|
Post by crabtree on Dec 2, 2016 22:36:29 GMT
I'm posting this in musical here as well as ballet as I wanted to ask if anyone got to see the ill fated musical and could say anything about it. Here are some rather spontaneous thoughts about the ballet.
So, just back from Matthew Bourne's new ballet, The Red Shoes. I went expecting numerous, easy dance parodies, very fluid sexuality, bum jokes, a haughty ice queen, meta theatricality, ravishingly lit scenic imagery, dance within dance, a lot of camp, a lot of a dancer's lot, someone with an animal head, great music,sexy chic costumes, naked torsos, and taut storytelling - and yes, we got all that, and none of which is a bad thing (and lord knows, themes repeat and repeat and repeat in my fims, We all have our own language), but this was truly sophisticated in every department - the star, I confess, was Lez Brotherson's extraordinarily complex, detailed but fluid design. Gorgeous. A great, if rather short evening - short only in that I didn't want it to end. We got to the train all too quickly. All this and good company, a Bernard Herrmann score, and Edwina Currie - don't ask.,
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Dec 2, 2016 22:41:36 GMT
I've booked to see this in January - I want my money back. Edwina Currie in a tutu? Pass the eye bleach!
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Dec 2, 2016 23:06:29 GMT
Edwina was in the audience just next to us, looking rather amazing and chatting and smiling. Not a tut in sight in the whole show, but a lot of nods to a lot of ballets the complete history of dance is in there somewhere. If there is a fault it is that it is too short, and rushes through the drama. But that drama is good.
|
|
379 posts
|
Post by ctas on Dec 2, 2016 23:08:40 GMT
I generally dislike Matthew Bourne's ballets but I'm intrigued about this as I love the red shoes film. Waiting on reviews though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2016 9:44:03 GMT
I saw this on opening night in Plymouth. I absolutely adored it. I was first on my feet at the end. Gorgeous score and stunning production. I tweeted Matthew and asked if they will release the soundtrack and he said he hoped to in the new year.
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Dec 3, 2016 17:21:59 GMT
There's certainly a lot of homage to other dances/ballets, huge chunks, which on reflection could have had the time spent with the central drama. The lovers don't really get together till the end of act one, then there's the drama, then the red shoes reappear, and then the train, and it's done, Perhaps a little less time with the bouncing balls would have been better.
|
|
204 posts
|
Post by Sue on Dec 3, 2016 20:15:50 GMT
I'm seeing this in April and it'll be a first for me, watching ballet so thanks for your review crabtree - I'm now looking forward to it even more than I was before!
|
|
19,776 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Dec 11, 2016 9:01:30 GMT
|
|
423 posts
|
Post by dlevi on Dec 12, 2016 9:00:11 GMT
I saw it on Friday evening and was thrilled by it. Sir Matthew is back in top form after a few years of artistically treading water, he has come up with a full evening narrative ballet that is satisfying on every level.
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Dec 12, 2016 18:54:29 GMT
yep this is clearly the ballet everything has been leading up to. I usually his ballets many times, but Sleeping Beauty left me cold. I've loved Dorian Grey, Swan Lake, Play Without Words, Car Man, Highland Fling and Lord of the Flies particularly. I wish they would stage his TV ballet, Late Flowering lust.
|
|
|
Post by Coated on Dec 13, 2016 23:56:43 GMT
Bourne does dance theatre / modern dance, not ballet. Guess that doesn't really matter, but it's a bit like calling Wicked an opera.
I'm seeing this tomorrow but haven't seen the film before, so I'll be reading up on the plot before going in - sounds like people who know the film get more out of the show.
|
|
87 posts
|
Post by greenswan on Dec 14, 2016 6:29:45 GMT
I wouldn't say you have to read the plot before but I caved in during the interval. There's some random elements otherwise.
I know it's not a classical ballet but in my opinion it's the most "balletty" out of all the MB choreographies I've seen. Mainly straightforwardly told and some quite "random" group dance numbers.
However I did enjoy it a lot when I saw it on Sunday. The dancers are very good and the score is strong. Also the £35 seats at the end of the stalls are fine. You don't lose anything except some surtitles with place names.
|
|
204 posts
|
Post by Sue on Dec 24, 2016 22:45:19 GMT
I booked this last May, as my first foray into ballet/modern ballet and even booked a box much to my partner's delight! Roll on April, everything I'm hearing is all good!
|
|
379 posts
|
Post by ctas on Jan 6, 2017 0:05:51 GMT
I saw this last night and quite liked it. There was a lack of development of Lermontov's character so the ultimate dramatic ending fell a little short imo. I enjoyed the Sylphides moments but could've done without the comedy music hall dance number. Very effective design and music.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Jan 26, 2017 8:56:23 GMT
I saw this last night and absolutely loved it.
Negative bit out of the way first - though it's minor! We were in the front row, which I always try and get, particularly for dance, and realised after 5 seconds that we would not be able to focus on beautiful insteps as we couldn't see them! Always a bit of a risk I know but, to be honest, the dancers weren't the highly technically skilled Russians/Cubans/Americans/British/Spanish that you see in the more classical shows anyway, so I got over it quickly as there really was so much else to look at!
We had a fantastic view of the orchestra, though I hardly glanced at them as the action on the stage was all-encompassing. The best bit of being so close was the gorgeous, sumptuous costumes. I could actually smell them! Also, the expressions on the dancers' faces, particularly in the "Oh god, have we GOT to do this tedious ballet?" scenes were hilarious.
The production was slick (only one kick in the face!) and there's a scene where Victoria dances in her pointe shoes with her ribbons undone (on purpose) which had our hearts in our mouths, being so close. It was brilliantly done.
The set and effects were stunning. There's an amazingly realistic storm scene which brought us in the front row so virtually into it that it played havoc with our eyes - one member of my group actually had to stop looking and focus elsewhere! The girls' costumes, black gypsy-style dresses, somehow melded in and became one with the black leaves which were projected swirling around the white background. The effect was simply mesmerising.
It definitely was less Bournesque than others I've seen and had something for everyone. Fantastico!
|
|
2,778 posts
|
Post by daniel on Feb 4, 2017 0:47:56 GMT
From what I gather, this is one of New Adventures' most successful tours, in terms of ticket sales at least. Good job, Sir Matthew!
|
|
19,776 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Mar 11, 2017 13:25:51 GMT
This is coming back to The Lowry for another week in July so Ive booked. My first ever ballet!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2017 15:45:49 GMT
Please would a Mod move this thread to the Entertainment and Family subforum?
|
|
204 posts
|
Post by Sue on May 5, 2017 17:36:06 GMT
This is coming back to The Lowry for another week in July so Ive booked. My first ever ballet! Oh Burly, I saw it a few weeks ago and it was mesmerising! The scene where the Shoemaker taunts, tempts and teases Vicky with the Red Shoes in the the 1st act gave me goose bumps! It was simply stunning but the 2nd act ended far too soon. I've already booked to see Cinderella next March, again in Bristol. Hope you like it too x
|
|
848 posts
|
Post by duncan on May 12, 2017 22:55:45 GMT
17 - The Red Shoes - Festival Theatre
Matthew Bourne does a Ballet version of the seminal Archers film. BALLET! BALLET! BALLET! Yes, for the first time ever I went to the ballet - so that's another one to tick off the bucket list. And indeed it seems everyone else was at the ballet too, first time I've ever seen the Festival sold out with all levels open and there was a rousing standing ovation at the end that seemed to last forever, and very well deserved it was too.
For those who don't know its played out to the music of Bernard Herrmann. And it works - its effectively a silent movie version of the film with some of the most historic music in film history used as the background to the on stage action. But not any of the Hitchcock scores - certainly recognised some Citizen Kane and there were sections from Fahrenheit 451 and The Ghost and Mrs Muir.
I've no idea if the actual ballet was any good as its not really my artform but I thoroughly enjoyed it. The Red Shoes Ballet scene was a superb combination of dance, choreography and music.
Only complaint would be that the first act is around 70 minutes but the second only half and hour.
8/10 - Mesmerising.
|
|
19,776 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jul 12, 2017 21:28:51 GMT
Quite good that isn't it? Loved the design, gorgeous visuals and music. As duncan said about I know nowt about dance so can't comment but it looked ok! The one who played the star who injured her ankle was fab. Great face. Very Joan Crawford. BUT.... I haven't seen the film and I lost the plot a bit. So she gets job as new star, goes into The Red Shoes where she's a huge hit. We know the red shoes make her feel a bit funny. End of act 1. Act 2 she's on the skids in a seedy east end strip joint with showgirls and a couple of sand dancers. What happened?
|
|
736 posts
|
Post by dippy on Jul 12, 2017 23:38:41 GMT
BurlyBeaR It's meant to be obvious but I agree that it isn't! It's along the lines of the person who runs the ballet not approving of her relationship with the conductor so he gets fired. She leaves with him and then later while going a bit crazy returns or something along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2017 20:07:20 GMT
There was more about that in the film, so it wasn't as obvious in the ballet. In the film, the main ballerina wasn't injured, she announced she was getting married, and Lermontov blew his top and kicked her out, saying that a ballerina had to be married to her art and couldn't love dance and a man at the same time. So Irina being sacked gave Vicky her big chance and made her a star, but when she fell in love with Julian, Lermontov made her choose ballet or marriage, so she chose ballet, hence the decline to cheap music halls. But the red shoes had captured her and she couldn't resist going back to the ballet again, but Julian and Lermontov were both trying to force her to choose between them, so the red shoes forced her off the balcony onto the train tracks.
I loved the ballet version! I really loved how they distinguished between the dancer characters and the non dancer characters, even though they all danced. I saw Dominic North as Julian and I thought he was sensational. I loved the Red Shoes ballet too, it was fabulous.
|
|
18 posts
|
Post by aliwag on Jul 20, 2017 11:36:11 GMT
I went to see this last night in Birmingham. Again, I am no dancer so couldn't comment on the technical of it but I thought it looked and sounded amazing. I didn't follow all of the plot, but I didn't care. The emotion the dancers conveyed was unbelievable, and I was just lost in the drama of it all. This is the 6th MB production I have seen and they never disappoint. If you haven't seen it yet, get yourself a ticket now as you are missing out!
|
|
1,351 posts
|
Post by CG on the loose on Jul 20, 2017 12:05:51 GMT
I was there last night too and have a similar lack of dance knowledge but, like aliwag, found myself totally absorbed in the emotion and drama of it all. I loved the little comic touches too... the roll of an eye (well both actually, just one would be a bit freaky), the shrug of a shoulder. So glad it came back for another week in Brum, I'd have missed it otherwise.
|
|