3,575 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 28, 2018 6:33:34 GMT
I'm not sure if this is the right section for a post on an opera-related exhibition (for which I couldn't find a thread), so apologies if it's not or I've duplicated something I've missed.
It seems likely that others here have seen this or plan to - it runs until Sat 25 Feb - and as I visited yesterday, I'd be interested to hear others' views. As I've never seen an exhibition about opera before, I'm starting from scratch so it may not measure up for those who know more, but for me the presentation - chronologically but also by opera and location - made it accessible and created as natural as possible a sense of progression. Such a huge subject could only ever allow for a snapshot format but even so, I found this very dense and quite enough to absorb in one session, what with so much to listen to, read and see.
There's music (of course), but also artefacts, paintings, costumes, video, a replica stage set and so on - plus, perhaps not surprisingly, at the end, a dedicated shop, separate from the main shop.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Snow on Jan 28, 2018 11:14:26 GMT
Nice review, indeed it can only be a snapshot. I also enjoyed it. Wearing heafdphones and being totally immersed in it was wonderful and made it more enjoyable than say a visit the The Scala Museum.
It did get some discussion try the search function, or at a guess look into the One offs in London.
Worthy of its own thread.
|
|
4,983 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Jan 28, 2018 14:27:14 GMT
Despite the fact I was forced to listen to Wagner, I really loved this exhibition
Totally recommend
|
|
3,575 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 28, 2018 15:12:27 GMT
Thank you, Mr Snow - I did try the search function before starting a thread but don't find that very reliable and drew a blank as usual.
I didn't think, someone in a tree, that the audio aspect was explained at all, let alone well, as when I entered the exhibition, a staff member thrust a handset and headphones upon me and gave me the operating instructions, but didn't mention what I should expect to hear, so after several minutes of music only when I had anticipated commentary (based on experience at other exhibitions and stately homes), I went back to ask if that was right and only then was I told that yes, it was music only. Whereupon I returned the items because - no offence to others who can cope with this and appreciate it - trying to look at the displays and read the labels whilst also listening to a soundtrack was just too much at once for me and made it hard to concentrate. Plus I wouldn't choose to listen to anything, be it music or speech, whilst doing something else, so I fared better without it.
If I went back for a second visit I'd try it with the soundtrack but I may not have time. I did like the fact that in the main museum, there were so many members of staff dotted about to answer questions and give directions, though I could have done without the security staff talking loudly in the exhibition area itself.
|
|
4,029 posts
|
Post by Dawnstar on Jan 28, 2018 18:57:12 GMT
I didn't think, someone in a tree, that the audio aspect was explained at all, let alone well, as when I entered the exhibition, a staff member thrust a handset and headphones upon me and gave me the operating instructions, but didn't mention what I should expect to hear, so after several minutes of music only when I had anticipated commentary (based on experience at other exhibitions and stately homes), I went back to ask if that was right and only then was I told that yes, it was music only. Whereupon I returned the items because - no offence to others who can cope with this and appreciate it - trying to look at the displays and read the labels whilst also listening to a soundtrack was just too much at once for me and made it hard to concentrate. Plus I wouldn't choose to listen to anything, be it music or speech, whilst doing something else, so I fared better without it. So you found it worked alright without a headset? I was put off going to see this when I read about having to wear headsets because with having OCD I flatly refuse to put on headphones that goodness knows how many other people may have worn & I hate being talked at when I'm looking at paintings/architecture/whatever. If the exhibition makes sense without a headset then I may try to go to it after all.
|
|
3,575 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 29, 2018 4:07:41 GMT
Yes, do go to see this, Dawnstar - absolutely no need for a headset; just a shame this isn't made clear. It sounds as though you have even more reason than I to prefer not to use one but we agree about not wanting commentary at the same time as looking at exhibits and this is one case when there is none, so it should be a case of less is more.
|
|
1,347 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Jan 29, 2018 7:07:58 GMT
I'm very keen to go to this. I would want to listen to the commentary so how long showgirl should I allow to do it justice?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Snow on Jan 29, 2018 7:15:56 GMT
An hour and a half should be plenty. The final room features many contemporary performance excerpts and it depends on how many you want to see.
Personally I think the soundtrack adds so much and makes it special. Mostly it directly relates to what you are seeing u.e. makes it an Operatic experience. Without it I could get through everything in 30 mins.
Forced to listen to the Tannhauser overture!!!!
|
|
4,983 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Jan 29, 2018 9:02:40 GMT
[quote author=" Mr Snow" source="/post/180484/thread" mins. Forced to listen to the Tannhauser overture!!!![/quote] Bloody Wagner! I think the recommended time is 70 minutes. It took my friend and I 2 hours. Happy days 😄
|
|
3,575 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 29, 2018 11:31:13 GMT
I was there just under an hour - but maybe those with the soundtrack need longer to savour the experience?
Btw, I did email the museum to suggest clarifying the headset issue, ie to say these are optional.
|
|