|
Post by mattnyc on Jun 3, 2024 18:59:34 GMT
doesn’t it close 3rd august? Sadly, yes.
|
|
|
Post by lizabella on Jun 3, 2024 19:13:45 GMT
doesn’t it close 3rd august? Sadly, yes. Sorry my mistake 3rd August, not long though
|
|
227 posts
|
Post by galinda on Jun 8, 2024 18:47:48 GMT
Cancelled tonight due to cast illness. Shows seem to cancel a lot more than they used to?
|
|
3,485 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Jun 9, 2024 0:42:13 GMT
Really enjoyed the Saturday matinee. What a great band! Moving at times though vocals often drowned out by music. Simple but effective lighting and set.
|
|
|
Post by flouise on Jun 9, 2024 17:52:34 GMT
Cancelled tonight due to cast illness. Shows seem to cancel a lot more than they used to? I've just seen the Sunday matinee, there were 7 cast members off which might normally be fairly manageable but I'm guessing that they must have been pretty much at the limit as it included most of lead roles- Poppy, Joy and Rose were all covers, as well as Marcus and Connie. A couple of the female swings were off too, so I can understand why last night's performance couldn't go ahead assuming that there was even more sickness then. They all did a fantastic job, it was 2nd cover Karen Wilkinson's debut as Poppy, I was very impressed!
|
|
3,576 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jun 21, 2024 1:10:52 GMT
I finally saw this for the first time tonight, in lieu of the cancelled Alma Mater, and it absolutely blew me away. One of the most stunning and moving pieces of theatre I've ever seen. If I could go back again before the 3rd August, when it very sadly closes, I would. Stunning in every respect. Extremely moving and beautifully staged and performed. Richard Hawley's music was sublime.
|
|
|
Post by flouise on Jun 23, 2024 9:17:36 GMT
I'm not entirely sure what's going on with the pricing at the show, despite tickets sales being fairly poor, the minimum price ticket now seems to be £39.50 when bought directly from the theatre's website, and I'm currently trying to get a rush ticket for this afternoon's performance and there appears to be very few (if any!) available despite half of the seats being unsold for the performance.
I can't quite understand the logic!
|
|
42 posts
|
Post by viscountviktor on Jun 23, 2024 21:09:05 GMT
Loved it so much. So political and powerful.
|
|
1,570 posts
|
Post by showtoones on Jun 26, 2024 15:20:42 GMT
question - is this show worth a visit? I wanted to see it before it closed but the two songs they did at West End Live were terrible and sounded like songs that would sung in a pub. Thoughts?
|
|
5,180 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Being Alive on Jun 26, 2024 15:24:50 GMT
It's great - the cast are wonderful - I'm going again before it ends.
|
|
3,576 posts
|
Post by Rory on Jun 26, 2024 15:37:51 GMT
question - is this show worth a visit? I wanted to see it before it closed but the two songs they did at West End Live were terrible and sounded like songs that would sung in a pub. Thoughts? YES, it's fabulous. I saw it last week and adored it, and the singing was beautiful. Go!
|
|
|
Post by flouise on Jun 26, 2024 16:40:59 GMT
question - is this show worth a visit? I wanted to see it before it closed but the two songs they did at West End Live were terrible and sounded like songs that would sung in a pub. Thoughts? I'd definitely recommend it, I don't think the WEL performance was a great representation of the show-they work much better in context, and I saw the matinee the afternoon of WEL and felt that Lauryn performed the song much better then, and Tonight The Streets Are Ours is a great song where all of the main cast come together
|
|
725 posts
|
Post by theatremiss on Jun 26, 2024 16:48:35 GMT
I’ve seen it and have 2 more trips before it closes. This is a wonderful show
|
|
|
Post by A.Ham on Jun 26, 2024 16:50:26 GMT
question - is this show worth a visit? I wanted to see it before it closed but the two songs they did at West End Live were terrible and sounded like songs that would sung in a pub. Thoughts? Yes, no question, go! It’s wonderful!
|
|
|
Post by jaybird89 on Jun 26, 2024 22:40:08 GMT
Hey all,
I'm finally getting around to seeing this tomorrow evening, question though I'm usually a front row lover but is this better a bit further back to take it all in just looking for some advice as will likely only get round to seeing it the once.
Thanks :-)
|
|
3,316 posts
|
Post by david on Jun 26, 2024 22:51:50 GMT
Hey all, I'm finally getting around to seeing this tomorrow evening, question though I'm usually a front row lover but is this better a bit further back to take it all in just looking for some advice as will likely only get round to seeing it the once. Thanks :-) I watched it from stalls R55 and had a great view and missed nothing (I specifically wanted further back for the entire view - cast. Lighting etc ) as the viewing would be a 1 hit thing for me.
|
|
|
Post by 141920grm on Jun 26, 2024 23:10:58 GMT
better a bit further back to take it all in yep, stalls E and back are great, front row is too close imo and I was constantly swivelling my head to follow the actors traversing the stage
|
|
|
Post by jaybird89 on Jun 26, 2024 23:13:03 GMT
Thank you both I was thinking that would be the case I'm going to go with further back :-) very excited to finally getting around to seeing this.
|
|
1,287 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Jun 26, 2024 23:13:45 GMT
I got the £10 Friday Rush tickets in row E and the view was great
|
|
|
Post by A.Ham on Jun 27, 2024 8:51:59 GMT
The stage is very wide and runs across almost the full width of the auditorium, so would agree a few rows back at least (and ideally fairly central) would give the best views.
|
|
|
Post by oedipus on Jun 29, 2024 11:37:34 GMT
Caught this last night on a rush ticket (row G is awesome, btw: far enough back to see the whole stage). As an American, I struggled with a few of the more specific references, but I got the gist of whole social critique, particularly of Thatcherism.
I went in not knowing anything about the musical (I usually prefer it that way), and at first was totally baffled by the format. At intermission, I googled to discover that it was a jukebox, and I was like aha! that's why the songs are at times so obliquely related to the stage action. That's not a criticism, per se, but it helps to know what to expect (or would have helped me, at any rate).
As for the book, well, I thought 2/3 of it was effective. The thing is, it's hard to interweave three complex stories together without flattening the characters, even within the rather leisurely running time of three hours. So the through-line has to be social commentary, which made sense for the first two time periods, but was something of a struggle for the third (which seemed to be aimed at gentrification, but ended up as a weird dissection of toxic relationships, familial and romantic).
So: I liked it--sometimes a great deal--but between the jukebox structure and the crisscrossing timelines, it could seem a bit unfocused. Some terrific design work, and I even sort of dug the out-there choreography (with all of its Pina Bausch-like repetitions).
|
|
|
Post by somnorific on Jun 29, 2024 21:25:07 GMT
So: I liked it--sometimes a great deal--but between the jukebox structure and the crisscrossing timelines, it could seem a bit unfocused. . ... But -- it's *not* a jukebox musical!
|
|
|
Post by max on Jun 29, 2024 21:37:30 GMT
So: I liked it--sometimes a great deal--but between the jukebox structure and the crisscrossing timelines, it could seem a bit unfocused. . ... But -- it's *not* a jukebox musical! Features 'new and existing songs' says Wikipedia. I saw the show last week and recognised one song from somewhere - realised afterwards it was the stand out song from Shirley Bassey's 2009 album 'Performance' where a number of writers were commissioned to write songs for her (her first album of original songs for 30 years). Richard Hawley's song for her was 'After The Rain' with the hook line 'this girl just can't take it anymore'. A beautiful song, and amongst those that worked best in the show I thought.
|
|
|
Post by oedipus on Jun 29, 2024 22:33:19 GMT
... But -- it's *not* a jukebox musical! Features 'new and existing songs' says Wikipedia. I saw the show last week and recognised one song from somewhere - realised afterwards it was the stand out song from Shirley Bassey's 2009 album 'Performance' where a number of writers were commissioned to write songs for her (her first album of original songs for 30 years). Richard Hawley's song for her was 'After The Rain' with the hook line 'this girl just can't take it anymore'. A beautiful song, and amongst those that worked best in the show I thought. Thanks for this. The learning resource pack on the show's own website even says it's a jukebox musical (pg. 10). Perhaps RH also added additional material in its development? The interview with the book writer gives a bit of insight into how the creative team approached pre-existing material.
|
|
|
Post by max on Jun 29, 2024 23:28:29 GMT
Features 'new and existing songs' says Wikipedia. I saw the show last week and recognised one song from somewhere - realised afterwards it was the stand out song from Shirley Bassey's 2009 album 'Performance' where a number of writers were commissioned to write songs for her (her first album of original songs for 30 years). Richard Hawley's song for her was 'After The Rain' with the hook line 'this girl just can't take it anymore'. A beautiful song, and amongst those that worked best in the show I thought. Thanks for this. The learning resource pack on the show's own website even says it's a jukebox musical (pg. 10). Perhaps RH also added additional material in its development? The interview with the book writer gives a bit of insight into how the creative team approached pre-existing material. I downloaded that too but haven't had a chance to look at it yet - interesting they use the 'jukebox' term. I guess it's as if 'Mamma Mia' had been mainly back catalogue, but Benny/Bjorn had written some new songs too (surprised they didn't actually, to try to bag an Oscar). This was the case with Boy George's 'Taboo' though the majority of the songs there were new; I'm sure there are other examples of a mix of existing plus new/bespoke. I'm still thinking about the way 'Standing At The Sky's Edge' used songs. Some were very fitting for a character in a location in a specific moment (as we expect in a Musical). Other songs were mood pieces supporting emotion but not the exact detail of a drama moment or character (as in 'Girl From The North Country). There's a scene where Jimmy talks about possibly going to work on an oil rig, how it'll be like going into space (harking back to his childhood imagining of his dad's steelworks job), and they'll build the new Jerusalem. It feels perfect for being sung, as if the dialogue is going to slip into song at any moment, and be strong in Richard Hawley's songwriting style. Instead, it stays as dialogue. That's okay, because we weren't promised a Musical as such, and songs are being used in a different way. Except... immediately the next scene features a character we've never met who's introduced via a full song with a 'let me in' narrative. It's in the very real setting of the landing of the flats, at the front door of her ex - a specific time place and need, like we'd expect in a Musical. Then they do that same action, but in dialogue - just like you shouldn't really do in a musical. For me, mixing the two approaches in the same piece didn't work that well. Too many cases of being able to see 'what you could have won', and feeling disappointed when they went the other route. It's not straight-out 'jukebox' but knowing the songwriter was instead on-hand to make things bespoke when needed.... I thought that need was underestimated, and it could have been better.
|
|