
I enjoyed Game of Thrones but, much like The Walking Dead, I think it outstayed it’s welcome, and any time there’s talk of potential spin-offs I can’t help but wonder “does anyone still care?” It may be because I had pretty low expectations, but I quite liked the first episode. Great cast too.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 22, 2022 14:37:08 GMT
Mixed reviews on Radio 5 just now, though I did feel their listener-reviewer had watched a different show to the one I saw!
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 22, 2022 14:40:44 GMT
I enjoyed Game of Thrones but, much like The Walking Dead, I think it outstayed it’s welcome, and any time there’s talk of potential spin-offs I can’t help but wonder “does anyone still care?” It may be because I had pretty low expectations, but I quite liked the first episode. Great cast too. My issue with GoT was in the middle of the series - so many plot threads like the gratuitously violent 'Reek' torture plotline, Arya in the assassin training school that also felt very brutal and sadistic and went on for ages, a lot of the Daenerys plotline was repetitive
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Aug 22, 2022 14:48:12 GMT
Still not ready to jump back in after the mess made of the last series of GoT I really liked the last series! I rewatched the battle for King's Landing episodes again on Now TV last night and they were phenomenal. {Spoiler}{Spoiler} If you take the White Walkers as the Black Death, then having it defeated by science - a jab - after a battle resembling Breughel's 'Triumph of Death' was historically appropriate, as was Daenerys' initially laudable social crusade descending into tyranny, with her Robespierre hair and Nazi-like following. I mostly liked where the characters ended up - especially Arya as Reepicheep! . Whether or not you liked the last series I'd say give this a go - it's tonally different, more I, Claudius-style court politics thus far, and a more Byzantine look (the 70s sword and sorcery, boobs and bums aspect of the early GoT series haven't aged well). I liked the last series too! There are some things I wished they'd done differently, and it did feel rushed, with a bit too much attention given to how many stunt men they could set on fire in a single take, but I thought the overall ending was logical, even if a lot of people wanted something more traditional or fairytale which GRRM kept warning us wasn't going to happen. Some stuff that might have been in keeping with the books or GRRM's world view wasn't going to happen because it was impractical. The big gap between the 7th and 8th seasons (required because of the scale of the production) meant people went mad with theories, and there were a lot of unrealistic expectations. {Spoiler}{Spoiler - for S8 GOT only}I'm not claiming to have predicted the ending, but I did anticipate a lot of the big things, such as the quest to sit on the Iron Throne being a red herring, with those most desperate to sit on it being unfit to sit on it, and I had an inkling that it would be destroyed.
Dany had been been showing tyrannical tendencies from the first book/season, and while individual actions might be justified, the big red flag was that she got a thrill from exerting power over others. Jon also did things that aren't compatible with the Geneva Convention, but he was burdened by it. Knowing GRRM's views on war and power, it seemed obvious to me that her story was intended to show how easy it is for people to make excuses and ignore the signs when they believe the cause is noble.
I thought it might be possible for Dany to develop a bit of self awareness, realising she wasn't the ruler that Westeros needed, but it was either that or going full 'mad'* then dead.
* I don't think Dany was actually mad in the traditional sense. No more than any other massively narcissist despot from history who is convinced they know best.
I think it was hoped the boobs and bums would make it easier to keep viewers engaged as they were introduced to a large cast of characters with strange names in strange lands, but it became unnecessary. It's odd re-watching the early stuff to spot the clues we missed first time around against a background of all of those boobs and bums for no apparent reason (& light blond Tyrion).
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Aug 22, 2022 15:16:43 GMT
I enjoyed Game of Thrones but, much like The Walking Dead, I think it outstayed it’s welcome, and any time there’s talk of potential spin-offs I can’t help but wonder “does anyone still care?” It may be because I had pretty low expectations, but I quite liked the first episode. Great cast too. My issue with GoT was in the middle of the series - so many plot threads like the gratuitously violent 'Reek' torture plotline, Arya in the assassin training school that also felt very brutal and sadistic and went on for ages, a lot of the Daenerys plotline was repetitive All of these things went on for even longer in the books and if I remember correctly, were just as, if not more brutal. I know it's fashionable to say that the showrunners were nothing without GRRM, but they did a great job of pruning these more repetitive plotlines and condensing characters so things flowed. GRRM has brilliant ideas and has given us a range of characters that feel distinct, with complex plots and story arcs are all the more fulfilling because he planted the seeds in earlier books. I don't want this to come across as hating on him, but he needed a good editor. Someone to ask him 'is this really necessary?', then when he inevitably says 'yes' to follow up with 'but does it all need to be this detailed?' and 'are you sure we need this much description of the food?' I think the problem was that time was needed for the dragons to grow or so that other characters could get on with their storylines to be in the right place for everyone to come together. I suspect this is also why it's over ten years between the 5th and 6th books.
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 22, 2022 15:58:39 GMT
My issue with GoT was in the middle of the series - so many plot threads like the gratuitously violent 'Reek' torture plotline, Arya in the assassin training school that also felt very brutal and sadistic and went on for ages, a lot of the Daenerys plotline was repetitive All of these things went on for even longer in the books and if I remember correctly, were just as, if not more brutal. I know it's fashionable to say that the showrunners were nothing without GRRM, but they did a great job of pruning these more repetitive plotlines and condensing characters so things flowed. GRRM has brilliant ideas and has given us a range of characters that feel distinct, with complex plots and story arcs are all the more fulfilling because he planted the seeds in earlier books. I don't want this to come across as hating on him, but he needed a good editor. Someone to ask him 'is this really necessary?', then when he inevitably says 'yes' to follow up with 'but does it all need to be this detailed?' and 'are you sure we need this much description of the food?' I think the problem was that time was needed for the dragons to grow or so that other characters could get on with their storylines to be in the right place for everyone to come together. I suspect this is also why it's over ten years between the 5th and 6th books. I heard there had been ten years between the books as the author was so pissed with what the tv show did to his books
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Aug 22, 2022 17:36:38 GMT
All of these things went on for even longer in the books and if I remember correctly, were just as, if not more brutal. I know it's fashionable to say that the showrunners were nothing without GRRM, but they did a great job of pruning these more repetitive plotlines and condensing characters so things flowed. GRRM has brilliant ideas and has given us a range of characters that feel distinct, with complex plots and story arcs are all the more fulfilling because he planted the seeds in earlier books. I don't want this to come across as hating on him, but he needed a good editor. Someone to ask him 'is this really necessary?', then when he inevitably says 'yes' to follow up with 'but does it all need to be this detailed?' and 'are you sure we need this much description of the food?' I think the problem was that time was needed for the dragons to grow or so that other characters could get on with their storylines to be in the right place for everyone to come together. I suspect this is also why it's over ten years between the 5th and 6th books. I heard there had been ten years between the books as the author was so pissed with what the tv show did to his books There were only ever meant to be seven seasons of the tv show to match the seven planned books. The fifth book came out about a month after the first season aired. That was over eleven years ago. He's since attended a plethora of conventions, premieres and awards shows, which suggests he likes (or at least liked) what was happening on tv. He admitted to problems in the earlier books getting the timelines to work, so it's bound to be tougher for the final books. If he were that precious about the tv show matching his plans for the books then it suggests he'd already got plans for the books, so even if he couldn't write them in time, he could have shared more of the important plot points. We know he did share some important stuff that's not yet published, such as Jon Snow, Shireen and Hodor, and know he shared unspecified aspects of the ending. It was reported that most of the main character endings were to be the same, but it is possible that having seen fan reaction he may have changed his mind. Some stuff is definitely different. The most obvious being Bronn, who was a minor book character, who ended up taking a larger role in the tv show. First because the actor playing Ser Ilyn Payne was diagnosed with terminal cancer, and they didn't want to recast him, so chose to have Jaime sparring with Bronn instead. Then he became a convenient and popular secondary character that helped translate the Jaime and Tyrion stories from page to screen.
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 22, 2022 22:02:09 GMT
I heard there had been ten years between the books as the author was so pissed with what the tv show did to his books There were only ever meant to be seven seasons of the tv show to match the seven planned books. The fifth book came out about a month after the first season aired. That was over eleven years ago. He's since attended a plethora of conventions, premieres and awards shows, which suggests he likes (or at least liked) what was happening on tv. He admitted to problems in the earlier books getting the timelines to work, so it's bound to be tougher for the final books. If he were that precious about the tv show matching his plans for the books then it suggests he'd already got plans for the books, so even if he couldn't write them in time, he could have shared more of the important plot points. We know he did share some important stuff that's not yet published, such as Jon Snow, Shireen and Hodor, and know he shared unspecified aspects of the ending. It was reported that most of the main character endings were to be the same, but it is possible that having seen fan reaction he may have changed his mind. Some stuff is definitely different. The most obvious being Bronn, who was a minor book character, who ended up taking a larger role in the tv show. First because the actor playing Ser Ilyn Payne was diagnosed with terminal cancer, and they didn't want to recast him, so chose to have Jaime sparring with Bronn instead. Then he became a convenient and popular secondary character that helped translate the Jaime and Tyrion stories from page to screen. Only needed seven series. Just needed to tell the story and all those plot lines. Amazing they could get it so wrong. Should be the greatest ever. Not even a foot note now
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 22, 2022 22:54:56 GMT
Not even a footnote? Come on! On 'House of the Dragon', it's a few hours since I watched it and comparing it with the opening of Game of Thrones, where the characters were immediately engaging and I really wanted to find out what the story had in store for them, I haven't really got that so much from HotD. I think the characters need more charisma, humour, sexiness. Hopefully that will come, though exiling the gleefully scheming Richard III-type character (Shakespeare's, not historical) in the first episode could be an issue - he was horrible, but the most entertaining of the characters so far introduced. Most of the rest are rather po-faced! The girls are good, though apparently they will be replaced partway through by older actors playing them as adults who also look rather po-faced on the stills I've seen [/span]
|
|
2,339 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Aug 23, 2022 6:20:43 GMT
Not even a footnote? Come on! On 'House of the Dragon', it's a few hours since I watched it and comparing it with the opening of Game of Thrones, where the characters were immediately engaging and I really wanted to find out what the story had in store for them, I haven't really got that so much from HotD. I think the characters need more charisma, humour, sexiness. Hopefully that will come, though exiling the gleefully scheming Richard III-type character (Shakespeare's, not historical) in the first episode could be an issue - he was horrible, but the most entertaining of the characters so far introduced. Most of the rest are rather po-faced! The girls are good, though apparently they will be replaced partway through by older actors playing them as adults who also look rather po-faced on the stills I've seen [/span][/quote] I was speaking to a friend who worked on the programme last night. In the GOT thread I put up a few of his stories. He said we should have talked about GOT forever. You used to watch each episode several times. You would rewatch it each year before the new series started. It was a programme that gave us the red wedding, the wall, hatdholme, battle of the bastards and still it fell off a cliff with such a terrible final series.
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Aug 23, 2022 8:29:54 GMT
We are still talking about it. There's another series, which predates the original, and all lots of people can do, including you, is talk about the original series. The series was the top streamed show in the world for the two years after it ended, and is consistently in the top ten streamed shows on HBOMax. It's OK if you didn't like it, but it's hyperbole to claim that people stopped watching it or talking about it.
As it turns out, despite claims that the franchise was ruined, and that no-one ever wanted to be reminded of that world ever again, the first episode of House of the Dragon had overnight viewing figures on HBO of 10 million, which is a record for them for a 'new' series, which is of course expected to grow.
I watched that first episode last night, and it was a solid start, but hasn't yet grabbed me. I went in braced for a lot of new names and ground laying, and that's exactly what I got. It was fun to see places we're already familiar with looking a little bit different, after a period of peace. At the beginning of Game of Thrones, everyone is still recovering from the last war. You can't expect the thrills of the later season finales until we've all put the work.
One of the great strengths of the Game of Thrones series (tv and books) was the different settings and different types of people and distinct characters. People had their favourite characters, families and settings, but hopping between them all make them all more interesting. Hopefully the next episode will expand beyond King's Landing.
One of the reveals was the big terrible secret about the prophecy of what we now know as "The Others" being passed from ruler to heir. My problem with that is that if it's that important, then having periods of time when only one person knows about it, is flawed, and all I could think about was how stupid they were to not have a contingency. Or why it needs to be kept a secret from the wider family or even the public in the first place.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 23, 2022 8:52:52 GMT
One of the reveals was the big terrible secret about the prophecy of what we now know as "The Others" being passed from ruler to heir. My problem with that is that if it's that important, then having periods of time when only one person knows about it, is flawed, and all I could think about was how stupid they were to not have a contingency. Or why it needs to be kept a secret from the wider family or even the public in the first place. Yes, I don't get that aspect at all either, given that it's something the whole population will have to brace and prep for. On the GoT last series 'issue', by the final series many of the characters you grew to know and enjoy the company of, as it were, in earlier series have been killed off, and by definition there isn't going to be much of that joviality or lightness left. It is what it is. Some people are p-d off that Daenerys became a tryrant, and Cersei didn't have a 'made it ma, top of the world' death, but rather a realistic one. I liked that, and many didn't. Was GRR Martin planning something different? Well, we'll have to see.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Aug 23, 2022 9:06:44 GMT
I watched that first episode last night, and it was a solid start, but hasn't yet grabbed me. I went in braced for a lot of new names and ground laying, and that's exactly what I got. It was fun to see places we're already familiar with looking a little bit different, after a period of peace. The opening episode of the original GoT is a masterclass in character introduction, but did have the huge advantage of a series of books to draw on so the showrunners knew where they were going. I don't think that's the case with many series these days - some seem to be making it up as they go along and drawing on fan reaction to lean in certain directions.
|
|