1,485 posts
|
Post by mkb on May 23, 2022 12:23:50 GMT
Act 1 is badly in need of significant pruning and re-writing. It has very little to say over 71 minutes, and Moses and Governor Al Smith are played as larger-than-life stereotypes who speak to everyone as though it were a hustings speech. At times, Fiennes roams the large thrust stage simply because the space has to be filled, not because his character has any motivation to do so. The narrative is dull.
Act 2, as others have commented, improves considerably, and there is at least a glimmer of the human side of the characters. I was aching to know what Moses was like outside the office: did he socialise?; how was the relationship with his wife and family?
Hare's dialogues favours grand-standing rather than nuance. Expositional information is shoe-horned unconvincingly into the conversation between characters: you would think this was the work of a novice playwright.
There are some good performances, particularly from Siobhán Cullen as Moses' right-hand woman. However, Hare never manages to fully explain why she stood by Moses for so long if he was as monstrous as portrayed.
Three stars.
Act 1: 19:36-20:47 Act 2: 21:08-22:11
(I wish The Bridge would revert to its original policy of having Sunday performances and later evening starts (at 19:45 usually). When they opened, their scheduling policies were a breath of fresh air to those of us who have to travel from outside of London. Saturday evening shows are impossible without a hotel stay thanks to the rail policy of closing the West Coast Mainline mid-evening Saturday, so Sunday shows were very helpful.)
|
|
725 posts
|
Post by theatremiss on May 23, 2022 16:50:42 GMT
Act 1 is badly in need of significant pruning and re-writing. It has very little to say over 71 minutes, and Moses and Governor Al Smith are played as larger-than-life stereotypes who speak to everyone as though it were a hustings speech. At times, Fiennes roams the large thrust stage simply because the space has to be filled, not because his character has any motivation to do so. The narrative is dull. Act 2, as others have commented, improves considerably, and there is at least a glimmer of the human side of the characters. I was aching to know what Moses was like outside the office: did he socialise?; how was the relationship with his wife and family? Hare's dialogues favours grand-standing rather than nuance. Expositional information is shoe-horned unconvincingly into the conversation between characters: you would think this was the work of a novice playwright. There are some good performances, particularly from Siobhán Cullen as Moses' right-hand woman. However, Hare never manages to fully explain why she stood by Moses for so long if he was as monstrous as portrayed. Three stars. Act 1: 19:36-20:47 Act 2: 21:08-22:11 (I wish The Bridge would revert to its original policy of having Sunday performances and later evening starts (at 19:45 usually). When they opened, their scheduling policies were a breath of fresh air to those of us who have to travel from outside of London. Saturday evening shows are impossible without a hotel stay thanks to the rail policy of closing the West Coast Mainline mid-evening Saturday, so Sunday shows were very helpful.) Tbh I prefer a 7pm start so I can get an earlier train home as usually I have to hang around until the 2340hr train home and end up in the house at 0130hrs, a killer when you have work 6 hrs later. But I don’t suppose we can all be pleased at show times and train schedules. I always feel a little leap of joy when seeing Come From Away which finishes early and a.lows me to get the 2220hrs train home. Same with the Old Vic as it’s 5 mins to Waterloo and most shows finish around 2200hrs
|
|
902 posts
|
Post by bordeaux on Jun 9, 2022 12:04:47 GMT
This was so much better than I had been led to believe from some commenters and the odd review. Hare provides a fascinating character study and a portrait of a society as it changes from the 20s to the 30s. Some brilliant acting all the way down the cast, all relishing the wit and argument in the dialogue. Hare's best work for a decade and a half in my view.
|
|
|
Post by theoracle on Jun 10, 2022 8:24:11 GMT
Whilst I love David Hare and think his working with Nic Hytner and Ralph Fiennes on paper seemed like a safe option for a great evening, this ended up feeling rather flat with some of the ideas a little muddled to the point where when Moses and Finuala have their last confrontation, one can’t help but feel underwhelmed.
There are some fantastic performances here of course - Fiennes, Cullen, Bailey and Webb are all brilliant. It’s a pity therefore to see a story that seems so well carved out - I don’t think a lot of people know who Robert Moses is - could end up feeling a little undercooked. Maybe when you have such an “establishment” team like Hytner, Fiennes and Hare, telling a story that criticises those at the top will be more challenging. 3.5* from me
|
|
|
Post by budd on Jun 27, 2022 16:22:58 GMT
|
|