|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 8, 2019 20:24:44 GMT
|
|
1,248 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Jun 8, 2019 21:42:34 GMT
Should this be the name of this thread?
It implies there will be lots more shows to discuss in relation to hate crimes against the performers in them?
Could we rename it "Rotterdam Hate Crime Attack" or similar?
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 8, 2019 22:04:40 GMT
I thought about that but it made it sound as if it happened in Rotterdam
|
|
2,496 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Jun 8, 2019 22:54:29 GMT
Horrible story.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 8, 2019 23:06:51 GMT
More details have been released on their twitter
Completely horrific.
|
|
3,585 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jun 8, 2019 23:25:47 GMT
Disgraceful.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2019 0:49:46 GMT
Disgusting news - I saw the play last month and was chatting to the cast afterwards at B'ham Rep. I hope that the cast members involved are okay.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Jun 10, 2019 4:47:13 GMT
Is this utterly disgusting behaviour increasing or is it just being reported more?
It sadly demonstrates exactly why we need equality education in our schools.
I trust the perpetrators of these crimes are caught and the harshest punishment possible received. Our society must give out the strongest signal that this vile behaviour will not be tolerated.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 23:40:16 GMT
With everyone being told they have to accept everyone for what they are, I have always pointed out to people what if one denomination's view and teaching is that they don't agree with the actions of another denomination how do people resolve this?
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 11, 2019 23:47:20 GMT
Your chosen denomination or religion is just that - a choice.
Your sexuality isn't. Just as your race isn't.
Quite simply, anything you cannot change trumps something you choose to believe.
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on Jun 12, 2019 0:00:07 GMT
With everyone being told they have to accept everyone for what they are, I have always pointed out to people what if one denomination's view and teaching is that they don't agree with the actions of another denomination how do people resolve this? f*** their views if they negatively impact somebody's right to exist
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on Jun 12, 2019 0:03:21 GMT
Intolerance must NEVER be tolerated !
EVER
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2019 13:05:21 GMT
With everyone being told they have to accept everyone for what they are, I have always pointed out to people what if one denomination's view and teaching is that they don't agree with the actions of another denomination how do people resolve this? f*** their views if they negatively impact somebody's right to exist Trying to put this into context can I give an example. In Birmingham there has been issues with parents demonstrating outside a mainly Muslim school about LGB teaching going on there. In this case the consensus would likely be that the parents were wrong despite their faith not agreeing with it. Then same parents were probably fasting for their Holy Month if someone said why the hell are you doing this, we'd likely side with the parents. Trying to be all things to all men can cause an issue. The local MP in the school issue has been criticized for appearing to side with the parents as his party is strongly pro LGBT but his electorate is likely a majority of the parents' faith so he is trying to appease them too.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 12, 2019 15:43:24 GMT
You are misrepresenting what is actually being taught at that school (and indeed many other schools)
The curriculum they are teaching is based around explaining that there are many forms of families and relationships and that they are all respected by the law of the land.
I don't care what any faith group may have to say on the matter - it is the law of the land that LGBT+ relationships and families are legal, valid and protected.
It is absolutely vital that primary age children are taught to respect the law of the land. And that means all laws.
The parents and protesters (many of whom have no children at the school in question) are misrepresenting what it is actually being taught in order to push a very specific agenda based on bigotry and hate. They should be resisted. And Godsiff should have actually read what is being taught before sounding off. He didn't and has shown himself to be as much of a bigot as those protesting. The same applies to McVey and her unwelcome intervention.
No religion can over-ride the law. Schools have to take responsibility to teach how our society works - particularly when children are not getting that necessary information at home.
I am absolutely fed up with the misinformation being spread about this teaching - it has nothing to do with gay sex and everything to do with respecting the law as regards equality as it applies to relationships.
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on Jun 12, 2019 19:38:17 GMT
f*** their views if they negatively impact somebody's right to exist Trying to put this into context can I give an example. In Birmingham there has been issues with parents demonstrating outside a mainly Muslim school about LGB teaching going on there. In this case the consensus would likely be that the parents were wrong despite their faith not agreeing with it. Then same parents were probably fasting for their Holy Month if someone said why the hell are you doing this, we'd likely side with the parents. Trying to be all things to all men can cause an issue. The local MP in the school issue has been criticized for appearing to side with the parents as his party is strongly pro LGBT but his electorate is likely a majority of the parents' faith so he is trying to appease them too. There is no need to appease people who choose hate. A simple exercise: replace gay people with black people, for example, as the minority group being affected, and one can see that there is no need for "context", logic, nuance or whatever. Being gay is just as innate as the colour of your skin. If the man in the sky told people to hate black people would anyone be second guessing or trying to appease, no.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 13, 2019 16:48:08 GMT
I am leaving this here - I think it says everything
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Jun 16, 2019 1:42:24 GMT
I am leaving this here - I think it says everything I wish it did.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 16, 2019 12:13:30 GMT
Shouting and screaming outside a school isn’t helpful. They should have approached the school through the governors or the parents’ rep group and had meetings with religious advisors and educational people. From what we see in the streets and the buses the kids need early education as to what is acceptable in society regardless of their own religious beliefs. Personally I think some people have bonkers beliefs but I don’t harass them in the street or anywhere else because that would be anti social and in fact illegal. If I want them to know how I feel, should it matter, then I would use platforms of free speech, newspaper columns etc. Such platforms cause enough grief as it is but we do have free speech in this country, despite it becoming a contentious issue of definition. Now, is a play a platform for free speech? Yes of course it is. But not if it encourages illegal harassment of any group or individual. There was a play which gave a very one sided view of the Israeli/Palestinian situation recently and lots of people have objected to it but it was still produced. Similarly a play about Muslim female abuse in Birmingham, produced, yes, but taken off when the glass doors of the theatre were smashed in by objectors. So it looks like violence gets it own way. But we regularly see work in the country that highlights the abuses of other countries and that is for us, free speech. Not for the other countries. What we actually need is more education and more discussion. Understanding the nuances of Shakespeare, say, would go a long way to showing how language can be used to influence. Friends, Romans, countrymen....? Drama instead of being shoved to the sidelines and only for the kids who have showbiz ambitions should be at the heart of the curriculum. Ditto art and music of course When children are capable of arguing without fighting, listening without interrupting and expressing without offending we shall be getting somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 18:13:45 GMT
Agree with lynette’s take on this - calm, respectful discussion is the only way to resolve any difference of opinion, great or small.
Let us hope that the radical element among LGBT activists comes to appreciate this also.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jun 16, 2019 19:14:31 GMT
Agree with lynette’s take on this - calm, respectful discussion is the only way to resolve any difference of opinion, great or small. Let us hope that the radical element among LGBT activists comes to appreciate this also. Which radical element would this be? Calm, respectful discussion only works when both sides will engage in that manner. And a lot of this isn't about a difference in opinion. It is about a worldview that denies my existence has being valid and, in some instances, calls for my death for who I am. You cannot deal with that sort of hate by respectful discussion. Reason and logic doesn't work. You cannot compromise with hate. Sometimes you need to take a strong stand against hate.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 16, 2019 19:30:40 GMT
Please don’t think that anyone here underestimates any horrible ignorant prejudice you have experienced, oxfordsimon.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:49:37 GMT
Agree with lynette’s take on this - calm, respectful discussion is the only way to resolve any difference of opinion, great or small. Let us hope that the radical element among LGBT activists comes to appreciate this also. Which radical element would this be? Calm, respectful discussion only works when both sides will engage in that manner. And a lot of this isn't about a difference in opinion. It is about a worldview that denies my existence has being valid and, in some instances, calls for my death for who I am. You cannot deal with that sort of hate by respectful discussion. Reason and logic doesn't work. You cannot compromise with hate. Sometimes you need to take a strong stand against hate. The radical element of trans activism. And yes - it only works when both sides engage in that manner. As is well demonstrated by moderate voices in the trans community who, while striving for recognition of issues affecting trans people, understand that bullying or shutting out others from the conversation is not helpful (so long as those others are similarly moderate and understanding, of course). I make no excuses for so-called ‘TERF’ behaviour - I merely point out it is a term often misapplied to those raising valid concerns to try to deny them a voice. Often these moderate voices have a range of even more unpleasant words applied to them, too, which is equally unacceptable. Hate is wrong, whoever’s practising it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2019 7:52:35 GMT
I swear, there are people out there who hear the phrase "civil rights movement" and think the "civil" applies to the movement rather than the rights. People who are being oppressed and attacked for asking to be treated like human beings are GOING to be cross and they're GOING to shout, and it's the duty of everyone else to listen to why they're upset and do what we can to help, not sit primly and ask them to keep the volume DOWN, we do of course agree that they should be treated like people but only if they're going to BEHAVE. Tone-policing is super uncool.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Jun 17, 2019 8:51:12 GMT
Tone-policing is super uncool. If this is about the 'TERF' comment, I've unfollowed two Twitter followers in the last fortnight for tweeting with approval 'shoot a TERF' memes. I didn't know these were a 'thing' until recently but if you twitter search "shoot/punch/choke a TERF" it's pretty shocking and post Jo Cox I do think that language and atmosphere needs policing.
|
|
1,250 posts
|
Post by joem on Jun 17, 2019 9:06:35 GMT
You need to be wary about teaching unquestioning obedience for the law of the land. The law of the land is not always on the side of the angels so if we accept it is always right then we cannot question it when we think it is wrong.
|
|