385 posts
|
Post by Ade on Feb 19, 2017 22:10:46 GMT
While personally I think Amber deserves it over Sheridan, I find it ridiculous she was nominated in the first place. Submitting nominations for the awards ended on 24th November and Dreamgirls only started previews on 19th November. The fact that she was eligible in the first place shows how flawed the awards are. That, I agree with. It seems like they just picked the easiest roles/places that maybe previous incarnations of the show have amazed at and got nominations through that like Jimmy and Effie being the showiest roles etc. I know audiences "pick" the nominees but there is no way, based on 5 days of performances, it could of got enough votes for their nominations. It does seriously make me doubt the credibility of it. I stand corrected and it actually would have been 6 days so 8 audiences would have seen it - just shy of 10k people. But realistically what portion of those are going to have voted? Not a high number. Perhaps you could argue that a large number of avid theatregoers would have been attending those performances, but I'd also assume a lot of them would already have given their nominations much earlier in the month when voting opened. So I can only assume that either they fixed it so that she received a nomination in the shortlist, or that people popped her name down when they were voting before they'd even seen it. Don't get me wrong, this is no criticism of her performance at all - just the credibility of the awards.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 22:16:57 GMT
That, I agree with. It seems like they just picked the easiest roles/places that maybe previous incarnations of the show have amazed at and got nominations through that like Jimmy and Effie being the showiest roles etc. I know audiences "pick" the nominees but there is no way, based on 5 days of performances, it could of got enough votes for their nominations. It does seriously make me doubt the credibility of it. I stand corrected and it actually would have been 6 days so 8 audiences would have seen it - just shy of 10k people. But realistically what portion of those are going to have voted? Not a high number. Perhaps you could argue that a large number of avid theatregoers would have been attending those performances, but I'd also assume a lot of them would already have given their nominations much earlier in the month when voting opened. So I can only assume that either they fixed it so that she received a nomination in the shortlist, or that people popped her name down when they were voting before they'd even seen it. Don't get me wrong, this is no criticism of her performance at all - just the credibility of the awards. There is definitely something shady about how Dreamgirls got its nominations, just because logically it wouldn't be possible unless people voted for it before it even happened, which even then, I would only imagine they would vote for Amber and not the other aspects of the show. That being said, she sounds amazing and has got stellar reviews and having seen the show with Marisha, it is a deserving role, so I am not upset she won at all. But it does make you look at Dreamgirls as an example of maybe these aren't just the audience awards.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 22:41:35 GMT
I cannot believe Groundhog Day has won nothing tonight! It is by far one of the best theatre productions I've ever seen!
Seeing School of Rock in a couple of weeks will be very interesting...
|
|
2,452 posts
|
Post by theatremadness on Feb 19, 2017 22:45:28 GMT
I cannot believe Groundhog Day has won nothing tonight! It is by far one of the best theatre productions I've ever seen! Seeing School of Rock in a couple of weeks will be very interesting... Yes I'd tend to agree with you about Groundhog Day, especially about it being one of the best productions I've ever seen, but I'm not totally surprised it won nothing. It was a very limited run which finished quite a while before nominations began, and I'm making a rather general assumption that the vast majority of audiences who would've seen the show (this board not included!), would not be the type to vote in these awards. As for Dreamgirls, I think there's definitely a case of fans of Amber voting for her to support her without even having seen her in the show, but it just so happens that she ended up being so good that she actually deserved it (not seen Dreamgirls myself yet, just going on reviews from others!). The audience voting/popularity contest discussion will *always* be the biggest 'problem' of these awards and will forever be discussed every year these awards continue. This year there seems to have been a few more 'deserving' winners, but there has also been a notable rise in the way theatre productions interact with their audiences on social media, so maybe it gives lesser known names a chance of winning via the fan bases of the show, as opposed to fan bases of the performer themselves!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 3:47:42 GMT
I'm also not sure if non-theatre fans loved Groundhog Day as much as this board does but admittedly I'm just basing this off the fact that when I went to see it no one stood up to clap which is a rarity these days.
|
|
256 posts
|
Post by frankubelik on Feb 20, 2017 4:55:18 GMT
Someone mentioned credibility. "New Musical" - DREAMGIRLS 1981 & SIXPENCE 1963. I realise the latter has been substantially altered but these are not "new" - there goes credibility. How anyone could think the bland Emma Williams could have been thought better than Rebecca Trehearn is beyond me.
|
|
8,155 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Feb 20, 2017 7:21:50 GMT
First time ever... a tie!! So of the thousands of people who voted both musicals got EXACTLY the same number of votes? Call me a cynic but I find that hard to believe.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:08:51 GMT
Someone mentioned credibility. "New Musical" - DREAMGIRLS 1981 & SIXPENCE 1963. I realise the latter has been substantially altered but these are not "new" - there goes credibility. How anyone could think the bland Emma Williams could have been thought better than Rebecca Trehearn is beyond me. Nothing wrong at all with shows being brought back, not sure I get your point?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:11:09 GMT
First time ever... a tie!! So of the thousands of people who voted both musicals got EXACTLY the same number of votes? Call me a cynic but I find that hard to believe. It can easily happen - Barbra Streisand and Katherine Hepburn got exactly the same number of votes from the thousands of member of the Academy for the Best Actress Oscar years ago. Not sure why there's a need to be cynical - there's nothing to be gained for anyone in having a tie between two shows which don't need any help with publicity or selling tickets!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:32:13 GMT
Well. Those winners were major surprises weren't they? Harry Potter winning everything, OMGosh. Give me a heavy fringed bob and call me Mystic Meg!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:38:28 GMT
Someone mentioned credibility. "New Musical" - DREAMGIRLS 1981 & SIXPENCE 1963. I realise the latter has been substantially altered but these are not "new" - there goes credibility. How anyone could think the bland Emma Williams could have been thought better than Rebecca Trehearn is beyond me. Nothing wrong at all with shows being brought back, not sure I get your point? The point seems to be bringing shows back, but calling them new rather than revivals. Dreamgirls has never had a UK run before so counts as new whether we like it or not, though passing Half A Sixpence off as an entirely new piece is rather cheeky.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:45:13 GMT
I think there is a rule somewhere, I can't remember where I read it may be the Tony rules, but if a musical has at least 75% new material, it can be considered a new musical in awards. So that may be where Half a Sixpence got in?
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Feb 20, 2017 10:32:46 GMT
I'm also not sure if non-theatre fans loved Groundhog Day as much as this board does but admittedly I'm just basing this off the fact that when I went to see it no one stood up to clap which is a rarity these days. I have heard a professional film critic (Chris Hewitt on the Empire Podcast) describe it as the best thing in any medium he saw last year. But then I guess he doesn't pay much attention to the WOS awards.
|
|
1,046 posts
|
Post by jgblunners on Feb 20, 2017 10:47:52 GMT
I don't have any problem with Half a Sixpence being classified as a new musical - given that there's more new material than old in the show, I think it would be a bit of an insult to Stiles and Drewe if it was considered a revival! I am also shocked at School of Rock winning, though. I haven't seen the show, but Dreamgirls, Half a Sixpence and Groundhog Day (which had my vote) were so sensational that I was convinced it was going to be a close competition between those three and SoR wouldn't stand a chance! Maybe I'll be even more blown away by School of Rock but somehow I doubt it.
Without wishing to stoke the fire on the legitimacy of these awards, I also find it very telling that Carrie Hope Fletcher was nominated for best supporting actress for a limited run in a touring production - I believe all the other leading/supporting nominations for both plays and musicals were for West End or Off-West End productions? I have no doubt that she was very good, but I think it's probably quite clear that she got the nomination because she has such a large and dedicated fanbase.
EDIT: scratch that, Ian Hallard was nominated for Boys in the Band which didn't make it to the West End until after nominations closed, and I don't think the Park Theatre counts as Off-West End. Pixie Lott also got nominated for Breakfast at Tiffany's which was a tour, although it did do a run in the West End. My point still stands for the musical actor/actress categories though.
|
|
1,319 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Feb 20, 2017 15:25:39 GMT
I've just seen the Mischief Comedy ad in the WOS Programme - image of Comedy About A Bank Robbery at the top of the page, image of the Play That Goes Wrong at the bottom of the page, with a line of type through the middle "WE SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT WE ARE UP TO NO GOOD". Snorted out loud and office now know I'm not really working...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 15:49:57 GMT
I've just seen the Mischief Comedy ad in the WOS Programme - image of Comedy About A Bank Robbery at the top of the page, image of the Play That Goes Wrong at the bottom of the page, with a line of type through the middle "WE SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT WE ARE UP TO NO GOOD". Snorted out loud and office now know I'm not really working... ... Harry Potter Goes Wrong next then?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 16:05:23 GMT
Um, what the hell, Groundhog Day was so robbed.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 16:06:58 GMT
The people have spoken.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 16:24:35 GMT
I am surprised SoR won over Dreamgirls
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 16:27:02 GMT
I think Half a Sixpence could well have win the same three awards at the Oliviers. Charlie and the Choreography, in my opinion, are pretty much locks. I think it is Emma vs. Rebecca at this moment, and if they are going for performance, Rebecca does have the meatier role and was stunning. But Emma is great in the show, and does well with what she has. She also has three prior nominations and sometimes they vote based on body of work rather than just the one role, in which case, it will be Emma's to take home. I wouldn't mind either personally. I also think, especially as it has gone into a full run rather than limited, it could be the winner of Musical Revival too. It was completely re-worked, re-wrote and re-staged the piece and made it work for todays audiences, and it worked out to stellar reviews and popularity with audiences. that is the one I would want to see win it personally!
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Feb 20, 2017 16:33:50 GMT
I am surprised SoR won over Dreamgirls Me too. Positively, I must add.
|
|
1,319 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Feb 20, 2017 17:14:39 GMT
Um, what the hell, Groundhog Day was so robbed. Me too, absolutely freaking robbed.
|
|
1,064 posts
|
Post by bellboard27 on Feb 20, 2017 19:08:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by firefingers on Feb 20, 2017 19:25:43 GMT
Who won the sound design award? Oh. They still don't do one. Rude.
|
|
527 posts
|
Post by Hamilton Addict on Feb 20, 2017 20:09:01 GMT
I think it is Emma vs. Rebecca at this moment, and if they are going for performance, Rebecca does have the meatier role and was stunning. But Emma is great in the show, and does well with what she has. She also has three prior nominations and sometimes they vote based on body of work rather than just the one role, in which case, it will be Emma's to take home. I wouldn't mind either personally. Rebecca was off when I saw Show Boat and Emma was off when I saw Half a Sixpence. Apparently the two best supporting actresses of the year and I missed them both!
|
|