|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2019 22:40:04 GMT
I can only echo what everyone else has said - what a privilege to see a Dame Maggie Smith acting masterclass live.
I agree the play is slight, and I found it rather imbalanced given the lengthy focus on her early life and the compararively brief, almost glossing over, precis of the post-war part, but that may have been deliberate. From a subject perspective, that was disappointing, but from an acting perspective it didn't really matter what the play was, the standard of performance was a privilege to watch.
|
|
|
Post by orchidman on May 9, 2019 0:40:40 GMT
It's a weak play, and however glad people (myself included) are to see Maggie Smith, I couldn't say it was good theatre.
I don't like knowing too much before I see things and hadn't realised there's a documentary of the actual woman, filmed aged 105. Now, that is a much more promising concept. Firstly because it's not often you see someone aged 105 reflecting on their life. Secondly because that makes her one of the last people alive to have lived through these events. Thirdly to see her in close-up and judge for yourself how much you believe her.
But to see someone else play her removes the main elements that are interesting in the source material. Her life story isn't one of particular note given the many, many fascinating stories from that time. So telling it as a play is probably a bad idea but there are ways to bring it to life, none of which are taken. We just get one actress playing her and a monologue in continuous time. Seriously? This is the best adaptation they could conjure up?
Maggie Smith is captivating for about twenty minutes until you realise it's not really going to go anywhere, beyond that she does as well as anyone could with the material. Sometimes you know you aren't loving something but you can feel you are out of step with the audience (Come From Away recently), but here, I got the feeling a lot of the audience was politely bored.
|
|
|
Post by bgarde on May 9, 2019 6:09:58 GMT
It's a weak play, and however glad people (myself included) are to see Maggie Smith, I couldn't say it was good theatre. I don't like knowing too much before I see things and hadn't realised there's a documentary of the actual woman, filmed aged 105. Now, that is a much more promising concept. Firstly because it's not often you see someone aged 105 reflecting on their life. Secondly because that makes her one of the last people alive to have lived through these events. Thirdly to see her in close-up and judge for yourself how much you believe her. But to see someone else play her removes the main elements that are interesting in the source material. Her life story isn't one of particular note given the many, many fascinating stories from that time. So telling it as a play is probably a bad idea but there are ways to bring it to life, none of which are taken. We just get one actress playing her and a monologue in continuous time. Seriously? This is the best adaptation they could conjure up? Maggie Smith is captivating for about twenty minutes until you realise it's not really going to go anywhere, beyond that she does as well as anyone could with the material. Sometimes you know you aren't loving something but you can feel you are out of step with the audience (Come From Away recently), but here, I got the feeling a lot of the audience was politely bored. Yes, of course Maggie Smith was so compelling but I definitely had a sense of "is that it?" afterwards.
|
|
5,691 posts
|
Post by lynette on May 9, 2019 14:28:36 GMT
I disagree guys. I 'saw' the action being described very well. I think it was well written and did justice to the performance. The Jewish girl sitting on the wall outside the office where her best friend was signing up to the Nazi Party? Many other details were loud and clear. Astonishing acting and writing that enabled it. One person performances are drama just as much as regular plays.
|
|
1,046 posts
|
Post by jgblunners on May 9, 2019 15:24:07 GMT
Saw this on Tuesday - 5 stars, absolutely incredible performance from Her Royal Highness Maggie. I don't care whether she was acting the forgetfulness or genuinely losing her place, because she was riveting. The material is indeed pretty average, but in her hands it is elevated to a captivating and thought-provoking evening during which a woman in a chair conjures up vivid images of a time and place that is miles away from anything I've ever known. For me, the most intriguing aspect was the ambiguity of whether she genuinely felt guilt-free about the part she played or whether she simply buried the guilt for her own protection. After all, she goes to great lengths to tell us how intelligent and hard-working she was, but then claims that many things simply passed her by because it 'wasn't her place' to know them or because she was simply 'too stupid' to notice. And then there's the whole 'I had no choice' argument, which is another kettle of fish...
|
|
1,083 posts
|
Post by andrew on May 9, 2019 16:24:18 GMT
General warning information for the last few day seats: 4am is the first arrival, by 6.30am your chances are getting very dodgy indeed, probably nil unless the house find a few extra seats. Instead of star ratings, maybe for high profile shows we should say how early we'd be prepared to queue for? 4am is not something I'd be prepared to do...
|
|
3,334 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on May 10, 2019 7:22:21 GMT
Report from last night. This was a rather fascinating story and I'd be keen to read a fuller account in a book someday.
I've only ever seen Maggie Smith on stage once before, in The Lady from Dubuque. She owned the stage then, as she did for A German Life.
As a play, this is powerful, but slight. I suspect, without a star name attached, it would struggle to attract an audience. But the performance, the mannerisms, the seeming forgotten moments and stumbles, were all masterfully done.
I did get the impression that a lot of the audience didn't really want to be there. I was in the top level, 2nd row, one of the high £15 seats. A bargain! A clear view (there was a rail, but you didn't even need to lean forward due to where Dame Smith was positioned on stage) and much closer than the rear Stalls. Clear sound too (obviously helped by amplification). But, you could see every phone screen lighting and every sneaky photograph being made. And, you could hear every cough.
I heard one gentlemen complaining as he was leaving about the lady next to him continually checking her emails on her watch. It must be a time for announcements to remind people to turn their smartwatches off, just as they do for phones.
My other annoyance is the usual one about the small number of people who decide to laugh loudly at the most inappropriate times. I just can't understand about how hearing about the death of Jews prompts that type of reaction in people.
For one actor to hold my attention for 1 hour 40 minutes without a break is quite a feat. I can't see this production as anything other than deserving of a load of awards.
|
|
|
Post by d'James on May 10, 2019 10:21:46 GMT
Report from last night. This was a rather fascinating story and I'd be keen to read a fuller account in a book someday. I've only ever seen Maggie Smith on stage once before, in The Lady from Dubuque. She owned the stage then, as she did for A German Life. As a play, this is powerful, but slight. I suspect, without a star name attached, it would struggle to attract an audience. But the performance, the mannerisms, the seeming forgotten moments and stumbles, were all masterfully done. I did get the impression that a lot of the audience didn't really want to be there. I was in the top level, 2nd row, one of the high £15 seats. A bargain! A clear view (there was a rail, but you didn't even need to lean forward due to where Dame Smith was positioned on stage) and much closer than the rear Stalls. Clear sound too (obviously helped by amplification). But, you could see every phone screen lighting and every sneaky photograph being made. And, you could hear every cough. I heard one gentlemen complaining as he was leaving about the lady next to him continually checking her emails on her watch. It must be a time for announcements to remind people to turn their smartwatches off, just as they do for phones. My other annoyance is the usual one about the small number of people who decide to laugh loudly at the most inappropriate times. I just can't understand about how hearing about the death of Jews prompts that type of reaction in people. For one actor to hold my attention for 1 hour 40 minutes without a break is quite a feat. I can't see this production as anything other than deserving of a load of awards. Admittedly I have only had a Smartwatch since Christmas and it’s always on Theatre Mode anyway (yes, that’s a thing). I made an exception for Dame Mags though and switched it off for the first time in a show.
|
|
5,691 posts
|
Post by lynette on May 10, 2019 12:44:34 GMT
Making us laugh at times in this piece is part of the dramatist’s brilliance. It breaks the tension which was tangible I thought and it makes us think. Wry laughter here I thought not a bad thing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 14:06:21 GMT
Yes, the smart watches were a huge irritant from the second gallery when I was there last week as well! I must have counted about 20 of them!
|
|
1,306 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on May 10, 2019 14:30:03 GMT
Saw this Monday evening with my 2 American friends. They wanted to see a Star on a stage – box ticked. I don’t know if the play meant anything to them other than that impressive performance by Dame M. I had mentioned earlier that the forgetfulness was part of the performance, the dithering thing likewise. I hadn’t mentioned the stage creeping forward; pointed it out just as we were leaving, neither had noticed. It is a slight piece but interesting - I'd been to Berlin in February this year, my first visit. Tied in nicely with the information amassed by the performance.
A pretty good audience, I saw a few lights from watches from my Gallery 1 Seat 54 (very comfy, little bar to lean on without disrupting view of Seat 53, excellent view). Most irritating was the staff member sat next to me on the little Staff seat “policing” the audience in her outdoor rustling coat. Leaning forward, leaning back, rustle, rustle, rustle. Before the show started the woman across the aisle had asked if the cold air blower could be turned down as it was blowing full blast and blooming cold! It wasn't ....
And as I put in the survey the Bridge sent to me after the show, there really must be another way of informing people that cameras must not be used rather than the waving of arms, pointing at the attending patron etc prior to "curtain up". Yeah, if you are a regular theatre goer you know, but for the people that don’t go often or are tourists, especially attending a show with a name such as the Dame, it’s inelegant, rude even, to point and gesticulate, with other audience members looking at the inadvertent wrong doer.
|
|
1,083 posts
|
Post by andrew on May 10, 2019 17:17:59 GMT
I hadn’t mentioned the stage creeping forward; pointed it out just as we were leaving, neither had noticed What?! She moves like 15 metres forward?! The set at the back blows slowly apart? They didn't even notice by the end?! I mean did anyone else not notice it? I have a smartwatch, I turn it off for every show. I left it in theatre mode once, and if I'm a bit bored I'll fiddle with my hands, and I brushed the watch once and it lit up. Never again.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 17:54:23 GMT
I hadn’t mentioned the stage creeping forward; pointed it out just as we were leaving, neither had noticed What?! She moves like 15 metres forward?! The set at the back blows slowly apart? They didn't even notice by the end?! I mean did anyone else not notice it? I didn't notice until halfway through the play when the flickering light on the bookshelf momentarily caught my attention. I was focused on Dame Maggie and not what was around her.
|
|
873 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by juicy_but_terribly_drab on May 10, 2019 18:02:23 GMT
I hadn’t mentioned the stage creeping forward; pointed it out just as we were leaving, neither had noticed What?! She moves like 15 metres forward?! The set at the back blows slowly apart? They didn't even notice by the end?! I mean did anyone else not notice it? I have a smartwatch, I turn it off for every show. I left it in theatre mode once, and if I'm a bit bored I'll fiddle with my hands, and I brushed the watch once and it lit up. Never again. Went with my mum and she didn't notice either. I think once you're engrossed in her acting you kind of ignore what's happening around her. I noticed because I'd read about it here but I think it's entirely possible if I wasn't looking out for it my brain might have just ignored it.
|
|
1,083 posts
|
Post by andrew on May 10, 2019 20:56:17 GMT
I was focused on Dame Maggie and not what was around her. Am I weird for looking around at the set a few times during a one woman show? I can't stare at one spot for 90 minutes, but maybe it's part of the cursed syndrome of the mobile phone generation. I hadn't read about the set before seeing the show, but I'd noticed a change by about 20 minutes probably. Then I thought it was quite fun. Presumably there were people who watched Maggie slide right past their heads. Imperceptibly slowly. Hopefully they noticed they'd started off facing one way and ended up facing the other!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 22:18:53 GMT
I was focused on Dame Maggie and not what was around her. Am I weird for looking around at the set a few times during a one woman show? I can't stare at one spot for 90 minutes, but maybe it's part of the cursed syndrome of the mobile phone generation. I hadn't read about the set before seeing the show, but I'd noticed a change by about 20 minutes probably. Then I thought it was quite fun. Presumably there were people who watched Maggie slide right past their heads. Imperceptibly slowly. Hopefully they noticed they'd started off facing one way and ended up facing the other! I knew from this board that it would happen but didn't notice it had until part way through. Even then I didn't see it actually move. I looked around at the set a bit but wasn't really paying attention to the floor!
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on May 10, 2019 22:30:18 GMT
I mean did anyone else not notice it? I noticed the 'exterior' lighting changing as the afternoon turned to evening, and noticed the interior lights dimming as well, but completely missed the movement of the set.
|
|
873 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by juicy_but_terribly_drab on May 11, 2019 0:55:37 GMT
While I did notice all these things I will say I never noticed them happening, I only noticed them after they had happened so they were obviously all subtle changes and designed to be as such so I don't think it's that unlikely people missed them.
|
|
5,817 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on May 11, 2019 7:58:14 GMT
I’m mystified how anyone can say this is deserving of “All the awards”. I found it a very hard thing to sit through- her every (strangely placed) pause made me feel like she’d forgotten her next line and as a result I never became engrossed. My main focus was watching the slowly shifting set.
She’s a marvel... she’s a legend and I adore her ..but this is not award worthy. I have full admiration for the huge risk she’s taking every night though going out there all on her own but let’s not all get carried away.
|
|
2,246 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by talkingheads on May 11, 2019 9:55:23 GMT
I’m mystified how anyone can say this is deserving of “All the awards”. I found it a very hard thing to sit through- her every (strangely placed) pause made me feel like she’d forgotten her next line and as a result I never became engrossed. My main focus was watching the slowly shifting set. She’s a marvel... she’s a legend and I adore her ..but this is not award worthy. I have full admiration for the huge risk she’s taking every night though going out there all on her own but let’s not all get carried away. I took the pauses as the fact that the character as an unreliable narrator in old age would have trouble recollecting things and would also get muddled in speech.
|
|
5,691 posts
|
Post by lynette on May 13, 2019 10:19:07 GMT
Actual person on BBC4 10 o’clock tonight in the interview they made off her when she was very old.
|
|
1,306 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on May 14, 2019 14:30:49 GMT
I hadn’t mentioned the stage creeping forward; pointed it out just as we were leaving, neither had noticed What?! She moves like 15 metres forward?! The set at the back blows slowly apart? They didn't even notice by the end?! I mean did anyone else not notice it? I have a smartwatch, I turn it off for every show. I left it in theatre mode once, and if I'm a bit bored I'll fiddle with my hands, and I brushed the watch once and it lit up. Never again. One had noticed the lighting changing, the shadows on the floor changing; both had registered the large black space at the front of the stage, but I held them back as everyone was leaving to point out that the "floor" was now near the front of stage.
|
|
2,246 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by talkingheads on Jan 9, 2021 11:51:34 GMT
|
|
5,691 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jan 9, 2021 15:53:02 GMT
This was one of the most moving, brilliant pieces of theatre i have ever seen. It was a privilege being in the theatre and I am pretty sure the whole audience felt the same, a real community of theatre. Looks like a movie version will be good and give us Maggie’s performance for posterity, but in the theatre it was amazing.
|
|