|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 16:47:20 GMT
You don't really want us to get in to the whole structural inequality thing again, do you? I feel like we've gone over that argument more than enough times. (As it happens, I think the argument about the word '****' (I wonder if the board will allow that through?) is misguided. Not keen on the use of 'gay' as an insult but feel that's a bit different - no-one I know uses '****' as anything but an insult, so its usage has changed its signifying value from its original meaning.) Edit: No, the board doesn't like 'the c word'. For the sake of argument, I a woman, use both 'dick' and variations of and 'the C word' regularly, and personally don't mind the latter at all.
And yes, not beating that dead horse of an argument with someone who clearly is looking to argue for argument's sake.
ETA: I may start using 'Clitface' I quite like it...
FYI: clitface (noun)- someone who claims their lips are sealed when in fact they cannot resist opening them only to reveal something of very little significance (not to be confused with 'Tw*t', which is commonly used to describe someone obnoxious. Only on specific occasions are these words interchangeable.)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 16:55:49 GMT
For the sake of argument, I a woman, use both 'dick' and variations of and 'the C word' regularly, and personally don't mind the latter at all.
And yes, not beating that dead horse of an argument with someone who clearly is looking to argue for argument's sake.
ETA: I may start using 'Clitface' I quite like it...
I like the sound of clitface too. There's a joke in there about not being able to see/find it. Sensitive and overlooked?? Of course the same might be applied to 'bell-end'...
|
|
4,799 posts
|
Post by The Matthew on Feb 15, 2017 16:58:41 GMT
So we started off talking about miscast celebrities and now we're talking about ****s and ****s and *******s, but try as I might I can't bring myself to see it as a change in subject.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 15, 2017 17:20:35 GMT
Blimey! You go away for a few hours and suddenly the Oxford Dictionary of Asterisks is being quoted verbatim.
Best 'name' I've ever seen is Kunal Nayyar in The Spoils at the Trafalgar Studios. Absolutely brilliant theatre actor. I'd go and see him recite the phone book!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 17:23:39 GMT
Let's get back to the subject, eh?
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Feb 15, 2017 18:11:53 GMT
Should this thread be in General Chat, not in Musicals?
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 15, 2017 18:22:05 GMT
Should this thread be in General Chat, not in Musicals? more like Digital Spy.....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 18:58:43 GMT
How's this for almost reverse 'name' recognition. At Dreamboats and Petticoats last night, I assumed that your man playing Older Bobby was "some soap star"because I sort of recognised him but couldn't place him. On googling him I find it was in fact Jimmy Johnston who I know from my obsessive watching of the NT Oklahoma! Lesson there for me not to leap to conclusions about a Bill Kenwright tour Back on topic more, I'll be honest I'm going to see Gaslight because I have a bit of a thing for Kara Tointon, and also because I REALLy want to see Keith Allen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 19:04:23 GMT
^^Love Kara too! She's fab and loved her in Sound of Music so hope she does a musical too
|
|
426 posts
|
Post by alison on Feb 15, 2017 20:04:23 GMT
I really dislike watching a "name" put in a poor performance in a show where you know they've been cast purely in an attempt to put bums on seats. On the other hand, if they're actually capable of doing a decent job of the role (and some are, for sure), I have no issue with it. It's a reality of the business that sometimes the producers are going to have to put their profits first, or very little new would end up being produced.
One of my favourite celebrity castings I've seen remains Antony Costa (from Blue) in Blood Brothers. I went in expecting very little and ended up loving him ... his singing varied from poor to somewhat decent depending on the night, but his acting was surprisingly solid, and ultimately I found him very believable and really enjoyed his performance. Also Matt Cardle in Memphis, who surprised a lot of people.
|
|
|
Post by danb on Feb 15, 2017 20:32:26 GMT
How's this for almost reverse 'name' recognition. At Dreamboats and Petticoats last night, I assumed that your man playing Older Bobby was "some soap star"because I sort of recognised him but couldn't place him. On googling him I find it was in fact Jimmy Johnston who I know from my obsessive watching of the NT Oklahoma! Lesson there for me not to leap to conclusions about a Bill Kenwright tour Back on topic more, I'll be honest I'm going to see Gaslight because I have a bit of a thing for Kara Tointon, and also because I REALLy want to see Keith Allen. I'll fight you for Ms Tointon...hands off! 😀
|
|
806 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 15, 2017 21:23:41 GMT
I think as well that its easy to forget that those of us on this board are likely to be the more regular theatre goers and will know about performers or shows that the more casual theatregoer may not. For a lot of people the way into theatre is by seeing someone they know from the telly in it, or in a very familiar show. I also would prefer a non name who can handle the role but that isn't always good for business. This is the thing. Regular theatre goers would get excited to see MT stars in a show but majority of a theatre audience are people just going to the theatre for a treat, one off etc. I would've thought producers want to sell as many tix as possible and when a 'name' of the TV is in a show it can attract people. Usually is done for new musicals. If a show is super well known then you wouldn't get celebrities in it - 'Billy Elliot', 'Wicked' etc.
It has got better recently, imo. You must remember that half the people off the TV who care cast in shows have been in musicals before and have had training in the MT spectrum too. Imelda Staunton, Alexandra Burke, Amber Riley, Sheridan Smith, Claire Sweeney, Beverley Knight, Carley Stenson etc are all off of the TV or are Singers but have made great names for themselves in musicals - that's the same as what you're trying to say isn't it?
I mentioned in the Wonderland thread that I was impressed that Wendi Peters agent had got her top billing despite her limited stage time. The issue for the Producers of course being that in Edinburgh and other locations Wendi Peters is going to put far more bums on seats than Kerry Ellis. Kerry may be well known in musical theatre circles but that's a very limited pool of people and those circles wont fill the Playhouse 8 times a week.
|
|
18,845 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Feb 15, 2017 21:29:13 GMT
Wendi was unimpressive in the Frank Wildhorne concert. Out of her depth
She might sound better with a jam tart in her gob.
Or three.
|
|
2,570 posts
|
Post by viserys on Feb 16, 2017 6:34:32 GMT
I think it very much depends on the "name" in question. The last 10-15 years have seen an enormous rise in vapid "reality TV" and "talent show" stars with zero qualification whatsoever. As a foreigner who doesn't follow these things, the names mean nothing to me and I would certainly not book for any of them. I wasn't impressed by the few I've come across.
But it's different when it's someone who's actually had some drama/MT training and was just lucky to get a well-paid part on television, then goes back to the stage. I watch a lot of British TV through VPN and there have been plenty of people I first saw on TV without knowing their backgrounds, so I'm usually thrilled to get a chance to see them live on stage. When it comes to plays there's such a huge choice in London that I book either because it's a subject I find fascinating or because of who's in it. I booked "The Maids" last year solely to see Uzo Aduba live as I think she's incredible in OITNB (not British, I know). Right now I wish I could see "La Ronde", not because of the play itself (ugh) but because I thought Alexander Vlahos was by miles the best thing about "Versailles" on TV and would love to see him live. So yes, when it comes to me, casting the right people will nudge me to book a ticket, but I don't consider these people stunt casting.
|
|
1,722 posts
|
Post by stevejohnson678 on Feb 16, 2017 8:20:37 GMT
One of my favourite celebrity castings I've seen remains Antony Costa (from Blue) in Blood Brothers. I went in expecting very little and ended up loving him ... his singing varied from poor to somewhat decent depending on the night, but his acting was surprisingly solid, and ultimately I found him very believable and really enjoyed his performance. I agree about Antony Costa. Saw him in Save The Last Dance For Me last year and while his vocals were fairly weak, his comic timing was surprisingly good. The same production also had Lola Saunders as one of the central characters - acting wise she was also reasonably impressive, however she tried to belt out every note of every song, with no light or shade from one line to the next, so it came across like she was just trying too hard to impress. How's this for almost reverse 'name' recognition. At Dreamboats and Petticoats last night, I assumed that your man playing Older Bobby was "some soap star"because I sort of recognised him but couldn't place him. On googling him I find it was in fact Jimmy Johnston who I know from my obsessive watching of the NT Oklahoma! Lesson there for me not to leap to conclusions about a Bill Kenwright tour Antony Costa and Lola Saunders in Save The Last Dance For Me aside, the two Dreamboats shows and their sister production generally avoid casting names. Many of the cast have toured with all three shows and that chemistry comes across on stage. Elizabeth Carter who is currently touring as the lead in Dreamboats and Petticoats (having also played the role in Dreamboats and Miniskirts and been the lead Marie in a couple of tours of Save The Last Dance For Me) is fantastic. I could listen to her sing anything (her rendition of Terry Stafford's Suspicion in Save The Last Dance For Me is probably a personal favourite from the three productions). If only there wasn't the propensity to stunt cast so often, there might be a chance to see her spread her wings in something else!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 8:36:08 GMT
stevejohnson678 that's good to know! I wasn't really making assumptions about their casting choices (as in being judgemental that they cast 'rubbishy soap stars' more my 'hmm your man looks familiar there, but I can't place him, ah he must be off the telly somewhere' type assumptions! Antony Costa is indeed surprisingly great!
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Feb 16, 2017 9:37:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Feb 16, 2017 9:45:37 GMT
^ EDITED DUE TO FALSE MEMORY !!
|
|
578 posts
|
Post by lou105 on Feb 19, 2017 11:48:08 GMT
Fascinated to hear Louisa Lytton on Sunday Brunch saying that she was asked to play Sandy on the Grease tour. She asked if she could be Rizzo instead because she didn't think her singing was strong enough for Sandy!I mean..Good for her, but..What a way to cast.
|
|
4,458 posts
|
Post by poster J on Feb 19, 2017 15:05:15 GMT
I really dislike watching a "name" put in a poor performance in a show where you know they've been cast purely in an attempt to put bums on seats. On the other hand, if they're actually capable of doing a decent job of the role (and some are, for sure), I have no issue with it. It's a reality of the business that sometimes the producers are going to have to put their profits first, or very little new would end up being produced. One of my favourite celebrity castings I've seen remains Antony Costa (from Blue) in Blood Brothers. I went in expecting very little and ended up loving him ... his singing varied from poor to somewhat decent depending on the night, but his acting was surprisingly solid, and ultimately I found him very believable and really enjoyed his performance. Also Matt Cardle in Memphis, who surprised a lot of people. Matt Cardle was great in Memphis, I was definitely one of the people who were pleasantly surprised! There are certain names who make me want to see the shows they are in (Imelda Staunton being one, though it's difficult to argue she's not as much of a theatre actress as she is a film actress, just as for a lot of really good acting "names"), and there are shows where I will see it despite certain names being cast because I love the show (Ronan Keating being cast in Once being an example of that - love the show, don't like the man, though he wasn't completely terrible). It's not something I would ever make a blanket judgement on though - it will always depend on the particular show and particular cast, and I think to have a blanket rule on this type of thing risks missing out on a lot of good theatre, even if you have to take the risk that you might see a dud every now and again!
|
|
4,458 posts
|
Post by poster J on Feb 19, 2017 15:09:44 GMT
Fascinated to hear Louisa Lytton on Sunday Brunch saying that she was asked to play Sandy on the Grease tour. She asked if she could be Rizzo instead because she didn't think her singing was strong enough for Sandy!I mean..Good for her, but..What a way to cast. Asking a name to play a character (or even to play a character of their choice!) must happen every day - I'm sure no-one seriously thinks people who have a high enough profile always have to audition for a role or that they don't get their pick of the roles. All depends on their profile though - Jennifer Hudson didn't have to audition for The Color Purple on Broadway, they just asked her to do it, whereas I believe Danielle Brooks (despite already having a profile in the US) did have to do an audition, though it was by invitation rather than her applying for the job. And Cynthia Erivo got her role off the back of playing it in London and didn't have to re-audition. So it all depends on profile and circumstances. As far as asking for a different roles goes, why not if you have the chance and a justifiable reason - she had nothing to lose and presumably could probably have still said yes to playing Sandy if she wanted to if they refused to let her play Rizzo! And if the producers want a particular name then they're likely to be fairly accommodating about anything that gets that person to sign on the dotted line...
|
|
578 posts
|
Post by lou105 on Feb 19, 2017 15:26:21 GMT
I totally get what you're saying, but she said herself that she hadn't done enough musical theatre to play Sandy. No problem with her suggesting Rizzo instead!
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 19, 2017 15:31:48 GMT
And we come full circle to a certain P. Schofield being approached by ALW to play Joseph. Now, whilst the general consensus seemed to be that he wasn't bad, I wouldn't have touched it with a long barge pole. There are more than enough trained, excellent MT actors who could have done it so much better.
ETA - No, I didn't see it, ergo don't actually know if anyone else could have done it better, but this is exactly the sort of casting that gets my goat.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 20, 2017 15:53:07 GMT
^ He was OK, better than Donovan at times, and his name kept the show running ( and thus a large team employed) for over a year.Well, seeing as you put it like that.... Can't argue with that Monkey. But couldn't someone else have done that? I mean, there were enough groups around. Couldn't ALW have found a spare Borezone or Roller or even, dare I say, Monkee for heaven's sake?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 17:40:56 GMT
He was about as big a star as they could get / afford at the time, I guess... and maybe the only one safe around children... With the role of Joseph, whoever plays him doesn't need to be great...it kind of all happens around him.
|
|
90 posts
|
Post by bobbybaby on Feb 20, 2017 19:29:22 GMT
Bit of an old one this. I've been guilty of the oh no not him off the tv attitude. I lost it when a friend wanted to see Cabaret on Shaftesbury Avenue and James Dreyfus was MC. I was very unenthusiastic, boy was I wrong. He and the show were excellent. Best show and performances I'd seen in a long time. I suppose the lesson I learnt is most performers (TV or otherwise)have included singing and dancing in their training at some point so don't be so dismissive. Now Graham Norton in 'La Cage' on the other hand . . .😦
|
|