433 posts
|
Post by alison on Jul 30, 2021 15:31:30 GMT
Anyone else looking at the weather forecast for tomorrow and crossing all their fingers and toes? It'll be gutting if the first preview for this is rained off too like Romeo & Juliet.
|
|
19,788 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 30, 2021 15:48:25 GMT
I saw the run time has also gone down from 2hrs 50 to 2hrs 35mins. Do we reckon there’ll be any significant cuts? Also, with the absence of strings, what will this mean for the Carousel waltz?this…?
|
|
|
Post by dontdreamit on Jul 31, 2021 22:09:06 GMT
Was anyone in the first preview tonight? I’m in on Monday but wondered how it was...
|
|
736 posts
|
Post by dippy on Jul 31, 2021 22:11:46 GMT
I was, I think it will lead to a lot of discussions, some people will probably love it, others will hate it. Sadly there were lots of giggles in the audience right at the end.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2021 22:17:33 GMT
I was as well and agree with dippy . It's a very modern production in some ways yet in others doesn't know at all what it wants to be. I'm not sure what I thought of it really, I certainly didn't love it but I didn't hate it either. The choreography is impressive, the set not so much. Overall very polished for a first preview (even with two understudies on who I'm surprised were properly rehearsed already) except for a couple of people who were really struggling vocally. It will be extremely polarising I think, much like Evita (it reminded me of that in some ways). There seemed to be a few walkouts this evening. Mask wearing was probably about 10% at most in the auditorium itself, a bit more in the rest of the venue.
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jul 31, 2021 23:43:29 GMT
Mask wearing was probably about 10% at most in the auditorium itself, a bit more in the rest of the venue. Argh, that does not fill me with hope about going to Regent's Park in a month.
|
|
5,186 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Aug 1, 2021 0:05:47 GMT
Well that was certainly an interesting night at the theatre!
Now, Carousel is my favourite score of all time. I think it's everything a musical score should be - soaring melodies, meaningful, hard hitting lyrics, and an overall feeling that's overwhelming. That is not what this is - this is not a normal Carousel...
Positives: The concept in a manner of speaking works. I very much was on board with the change of location to the north of England and found it worked very well (with the exception of a few lyrics that didn't work as a result). Sometimes American accents can make everything a bit twee, and the working class aesthetic here really drives the darkness through in a way I've not seen it done before. The change in orchestration from strings to brass bands and other instruments is fine and you get used to the missing violins after a while...!
Performances on the whole are good. Carly Bawden is, as ever, superb. Really brings out a heart in Julie and makes her 3D. The show highlight was her What's The Use Of Wonderin for me. Joanna Riding is a great Nettie, and Christina Mondesteu (sp) is a joyous Carrie and gets lots of laughs.
The stage itself is quite clever, with a nice revolve and clever staging in the act 2 Ballet.
There's a change in the shows final act after Billy's death (spoiler but it's a 75 year old musical!) which I REALLY liked. Bought a different perspective to the remainder of the show.
Negatives:
None of these songs SOAR in the way they are meant to because they have lowered everything to sound more like the actors speaking pitch. Which is a massive shame because performers like Carly Bawden and Christina Mondesteu can certainly sing them as intended. The lowering bad certainly helped some people, but for others who could have sung it in the original key, it seems a shame. I understand why, it's just not how I'd want a score like this sung.
I really, really disliked Drew McOnies choreography. Whilst I have enjoyed some of his work (mainly JCS which I thought was stellar) I just didn't...get this. It felt like he was trying too hard to be modern when it should be reflecting a world that is post war. The Ballet (which can be showstopping - as per 1992) for me was a little uncomfortable to watch. I got what he was trying to achieve in relationship to the story but it was just...not right for me.
The ending. I don't want to spoil the ending because I want people to go in and see it fresh but this isn't how Carousel ends in a 'normal' production. They've decided Billy deserves no redemption (which is fine I guess because Declan Bennett's portrayal of him made him SO unlikeable that I didn't want him to be redeemed) and thus the whole end of the show is changed. To me, this opens a bigger conversation of 'if we aren't happy with shows from the past that have problematic themes in them, why are we doing them?' it doesn't sit right with me to change the ending of a show because you're not happy with it in today's society. And the ending they've settled on just doesn't work (there were some people actually laughing at it...)
Few older members of the audience walked out after about 20 mins (but I think that's likely because they were expecting a traditional Carousel) and a few didn't return after the interval. Not a full house, but it was originally sold as socially distanced and only released more tickets a few weeks back.
Look, I didn't hate it (despite how this might sound). There's a solid idea in there for how to do it. There's a good cast doing their best. I hope it'll bed down in previews and they'll find their way. But this will be marmite. It'll get 2s, a few 3s and 5s. There will be very little middle ground. I'd give tonight 3 stars, and am back to see the final matinee and will be interested to see how it all has changed.
|
|
|
Post by FairyGodmother on Aug 1, 2021 1:18:05 GMT
I don't think he's redeemed in the play it's based on, but I don't think it made anyone laugh!
|
|
116 posts
|
Post by alexandra on Aug 1, 2021 6:10:40 GMT
Excellent performances by the leads, but I’d forgotten what a horrible musical this is. Violent abusive men, doormat victimised women. At least this plays down the tweeness, but it’s grim.
|
|
5,903 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Aug 1, 2021 6:12:39 GMT
There will be a lot of people who booked this expecting a traditional production and will be in for a shock !
|
|
4,988 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Aug 1, 2021 7:01:43 GMT
Ee by gum that were a first preview! I wish they had gone full out with the brass band, banjo and washboard concept but instead we got a lot Bontemi and some very engetic dance moves on the set of Peter Grimes.
Blow High should sound glorious here it doesn't as the men are busy spitting beer over each other. I'm guessing the cast are mostly dancers and not singers?
Jo Riding was incredible and so was the Star Keeper scene and accompanying ballet but I'm afraid most of it left me cold and dry eyed. First preview so lots can change and I truly hope it does.
It's not tedious a la ENO production but nor is is it the glorious Opera North one that faithfully updated it and managed to sound brilliant in the process.
If it discounts I'd be interested in going back towards the end of its run.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Aug 1, 2021 10:59:51 GMT
So my question is...(and based on the gist of what others have posted above) If you have to change a piece someone has created to the extent where it ceases to resemble the original what is the purpose? If the music has changed to a colliery band with orchestral elements removed, again, why? The songs lowered? With the wealth of talent across the UK - Why? The book may be problematic but don’t tinker with a score that is one of the most sumptuous in MT just to ‘update it’ It needs strings to truly soar. It just does. The whole thing sounds depressing and I can only guess what happens to Billy at the end (please someone enlighten us with a spoiler tag) If the elements don’t fit with a modern world write something new, perform something new? And a final technical question: Fiddler and WSS had clauses (no idea if this is still the same) where the production had to replicate the original. I can understand changing choreo but How do productions obtain the rights to change huge elements such as changes to the book or cutting or changing scenes or music?
|
|
19,788 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 1, 2021 11:53:41 GMT
And a final technical question: Fiddler and WSS had clauses (no idea if this is still the same) where the production had to replicate the original. I can understand changing choreo but How do productions obtain the rights to change huge elements such as changes to the book or cutting or changing scenes or music? Go to 12:15 in this video. The man who looks after R&H’s estate explains.
|
|
3,486 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by ceebee on Aug 1, 2021 13:02:10 GMT
Off to see this tomorrow, very interesting feedback so far.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Aug 1, 2021 13:19:52 GMT
And a final technical question: Fiddler and WSS had clauses (no idea if this is still the same) where the production had to replicate the original. I can understand changing choreo but How do productions obtain the rights to change huge elements such as changes to the book or cutting or changing scenes or music? Go to 12:15 in this video. The man who looks after R&H’s estate explains. Thank you for posting that BB - you certainly can’t fault the passion of the director and choreographer in their re imagining of this classic - they obviously love musicals . It was when they pulled the ex president of R&H out to justify why they ‘would be happy their work is being seen today’ in new contexts I started to doubt the pushed narrative. he goes onto to say he spoke the family of R&H who of course would want the musical to appeal to ‘modern audiences’. If it doesn’t get performed no $$$ right? I applaud a fresh take but some things like a harp and violins are non negotiable for me. The vibraphone and electric guitar may ‘update it’ to make it ‘familiar to modern audiences’ but do they bring anything? Nope. The director says he has memories of childhood losing yourself in romantic mgm movies. Can’t we just keep those? Escapism? Modern doesn’t always have to mean gritty? Maybe musicals don’t have to serve the purpose of education? There are other mediums for that? He says he doesn’t want to romanticise the darker elements of the musical. But I never thought Carousel did? Ok so there’s still a fair amount of frivolous dancingand singing but I feel they act as a counterpoint to the sadness of Julie’s situation and they don’t shy away from Billy still being a wife beating narcissist. As the director says Julie and Billy love each other (however twisted we feel this to be then and now) but it’s not like they walk off into the sunset at the end?
|
|
4,988 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Aug 2, 2021 10:53:16 GMT
stagebyte I would argue that this production is still Carousel albeit one that sounds different. Just like the Papp take on Pirates with its MT orchestraions was still Pirates. In the states Sondheim has sanctioned a heavy metal Sweeney Todd, which I'd be fascinated to see. Great art will always surrive different interpretations. See Shakespeare and Carmen for details.
|
|
136 posts
|
Post by Lemansky on Aug 2, 2021 13:18:06 GMT
I saw this on Saturday and while I didn't love it, I was glad to have seen it. It was also my first trip back to the theatre since City of Angels last year, and it felt amazing to be back.
I think my main issue is that I am just not overly keen on Carousel as a show, rather than not liking the production itself. I felt the lead performances were all really strong, the singing sounded wonderful for the most part and I liked a lot of the choreography. I'm not convinced the final bit of choreography works as well as they think it does, so it would be interesting to see whether this is changed at all before press night. We were sat on the far side of stage left and while you could see what was going on, it was more distracting than anything else. I did hear people laughing which wasn't great.
We did have an elderly couple in front of use who were enjoying it immensely - he was conducting the music for most of the songs, and they kept singing little snatches of the lyrics to each other as well as chatting a bit about the show. In normal circumstances I would have asked them to please keep it down and put it on the bad behaviour at a show thread, but they were clearly having such a nice evening and the show was loud enough that it didn't bother me too much, so I couldn't bring myself to do it!
|
|
3,486 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by ceebee on Aug 2, 2021 20:08:04 GMT
I'm at this show tonight, and I get what they are doing. Only first half gone, but it has the makings of a really good show. I love the script changes and orchestrations. It's certainly not a traditional production, and possibly better for it as a result.
|
|
|
Post by dontdreamit on Aug 2, 2021 20:12:16 GMT
I'm at this show tonight, and I get what they are doing. Only first half gone, but it has the makings of a really good show. I love the script changes and orchestrations. It's certainly not a traditional production, and possibly better for it as a result. I agree, the orchestrations are sublime! Am also in tonight and have thoroughly enjoyed the first act.
|
|
3,349 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Aug 2, 2021 21:45:12 GMT
I liked the music. I’ve never heard the energy sucked out of a place so quickly as during that ending.
No laughs at the ending though, but several at inappropriate times during the show. And clapping during songs.
First show I’ve been to in ages without a standing ovation (apart from one chap at the front and a few people grabbing coats to leave).
I had the most annoying people sat near me. With a carrier bag of Tesco goodies. Just as you thought they’d finished one bag of rustling treats, they found another, or a fizzy drink. This were visiting and had come from Hamleys (although the boyfriend wanted to be anywhere but here).
The poor chap playing Mr Baskin cracked his head on the top of the set during his entrance. It is tight and easily done.
I liked it a lot up until the death scene. Lots of cuts, but nothing too glaring other than trimming Wonderin. Lots of word changes to fit the English setting. After that point it became rather stylised and I missed what happened to Billy. The ending was very tame compared to what I expected.
|
|
3,349 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Aug 2, 2021 22:14:11 GMT
A few more thoughts now I'm home. Theatre was maybe three quarters full. A lot of people moved during the interval (or earlier) but I was rather wedged in one of the cheap restricted view seats (it wasn't really restricted, just a rail in front). But I would like to see this from closer to the front. Too many helicopters. Please don't start the second half music when one is right overhead! We had covers on for Jigger Craigin and Mrs Mullin. Lots of swings on. I spotted Jack Butterworth and Christopher Tendai, but I was sat too far away to make out everyone. I had no idea Ediz Mahmut (Eddie Miles) was in the cast until I just looked up the cast list. This is really trimmed. All done and dusted by 10:15pm (and that's with a 7:45pm start and a 25 minute interval). Carly Bawden is excellent as Julie Jordan. I didn't think that Declan Bennett's voice suited the songs so well, but he acts very well. There is an odd echo at some points (but maybe that depends where you sit). The poor female cast members have to lift these massive poles in and out of the set in the second half, which are barely used. They are probably meant to symbolise something, but I couldn't tell what. Some of the cast were really struggling to move them and I expect an accident is imminent. It started to rain towards the end, which was a bit distracting. But not too heavy. I do wonder if the ending has changed since Saturday based on the comments. {Spoiler - click to view} The cast all form a circle facing inwards, but Louise is facing outwards. They slowly join hands. Now, I think Julie and Mr Baskin join hands to show forgiveness (not certain from my viewing position). Billy disappears, but I missed how. Louise does not join the circle and moves to the raised portion of the set, showing that she is excluded. Billy does not talk to Julie or Louise during this scene, so the line that always brings a tear to my eyes is gone. Then it suddenly ends.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Aug 2, 2021 22:22:40 GMT
A few more thoughts now I'm home. Theatre was maybe three quarters full. A lot of people moved during the interval (or earlier) but I was rather wedged in one of the cheap restricted view seats (it wasn't really restricted, just a rail in front). But I would like to see this from closer to the front. Too many helicopters. Please don't start the second half music when one is right overhead! We had covers on for Jigger Craigin and Mrs Mullin. Lots of swings on. I spotted Jack Butterworth and Christopher Tendai, but I was sat too far away to make out everyone. I had no idea Ediz Mahmut (Eddie Miles) was in the cast until I just looked up the cast list. This is really trimmed. All done and dusted by 10:15pm (and that's with a 7:45pm start and a 25 minute interval). Carly Bawden is excellent as Julie Jordan. I didn't think that Declan Bennett's voice suited the songs so well, but he acts very well. There is an odd echo at some points (but maybe that depends where you sit). The poor female cast members have to lift these massive poles in and out of the set in the second half, which are barely used. They are probably meant to symbolise something, but I couldn't tell what. Some of the cast were really struggling to move them and I expect an accident is imminent. It started to rain towards the end, which was a bit distracting. But not too heavy. I do wonder if the ending has changed since Saturday based on the comments. {Spoiler - click to view} The cast all form a circle facing inwards, but Louise is facing outwards. They slowly join hands. Now, I think Julie and Mr Baskin join hands to show forgiveness (not certain from my viewing position). Billy disappears, but I missed how. Louise does not join the circle and moves to the raised portion of the set, showing that she is excluded. Billy does not talk to Julie or Louise during this scene, so the line that always brings a tear to my eyes is gone. Then it suddenly ends. Well that ending doesn’t sound like cause for laughter but it does seem a tad emotionless Can someone post what caused the laughter with a spoiler tag over it pls
|
|
|
Post by FairyGodmother on Aug 2, 2021 22:41:43 GMT
I thought I knew Carousel reasonably well, but who on earth is Mr Baskin?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2021 22:42:48 GMT
Was this part of the ending not in it tonight? one of the female ensemble dancing on the left side of the raised part, constantly falling down it and crawling back up again, but falling multiple times until Louise leaves the main stage and comes to help her.
From reading the programme it seemed to me intended to symbolise a woman trying to escape domestic violence and Louise ultimately helping her.
|
|
736 posts
|
Post by dippy on Aug 2, 2021 22:49:08 GMT
Yes, the ending has changed there was a female ensemble member, I can only assume playing someone who is abused rolling/tumbling from the top of the sloped section then grabbing one of the poles to stop herself, then dragging herself to the top, only to tumble down again, and again. It definitely caught your eye and I guess it's why I didn't see what happened to Billy, but maybe he vanished earlier. I do think that a Billy is just meant to vanish, a sign he's been forgotten? At the very end Louise helps the lady up the steps and away. The poles are twisted like the poles of a carousel.
|
|