562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Feb 10, 2018 16:44:19 GMT
FYI, TM is TM.C on this board, rather than TMI or ATM, say. Yep, RC here is RC. BRB. That makes everything as clear as day. Thanks very much for being so understanding Ah, just meant in jest. Never quite sure of people's tone in messageboards posts. TM = theatre monkey (.com), RC = royal court.
|
|
904 posts
|
Post by lonlad on Feb 11, 2018 1:21:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by QueerTheatre on Feb 11, 2018 2:42:40 GMT
I got an email telling me about the new front row, but saying i could swap my row A seat, to what i'm presuming will be called Row AA if i wished - for those who've seen this now (or know the usual RC set up for extra seats) should i stay in A or move to AA?
Its nearly 3am as i type this and i now have no idea if what ive typed even makes sense. Sorry.
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Feb 11, 2018 18:36:26 GMT
We were in Row B of the circle - same seats where we saw The Ferryman and they were fine for that. But for a one person show where the character stands centre stage 90% of the time, the raised bar which slightly restricts the view was a little more of an issue. Can't comment on first row, Theatrebass, - but Carey Mulligan's performance is exquisite and I would think the closer you could be the better.
We came away having found this a bit of a mixed bag. Wonderful to see an actor as resourceful, intelligent and nuanced as Mulligan giving such a rich, varied performance. Sections of the writing are wonderful - loved the description of a crowd waiting at an airport and another section describing a job interview. And yet .....the ending felt like a lecture or infomercial. There is a section where she repeats some physical actions (don't want to give too much away about this) and there is a revelation about these actions which I think should have been more of a theatrical coup than it turned out to be.
But I bought the script, have thought about the play a lot today and am very glad to have seen it.
|
|
1,254 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Feb 11, 2018 18:57:53 GMT
Where were your seats in the Circle, foxa? I am seeing it tomorrow night and I am in seat C4 which is slightly round to the side but not into the slips. Worried that my view might be compromised by being further round.
|
|
2 posts
|
Post by tigerlily on Feb 11, 2018 19:35:37 GMT
I went to see it on Thursday. Possibly I had less info about the play upfront than some of the commenters above - I knew the name, the lead actress, the writer and the first line. So the shock factor was probably greater for me than for some of the audience. However I was completely, utterly bowled over by it. I thought Carey Mulligan was exceptional, but I also thought the script was like nothing I’ve ever seen before. It was a very hard watch at times for me ... without alluding to specifics, I think there should be some form of trigger warning. However overall I thought it was absolutely brilliant. I’ll be interested to see how reviewers write it up as it must be hard to comment without spoilers.
|
|
2 posts
|
Post by tigerlily on Feb 11, 2018 19:35:50 GMT
I went to see it on Thursday. Possibly I had less info about the play upfront than some of the commenters above - I knew the name, the lead actress, the writer and the first line. So the shock factor was probably greater for me than for some of the audience. However I was completely, utterly bowled over by it. I thought Carey Mulligan was exceptional, but I also thought the script was like nothing I’ve ever seen before. It was a very hard watch at times for me ... without alluding to specifics, I think there should be some form of trigger warning. However overall I thought it was absolutely brilliant. I’ll be interested to see how reviewers write it up as it must be hard to comment without spoilers.
|
|
1,861 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Feb 11, 2018 19:51:48 GMT
Started innocuously, pivoted on an almost throw away line half way through, and ended with a devastating last line.
As previously stated almost impossible to comment on without saying too much, my advice, keep away from spoilers and immerse yourself in the scintillating story telling.
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Feb 11, 2018 20:01:21 GMT
Where were your seats in the Circle, foxa? I am seeing it tomorrow night and I am in seat C4 which is slightly round to the side but not into the slips. Worried that my view might be compromised by being further round. On the aisle of the centre section - so not slips but far to the stage right side. It didn't spoil my evening, but I was looking at long sections by ducking my head down so I could see her through a rectangle of safety bars, so not ideal - usually more of the stage would be used so the restriction wouldn't matter so much. In a follow up email, we were asked for opinions about whether or not we knew enough about the subject beforehand (I think they were trying to feel out if we thought TWs were necessary.) It's tricky for a theatre because too many warnings could make it less interesting/suspenseful.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Feb 11, 2018 20:57:56 GMT
For anyone who's been, would it be possible to ask a spoiler-free 'trigger' question?
We've just had a sudden/l illness-related death in the family, and I'm slightly worried that anything too close to that might be too much for my better half. No need for any details, but is there anything like this in the play?
|
|
2,848 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Feb 11, 2018 21:00:32 GMT
For anyone who's been, would it be possible to ask a spoiler-free 'trigger' question? We've just had a sudden/l illness-related death in the family, and I'm slightly worried that anything too close to that might be too much for my better half. No need for any details, but is there anything like this in the play? {Spoiler - click to view} There are two non illness-related deaths, they do not happen on stage, but they're talked about at length in the second part of the monologue.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Feb 11, 2018 21:03:56 GMT
For anyone who's been, would it be possible to ask a spoiler-free 'trigger' question? We've just had a sudden/l illness-related death in the family, and I'm slightly worried that anything too close to that might be too much for my better half. No need for any details, but is there anything like this in the play? {Spoiler - click to view} There are two non illness-related deaths, they do no happen on stage, but they're talked about at length in the second part of the monologue. Thanks so much for the info and quick response couldileaveyou.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 9:21:55 GMT
The Royal Court are very understanding about the need to balance spoilers with trigger warnings, and do advise that if anyone has any concerns, they should get in touch: royalcourttheatre.com/your-visit/trigger-warnings/I have yet to hear any feedback on how good they actually are (another theatre recently offered warnings for a production; they apparently thought nudity and loud music were worth mentioning, but attempted suicide wasn't), but the fact they seem to understand what a trigger warning really is (unlike, say, mainstream media) hopefully bodes well.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 11:56:55 GMT
I recall at the Almeida for a play recently (can't remember which one), there was a warning that there were balloons on stage.
With so many things affecting people nowadays, I wonder what they consider as being worthy of a trigger warning and what doesn't. Is there a list somewhere?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 12:00:23 GMT
I think with the balloons, there was a risk of them coming into the audience, which someone with a latex allergy would need to know. Theatres don't seem to do trigger warnings up front, the theatres who think there might be a point of concern leave it for concerned audience members to get in touch with them, so I doubt there's any sort of list for that. You do get content warnings reasonably frequently (minimum age recommendations, gun shots, strobe lighting, sometimes they mention adult themes or explicit language) though, so you can get an idea of the sort of things theatres have had complaints about in the past.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 12:04:30 GMT
Oh I see. So it's about someone being allergic rather than just not liking or having a phobia about balloons? I thought it seemed odd at the time to be notified of balloons, that makes sense now I guess.
|
|
5,139 posts
|
Post by TallPaul on Feb 12, 2018 13:45:01 GMT
Globophobia, apparently. Who knew???
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Feb 12, 2018 14:17:26 GMT
;-) It might be the latex, or globophobia - or I suppose they could suddenly pop, so loud bangs?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 14:19:25 GMT
Indeed, I believe some people's globophobia is based on the fairly rational possibility that a balloon could pop at any time and they just can't take the tension.
|
|
1,064 posts
|
Post by bellboard27 on Feb 12, 2018 19:08:43 GMT
;-) It might be the latex, or globophobia - or I suppose they could suddenly pop, so loud bangs? I do have a fear of latext popping. But that’s probably something different.
|
|
1,254 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Feb 12, 2018 22:37:30 GMT
Carey Mulligan should start making space in her awards cabinet as she deserve plenty of awards for her performance in this. Captivating to watch, strong writing (although the writing gets slightly clunky and leaden around the mid section but not for long) and held my attention with Mulligan's truthful and varied performance which was a delight to watch. Very funny in the first half hour. Great stuff. Not entirely sure that it needed the set it has though. Could easily have worked just as well without it on the scale it was.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Feb 13, 2018 0:48:53 GMT
The consensus on twitter seems very positive, so I may be in the minority here, but this really didn't do much for me. I thought the acting was great, and loved the stage and use of light & colour. The first third or so was reasonably funny too, but that was about it.
In my opinion, the script simply wasn't strong enough to justify the change of focus to such an emotionally charged & sensitive topic midway through. The play deals with an undoubtedly important issue, but the structure felt too contrived and emotionally manipulative, and the twist felt overly telegraphed. By the end, the play also seemed to morph into a lecture.
Two and a half stars for me. Maybe three.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2018 11:07:29 GMT
The consensus on twitter seems very positive, so I may be in the minority here, but this really didn't do much for me. I thought the acting was great, and loved the stage and use of light & colour. The first third or so was reasonably funny too, but that was about it. In my opinion, the script simply wasn't strong enough to justify the change of focus to such an emotionally charged & sensitive topic midway through. The play deals with an undoubtedly important issue, but the structure felt too contrived and emotionally manipulative, and the twist felt overly telegraphed. By the end, the play also seemed to morph into a lecture. Two and a half stars for me. Maybe three. I agree with this. I thought the first half was beautifully written - not a word out of place; very understated and insightful, reproducing the poetry of every day language. The writer loses control as we approach the denouement and I too felt manipulated and became aware that the writer was exploiting the subject matter for dramatic effect. The subject is very powerful and, as you say, important. The play left me with a lot of questions and some of the things the writer implies about the differences between “girls” and “boys” are quite worrying.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2018 11:08:18 GMT
Oh, I should add that Carey Mulligan is a genius
|
|
9 posts
|
Post by bacon on Feb 14, 2018 12:57:51 GMT
Didn't think much of this either. Full of glib, empty statements about the world: men are sh*t, posh people are sh*t, good-looking people are sh*t...all while being delivered by a posh, good-looking woman...and being written by a man. All the profundity of a hashtag. I suspect, therefore, that it will be universally adored by the critics.
|
|