5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Mar 3, 2019 22:22:23 GMT
Just a note re Neil's point about people going to university and then taking advantage of the Arts. I’m not talking Oxbridge but when I went to university it was 10% and I can say from my own experience and friendship group we were nearly all 'working class'. Yes, aspirational, yes with some parents in trade and oh yes, all from grammar schools. We devoured the Arts.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 9:58:29 GMT
all from grammar schools. We devoured the Arts. I think (based on family experience) children, especially boys in working class areas can be subjected to bullying by their peers if they show an interest even in, sad to say, stuff like reading for pleasure (as a teenager reading a book on a bench in the street a car pulled up and some men shouted "f***ing student!" at me and drove off. Well, made a change from the usual misogynistic abuse from men in cars!). This wasn't the case for my grandfather's generation - he was a factory worker in a Left-wing workers' theatre group and had shelves of books, and poets and opera singers would visit the Dunlop factory to give readings and perform. I think the devastation of factory closures and flight of the middle classes from many Northern areas with the knock-on of theatres, cinemas and bookshops closing - certainly the case in my home town in the 80s and 90s - has created an understandable insecurity which at the school my cousin went to meant being interested in reading, showing enthusiasm in class was attacked by peers for being somehow unmanly, not 'one of us'. Even how you spoke was policed by peers - Liverpool is one of the few regions where the accent has actually got stronger to the extent I sometimes pass people in the shops and it takes a few seconds to realise it's not East European.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2019 10:24:16 GMT
all from grammar schools. We devoured the Arts. I think (based on family experience) children, especially boys in working class areas can be subjected to bullying by their peers if they show an interest even in, sad to say, stuff like reading for pleasure (as a teenager reading a book on a bench in the street a car pulled up and some men shouted "f***ing student!" at me and drove off. Well, made a change from the usual misogynistic abuse from men in cars!). This wasn't the case for my grandfather's generation - he was a factory worker in a Left-wing workers' theatre group and had shelves of books, and poets and opera singers would visit the Dunlop factory to give readings and perform. I think the devastation of factory closures and flight of the middle classes from many Northern areas with the knock-on of theatres, cinemas and bookshops closing - certainly the case in my home town in the 80s and 90s - has created an understandable insecurity which at the school my cousin went to meant being interested in reading, showing enthusiasm in class was attacked by peers for being somehow unmanly, not 'one of us'. Even how you spoke was policed by peers - Liverpool is one of the few regions where the accent has actually got stronger to the extent I sometimes pass people in the shops and it takes a few seconds to realise it's not East European. Slightly tangental, but comedian Mark Thomas did an incredibly moving piece about his Working-Class father's love of opera called Bravo Figaro. There's a DVD of it, and well worth watching. I actually was an usher in the show on tour and I really had to pull myself together in order to see the audience out, incredibly moving. Less tangential, I don't have any facts and figures to hand, but I'd be willing to bet that a similar knock-on effect was seen in South Wales as the mines and factories closed (people forget that outside the valleys we have a lot of 'factory towns' like Bridgend for example, as well as 'mining towns')
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 10:38:49 GMT
a similar knock-on effect was seen in South Wales as the mines and factories closed Yes - I think a case of factories not only giving security but also to a degree a cultural hub with the Workers' Educational Association and performances (Mum said Kathleen Ferrier performed at Dunlops, while C. Day Lewis - Daniel's dad - came to their school.). Related to the Mark Thomas programme (thank you, I'll seek it out) I remember Mark Steel - I think - saying once that his Mum thought "BBC2 isn't for the likes of us" ! TV scheduling used to be amazing: I've probably said this before, but the listings read like BFI South Bank film programming, arts shows at reasonable hours of the day showed clips from current stage productions, there were lengthy interviews with writers etc. (I hope old Arenas and Omnibuses turn up on the new BBC streaming service). It felt like there was a genuinely concerted effort to reach out, educate and inform: the arts are for everyone, not hidden behind a paywall.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2019 10:44:21 GMT
a similar knock-on effect was seen in South Wales as the mines and factories closed Yes - I think a case of factories not only giving security but also to a degree a cultural hub with the Workers' Educational Association and performances (Mum said Kathleen Ferrier performed at Dunlops, while C. Day Lewis - Daniel's dad - came to their school.). Related to the Mark Thomas programme (thank you, I'll seek it out) I remember Mark Steel - I think - saying once that his Mum thought "BBC2 isn't for the likes of us" ! TV scheduling used to be amazing: I've probably said this before, but the listings read like BFI South Bank film programming, arts shows at reasonable hours of the day showed clips from current stage productions, there were lengthy interviews with writers etc. (I hope old Arenas and Omnibuses turn up on the new BBC streaming service). It felt like there was a genuinely concerted effort to reach out, educate and inform: the arts are for everyone, not hidden behind a paywall. Again tangental but I've had a few instances of snobbery from very middle class people around TV channels. A girl, my own age so mid 30s, lefty, gay woman, describes things she feels are a bit 'common' as 'very ITV' and honestly, I want to smack her with a Radio Times. Secondly a very upper middle class friend of mine was OUTRAGED that my family didn't routinely watch David Attenborough shows, and forever saw it as a mark of my 'uneducated working class background' (what she didn't know was my Dad instead had us watch every transport and war related documentary every known) So I forever take my lack of knowledge of wildlife docs as an indication that I'm terribly common.
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 4, 2019 10:46:37 GMT
Just to say I second what @emicardiff said about Bravo Figaro.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 10:50:31 GMT
describes things she feels are a bit 'common' as 'very ITV' Apart from anything else, ITV's South Bank Show used to be the flagship arts programme, though I always resented the Londoncentric title!
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 4, 2019 11:00:26 GMT
. Again tangental but I've had a few instances of snobbery from very middle class people around TV channels. A girl, my own age so mid 30s, lefty, gay woman, describes things she feels are a bit 'common' as 'very ITV' and honestly, I want to smack her with a Radio Times. Secondly a very upper middle class friend of mine was OUTRAGED that my family didn't routinely watch David Attenborough shows, and forever saw it as a mark of my 'uneducated working class background' (what she didn't know was my Dad instead had us watch every transport and war related documentary every known) So I forever take my lack of knowledge of wildlife docs as an indication that I'm terribly common. Cultural snobbery is for me one of the most ugly and unpleasant traits a person can have. I had a colleague with whom I'd discuss culture especially theatre, and when she heard me saying I liked pop music and various things she considered beneath her and somehow unworthy of me, a like minded culturephile, she was actually shocked. It was as if I'd let the side down. She once even said "I don't understand why you're so populist, I've been trying to work it out." TRYING TO WORK IT OUT?! I said, well don't bother. I just like stuff. But she couldn't comprehend this, she seemed to think I actually had some kind of agenda! The Attenborough/wildlife docs thing is hilarious. My Dad liked wildlife docs so I grew up seeing them and didn't mind them but I've grown bored of them. I can't be bothered with them. Good one for the Unpopular Opinions thread - Attenborough's shows are boring. Side note - I love the shock and outrage that greets any revelation that not everything in those docs is filmed in situ and that sound effects are added in the studio etc.
|
|
1,863 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Mar 4, 2019 11:50:58 GMT
Well having watched last nights Endeavour, any cultural snobs will have missed one hell of a TV programme / series.
Same goes for Vera.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 12:21:28 GMT
It's fantastic, one of my favourite shows. It's clearly made with so much love and affection for the characters and audience. I was cheering out loud at the finale (I've shed a few tears too), and there are very few series that have me worrying about the characters' fates like that. It's also packed with lovely references which are a joy to spot but never threaten to overwhelm or pull you out, but are instead part of Endeavour's alternative universe where the Crossroads Motel is a real place to stay, Raymond Duck is on the 4th floor of the Charing Cross Road and Thursday reads 'The Lone Rider of Santa Fe'.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2019 12:24:56 GMT
Well I know but . . . ITV . . . I always record ITV shows so that I can skip through the adverts and pretend that I'm watching the BBC. I do rather like Shaun Evans' moustache in 'Endeavour' though.
|
|
999 posts
|
Post by Backdrifter on Mar 4, 2019 12:54:01 GMT
It's fantastic, one of my favourite shows. It's clearly made with so much love and affection for the characters and audience. I was cheering out loud at the finale (I've shed a few tears too), and there are very few series that have me worrying about the characters' fates like that. It's also packed with lovely references which are a joy to spot but never threaten to overwhelm or pull you out, but are instead part of Endeavour's alternative universe where the Crossroads Motel is a real place to stay, Raymond Duck is on the 4th floor of the Charing Cross Road and Thursday reads 'The Lone Rider of Santa Fe'. I had one episode recommended to me which I dutifully watched. It was OK and while I didn't dislike it, neither did I feel any urge to watch more. I absolutely see the appeal of it and I love Allam.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 4, 2019 14:07:35 GMT
Btw, the Guardian has just run a piece on an actress which mentions class in the headline and goes on to describe her parents as teachers in Hackney. It doesn't mention her father went on to be a commissioner at the BBC and ch4 and her grandfather was the President of Uganda. She's a really talented young actress but why does the paper mention class - thus bringing the subject up - in the headline and then not tell the whole story? If the piece was just focused on her role then we needn't know anything, but as this is also a profile, why miss out relevant facts? The newspaper did something similar with another actor recently, implying he only got to go to drama school thanks to kindly benefactors - they didn't mention he'd already done a PPE degree at Christ Church, Oxford. When Radio 4 repeated this rather Dickensian line the actor himself corrected them and set out the whole picture. Last week we had the 'Olivia Colman, from toilet cleaner to the Oscars' Cinderella story, when it's clear from the recent Who Do You Think You Are that she's solidly middle class. It's sending out the misleading message that anyone can do it regardless, when in reality the cards are very much stacked against many talented youngsters and that is something we need to address.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Mar 4, 2019 21:13:31 GMT
Nicholas. I know we can’t afford books and libraries anymore. And I know taking kids from school to theatres is difficult. But we should try. Interesting development re boos: bookshelves at tube stations by me, northern line. You can give and you can take, all sorts, some for kids. Brilliant idea I think. So you can get your kid to read a book on the tube instead of staring into space while you fiddle with your phone ( not you, but the woman on the train the other day opposite me. I was so annoyed I was about to start a conversation with the kid but then you can be hauled off to prison for less)
Endeavour, best thing on tv. I wasn’t aware of any snob thing about it? Was that because it is on ITV? When I was a kid, ITV was a bit 'common' to use Alan Bennet's word that his mum used. Ah, those were the days 😂
|
|
644 posts
|
Post by jek on Mar 5, 2019 8:11:34 GMT
My kids have all attended schools here in East London. Schools do increasingly struggle with taking kids on theatre trips. In fact the primary school my kids attended has stopped the annual pantomime trip to Stratford East (a short walk away from the school) as it has become too expensive - the school can't meet the whole cost and most of the parents would struggle to find the money to pay any portion of it. The most successful theatre intervention I have seen around here in recent years came about by accident. Stratford Town Hall was one of the venues chosen to host A Curious Incident after the ceiling fell in at the theatre. My daughter's school were able to walk to the theatre (so no fuss there) and see the production for free. As a school which does very good productions on a shoestring (they've just done a magnificent Hairspray) this was a really good way for a group of kids who were unlikely to go the few stops on the Central Line to see a show 'up west'. Still disappointed that there hasn't been a Hamilton education initiative in the UK. I was only able to afford to pay for my daughter to bring one friend when we saw it 14 months ago - ideally given how the show looks so much like the kids in her classroom I would have taken a bus load!
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 9:52:26 GMT
most of the parents would struggle to find the money to pay any portion of it. Don't they do any young person schemes? Many theatres have special offers and even free performances designed to get young people through the doors. Maybe there are other issues coming into play - health and safety type stuff? - that make it a bit of a headache for schools. My school was clearly very skint (geography books with maps of countries that no longer existed, English books with names of teachers in the front from when they were girls, music room books dated 1906, desks with inkwells, lessons in prefabs) and in one of the poorest parts of the country but we still managed theatre trips, locally and all the way to London to the NT.
|
|
644 posts
|
Post by jek on Mar 5, 2019 10:32:21 GMT
crowblack I'm told by someone who works at the school that all avenues were explored - and I know that there are all sorts of subsidies and schemes (including a borough wide scheme called Every Child A Theatregoer which has now fallen foul of austerity cuts) - but nothing could bridge the gap. Have to say though that as I walk past Stratford East most days I see plenty of school groups queuing up to go in during panto time so maybe it is just a question of schools choosing which activities to prioritise/ask parents for money for. Can't imagine it's a health and safety concern as the kids are taken to swimming, museum trips and the like. As a one time parent helper getting a kid into a local theatre seat would be a lot less stress than wrangling them onto the tube (there is always one kid who has never been on an escalator) and then trying not to lose them in the science museum.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 10:44:04 GMT
schools choosing which activities to prioritise/ There may be a Catch 22 here - schools thinking "well, why bother taking them if we're pressed for time? Theatre, film, TV is dominated by the middle and upper classes so they wouldn't have a chance to get into it anyway". And thus it remains "not for the likes of them" There may also be cultural / language issues and objections. I do know some teachers with that attitude, including a teacher friend in a very low income area told off by the head for telling kids about Spain "because none of these children will ever go there".
|
|
644 posts
|
Post by jek on Mar 5, 2019 11:22:39 GMT
crowblack I know what you mean - I grew up in the East End in the 1970s when all sorts of things were 'not for the likes of us' (the only theatre trip we ever went to with school was to see a production of Pygmalion at the local university settlement - Toynbee Hall. No doubt a well meaning attempt to bring us some culture with a message but we were just put out that there were no songs - someone must have mentioned My Fair Lady to us in connection with the trip.) But I know that the school in question also has at points in the year run out of blue tack to display children's work - funds are that short. As for cultural 'fit' the Stratford East panto is as multicultural as the schools it performs for. There are - of course - no easy answers to any of this. And of course access to any sort of culture is much easier if you live in a major city and can take advantage of free TFL fares for school parties etc.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2019 12:15:04 GMT
And of course access to any sort of culture is much easier if you live in a major city and can take advantage of free TFL fares for school parties etc. Yes, if you live in a rural or even suburban area it's difficult. I grew up on the rural outskirts but went to an inner city school (neighbour with big car dropped us in on the way to work) and if I wanted to see a show or go to the arts cinema I'd take a change of clothes and get the bus into the city centre or train to Manchester after school: friends joked about my special rucksack I'd bring in when I had something to go to.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Mar 5, 2019 17:49:33 GMT
Nicholas. I know we can’t afford books and libraries anymore. And I know taking kids from school to theatres is difficult. But we should try. Interesting development re boos: bookshelves at tube stations by me, northern line. You can give and you can take, all sorts, some for kids. Brilliant idea I think. So you can get your kid to read a book on the tube instead of staring into space while you fiddle with your phone ( not you, but the woman on the train the other day opposite me. I was so annoyed I was about to start a conversation with the kid but then you can be hauled off to prison for less) Endeavour, best thing on tv. I wasn’t aware of any snob thing about it? Was that because it is on ITV? When I was a kid, ITV was a bit 'common' to use Alan Bennet's word that his mum used. Ah, those were the days 😂 Oh yes Lynette, think we are of similar vintage. We didnt watch Itv in my house til i was at secondary school. Remember other boys in my class talking about programmes id never heard of!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2019 19:01:13 GMT
Nicholas. I know we can’t afford books and libraries anymore. And I know taking kids from school to theatres is difficult. But we should try. Interesting development re boos: bookshelves at tube stations by me, northern line. You can give and you can take, all sorts, some for kids. Brilliant idea I think. So you can get your kid to read a book on the tube instead of staring into space while you fiddle with your phone ( not you, but the woman on the train the other day opposite me. I was so annoyed I was about to start a conversation with the kid but then you can be hauled off to prison for less) Endeavour, best thing on tv. I wasn’t aware of any snob thing about it? Was that because it is on ITV? When I was a kid, ITV was a bit 'common' to use Alan Bennet's word that his mum used. Ah, those were the days 😂 Oh yes Lynette, think we are of similar vintage. We didnt watch Itv in my house til i was at secondary school. Remember other boys in my class talking about programmes id never heard of! The opposite for me, ITV was the default, the BBC rarely got a look in. As for the fabled BBC2, only when the cricket, Wimbledon or something similar was on. When we got a portable in the kitchen, when I was about twelve or so, I could then go and watch things that I wanted to. So much of my education came from television - The World at War, Disappearing World, World in Action (plus other programmes without world in the title....)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2019 19:23:22 GMT
These days, and going by various TV documentaries - that recent series on BBC2, for example, I do find it rather hard to believe that schools are in fact strapped for cash. To me, it seemed far more like they were strapped for common sense and commercial organisational ability. To see about 3 layers of non-teaching management and massive duplication of simple administrative roles, and particularly an "executive head" swanning about in a flash car on a 6 figure salary that makes the Prime Minister look like someone recently switched to Universal Benefit was unbelievable. Then they showed the state of the classrooms and talked about how many teachers were being sacked. #joinedupthinking. This is the real problem. The cash is there, but everybody in teaching is more worried about Ofsted's latest PC measurement and meeting that, than they are about teaching anything at all; and when they do get to teach, performing arts and other expensive subjects that don't show up in league tables get least attention. Scary. Schools chosen to be on documentaries are not particularly representative, they make for good television, though. There is a real issue with rampant administration, however, being constructed via layer upon layer of government demands. Change the whole culture of governments making changes, then new changes, then updates of those changes and the need to show that these are being implemented, run and monitored and those sort of executive roles will shrivel away. Yet, the consumers we are told want that level of oversight. It’s the usual problem - people want lower taxes and higher spending, increased efficiency yet greater oversight, having cake and eating cake. They are incompatible demands.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2019 20:17:05 GMT
a similar knock-on effect was seen in South Wales as the mines and factories closed Yes - I think a case of factories not only giving security but also to a degree a cultural hub with the Workers' Educational Association and performances (Mum said Kathleen Ferrier performed at Dunlops, while C. Day Lewis - Daniel's dad - came to their school.). Related to the Mark Thomas programme (thank you, I'll seek it out) I remember Mark Steel - I think - saying once that his Mum thought "BBC2 isn't for the likes of us" ! TV scheduling used to be amazing: I've probably said this before, but the listings read like BFI South Bank film programming, arts shows at reasonable hours of the day showed clips from current stage productions, there were lengthy interviews with writers etc. (I hope old Arenas and Omnibuses turn up on the new BBC streaming service). It felt like there was a genuinely concerted effort to reach out, educate and inform: the arts are for everyone, not hidden behind a paywall. The main channels have become much less keen on educating, that’s for sure. Post the second world war there wa a realisation that the people who did so much to ensure its success deserved to be treated as intelligent human beings, not just cannon fodder. That has withered to virtually nothing now. Regarding television, the idea that the current populist trend in programming is ‘giving people what they want’ is patronising and short sighted, the strength of a nation is built from the ground up and our collective lack of knowledge about the world and how it works alongside not being given the tools to make informed decisions leads inevitably to our current situation. How can we prosper if voters have no concept of trade and economics for example? It may serve politicians to have a populus who are supposed to just trust them but the rising lack of that trust is vastly amplified because lack of knowledge creates a people who have become too reliant on others who do not have their interests at heart, who are thus volatile and who are capable of self destruction. It’s a truism that a team is only as strong as its weakest link and, as a result, we are a damaged nation.
|
|
1,863 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Mar 5, 2019 20:40:00 GMT
We have the most educated generation in history, I have a lot of faith in the current generation as demonstrated by the climate change action.
The issues we have now is more the ignorance and selfishness of my generation and the preceding retired babyboomers who had the educative media when we were growing up.
|
|