|
Post by londonpostie on May 16, 2019 17:30:06 GMT
Yep, approximately speaking, he waved goodbye to his kidneys and liver on the beach. With his remaining hand.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on May 16, 2019 17:49:05 GMT
If Bran can mind f@?# ravens, horses and a dire wolf what is to stop him controlling a dragon Ah, that could be why he's still alive! I thought he and the Night King might cancel each other out but as he survived that episode he must still have a role to play in the final act.
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on May 16, 2019 18:53:53 GMT
I hope Robin Arryn wins the game of thrones
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on May 16, 2019 20:31:55 GMT
I hope Robin Arryn wins the game of thrones He he, I was team Cersei but if she is no longer and the Hound has gone, I have shifted allegiance to Tormund
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on May 16, 2019 20:32:12 GMT
I hope Robin Arryn wins the game of thrones He he, I was team Cersei but if she is no longer and the Hound has gone, I have shifted allegiance to Tormund Or Gilly
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on May 16, 2019 22:58:36 GMT
Gilly on the throne, Robin Arryn as the hand of the queen
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on May 16, 2019 23:40:32 GMT
I've finally all caught up. Who could've guessed that so much dragon-based destruction could be quite so boring.
My prediction is that Sansa ends on the throne (Jon will help to off Daenerys, but decide he doesn't want the throne), but to be honest I'm struggling to care...
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on May 17, 2019 8:37:26 GMT
I'm really surprised by the backlash. Apart from the first episode (twee dragon ride) I think this has been great. There was a lot of stuff in the earlier, presumably GRR Martin-based episodes that was dull or silly or dragged on and on, esp with Dany's storyline, Arya in that assassin school series, the Theon torture porn series etc.. if the Red Wedding (one of the best bits) occurred now fans would be howling in dismay, rather than congratulating the series for shocking them as they did then.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on May 17, 2019 9:20:33 GMT
f the Red Wedding (one of the best bits) occurred now fans would be howling in dismay, rather than congratulating the series for shocking them as they did then. I don't think that's true. (and more importantly, I don't think that the writers would do that sort of thing any more). At it's best, Game of Thrones has been happy for things to happen because they make sense given the characters' motivations, rather than because they feed into some over-arching narrative. This might be treated simply as 'nobody's safe in Game of Thrones' but it felt, at least to me, much more organic and alive than that. The Red Wedding, Ned Stark's death, Prince Oberyn's death, and so on stood out not just because they were unexpected, but also because looking back they make sense within in the world; they didn't feel (at least to me) like scenes that happened simply because GRRM willed them to happen (although, of course, I appreciate that GRRM has had some overarching narrative in mind). In contrast, this season has had so many scenes that don't feel like they make any 'real' sense, but would be expected in a more mainstream hollywood narrative (or, if I was being mean, fan fiction) because they serve a purpose: In this case largely to show what the screenwriters might think that the fans want to see: - Does it make sense that within all the anarchy only Cersei and Jamie meet each other just in time for her to realise her folly, and to die in embrace? No, but that final hug in front of collapsing buildings sure looks fab.
- Does it make sense for Sandor and Gregor to have a final one-to-one showdown? Nope, but they're brothers!
- Does it make sense for Euron Greyjoy to be the sole survivor of the sea battle who happens to land on the beach at the same time & location as Jamie? No, but he's a major antagonist now, so needs a cool ending. - Does it make sense for (pretty much) all of the main characters to survive the battle with the white walkers? No, but wouldn't it be sweet if Gilly and Samwell to go off into the sunset.
- and on and on...All these scenes might be fine in another show, but none of these things make sense if Westeros is supposed to be 'alive'. I have little doubt that there have been similar coincidences that happened in previous seasons but the issue is that they seem to happen in such quick succession this season.
|
|
|
Post by asfound on May 17, 2019 9:39:10 GMT
if the Red Wedding (one of the best bits) occurred now fans would be howling in dismay, rather than congratulating the series for shocking them as they did then. Nobody is complaining about anything being shocking though. People are complaining that the bad writing, lack of development and Hollywood-isation of the last couple of seasons mean that what should be shocking simply isn't. The twists just aren't having an impact when they're so contrived and out of character.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on May 17, 2019 9:55:50 GMT
I don't think that's true. (and more importantly, I don't think that the writers would do that sort of thing any more). I think they would, in the current social media climate - and had the series not been based on pre-existing books I think the writers would have been under pressure from the studios to scrap it altogether, given the popularity of the characters. Yes, there were some ludicrous coincidences (Euron on the beach stood out) but fantasy fiction/film and 19thc melodramas are full of them. When Star Trek TNG killed off a popular character in a 'natural' way, rather than in a mega showdown, fans complained and she had a quasi-return via a parallel universe as a fan service. We've had Jon come back from the dead, and Arya must be made of whatever Wile E Coyote is made of to survive the stuff she's been though. I think writers will get flak either way.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on May 17, 2019 9:58:53 GMT
Nobody is complaining about anything being shocking though. Some are - they're angered that a character they like (and in many cases named their children after!) is now (in their words, not mine) the 'villain'.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on May 17, 2019 10:06:38 GMT
Whilst I acknowledge that everyone is entitled to their opinions and it is great the people are so invested in the show - I am now totally over what feels like excessive negativity that has been circulating in recent weeks.
The early seasons certainly had plenty of flaws. And they were more closely based on the source books (which are over-packed with detail, characters, lore and more)
Yet there are many loud voices seeming to believe that everything upto the end of season 6 was near perfection and everything after it has been utter trash.
And that is simply not true.
I just take it all as it comes, enjoy it for what it is, have fun with the wild speculation - but it is still a piece of fantasy. The production values have, on the whole, been outstanding. There has been some brilliant directing, some great performances.
Would I have enjoyed seeing Lady Stoneheart? Very possibly. Did the narrative work without her? Yes, perfectly well for me.
There are still people who bemoan the fact that Tom Bombadil didn't make it into the LOTR movies. That was the point at which I stopped reading the books.
For those who are saying that seasons 7 and 8 are too short - I would point to The Hobbit movies which over-extended the source material to such an extent that it was almost unwatchable. The balance isn't always easy to get right - but sometimes longer doesn't necessarily mean better.
If you are happy with GoT - great, continue to enjoy it. If you are unhappy - there is nothing you can do to change it. Accept it is what it is and if it upsets you that much, just don't watch. It is disappointing when something you have enjoyed doesn't play out as you had hoped - but it isn't worth the anger and upset it has provoked.
Or perhaps I am just too chilled (which I can't quite believe of myself!)
Anyway, roll on Sunday - I am looking forward to it!
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on May 17, 2019 10:16:32 GMT
I don't think that's true. (and more importantly, I don't think that the writers would do that sort of thing any more). I think they would, in the current social media climate - and had the series not been based on pre-existing books I think the writers would have been under pressure from the studios to scrap it altogether, given the popularity of the characters. Yes, there were some ludicrous coincidences (Euron on the beach stood out) but fantasy fiction/film and 19thc melodramas are full of them. When Star Trek TNG killed off a popular character in a 'natural' way, rather than in a mega showdown, fans complained and she had a quasi-return via a parallel universe as a fan service. We've had Jon come back from the dead, and Arya must be made of whatever Wile E Coyote is made of to survive the stuff she's been though. I think writers will get flak either way. As you say, there have been contrivances in the plot to date (although Arya's didn't bother me to be honest), but my feeling is that it's the pace of these things that's made them stand out in this season. I read that HBO wanted a further two series of 10 episodes each, and it was Weiss and Benioff who pushed for a single season of 6. Presumably they made that decision for artistic reasons, but I can't help but think that spreading out all these coincidences across 20 hours (as well as giving Daenerys more time to transition from slightly conflicted to out-and-out psychopath) would've helped them to not be quite so apparent. In terms of Star Trek, it's been a long time since I saw it, but my recollection is that (as much as it was great and progressive) it was a far more straight forward episodic show than GOT: more clear cut good and bad guys, each episode wrapping up nicely, and so on. In Game of Thrones, having a few major characters 'just' die in battle might have been a little disappointing, but (in my opinion) it would have fit well with the show, and certainly have been preferable to having pretty much all the main characters 'luckily' survive. I certainly wouldn't call this season a complete failure, and I'm (cautiously) looking forward to the finale.
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on May 17, 2019 16:14:06 GMT
if the Red Wedding (one of the best bits) occurred now fans would be howling in dismay, rather than congratulating the series for shocking them as they did then. Nobody is complaining about anything being shocking though. People are complaining that the bad writing, lack of development and Hollywood-isation of the last couple of seasons mean that what should be shocking simply isn't. The twists just aren't having an impact when they're so contrived and out of character. This
|
|
2,340 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on May 17, 2019 16:15:43 GMT
|
|
528 posts
|
Post by vabbian on May 17, 2019 16:18:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on May 19, 2019 9:11:03 GMT
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on May 19, 2019 10:13:33 GMT
Goodness me, WHAT a take! However, it doesn't address something fundamental - that actual medieval societies believed in god/gods. I think this is something we just don't 'get' now*. It's been an underlying problem with GoT (the TV series - I haven't read the books) - 'rightful' kings have , in the minds of the populace they seek to control, God at their back. Even so, in GoT's relatively godless world, Danaerys has been obsessed with the idea that she is the rightful monarch - and now, with the revelation about Jo Snow, that's been snatched away from her, so she's snapped. Can't rule by being the anointed one, in medieval thinking, but still can through fear/superior weaponry. I think for a TV series to truly reflect all the factors that shape history, from bad weather to printing presses, good roads etc. would be beyond the budget and patience of studios/writers/actors and audience. I do also think the 'kill baby Hitler' pop culture narrative has misled us into a way of thinking about history that has left many people unprepared for what's happening right now, for example. *A Man for All Seasons. It's not really a choice to someone who believes in eternal damnation, is it? Similarly in Guardian-type discourses around faith schools, burquas etc. - if you believe something is pleasing / displeasing to an all powerful deity who created and can punish you, can you have 'free choice'?
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on May 20, 2019 2:36:40 GMT
I really am not sure what to think about that. {Spoiler - click to view} On the plus side, Peter Dinklage held the whole thing together with a great performance
Kit Harrington did convey Jon's torment
But Sam and the book - that was just trite
And Bran becoming king? Nah, I don't buy that.
I can just about follow Tyrion's thinking - but he could have made a slightly different speech about Jon or Sansa
Good that they didn't try to wrap up all the story arcs - but they gave it a good go.
It was always going to be impossible to make this work perfectly. They tried - but the lack of source material to flesh out the ending, it was a tall order.
They tried. It just about worked.
But Bran on the throne??? Really?
(and I don't care about Dany dying. Her speech on the steps made it inevitable - there was no way back for her.)
Very meh at the moment. It might be better on rewatching in a few months
|
|
1,500 posts
|
Post by Steve on May 20, 2019 2:43:06 GMT
After feeling like they missed a thousand plot beats in the penultimate episode, I felt the finale was just right.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on May 20, 2019 2:45:04 GMT
After feeling like they missed a thousand plot beats in the penultimate episode, I felt the finale was just right. {Spoiler - click to view} I am just not sure Bran deserved the promotion...
|
|
230 posts
|
Post by hal9000 on May 20, 2019 2:53:35 GMT
I was accidentally spoiled a few days ago (waves fist at reddit addicted coworker) but nonetheless loved the finale.
My late father was in on a wheelchair the last 5 years of his life and died after Season 7 ended. So I cried bittersweet tears today.
And it’s opened up for a new series in 10 years, so yay!
Still hate Sam, still hate Bronn and it has a lot to do with their sing-songy manner of speech. And the supremely self-interested like Bronn tend not to die, which is always annoying.
And Robyn Arryn had a major glow up, y’all
|
|
344 posts
|
Post by sophizoey on May 20, 2019 5:33:41 GMT
I found that satisfying, not incredible or mind blowing. I predicted everything that was going to happen at 04:30 am before I got up to watch it. {Spoiler - Click to show} I'm glad Daenerys got to "break the wheel", even if she isn't alive to see it. Which was the right thing. I'm still completely unsatisfied with Cersei's end, and was hoping she'd be alive under there for a proper ending. Once again though - 'The lone wolf dies but the pack survives.' The Starks have well and truly proved that. I can't be the only one worried now they've all going their separate way in the conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2019 5:59:31 GMT
And Robyn Arryn had a major glow up, y’all Very Neville Longbottom!
|
|