|
Post by jojo on Dec 5, 2018 19:14:41 GMT
I don't much see the point in having a trip into fancy London town just to see a film at twice the price (or more) of elsewhere, but I reckon a lot of people will have seen that it's the cinema where they have the film premieres, so people are happy to pay extra to be in the same space that their favourite film star, or turn up to an envelope opening celebrity once occupied.
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Dec 5, 2018 20:23:59 GMT
Depends where they are staying, and how early the lines start. On the one hand, the line may form before the tube opens so they won't be near the front. On the other, many people will find getting up at being in line from 7am, then seeing the show at 7.30pm leaves them too tired to enjoy it that much. Fine if you are younger and can cope, not so much as you get a bit older. I gave up on day seating because I was too tired to then enjoy the show when I was still in my 20s so I wouldn't just say it's when people get older! I confess to being very happy that my current favourite long-running WE shows do not do day seats so I don't even have consider it as an option.
In terms of cinema prices, I only ever go to the cinema to see opera or ballet cinecasts where the tickets are typically around £20 as standard so I didn't think the newly-announced £40 seemed that high. Not that I'd pay it myself but then I'd never go to the cinema in London as there's no point going down there for something I can see locally, unlike for live theatre.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Dec 20, 2018 13:54:36 GMT
As a Limitless holder I got an invite to their ‘dress rehearsal’ day on 20th Dec, so I’m going to try the circle seats out. So, they cancelled the 'dress rehearsal' showing I booked, and have sent me a £25 e-gift card instead. RESULT! Especially as I had forgotten all about it and booked to go to Inheritance part 1 tonight......
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 10:35:27 GMT
As part of my current dejunking I found the scrapbook of my 1978 school trip to London - including the ticket for my first ever West End show, Oliver! at the Albery (now the Noel Coward)
Judging by the stamp on the ticket stub we paid £1.20 for Row N of the stalls - same seats are now £135 for All About Eve!
Looking at measuringworth.com, "In 2017, the relative value of £1.20 from 1978 ranges from £5.67 to £13.15."
To be fair our tickets were presumably a group booking. And this was the 1977 revival of Oliver! which would have been running for about a year by that point. But still, that's about 11000% inflation.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 12:11:29 GMT
To be totally fair here I've had a look at prices for school group bookings to Matilda (which I'd say is comparable in terms of the type of show and length of run)
For school bookings of groups of 10+ they offer "Band A or below reduced to £25 for Tuesday - Thursday evenings & Wednesday matinees" so in fact that's about double the £13.15 value in today's money of my £1.20 Oliver! ticket. Interesting!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 13:00:15 GMT
As part of my current dejunking I found the scrapbook of my 1978 school trip to London - including the ticket for my first ever West End show, Oliver! at the Albery (now the Noel Coward) Judging by the stamp on the ticket stub we paid £1.20 for Row N of the stalls - same seats are now £135 for All About Eve! Looking at measuringworth.com, "In 2017, the relative value of £1.20 from 1978 ranges from £5.67 to £13.15." To be fair our tickets were presumably a group booking. And this was the 1977 revival of Oliver! which would have been running for about a year by that point. But still, that's about 11000% inflation. In 1978 there were only 3 TV channels - none dedicated to showing films only - and although video recorders did exist they were the preserve of the very, very rich. (some films appeared on television once a decade if you were lucky with films like Vertigo - now widely accepted as the best film ever - not on our screens for over 20 years for example) People therefore went out to the theatre or cinema in far greater numbers than they do now or ever will do again and, as a consequence, tickets could be cheap. However, for all the talk of theatre being expensive or elitist if you are flexible with what you want to see or your dates you should be able to avoid paying more than £15-20 for a ticket which in 2019 is great value for money. If you're not flexible you will possibly pay more but theatres have to stay financially viable and we can't expect them to pander to the nostalgia of era which does not and will never again exist.
|
|
3,578 posts
|
Post by Rory on Feb 17, 2019 14:10:41 GMT
They are still obscene and getting worse in the West End. I don't care what anyone says. I nearly choked the other day when I saw the prices being charged for The Lehman Trilogy at the Piccadilly.
|
|
543 posts
|
Post by freckles on Feb 17, 2019 16:21:37 GMT
As part of my current dejunking I found the scrapbook of my 1978 school trip to London - including the ticket for my first ever West End show, Oliver! at the Albery (now the Noel Coward) Judging by the stamp on the ticket stub we paid £1.20 for Row N of the stalls - same seats are now £135 for All About Eve! Looking at measuringworth.com, "In 2017, the relative value of £1.20 from 1978 ranges from £5.67 to £13.15." To be fair our tickets were presumably a group booking. And this was the 1977 revival of Oliver! which would have been running for about a year by that point. But still, that's about 11000% inflation. In 1978 there were only 3 TV channels - none dedicated to showing films only - and although video recorders did exist they were the preserve of the very, very rich. (some films appeared on television once a decade if you were lucky with films like Vertigo - now widely accepted as the best film ever - not on our screens for over 20 years for example) People therefore went out to the theatre or cinema in far greater numbers than they do now or ever will do again and, as a consequence, tickets could be cheap. However, for all the talk of theatre being expensive or elitist if you are flexible with what you want to see or your dates you should be able to avoid paying more than £15-20 for a ticket which in 2019 is great value for money. If you're not flexible you will possibly pay more but theatres have to stay financially viable and we can't expect them to pander to the nostalgia of era which does not and will never again exist. True, but those £15-20 tickets are getting increasingly few and far between. Even dayseats and lotteries are rarely under £25 now.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 16:35:52 GMT
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Feb 17, 2019 17:06:18 GMT
The price hike is down to the spread of premium pricing. The premium seat allocation used to be just the centre front stalls and front dress circle - perhaps 100 seats a performance. Now premium seating takes huge swathes of the stalls and circle. There can also be "bands" of premium prices not just one! Top price tickets only buys you side and rear stalls and back of the circle.
Yes, of course there are cheaper seats and deals - but as I have said before, to the casual theatre goer who just looks online at the theatre websites the prices are horrific. Waitress for example - an unknown show over here with no star casting is asking £99.50 £115 and £135 for premium seats. £70/80 buys you very front stalls and sides. HUGE availability- it will have to discount - but perhaps discounting is a part of the business model?
Will theatre tickets become the new DFS sofa sale where no-one buys one unless it's "Half Price - sale must end Monday!"
|
|
65 posts
|
Post by Marcus on Feb 17, 2019 17:17:33 GMT
I always think some shows just ‘chance their arm’. They put seats at huge prices. If people pay that then great, if not they can reduce the price giving people the illusion of ‘this Seat is 50% off’.
The seat should have always been the ‘discounted’ price but people then feel they are getting a bargain.
|
|
2,702 posts
|
Post by viserys on Feb 17, 2019 17:56:30 GMT
I always think some shows just ‘chance their arm’. They put seats at huge prices. If people pay that then great, if not they can reduce the price giving people the illusion of ‘this Seat is 50% off’. The seat should have always been the ‘discounted’ price but people then feel they are getting a bargain. I never understand how this logic is meant to work. A show that needs to be discounting 50% (or more) vibes that it's not doing well and this in turn vibes that it's not popular/not very good. A show that's selling out/has low availability for weeks to come vibes that there's a huge demand and thus "must be good". American shows seem to cleverly capitalize on this by keeping booking periods short - even Hamilton, by all counts a success, only just extended booking for one month - June. Book of Mormon has been doing the same. Dynamic pricing is far more subtle, but I also wonder how many people are scared off by checking new shows, see the initially very high prices, decide against booking and never check back. I think it would make far more sense to start low and only hike prices when there's a big demand. Also gives new shows a chance to get the punters in and then help to spread word of mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 18:16:57 GMT
I always think some shows just ‘chance their arm’. They put seats at huge prices. If people pay that then great, if not they can reduce the price giving people the illusion of ‘this Seat is 50% off’. The seat should have always been the ‘discounted’ price but people then feel they are getting a bargain. I never understand how this logic is meant to work. A show that needs to be discounting 50% (or more) vibes that it's not doing well and this in turn vibes that it's not popular/not very good. A show that's selling out/has low availability for weeks to come vibes that there's a huge demand and thus "must be good". American shows seem to cleverly capitalize on this by keeping booking periods short - even Hamilton, by all counts a success, only just extended booking for one month - June. Book of Mormon has been doing the same. Dynamic pricing is far more subtle, but I also wonder how many people are scared off by checking new shows, see the initially very high prices, decide against booking and never check back. I think it would make far more sense to start low and only hike prices when there's a big demand. Also gives new shows a chance to get the punters in and then help to spread word of mouth. It's common marketing technique. For example, the day they stocked the shelves with Easter Eggs, Tesco were selling lead brands as 50% off. It's not a 50% reduction. It's the price point at which they make profit on the item labeled as "50% off"; making the customer think they're getting a deal and triggering sales. All those "January Sales" - just items brought in at a particular price point and branded as "discounted" (these days).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 19:48:23 GMT
Supermarkets aren't a great comparison though, a lot of their discounted products are loss leaders, stuff they're willing to lose money on because it will help lure people in who will also buy other things so the retailer ultimately does end up in profit. Theatres only *really* sell tickets (programmes, refreshments, and merch are accessories rather than the primary reason for some customers' visits), you can't loss lead those in the same way because even a whole bottle of interval wine won't make up for a ticket purposefully sold at a loss.
|
|
7,190 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Feb 17, 2019 20:06:28 GMT
We've seen with The Full Monty and The Girls that making prices cheaper with no premium pricing doesn't work.
|
|
2,022 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Feb 18, 2019 15:25:42 GMT
Does anyone fear that they (if things carry on as they are) will simply be priced out of West End theatre for good?
(especially people who do not live and/or work in greater London and don't have the flexibilty necessary to get cheap day tickets)
|
|
3,578 posts
|
Post by Rory on Feb 18, 2019 16:01:41 GMT
Does anyone fear that they (if things carry on as they are) will simply be priced out of West End theatre for good? (especially people who do not live and/or work in greater London and don't have the flexibilty necessary to get cheap day tickets) Yes, big time - if the ever increasing price trajectory continues.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2019 16:20:09 GMT
Does anyone fear that they (if things carry on as they are) will simply be priced out of West End theatre for good? (especially people who do not live and/or work in greater London and don't have the flexibilty necessary to get cheap day tickets) Absolutely. Not just in terms of ticket prices (I can't book in advance because of prices, so generally have to rely on chancing it on the day) but with travel from the North and potentially accommodation, the total cost is quickly becoming prohibitively expensive. Like many, I get 4 weeks notice of shifts from work by which point both train and theatre tickets have escalated as the 'book early' period is well out the window, else its a case of having to book holidays/time off.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2019 16:31:58 GMT
It's definitely going to happen. I used to book the random plays that Delfont Mackintosh puts on sale because I could get a perfectly respectable seat for £20 or less, but the cheapest seats that you can actually see the stage from have started going for £25 or £30 these days, and that's just beyond the price point that I'm willing to splash out on a whim. I probably won't miss the West End much when I stop booking nearly everything, as long as I can still get tickets for the National, Young Vic, Old Vic, Royal Court, Almeida, Donmar, Globe, etc for a decent price, and I'm very fortunate that I can afford to pay more for something I actually *want* to see, but it's still a shame.
|
|
|
Post by clair on Feb 18, 2019 16:44:19 GMT
I'm already priced out unless I can get deals or decide to just go with cheap seats but I dislike the latter as I simply end up not enjoying the show as much if I can't actually see performers faces properly. The amount of theatre I see has dropped year on year as prices have increased and sadly I can't see that changing.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Feb 18, 2019 17:53:50 GMT
I don't know the breakdown of WE audiences but it would be interesting to know what percentage are tourists (the pound is low - so tickets seem cheap to visitors) and one off yearly visits for special occasions - birthdays etc. when price doesn't matter if you're spending £200 or more on a pair of tickets just once a year
or
regular theatre goers, say, who go to the theatre every week - probably Londoners and people on this board.
Clearly this will affect what folk are prepared to pay. If tourists and one off visitors make up the largest percentage of the audience I can't see the prices coming down anytime soon. The sad thing is that the people on the stage and crew are not benefiting from these price hikes as I am sure the salaries have not gone up at the same level as prices!
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Feb 18, 2019 18:35:36 GMT
Does anyone fear that they (if things carry on as they are) will simply be priced out of West End theatre for good? (especially people who do not live and/or work in greater London and don't have the flexibilty necessary to get cheap day tickets) Yes. There are several new musicals recently opened that a few years ago I would have probably bought a cheap ticket for & given them a go to see if I liked them. Now I doubt I'll be seeing them as if I'm paying that much money it's got to be for something I really want to see. If I'm paying £60+ for a ticket then I'd rather spend it at the Royal Opera House than in the West End. I'm already trying to save on travel costs by walking from Kings Cross/Liverpool Street into the West End whenever I can so I can pay for a return ticket plus 1 lot of tube fare rather than buying a Travelcard like I used to. I'm already priced out unless I can get deals or decide to just go with cheap seats but I dislike the latter as I simply end up not enjoying the show as much if I can't actually see performers faces properly. I feel the same & being pretty short-sighted doesn't help. It's simply not worth sitting up in the balcony of a large theatre when I can't see any of the acting.
|
|
2,022 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Feb 18, 2019 19:26:09 GMT
Does anyone fear that they (if things carry on as they are) will simply be priced out of West End theatre for good? (especially people who do not live and/or work in greater London and don't have the flexibilty necessary to get cheap day tickets) Yes. There are several new musicals recently opened that a few years ago I would have probably bought a cheap ticket for & given them a go to see if I liked them. Now I doubt I'll be seeing them as if I'm paying that much money it's got to be for something I really want to see. If I'm paying £60+ for a ticket then I'd rather spend it at the Royal Opera House than in the West End. I'm already trying to save on travel costs by walking from Kings Cross/Liverpool Street into the West End whenever I can so I can pay for a return ticket plus 1 lot of tube fare rather than buying a Travelcard like I used to. I'm already priced out unless I can get deals or decide to just go with cheap seats but I dislike the latter as I simply end up not enjoying the show as much if I can't actually see performers faces properly. I feel the same & being pretty short-sighted doesn't help. It's simply not worth sitting up in the balcony of a large theatre when I can't see any of the acting.
I TOTALLY sympathise with sight issues and being stuck at the back. I'd rather not go at all - utter waste of money. And that's no snobbery against so-called cheap seats, but they're hardly going to appeal to ardent and long term theatre goers.
|
|
2,022 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Feb 18, 2019 19:30:10 GMT
I don't know the breakdown of WE audiences but it would be interesting to know what percentage are tourists (the pound is low - so tickets seem cheap to visitors) and one off yearly visits for special occasions - birthdays etc. when price doesn't matter if you're spending £200 or more on a pair of tickets just once a year or regular theatre goers, say, who go to the theatre every week - probably Londoners and people on this board. Clearly this will affect what folk are prepared to pay. If tourists and one off visitors make up the largest percentage of the audience I can't see the prices coming down anytime soon. The sad thing is that the people on the stage and crew are not benefiting from these price hikes as I am sure the salaries have not gone up at the same level as prices!
Very interesting.
Who are the real bread and butter customers, one wonders....
I know many will scoff and assume that because I go to the theatre a lot, I have a high an extravagant standard of living, but far from it. I make many other sacrifices in life to afford the luxury and indulgence of those tickets. Things that other people of my age and peer group would not like. I rarely eat out, shop at the cheap supermarkets, drive a (very well preserved) "old banger" and don't shop at John Lewis! hehe
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2019 19:57:38 GMT
I’ve become much more picky about what I book for in the West End. No longer will I go and see something without doing my homework on it before booking and I weed out anything that doesn’t appear to give good value on a ‘will I like it/what will it cost? calculation. The cost since I started going, as with xanderl, has just risen too greatly. The subsidised theatres and fringe are much better value for money and, to be honest, have the better shows most of the time, not the star-bait plays and tourist-trap bog standard revivals that make up so many West End openings.
The idea of spending so much just to be disappointed isn’t necessary if you do the right preparation (although, seemingly, some seem to have so much cash they happy to parade how much they spend on something they appear to barely enjoy).
|
|