|
Post by talkingheads on Dec 15, 2020 0:40:15 GMT
They tried to put the economy first all the way through, which ironically has resulted in destroying the economy. If they'd locked down hard and provided ample financial support to all citizens we would be in a better place. Now I can't see much happening before February and a Universal Basic Income isn't a projection it's a necessity.
|
|
2,414 posts
|
Post by theatreian on Dec 15, 2020 9:51:58 GMT
Unfortunately blame rests on all sides. If people did what they were supposed to then the situation would not have been as bad. All governments have made mistakes and most are having to go back into lockdown, some more serious than us. This is an unprecedented situation and some decisions have been in retrospect been wrong. However is is always easy to look back and criticise. At least we were the 1st country to start a vaccination programme which will hopefully see an end to this awful situation. People will always see things in different ways. I guess we will see next year how this pans out with the economy and hospitality and the arts in particular. Hopefully they will recover, though not all businesses will survive I am sure.
|
|
5,001 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Dec 15, 2020 10:56:19 GMT
I photographed this at my local station this morning. Over the months I have thankfully noticed more compliance with mask wearing
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Dec 15, 2020 10:57:35 GMT
All the years of unwanted scams and selling cold calls has resulted in a culture of us all blocking unknown numbers - those companies need to accept that part of the problem now is their fault Very much this - all day long it's fake calls about Amazon accounts, tumble drier insurance etc etc.. No wonder they don't pick up the phone to strange numbers. More generally, some theatre Twitter is coming across quite badly today, with its conspiracy-theorising and Allison Pearson-like desire to carry on as if covid wasn't killing people. I'm a hairy old Lefty but I don't think Tories want to see theatre die any more than the Centrists (which is where I think most theatremakers sit) and Left do. In general I think the handling of Coronavirus has been pretty poor but that's because I think more things should have been shut down earlier, not less!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2020 11:38:40 GMT
More generally, some theatre Twitter is coming across quite badly today, with its conspiracy-theorising and Allison Pearson-like desire to carry on as if covid wasn't killing people. I'm a hairy old Lefty but I don't think Tories want to see theatre die any more than the Centrists (which is where I think most theatremakers sit) and Left do. I think deep down people love to be the victim: if life isn't smooth and tranquil then there must be someone they can hold accountable for their woes. It can't ever be "sh*t happens"; there must be a perfect solution and if it isn't given to them then that has to be because someone is maliciously withholding it.
If there was a solution to this that would allow businesses to carry on as normal without resulting in many millions of deaths then someone would have found it. There's no question that many governments have made mistakes while trying to navigate their way through an unprecedented situation, but one thing we can be absolutely certain of is that there will never be a time when historians look back on 2020 and say "Those poor fools. If only they'd listened to the self-appointed experts on social media".
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Dec 15, 2020 12:07:12 GMT
If there was a solution to this that would allow businesses to carry on as normal without resulting in many millions of deaths then someone would have found it. There's no question that many governments have made mistakes while trying to navigate their way through an unprecedented situation I agree - various demographically similar Western countries have tried different approaches but we all seem to have ended up in much the same place. If duration of exposure is a factor in increasing the severity of an individual's illness, then an entertainment that requires people to sit still for two hours plus in other people's breath is going to have to be suspended, especially when audiences tend to be older. It must be heartbreaking, especially for those just starting out, but it'll be back.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Dec 15, 2020 12:07:19 GMT
All the years of unwanted scams and selling cold calls has resulted in a culture of us all blocking unknown numbers - those companies need to accept that part of the problem now is their fault Very much this - all day long it's fake calls about Amazon accounts, tumble drier insurance etc etc.. No wonder they don't pick up the phone to strange numbers. More generally, some theatre Twitter is coming across quite badly today, with its conspiracy-theorising and Allison Pearson-like desire to carry on as if covid wasn't killing people. I'm a hairy old Lefty but I don't think Tories want to see theatre die any more than the Centrists (which is where I think most theatremakers sit) and Left do. In general I think the handling of Coronavirus has been pretty poor but that's because I think more things should have been shut down earlier, not less! If that's the case then why is theatre always the first to close? Places with highly enforced safe distancing and seating while people are packing into supermarkets and shops?
|
|
189 posts
|
Post by saral on Dec 15, 2020 12:08:49 GMT
My Dad's one of those, as far as he's concerned if he doesn't know the number he doesn't need to speak to them. Doesn't he check his voice mail, though? I may not answer, but if even an unknown number leaves a message, I'll listen to it. (I get a lot of "We've been notified you've recently been in an accident...", but those are easy to delete.) If a message said "You've been exposed to COVID", I'd certainly call them back! I don't even think my mam knows how to check her voicemail and if it was an unknown number she would probably just think it spam or a wrong No. If someone did leave a message saying you had been in contact with a positive case and you felt fine, if there was a chance you would then lose best part of 2 weeks wages... Would you call them back 🤔
|
|
5,001 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Dec 15, 2020 12:35:45 GMT
|
|
643 posts
|
Post by christya on Dec 15, 2020 13:04:44 GMT
I don't even have voicemail on my mobile. Turned it off years ago as it was just full of silent calls, scams and spam. So if I don't pick up, that's it. Anyone I actually gave my phone number to can always get in touch with me on a messenger app of some sort. But my parents are in the 'have it but never check it' category.
|
|
2,342 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on Dec 15, 2020 13:11:37 GMT
More generally, some theatre Twitter is coming across quite badly today, with its conspiracy-theorising and Allison Pearson-like desire to carry on as if covid wasn't killing people. I'm a hairy old Lefty but I don't think Tories want to see theatre die any more than the Centrists (which is where I think most theatremakers sit) and Left do. I think deep down people love to be the victim: if life isn't smooth and tranquil then there must be someone they can hold accountable for their woes. It can't ever be "sh*t happens"; there must be a perfect solution and if it isn't given to them then that has to be because someone is maliciously withholding it.
If there was a solution to this that would allow businesses to carry on as normal without resulting in many millions of deaths then someone would have found it. There's no question that many governments have made mistakes while trying to navigate their way through an unprecedented situation, but one thing we can be absolutely certain of is that there will never be a time when historians look back on 2020 and say "Those poor fools. If only they'd listened to the self-appointed experts on social media".
I think history will be harsher. I think she'll say 'well you bloody voted for him three month earlier'.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2020 17:12:22 GMT
57% think the rules shouldn't be relaxed over Christmas ( YouGov) so it may not be the disaster it could have been. There's still the 31% who think it should go ahead, though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2020 18:28:11 GMT
57% think the rules shouldn't be relaxed over Christmas ( YouGov) so it may not be the disaster it could have been. There's still the 31% who think it should go ahead, though. And those of us who have spent money on transport to legally go home instead of spending Christmas alone. I'm afraid (for those who would want us all to lock ourselves in our houses and not move) that I'm still going to go unless it is made illegal by law (not guidance), for mental health purposes if nothing else, and because it might be the last time I ever get to see my 94 year old grandmother (through a window and talking on the phone). I won't be breaking any rules in terms of bubbles as it stands, and I am currently self-isolating out of an abundance of caution (not because I have been asked to), so I won't be changing my plans unless travelling could get me arrested. I have travelled before during this year and taken all precautions, and I won't be coming into contact with anyone who hasn't chosen either to travel themselves or to receive me, we aren't a big family.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Dec 15, 2020 18:32:11 GMT
If that's the case then why is theatre always the first to close? Places with highly enforced safe distancing and seating while people are packing into supermarkets and shops? Check out the links on Sarah Argent's measured series of Tweets this afternoon. When you sit in a theatre you are static for a long period in a poorly ventilated space, marinating in other people's breath (the average blue paper or cloth face masks are not virus-proof, they just lower your risk). Infection/severity is dose-related so the fleeting exposure you may get walking around in a well-ventilated, wide-aisled and easy-to-clean modern shop is not going to be as risky as the prolonged exposure you could get sitting for 90 mins or more in the very enclosed, cluttered space of a typical theatre, and the very narrow corridors and foyers that feed into it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2020 20:14:30 GMT
If that's the case then why is theatre always the first to close? Places with highly enforced safe distancing and seating while people are packing into supermarkets and shops? Check out the links on Sarah Argent's measured series of Tweets this afternoon. When you sit in a theatre you are static for a long period in a poorly ventilated space, marinating in other people's breath (the average blue paper or cloth face masks are not virus-proof, they just lower your risk). Infection/severity is dose-related so the fleeting exposure you may get walking around in a well-ventilated, wide-aisled and easy-to-clean modern shop is not going to be as risky as the prolonged exposure you could get sitting for 90 mins or more in the very enclosed, cluttered space of a typical theatre, and the very narrow corridors and foyers that feed into it. Please could you provide the case number statistics to back up that theory? I haven't seen anything to suggest that is what is actually happening in practice. It also presumably runs on the assumption that ventilation systems have not recently been modified, which I'm sure is not the case for the Palladium and some others. I'll have to look back at what was published about the adjustments made to theatres before they re-opened and the Government-approved risk assessment requirements in that regard.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Dec 15, 2020 21:27:41 GMT
Please could you provide the case number statistics to back up that theory? Sarah Argent says she knows several who have caught Coronavirus just from rehearsing. Check out the piece from El Pais that she retweets: "A Room, a Bar and a Classroom"
|
|
189 posts
|
Post by saral on Dec 15, 2020 22:06:03 GMT
Please could you provide the case number statistics to back up that theory? Sarah Argent says she knows several who have caught Coronavirus just from rehearsing. Check out the piece from El Pais that she retweets: "A Room, a Bar and a Classroom" I haven't read the article, but I would have thought if the government/sage had any inkling theatres were dangerous they wouldn't have let them open. After all the article they put out on hospitality dangers was pretty wafer thin in evidence In the pandemic nothing is going to be 100% secure, just look at footballers, supposed to be in a bubble, being tested, playing and training outside, they have still caught it
|
|
347 posts
|
Post by Figaro on Dec 16, 2020 10:34:31 GMT
Anyone know what time the new tiers are announced today?
|
|
395 posts
|
Post by lichtie on Dec 16, 2020 10:49:07 GMT
I think they don't get officially announced until tomorrow (decision gets made today) but it'll probably leak sometime later today...
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Dec 16, 2020 10:49:39 GMT
I would have thought if the government/sage had any inkling theatres were dangerous they wouldn't have let them open. They are Tories, free marketeers, the mayor in 'Jaws'. They know things are risky but have been letting them go ahead anyway - look at the 5 day Christmas free-for-all. I saw something weeks ago suggesting that Broadway wasn't going to reopen till next Autumn and was amazed that London theatres reopened - here in the North they have mostly remained closed.
|
|
395 posts
|
Post by lichtie on Dec 16, 2020 11:24:00 GMT
Keep in mind as well that the risk in any type of setting is not just down to how safe you can make it but also the prevalence of the disease. What was suitable for August is not necessarily suitable now. When you start to hit 1 in 50 infected then any enclosed venue where people are sat still for a length of time will be a risk, as ther chances are than one of those infected people is sitting near you. With a significant fraction of people showing little symptoms (not even temperature so the check wouldn't pick them up), you won't even know who passed it on to you. Those venues such as pubs and restaruants where no masks are worn are obviously riskier still (remember the mask largely protects others from you - the overall effectiveness may reduce the viral load you get as a recipient but you'll likely still end up infected if there's enough of it). They can't track good statistics on this because Track and Trace is so poor. It was easier when case numbers were lower when single instance type events in pubs etc were clear (the 2 infected oil rig workers on the pub crawl in Aberdeen after having been sent home; the Celtic fans on their trip to Blackpool, a hotspot at the time, to watch a game because pubs were shut in Glasgow). Shops, if they are keeping to the numbers they are supposed to have should be less of a risk, simply because people are moving and spend relatively little time in any one, though some definitely are (the persistent student scrum in the Leeds centre Morrisons was a good example of how not to do it, and an unfortunate member of staff died, and several others fell ill in that branch). The one type of venue that could probably feel truly hard done by with the tier 3 restrictions are museums, since people are moving, they tend to have lower numbers than things like shops, and at least the main ones are large airy buildings. Note that in terms of ventilation only aircraft really come up to scratch. Modern trains are moderately safe (they adjusted the air conditioning on them to change the flow pattern). The Tube really can't be particularly. Ventilation improvements in old theatres, whilst welcome, won't really bring them up to anywhere near the best practice.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2020 18:54:40 GMT
You can have your five days. But don’t use them. Have a little Christmas. But not a Merry one. You can mix three households. But don’t. The rules haven’t changed. But pretend they have.
|
|
19,812 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Dec 16, 2020 19:24:23 GMT
Come on though. What do we really expect the government to do? We slag them off when they lock things down, we slag them off when they make concessions.and open things up. There is so much political mischief around this entire circus that I can’t even keep track.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2020 19:33:32 GMT
I’d like them to just be honest for once, make the rules perfectly clear and give us an actual session where they explain how they come to their conclusions over lockdowns, the tiers and the restrictions. Those silly charts and 5 minute talks aren’t enough anymore.
Today it feels like I’m stuck on that zip wire and Boris is shouting to try going left and right to see if something works.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2020 19:35:33 GMT
I’m also at the point where all I do is skim the BBC headlines, as they seem to be reporting more and more on speculative measure rather than just reporting to facts. The rest of the media is just pure scare mongering.
|
|