256 posts
|
Post by frankubelik on Mar 24, 2017 7:14:08 GMT
Did nobody else think each song felt like an afterthought? Nothing grew from character or situation; it was almost as if they took an "this will do" approach which really annoyed me but then the two leads started dancing and I almost forgave them!
|
|
2,859 posts
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Mar 24, 2017 7:37:47 GMT
Did nobody else think each song felt like an afterthought? Nothing grew from character or situation; it was almost as if they took an "this will do" approach which really annoyed me but then the two leads started dancing and I almost forgave them! Isn't it true for every jukebox musical?
|
|
716 posts
|
Post by theatre-turtle on Mar 25, 2017 14:07:24 GMT
Show just been stopped for a technical fault. It hardly got going!
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Mar 25, 2017 17:24:59 GMT
Once it got going again it was great though. Really enjoyable and two knockout numbers in the second half including the ballet.
And to be fair there wouldn't be a show if the video projections failed.
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Mar 25, 2017 18:44:13 GMT
And please, this is hardly a 'jukebox musical'. Yes it is a group of unconnected Gershwin songs, some of which conjure up Fred and Ginger, some the glorious Gene Kelly and Leslie Caron film.
Ashley Day was absolutely fantastic in the lead, with a toothy smile and some glorious dance moves, and Leanne Cope was lovely.
I think I smiled all the way though and even got a bit teary as well. It's a fabulous score which gets by the book being a little prosaic.
This is fun all the way with some very clever staging and an orchestra which did the material justice.
|
|
840 posts
|
Post by Steffi on Mar 25, 2017 19:17:17 GMT
Full house tonight. Very much looking forward to seeing the show. Adored it on Broadway.
|
|
1,743 posts
|
Post by fiyero on Mar 25, 2017 19:24:15 GMT
Full house tonight. Very much looking forward to seeing the show. Adored it on Broadway. I'm here tonight too! Hopefully the only technical failure tonight will be the cast board in the lobby. Loving the row a legroom. 2 metres from a massive speaker stack so I'm sure I'll hear it!
|
|
716 posts
|
Post by theatre-turtle on Mar 25, 2017 19:31:24 GMT
Once it got going again it was great though. Really enjoyable and two knockout numbers in the second half including the ballet. And to be fair there wouldn't be a show if the video projections failed. Oh I agree. Stunning, beautiful, tremendous, other superlatives etc. Ashley Day was exceptional - I know he isn't the usual lead but he performed like one. For me this is a must see - return of the mega musical. Best thing I've seen all year. I cried at the end too.
|
|
840 posts
|
Post by Steffi on Mar 25, 2017 20:54:36 GMT
Interval. Just as stunning as I remember it from Broadway. I could watch Robert Fairchild and Leanne Cope dance all day without getting bored.
I don't think I stopped smiling once throughout act one.
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Mar 25, 2017 21:04:37 GMT
My review of this afternoon's performance:
The poster and publicity for this present it as ‘a new musical’, but that might surprise the Gershwins, who wrote this parade of songs (some from the 1951 film, some from other sources) which move along the story of Jerry Mulligan – here played by alternate Ashley Day in his debut in the role – and Lise Dassin, played by Leanne Cope, who also did the role on Broadway.
He’s a soldier who stays in Paris after the Nazi occupation has been routed to become an artist, as idealistic Americans often do. He keeps seeing pretty Lise and falls hard for her, knowing it cannot just be coincidence. Soon they start meeting by the Seine, but she doesn’t want to discuss her past or personal circumstances.
Abrasive Adam Hochberg (David Seadon-Young) is the piano player and the commentator on the action, and it was fun to see him deal with a technical malfunction in the first scene which stopped the show at the big reveal of the video projection: we were soon off again, though, into the busy streets where Nazi sympathisers were still about and idealistic Frenchmen like Henri Baurel saw lucrative futures for them across the Channel.
Jerry finds a patroness in the ‘international dilettante’ Milo Davenport (Zoë Rainey), a Ginger Rogers-like cougar who likes a lot more than his paintings, while on the periphery Henri’s parents M and Mme Baurel (Julian Forsyth and Jane Asher) worry about their son’s lack of interest in settling down to marriage, and slowly find their shared love of jazz music coming to the fore again.
The leads are required to mix styles from both grand ballet and musical theatre (Day is primarily from the latter, but his moves look stellar enough to me, and he has a glorious toothy smile which makes you warm to the character; Cope is a ballerina but displays a fine singing voice in her solo ‘The Man I Love’), and the show benefits from a talented company of dancers, swings and chorus.
The sets need to be mentioned: Bob Crowley (formerly with the National and the RSC) is scene and costume designer, and 59 Productions Ltd are responsible for the many projections which conjure up time and place, as well as a feeling of being in a city which celebrates the creative arts. And the music by George Gershwin with lyrics by brother Ira both feel timeless and a world away, with the friend scene-setting of ‘I Got Rhythm’ rubbing shoulders with Jerry’s solo ‘I’ve Got Beginner’s Luck’ and the four-part ‘For You, For Me, For Everymore’.
A couple of things I would change: ‘Stairway to Paradise’ cries out to be a huge production number with showgirls from the start, and Adam’s part is really reduced (OK, he’s not Oscar Levant who was essentially playing himself in the film, but still) so we lose some of the humour and asides the character could make. There’s also something of a running joke of Henri being possibly gay which felt forced.
Christopher Wheeldon directs and choreographs in the old style, and he does brilliantly, using his cast and his orchestrations (by Christopher Austin and Bill Elliott, conducted by John Rigby). This is just a good old-fashioned musical, with great tunes, more than competently performed.
And yes there is a long ballet to the ‘An American in Paris’ suite, full of eye-popping colours and flashy moves, punctuated by some tender pas de deux between Day and Cope. Elsewhere, there are mirrors and windows, and misunderstandings, and even a Jew in hiding subplot, but the story isn’t really why we’re here. Superlative.
|
|
840 posts
|
Post by Steffi on Mar 25, 2017 23:37:29 GMT
Loved this from start to finish and may have just booked myself a ticket for a return visit. I wasn't 100% convinced by Haydn Oakley but I think that's down to comparing him to Max von Essen who in my opinion was outstanding as Henri. Really enjoyed Zoe Rainey and David Seadon-Young. The stars of the show are the two leads though. Exquisite performances. Also have to say Robert Fairchild is delightful to chat to. :-)
|
|
2 posts
|
Post by patrickmusical on Mar 26, 2017 21:35:47 GMT
Thought it was brilliant. My father was a professional dancer so I've seen lots of good dancers in my life. But the dancing in this show was absolutely phenomenal.
Taking the wife next week!
|
|
215 posts
|
Post by frosty on Mar 27, 2017 12:15:17 GMT
The reviews have done the trick for me, just got tickets to see it on Wednesday night.
|
|
4,361 posts
|
Post by shady23 on Mar 27, 2017 12:22:24 GMT
As I LOVED 42nd Street I think this show will have to be next on the must see list!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 15:59:49 GMT
I found this very tedious
Leanne Cope is very talented as a dancer and a nice singer
But quite expresionless as an actress Robotic almost So affected in how she speaks her lines
What I find puzzling is why the quality of dancing was so poor
If you attend the Royal Ballet regularly
Many of their "new works" are way more impressive than this hybrid show
The directors own Winters Tale is astonishing
Same set designer too
And much more impressive
The fact is that most people going to see this show
Know nothing about professional dance
And just want a brainless evening out
The incessant head bobbing of the crowd just about sums it up
Jane Asher was the best thing about it
I kept thinking about her cakes
It's such a pathetic empty shell of a show
I can't see it lasting beyond 12 months
And again WHO thought this venue was a good idea
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 16:00:12 GMT
As I LOVED 42nd Street I think this show will have to be next on the must see list! It's not really on a par with that show It's for people who watch "rom coms" on a Friday night out And buy novels with pastel coloured covers on them in the 3 for 2 offer
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Mar 29, 2017 17:00:35 GMT
Some of us like this show and know plenty about professional dance, thank you.
|
|
904 posts
|
Post by lonlad on Mar 29, 2017 23:13:23 GMT
Jane Asher one of the LEAST good things about the show, along with Haydn Oakley, who isn't up to it vocally -- the dancing is glorious and to demean Robbie Fairchild (*a ballet world bona fide star) is so infantile as to not be worth further comment. The designs, too, are among Crowley's career best, which is saying a lot !
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 23:32:17 GMT
Jane Asher one of the LEAST good things about the show, along with Haydn Oakley, who isn't up to it vocally -- the dancing is glorious and to demean Robbie Fairchild (*a ballet world bona fide star) is so infantile as to not be worth further comment. The designs, too, are among Crowley's career best, which is saying a lot ! Yes Haydn Oakley has a constipated singing voice And I agree Fairchild is a world class ballet dancer Along with Cope Which makes their presence in this pseudo dance mock musical all the more confusing to me As a comparator see the sort of stuff Sylvie Guillem has done since she "retired" It's way above and beyond this show
|
|
5,910 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Mar 30, 2017 6:55:15 GMT
Jane Asher is dreadful in this! She gave up with her terrible accent after about 8 minutes.
I agree though- how this has got 5 star reviews is beyond me. It's utterly dull. The 2 lead dancers are wonderful but no moment impressed me choreographically. And the rip off of Crazy for you in I Got rythm said it all really.
Looking forward to something else at the dominion soon. I suspect Frozen maybe.
|
|
449 posts
|
Post by SageStageMgr on Mar 30, 2017 17:39:56 GMT
Jane Asher one of the LEAST good things about the show, along with Haydn Oakley, who isn't up to it vocally -- the dancing is glorious and to demean Robbie Fairchild (*a ballet world bona fide star) is so infantile as to not be worth further comment. The designs, too, are among Crowley's career best, which is saying a lot ! Crowley as in Bob "Love Never Dies" Crowley?! Oh wow...
|
|
21 posts
|
Post by elliott on Apr 1, 2017 11:57:52 GMT
Jane Asher one of the LEAST good things about the show, along with Haydn Oakley, who isn't up to it vocally -- the dancing is glorious and to demean Robbie Fairchild (*a ballet world bona fide star) is so infantile as to not be worth further comment. The designs, too, are among Crowley's career best, which is saying a lot ! Crowley as in Bob "Love Never Dies" Crowley?! Oh wow... Bob Crowley did win a Tony and a Drama Desk for the set designs in NY so they are quite special.... I thought so anyway
|
|
1,046 posts
|
Post by jgblunners on Apr 1, 2017 22:16:12 GMT
Really loved this tonight - it's such a lovely show. Suave and sophisticated. The design is brilliant, and the use of projections is very effective, creating a rich setting without having to use big set pieces that clog the stage and remove space for the choreography. Speaking of which, the choreography is mesmerising - stylistically it's a beautiful blend of classic and modern ballet with a bit of a musical theatre touch too.
The principals are all extremely good, and David Seadon-Young's comic acting is superb. We had the 1st Cover for Henri tonight - his first full show after having to make his debut in the role half way through today's matinee! He was very good, but I can't help but wonder whether Haydn Oakley makes a little more of the role. Some good comedy from Jane Asher and lovely vocals from Zoë Rainey. The ensemble are terrific - all clearly accomplished dancers. Unfortunately the ensemble here, while precise by any normal standards, pale in comparison to the 42nd Street ensemble, who were perfectly in time with every minute movement they made.
However, the show really belongs to Robert Fairchild and Leanne Cope. Any time either one is on stage, it's hard to take your eyes off them, and when they dance together it's truly astounding. They are so in sync (which I suppose is to be expected after playing the roles in France and on Broadway before coming over here) and seem effortless in their incredible dances. Their pas de deux in Act Two was magical, and by far the highlight of the show for me.
My only complaint is the sound - maybe it was just an off night, but the orchestra were rather quiet at times when you really wanted a bit of oomf from them, and the balance in the vocals fluctuated a lot.
Overall, a unique and stylish show which deserves to be successful but may struggle to find an audience. If it can, though, it could be a wonderful catalyst for uniting fans of ballet and musical theatre and bridging the gap between the two. 5 Stars from me!
|
|
571 posts
|
Post by westendwendy on Apr 2, 2017 12:09:53 GMT
No it's wasn't you there are massive sound problems in this show. If this show got 22 5 star reviews then I would give 42nd street my first 6 star. I enjoyed it, it just doesn't know if it's a musical, a ballet, a concept piece and its in the wrong theatre.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2017 12:31:38 GMT
No it's wasn't you there are massive sound problems in this show. If this show got 22 5 star reviews then I would give 42nd street my first 6 star. I enjoyed it, it just doesn't know if it's a musical, a ballet, a concept piece and its in the wrong theatre. I second or third this The sound compared to that at 42nd Street is very patchy Shrill is how I would describe the orchestra It's also possibly the ugliest theatre in town Lumbering is how I would describe it
|
|