|
Post by phantom13 on Dec 10, 2024 21:16:58 GMT
Can anyone sitting in the left side stalls (from audience perspective), explain what the staging is like as viewed from that area (in terms of restriction)? Bit nervous about my seats if most of the action is directed towards the central block. If you’re right on the end closest to the back of the stage, I think there might be some restriction. Further over, I don’t think it will be too bad. I was in the central block of the circle, but a handful of scenes aside, I felt it was directed at all sides fairly well. Thank you Sophie I’m in the middle of the row so hopefully I’ll be okay
|
|
|
Post by marob on Dec 10, 2024 21:46:09 GMT
I managed to get a seat but I’m expecting a fairly poor view as the one I got is one seat away from the wall at the end of the row. Not reflected in the price though.
|
|
5,996 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Dec 10, 2024 22:47:41 GMT
Have you never been to the Donmar? Yes, I have but I’ve only sat in the central stalls and central circle. I imagine how impacted you are viewing from the sides would change from production to production dependent on how it’s been directed and staged? I WAS going to say that I’m sure it will be fine on the sides. More seats are actually side view in there, so it will be designed and directed to not discount those seats. They certainly won’t have designed set pieces to block your view.
|
|
|
Post by theatre2023 on Dec 10, 2024 22:47:48 GMT
Absolutely loved this in NYC. The onstage immersive seating took the show to a whole new level.
Very intrigued to see how it plays in a small venue.
|
|
|
Post by jamesd123 on Dec 10, 2024 23:05:13 GMT
whew… this one will be divisive… it is an absolute fever dream of a show. This production feels somehow more vicious/dangerous than the quite OTT Broadway but this production also somehow feels even more stupid! The piece is flawed for sure and I still can’t quite tell if I loved it or hated it but I cannot help but admire the sheer creativity of the writing - it is truly a breath of fresh air in a sea of generic sounding IP/jukebox musicals. (And the vocals are out of this world good). Going to try and get a standing ticket for later in the run for a second viewing…
|
|
5,996 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Dec 10, 2024 23:09:10 GMT
whew… this one will be divisive… it is an absolute fever dream of a show. This production feels somehow more vicious/dangerous than the quite OTT Broadway but this production also somehow feels even more stupid! The piece is flawed for sure and I still can’t quite tell if I loved it or hated it but I cannot help but admire the sheer creativity of the writing - it is truly a breath of fresh air in a sea of generic sounding IP/jukebox musicals. (And the vocals are out of this world good). Going to try and get a standing ticket for later in the run for a second viewing… Cannot wait!
|
|
4cb
Auditioning
|
Post by 4cb on Dec 10, 2024 23:52:39 GMT
whew… this one will be divisive… it is an absolute fever dream of a show. This production feels somehow more vicious/dangerous than the quite OTT Broadway but this production also somehow feels even more stupid! The piece is flawed for sure and I still can’t quite tell if I loved it or hated it but I cannot help but admire the sheer creativity of the writing - it is truly a breath of fresh air in a sea of generic sounding IP/jukebox musicals. (And the vocals are out of this world good). Going to try and get a standing ticket for later in the run for a second viewing… Do you mind if I ask you to expand on your thoughts please? I am not trying to be disrespectful or anything. But when you say you admire sheer creativity of writing what piece does it relate to please? I am a bit conflicted, as to me the writing is one of (if not the) biggest problem of the production. Every character is portrayed as a sheer imbecile and I doubt this was the original intention. But maybe I miss something? I will be happy to tbh
|
|
|
Post by jamesd123 on Dec 11, 2024 0:17:12 GMT
whew… this one will be divisive… it is an absolute fever dream of a show. This production feels somehow more vicious/dangerous than the quite OTT Broadway but this production also somehow feels even more stupid! The piece is flawed for sure and I still can’t quite tell if I loved it or hated it but I cannot help but admire the sheer creativity of the writing - it is truly a breath of fresh air in a sea of generic sounding IP/jukebox musicals. (And the vocals are out of this world good). Going to try and get a standing ticket for later in the run for a second viewing… Do you mind if I ask you to expand on your thoughts please? I am not trying to be disrespectful or anything. But when you say you admire sheer creativity of writing what piece does it relate to please? I am a bit conflicted, as to me the writing is one of (if not the) biggest problem of the production. Every character is portrayed as a sheer imbecile and I doubt this was the original intention. But maybe I miss something? I will be happy to tbh i don’t think every character is portrayed as an imbecile… Natasha is basically a child so is naive, yes. Anatole reeks of privilege but is not an imbecile. Sonya again not an imbecile but maybe blighted by her good heart. Many of the characters are caricatures for sure which I suppose could read as them being stupid but that’s not how it read to me… and I think the music is so interesting. The way it blends electronica with an almost operatic classical score. The way it boldly crashes from one genre to another. It’s discombobulating for sure and that’s why I’ve no doubt some people will hate it but I found it very interesting.
|
|
|
Post by AGlitzyFinale on Dec 11, 2024 0:51:42 GMT
Saw the second preview yesterday and definitely see how this could split opinion.
I enjoyed it with the strong cast, lighting, and sound design being the highlights.
I don’t think this material was really for me personally but the reverence that it’s held by many has to say something and there were definitely others around me that enjoyed it more than I did (but also a noticeable amount that very much didn’t and left at the interval). It feels like the type of show that will only get better with repeat viewings but since it’s sold out I’ll wait cautiously for a transfer.
A couple of other things from last night, the front of house are being very strict about photos of the stage including curtain call filming, they did say when asked however that this was only for previews so shouldn’t be there for too long. The merch on offer was a programme (£5), playtext (£10), and a poster (£5) or a bundle of all 3 (£18). For anyone who has standing tickets the lightbulbs that are behind every seat in the theatre meant that people standing couldn’t stand in between the heads in front restricting the view a bit more than normal.
|
|
|
Post by max on Dec 11, 2024 2:05:51 GMT
On Restricted views etc, my circle ticket is next to the wall - and, though it's marked 'restricted view at times' I'm expecting it to be pretty good.
Tim Sheader has come straight from years at Regents Park Open Air theatre where actors have to play to a wide enveloping auditorium, I doubt he's lost the habit of sitting in all areas of the house. I enjoy extreme angles anyway - the show often looks really interesting, and they're a good test of whether the director can....direct.
I'll clock any production shots though, as rear stage set/light probably won't be visible to me. If I can't see the 'O' of Moscow doing whatever it does I'll probably be okay with that.
|
|
12 posts
|
Post by monsieurmarshall on Dec 11, 2024 12:51:51 GMT
Any sightline tips for standing ticket holders? I normally aim for a central position (and hope for a shorter person seated in front).
|
|
|
Post by illicitmeow on Dec 11, 2024 13:47:34 GMT
I managed to get tickets for the second preview of this much-anticipated show, and I have to say I was a bit disappointed with the director's approach and vision for the project overall. I genuinely think that much of the original material was misinterpreted, and I hope that is rectified before it opens properly because in its current form, it's not looking great. And I say this as someone who loves the show and Malloy's work, and also works in theatre too.
I don't want to spoil things too much, but the actor playing Pierre was simply miscast. His performance was flat, often robotic. The character's philosophical outbursts felt too dignified. He and Natasha (who was also a very talented singer/actor, but portrayed as extremely petulant and brattish - weird interpretation of the character, but I'll put it down to the director rather than the actor) had little chemistry, and the ending also felt flat.
As incredible as the rest of the ensemble were, it was very hard to sympathise with the two leads as everything really revolves around them. Maimuna Memon was outstanding and her interpretation of Sonya is one of my favourite theatre performances I've seen recently. She's so talented. Chloe Saracco was Princess Mary was also fantastic, what a fantastic voice and so many lovely acting choices every time she was on stage. Jamie Muscato stole the show, having seen him in many other shows before I knew he would be amazing but he really did offer a very fresh take on the character, while being undeniably charming - a multi-dimensional take on the rake archetype while having a blast on stage. Cedric Neal as Balaga was SO fun - I'm not spoiling his scenes but he really was a breath of fresh air. And the rest of the cast were really just brilliant, the harmonies were lush.
In terms of costume/set design, I'm not a fan. I'm sorry but it doesn't work at all.
|
|
|
Post by jamesd123 on Dec 11, 2024 14:01:12 GMT
I managed to get tickets for the second preview of this much-anticipated show, and I have to say I was a bit disappointed with the director's approach and vision for the project overall. I genuinely think that much of the original material was misinterpreted, and I hope that is rectified before it opens properly because in its current form, it's not looking great. And I say this as someone who loves the show and Malloy's work, and also works in theatre too. I don't want to spoil things too much, but the actor playing Pierre was simply miscast. His performance was flat, often robotic. The character's philosophical outbursts felt too dignified. He and Natasha (who was also a very talented singer/actor, but portrayed as extremely petulant and brattish - weird interpretation of the character, but I'll put it down to the director rather than the actor) had little chemistry, and the ending also felt flat. As incredible as the rest of the ensemble were, it was very hard to sympathise with the two leads as everything really revolves around them. Maimuna Memon was outstanding and her interpretation of Sonya is one of my favourite theatre performances I've seen recently. She's so talented. Chloe Saracco was Princess Mary was also fantastic, what a fantastic voice and so many lovely acting choices every time she was on stage. Jamie Muscato stole the show, having seen him in many other shows before I knew he would be amazing but he really did offer a very fresh take on the character, while being undeniably charming - a multi-dimensional take on the rake archetype while having a blast on stage. Cedric Neal as Balaga was SO fun - I'm not spoiling his scenes but he really was a breath of fresh air. And the rest of the cast were really just brilliant, the harmonies were lush. In terms of costume/set design, I'm not a fan. I'm sorry but it doesn't work at all. Natasha is petulant and brattish though… she is a teenage girl that spends most of the second half throwing a tantrum at her godmother who stopped her being groomed. And as for her chemistry, I quite liked the fact that her and Pierre didn’t feel at all romantic. I’ve always found that plot point weirdly hypocritical — Pierre stops her from being groomed by an older man to then confess his love for her as an older man…
|
|
|
Post by illicitmeow on Dec 11, 2024 14:16:28 GMT
Natasha is petulant and brattish though… she is a teenage girl that spends most of the second half throwing a tantrum at her godmother who stopped her being groomed. And as for her chemistry, I quite liked the fact that her and Pierre didn’t feel at all romantic. I’ve always found that plot point weirdly hypocritical — Pierre stops her from being groomed by an older man to then confess his love for her as an older man… This interpretation goes beyond petulant, however - she is downright mean at times, even in the first act. It's reasonable to point out how childish Natasha might really be, but considering in the context of the novel she's meant to be 19-20 at this time, making her childish in the sense of a 15-16 year old felt like a strange choice that went a little bit too far in some places. In act 2, her portrayal worked much better, as by that point Natasha is actively indulging in her most selfish impulses. In act 1, we see little of the "innocence" that Anatole is meant to be spoiling. {Spoiler - click to view} Also, unrelated to what you just said but I felt that the choice of Helene gifting her underwear as a very strange one. Make it a tight corseted dress like what Helene's wearing, not bright red underwear. It felt extra predatory, even more than Helene already is.
|
|
745 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by sophie92 on Dec 11, 2024 17:24:47 GMT
If anyone missed out on tickets, still wants to go, and is able to do last-minute, it’s definitely worth checking for returns. There have been a lot for this evening’s performance throughout the day (quite a lot available right now).
|
|
188 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by SylviaFowler on Dec 11, 2024 23:46:04 GMT
Very disappointed in this tonight. After all the hype surrounding the Broadway production I expected so much more. The music never really captivated me, and I found the story quite hard to follow (although my attention span was definitely waning). The act two opener was the best part, but other than that Cedric Neal was wasted in this show. Paired with some weak performances, and an incredibly un-stylish set and costume design, I’d rate this production ⭐⭐ overall.
|
|
260 posts
|
Post by frankubelik on Dec 12, 2024 7:20:32 GMT
Not a single redeemable feature for me. Dreadful on every level. Poorly cast, sung and directed. No sense of time or place. Confusing and irrelevant "narrative". A disappointing mess.
|
|
281 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by unseaworthy on Dec 12, 2024 7:55:44 GMT
The reviews on here are fascinating - a real mix of opinions!
|
|