|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 7:07:23 GMT
Post by Mr Snow on Jan 19, 2017 7:07:23 GMT
Please do all take time to watch Episode 2 Of hospital on iPlayer You are more likely to get a Hamilton ticket Than a bed in ITU if you need it
Sobering Its nonsense like this that means the general public tune out of most political discussion these days. Carry on with hyperbole, straw men, and 'post factual' shouting if you must. You are not helping move the debate forward at a time when interested parties can see we are at a crossroads. An aging poulation thanks to Health staff (typically as a Doctor your posts only reference your own hard working profession) delivering better but ever more expensive care and costs rising. Those, death and taxes are the future. And if you think this years bad, just wait. Now if the people within the NHS cared to lead the discussion sensibly, we might get somewhere. 3 Q's How do you propose in the light of the above challenges that free, at point of contact, care can be afforded in the future? Please reference your expenditure plans to a % of GDP, then it might mean something. As a Doctor what are your views on timewasters, no shows, drug courses not completed etc? What in your opinion are the most challenging issues facing the NHS in the next 3 years and next 10 years? Of course without knowing me you can dismiss me becasue of the politics you ascribe to me, or you can start a sensible debate. AS a Doctor people would like to hear some really well thought out arguments.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 9:28:19 GMT
You may recall There were a series of junior doctors strikes last year
Which were effectively ended by government and media manipulation and pressure
They were silenced
The doctors had good public support engaged with people and presented their arguments
The government just denied them and forced through what they wanted We have a health secretary with no medical training Laughable And who is happy to lie on a daily basis Doctors can be struck off for this sort of conduct But different rules apply for politicians
We run an NHS that we can afford
Or rather we run an NHS on the money provided by the government as opposed to the one people want or desire
This has always been the case
And it results in increasing rationing
The only realistic options are to start charging patients This is the only way things work these days Everything has a value and worth and cost
Or (preferably and) remove the NHS from out of the hands of the government
At the moment patients are unable to see the NHS as anything other than something serving their own individual needs and nothing is really practically done about this
Hence people think it's okay to attend A&E with a sore throat for less than a day Because they are only doing it once
Along with hundreds of others all having the same idea and thought process
I don't think you actually realise most staff have given up The system is in free fall and is a free for all Most people are taking from it what they want
The government choose to ignore or deflect and deny
Whilst patients don't take notice of warnings and continue to flock to seek healthcare
I am sorry to say but your post shows a level of naivety and ignorance
Constant pleas and headlines fall on deaf governmental ears
We live in a country which went to war with Iraq despite best public opinion to the contrary One million marched And this has been clearly admitted as a gross error of misjudgment and misinformation
People don't care about strikes and protests
Just because we are allowed to express things doesn't mean anyone gives a sh*t about what we are saying
Government can change the goalposts and boundaries as and when they want and lie at whim Without any real accountability
I think what you don't realise is that the current coverage of the NHS is a commentary on its last days in its current state
And most of the staff have given up trying or expecting change or improvement because they haven't the energy
I think you should watch Hospital And see the look on the face of the patient and team when planned major surgery involving 10 or more consultants is cancelled due to lack of ITU beds Surgery which has been planned months in advance And for which patients have been cancelled and moved from clinics to allow the team to all be available for this major undertaking And where this will occur all over again for the rescheduled operation once it goes ahead
You watch that and tell me that is acceptable for a modern developed country
By far the most frequent sorts of things I see in A&E are chronic problems which have been to their GP but they are waiting in pain for physio (up to 6 weeks) or for a scan (up to 3 months) or outpatient appointment (up to 6 months) or surgery (up to 18 months) Sometimes the patients are shopping around often their condition has flared and they need advice or reassurance What am I supposed to say to these patients? I am sorry that's the system you have to wait, miss work and live in pain
But There is no point having arguments and debates when no one plans to take any action
The chasm between the government and NHS workers is so large nothing can be done
Most of my colleagues have stopped debating and accepted things as they come
The public are happy to watch a drama from a safe viewing distance Try and educate and you get abuse or a complaint "I didn't get what I wanted so I feel upset and distressed" But ask them to take action Live healthily Lose weight Stop smoking Stop to consider the wider effects of procreation
And you get screamed at for infringing human rights Censored and told "I pay my taxes now sort out my problem"
Patients are actively encouraged to fill forms with feedback like they have just been to Waitrose and are rating their shop Complaints are encouraged but really no one takes them seriously because we can blame the system and increased demand
How can you succeed in this sort of climate?
This doesn't make it any easier on a daily basis when patients are left waiting for clinic appointments in pain or another community service has been taken away
We just apologise offer a sympathetic smile and refer to cuts and rationing
Secretly we are all hoping we don't fall ill anytime soon and pretend that we are immune to having to use these services
Once in a while a colleague will fall ill
And it might be their turn to face the system
Or they might have taken out health cover (most colleagues I know have private cover and this should be a telling sign) and can breathe a sigh of relief as they can have their treatment at their convenience
Most recently a good colleague in her 30s has gone through breast cancer treatment
She knows the limitations of the NHS as she works in it There would have been a delay in her diagnosis in her first outpatient appointment and subsequent operation and chemotherapy
Privately she had an outpatient review and surgery within 5 days from referral via her GP
This is what the NHS tries to pretend to be able to do but simply cannot cope with demand
Many hospitals are so overwhelmed with 2 week cancer referrals (these are supposed to be seen within 2 weeks from referral to exclude a possible serious diagnosis) that they can just temporarily stop accepting referrals in extreme pressure
What's the point of having targets and aims if they are just rendered meaningless and are regularly breeched and exceeded
So what is my conclusion?
We already have the poorest cancer survival rates of almost any modern western country
Perhaps we accept that the level of healthcare will just decline and tolerate it
This will have to be balanced off against constant headlines that someone slept on a chair or floor waiting for treatment But if that becomes the norm and they have no other choice then people will have to just get used to it
The government don't even think there is a problem Most people have no or little respect for politicians I wouldn't take advice on what to wear to bed from them let alone how to run a healthcare system and I don't know why people tolerate it In many ways we are such a meek and subservient nation The current excuse for a PM Actually engaged in a dialogue comparing and defending the NHS against human disasters Does she have a brain or any shame?
Perhaps we will all come round to the same conclusion if they ignore it for long enough
There was an interesting article recently which commented that humanitarian response teams are run with the sort of effort efficiency and organisation which the NHS can only dream about
I have increasingly contemplated leaving my work over the last 2 years because I am working in a system I don't trust anymore
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 10:08:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 10:08:17 GMT
I wish I hit the nail on the head as often as you do Parsley.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 10:08:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 10:08:38 GMT
I wish I hit the nail on the head as often as you do Parsley. Are you being sarcastic? It feels like watching a relative slowly suffocating to death In a glass box Whilst being forced to watch tied to a chair
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 10:38:29 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 10:38:29 GMT
I wish I hit the nail on the head as often as you do Parsley. Are you being sarcastic? It feels like watching a relative slowly suffocating to death In a glass box Whilst being forced to watch tied to a chair Genuinely not, I promise! Harsh reality of the situation. I've many friends who are Doctors/Nurses, all virtually concurring on the eventual extinction of the system we know now.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 10:44:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 10:44:53 GMT
My previous post
Comparing the price of Hamilton tickets
To healthcare
Might have seemed stupid and obtuse
I think what people didn't realise is
That I actively save for ill health
If someone on the board had a stroke And couldn't walk or look after themselves
What provision do they have other than banking on the NHS?
Just as you would not be able to live only off a state pension
I don't think people can assume the NHS can reliably look after the range of health needs they might think it can for very much longer
And people might need to readjust their expectations
Or stump up some cash
Which might be savings or money they use for enjoying themselves going on holiday or to the theatre
This would show how much they really value health
I think people will have to start making financial sacrifices
In 10 years time We might be posting
Should I see the new show for £500
Or shall I pay for my blood pressure medications for 2 years instead
|
|
19,782 posts
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 12:47:48 GMT
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jan 19, 2017 12:47:48 GMT
Why aren't timewasters who turn up at A&E with common colds and cut fingers etc just turned right round and sent away? I don't understand why this is entertained.
I'd stick a paid for private walk in centre next to every A&E, refer these jokers to it and let them pay for their cough syrup and consultation.
Simplistic I know but I do think we create some of these problems by being so soft.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 12:58:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 12:58:09 GMT
Why aren't timewasters who turn up at A&E with common colds and cut fingers etc just turned right round and sent away? I don't understand why this is entertained. I'd stick a paid for private walk in centre next to every A&E, refer these jokers to it and let them pay for their cough syrup and consultation. Simplistic I know but I do think we create some of these problems by being so soft. Often they complain And each and every complaint has to be addressed and answered If the patient is not happy with the response They can escalate to the ombudsman Which is run by the government And has the final say You can't argue against them Most of the time they favour patient choice and views This leaves front line clinical staff in a precarious position and individuals are understandably not wanting to take the risk E.g. A patient may ask for paracetamol to be prescribed If a doctor refuses and the patient escalates this Invariably the doctor will be found at fault and advised they should have prescribed it if it was indicated and the patient refused to buy it The system does not support change Although it's not nice to say it The system is on the side of the patients Which makes refusing anything on a case by case and face to face basis difficult Although ironically overall services and treatments are being withdrawn and scaled down all the time
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 13:09:24 GMT
Post by alexandra on Jan 19, 2017 13:09:24 GMT
"I have increasingly contemplated leaving my work over the last 2 years because I am working in a system I don't trust anymore"
And when you do, you will get a generous lump sum and an absolutely stonking public pension for the rest of your life, worth over a million pounds if you live a normal life expectancy. The kind of money the rest of us can't hope to save up (and if we did, it would produce an annuity of around 4%. The striking junior doctors never mentioned that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 13:36:35 GMT
"I have increasingly contemplated leaving my work over the last 2 years because I am working in a system I don't trust anymore" And when you do, you will get a generous lump sum and an absolutely stonking public pension for the rest of your life, worth over a million pounds if you live a normal life expectancy. The kind of money the rest of us can't hope to save up (and if we did, it would produce an annuity of around 4%. The striking junior doctors never mentioned that. Please I am not relying on the NHS pension It is this sort of narrow minded Daily Mail comment which I find stunting I don't even pay into an NHS pension All the savvy people are buying up property in London It offers a much better return And pensions have nothing to do with poor patient care It's a totally bizarre sour grapes comment So doctors are supposed to offer patients rubbish care and do a bad job And keep their mouths shut Because they are going to get a pension at the end of it? Many of my friends have left NHS work before the age of 35 Thereby forfeiting the NHS pension anyway In order to have a better working environment and less stress They don't want 45 years of misery for a pension They aren't greedy and have more sense and resources We aren't all sitting with our mouths open waiting for the government Others have chosen to opt out of the pension contributions (as high as 14.5% anyway) and to invest this money in other assests You need to get a financial advisor ASAP [br) If you are so badly off ask yourself why and consider moving to a country with cheaper living costs and where the government don't treat grass roots workers like sh*t But your own personal poor financial foreplanning has nothing to do with poor NHS funding
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 13:47:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 13:47:02 GMT
This is something that I think comes from the crumbling of social cohesion in society. First, "Doctor Mum" used to be nearby. Her and Gran had seen it all before and knew a nappy rash from a meningitis one. Now they live so far from the grandkids, there's nobody near at hand to ask. So "better safe than sorry." Second, I'm afraid there is a deep lack of "common sense" around. The old "wait and see" has been replaced by "I read that article where someone died / Doctor Google (the crazy sites, not the official ones) says that... People forget to balance what they read in the media with the idea that those who write this stuff are not medically qualified but do need a great story to fill a page and get themselves paid. Third, yep, there is a massive distrust and lack of respect for "the establishment." I'm not arguing the hows or whys of how that happened (I feel it the same as everyone else), but on the one side you have the dedicated trying to do good, in the middle the "don't cares" of both sides" and on the other the entitled who, as Parsley says, are out for themselves and don't see the broader picture. I'm not talking genuine negligence, but those cases over a paracetemol - and those warned to look after and take responsibility for themselves who just won't. It's a massive, massive and almost insoluble problem, not just cash but attitudes and education, I feel. I agree Is insoluble
|
|
19,782 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jan 19, 2017 15:12:19 GMT
Blimey, I've just agreed with parsley on something... ... could someone please call me a doctor? Theatremonkey, you're a doctor. Taxiiiiiiii!
|
|
5,059 posts
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 18:15:42 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Jan 19, 2017 18:15:42 GMT
The British people are very passionate about the NHS and the BBC and will fight tooth and nail to keep both.
I though the point of having a Triage Nurse in every A&E, is to wheedle out the 'malingers', send them on their way with 2 days worth of paracetamol, they think they have got treated, so no complaint?
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 22:17:06 GMT
Post by Mr Snow on Jan 19, 2017 22:17:06 GMT
Parsley on the one hand I can see that you really care, that you remember far longer the one patient you couldn’t help because of NHS limitations, than the 20-29 you send home happier each day. If you could turn that passion into positivity you might achieve something. Instead you radiate negativity (I bet you patents pick this up) and you spend your time with others who like you have given up and find it hopeless. I met people with your views in the NHS and Teaching 30 years ago and yet here we are. People are living longer and more people receive treatment than ever – SUCCESS. But we never did provide total healthcare to everyone and its more contentious when we fail.
Just reading this thread will remind you there are millions of people successfully being treated each and every day in the NHS. Don’t underestimate the great work you and your team do. Yes the no of limitations on you are growing and you find it intolerable, but saying its insolvable is no answer. Its nihilism. And get used to it, life is cruel, good people die and you just don’t like having to live within societies means.
And I do have a lifeteimes experience of living and socialising with employees of the NHS and its not my experience at all that “most staff have given up”. Just walking though a hospital the workers attitudes are really not that dissimilar to any large organisation. Perhaps you need to get out more.
The one thing we agree on is that it is a political football. There is no secret Tory plan to break up the NHS (come on Julian Assange show me that one!), they are s+++ scared of it and that prevents them taking big decisions like closing hospitals that don’t provide effective and efficient cover. They are just trying to keep the budgetary increases (and the facts show there are real increases every year) manageable. Just like Tony and Gordon did when it was their turn. Labour don’t want it to become apolitical because a Tory F up is the only thing they will have going for them at the next election. So they invent straw man arguments about what the Tories are going to do to the NHS. Well the Tories have had power for 28 of the last 40 years and the NHS is still here.
The same is true for lots of government expenditure, costs are rising and the tax take isn’t.
Somehow we need to get people to go back to read Beverage the ''architect of the welfare state”. He wanted the government to find ways of fighting the five 'Giant Evils' of 'Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor and Idleness. His report published in 1942 foresaw the dangers of a growth of dependency on a benefit culture and the waste that could come, but he though it worth the price to get the country back together after the war. These were problems that could be tackled later. He was against much that bedevils a free at he point of service provision. But to many people I am demonisng the 'working class', just by pointing this out.
But the budget remains key – there isn’t' enough money in the world to give everyone optimum treatment. Once that is set then hard choices can be made. The NHS cannot continue expanding its range of services to an ever ageing population unless robotiseation produces some huge economic boom. I'm not holding my breath and we are still borrowing money just to keep today’s government expenditure intact – a day of reckoning is due. So with Brexit to distract us all, how we get to an apolitical NHS is the real difficulty...but like a lot of political nettles it can be dealt with ...
PS Parsley please don’t call me ignorant of the situation when you know nothing about me. Also I'd like to point out that any target in an organisation like the NHS that isn't regularly breached is just not worth having. It sets no challenge. Targets have radically imporved waiting times. I bet you were against their introduction and now you use them as more evidence to support your viewpoint. . The breaches point us to the problems. This is basic management and I somehow get the feeling you just aren’t interested in that. You rather just moan about how hopeless it is.
I have said my piece. Thank you.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 22:35:28 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 22:35:28 GMT
.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 19, 2017 22:47:07 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 22:47:07 GMT
|
|
155 posts
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 10:43:22 GMT
via mobile
Post by synchrony on Jan 20, 2017 10:43:22 GMT
I actually agree with much of what Parsley has said.
I'm not a doctor but have many friends who work in the NHS and are extremely demoralised and considering quitting because of what is happening. It is terrifying.
I get the impression that much of the problem is caused by funding cuts in social services so people unnecessarily take up beds because they cannot be discharged (there was an article in the news today about a hospital having to go to court to remove someone who refused to leave for two years even though he was fine!!!).
I'm fortunate enough not to have needed the NHS much, but I do care. But don't know what to do about it (I'd be glad to know). I don't think it's even slightly a joking matter.
When I read criticism of the NHS in the news, I'm sure it's of little consolation to NHS workers, but it doesn't make me think badly of the NHS. It makes me loathe Jeremy Hunt and the government who seem to be actively trying to make the staff's life as miserable as possible.
I have voted Tory in the past, but this, together with Brexit, has ensured that I will never do so again.
|
|
155 posts
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 10:48:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by synchrony on Jan 20, 2017 10:48:24 GMT
"I have increasingly contemplated leaving my work over the last 2 years because I am working in a system I don't trust anymore" And when you do, you will get a generous lump sum and an absolutely stonking public pension for the rest of your life, worth over a million pounds if you live a normal life expectancy. The kind of money the rest of us can't hope to save up (and if we did, it would produce an annuity of around 4%. The striking junior doctors never mentioned that. I'm not a doctor and am in a fairly low paid job. But I find this comment to be blind to reality and agree with Parsley's response to it.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 11:12:47 GMT
Post by alexandra on Jan 20, 2017 11:12:47 GMT
Don't be silly, Parsley. I am not suggesting that the NHS pension is the source of all the NHS's woes, as you well know. But you mentioned the junior doctors' strike, and I was pointing out that people never mention their extremely favourable pension. I know many NHS staff including in my close family who have retired in their fifties because their public pensions (to which they have contributed something, yes, like many of us do, but to which the state also contributes handsomely, unlike to the rest of us) will keep them for the next 30 odd years in considerable style. So yes, they work hard, but for rewards which are frequently underestimated, and ought to be taken into account in pay disputes. As for the NHS funding crisis: raise taxes.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 11:14:44 GMT
Post by alexandra on Jan 20, 2017 11:14:44 GMT
How is it blind to reality, synchrony? Are you saying the pension isn't generous? Do you know what doctors get?
|
|
155 posts
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 11:33:37 GMT
via mobile
showgirl likes this
Post by synchrony on Jan 20, 2017 11:33:37 GMT
How is it blind to reality, synchrony? Are you saying the pension isn't generous? Do you know what doctors get? Yes, I have many doctor friends. For the amount of training they do, the stress of the job and the long hours they put in I think it's really not that much. Certainly as a junior. Would I stick at a job that caused me that much stress, with no life, just for the pension? Definitely not. None of the NHS workers I know went in to it for the money.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 11:37:08 GMT
Post by alexandra on Jan 20, 2017 11:37:08 GMT
"I think it's really not that much. Certainly as a junior."
I'm not talking about their salary, as I think was clear.
"None of the NHS workers I know went in to it for the money"
Another straw man.
|
|
1,088 posts
|
Post by andrew on Jan 20, 2017 22:57:00 GMT
"I think it's really not that much. Certainly as a junior." I'm not talking about their salary, as I think was clear. "None of the NHS workers I know went in to it for the money" Another straw man. The pension was completely gutted for new entrants into the system a few years ago, so if you really think it's the problem alexandra then I've got good news for you. Timewasters, incomplete medication courses, is all a red herring, the magnitudes of scale involved dwarf those problems. My perspective on this as someone inside the system is that healthcare for the UK costs a certain amount, and at the moment it's being met by the taxpayer. If you try to do anything other than this, the same cost has to be met, except this time it's by somebody who's not the taxpayer. It's still you, it's just you in a different way. And presumably if it's by a private enterprise, even if that's just an insurance based model or whatever hybrid you come up with, then Richard Branson makes a healthy profit somewhere in the middle. If the system is breaking because the need is so huge, then in addition to doing what we can to restructure, we have to swallow the fact that it needs more money. The largest, unhealthiest generation ever is retiring and it's not going to get any easier. We need to be cognisant of the fact that we have a surprisingly efficient system which per capita we spend not a relatively large amount of money on, and maybe we need to spend more. Nobody likes that fact, nobody wants to say it, but maybe it's true. Letting the NHS collapse will not suddenly alleviate the massive healthcare costs the country has, it just shifts it into the hands of private companies and lets in even more people exploit than are already allowed to. From my personal position, if the NHS goes private, I stand to work legal hours for the first time for probably more money. Don't let it go private.
|
|
|
NHS
Jan 20, 2017 23:04:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2017 23:04:31 GMT
"I think it's really not that much. Certainly as a junior." I'm not talking about their salary, as I think was clear. "None of the NHS workers I know went in to it for the money" Another straw man. The pension was completely gutted for new entrants into the system a few years ago, so if you really think it's the problem alexandra then I've got good news for you. Timewasters, incomplete medication courses, is all a red herring, the magnitudes of scale involved dwarf those problems. My perspective on this as someone inside the system is that healthcare for the UK costs a certain amount, and at the moment it's being met by the taxpayer. If you try to do anything other than this, the same cost has to be met, except this time it's by somebody who's not the taxpayer. It's still you, it's just you in a different way. And presumably if it's by a private enterprise, even if that's just an insurance based model or whatever hybrid you come up with, then Richard Branson makes a healthy profit somewhere in the middle. If the system is breaking because the need is so huge, then in addition to doing what we can to restructure, we have to swallow the fact that it needs more money. The largest, unhealthiest generation ever is retiring and it's not going to get any easier. We need to be cognisant of the fact that we have a surprisingly efficient system which per capita we spend not a relatively large amount of money on, and maybe we need to spend more. Nobody likes that fact, nobody wants to say it, but maybe it's true. Letting the NHS collapse will not suddenly alleviate the massive healthcare costs the country has, it just shifts it into the hands of private companies and lets in even more people exploit than are already allowed to. From my personal position, if the NHS goes private, I stand to work legal hours for the first time for probably more money. Don't let it go private. Lovely post What is your role? If you are happy to say?
|
|
3,577 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 21, 2017 0:21:39 GMT
One of the ongoing frustrations for many ordinary taxpayers who wish the NHS not only to survive but thrive, is that they would gladly pay more tax for this but don't have the option.
|
|