|
Post by max on Apr 25, 2021 14:14:58 GMT
"I have spent 50 years delivering the highest-quality musicals this country has ever seen and I'm not about to stop now." Eww - imagine doing the same job for 50 years. Who'd want to?
|
|
44 posts
|
Post by theatremole on Apr 25, 2021 14:19:52 GMT
I find myself in some agreement with CM. There are musicians who have been playing the same show for 30yrs and you can tell as they're usually the ones who rock up at drunk at beginners, are the first ones in the pub at the interval and the first ones in the pub at the end.
It's controversial but I prefer the new orchestrations in Les Mis to the original so I'm very intrigued to hear what Phantom is going to sound like.
|
|
19,742 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Apr 25, 2021 14:37:27 GMT
Wasn’t the actor who played the auctioneer in the production when it opened and all the way up to it closing?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 14:43:52 GMT
Interesting twist he's spun here, implying we should be grateful that without the pandemic causing the cancellation of the UK Tour, Phantom on West End would have closed. It's 'have the touring production or nothing at all'. With regard to the musicians comment, so he doesn't want musicians or actors to keep working on the same show, I presume that means he doesn't want fans to return to the same shows either then. After all, why would we "want to keep doing the same thing year after year"? Duly noted. Which makes me wonder once again - will you be going?I wonder the same thing scarpia ? For those so outspoken about their feelings on ALW and CM, does it put you in an awkward position of not wanting to line their pockets further by buying tickets? Or are you so clear that you don't want to see the new show that it's not something you need to consider? Genuinely interested. Honestly, not anytime soon, if at all. Hopefully that doesn't produce a response of 'well what are you moaning about'. Call me a purest, but the changes to the UK touring production were destructive enough to make me regret buying tickets. Once you've seen and heard the full original, its hard for any direct reduction of that to compare, in my mind. The diluted orchestrations genuinely made me writhe at points, but some have argued here most people aren't shrewd enough to notice, so it'll probably be hailed a veritable success and set a precedent for the further cuts in the future. And on the Cameron comments. Fair enough I say. It IS sad for the musicians. But he doesn't owe anyone a contract renewal (least of all of one that doesn't even currently exist). He and ALW may produce as they wish. The ticket buying public may decide if they wish to spend their money on his product. "I have spent 50 years delivering the highest-quality musicals this country has ever seen and I'm not about to stop now." Amen. And that's me over and out from this thread, at least until there is any new significant news or the show opens! Not legally or contractually. Morally though? He absolutely does. Some of the musicians (and cast) had been with the show since it opened in 1986. They dedicated almost the entirety of their professional careers, 34 years, to this production, to their employer. They've been thrown into the gutter like a pair of soiled underpants. Without a second thought. Some not even dignified with legitimate communication. It's disgusting. I guess it was entirely predictable though. Lets not forget this from the same Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber who flew back from New York to vote in favour of decreasing working tax credits for the lower class. He has no real regard for the people below him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 14:44:12 GMT
Wasn’t the actor who played the auctioneer in the production when it opened and all the way up to it closing? Philip Griffiths. Yes.
|
|
|
Post by scarpia on Apr 25, 2021 15:04:08 GMT
Wasn’t the actor who played the auctioneer in the production when it opened and all the way up to it closing? Philip Griffiths. Yes. Griffiths hadn't played the same role since 1986. He joined the show in 1990 and it was still a few years after that that he played the auctioneer/Reyer. There were only 2-3 members of the orchestra who'd been with the show since the beginning. If we keep saying that this a "business", then we have to recognise that part of business is that people who aren't billionaires like to have job security.
|
|
3,470 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Apr 25, 2021 15:41:28 GMT
Many of the orchestra will have been operating as self-employed artists no doubt, not paye, trundling from contract renewal to contract renewal. Some presumably assumed it'd go on forever. In business, nothing is owed to contractors at the end of a contract. It's the quid pro quo for enjoying the breaks/benefits of being a self-employed contractor. Mackintosh owes them nothing, though there is perhaps a tax question from HMRC around "disguised employee" status if they've done it for so long. That said, if they were on regular payroll then, yes, they should be compensated and may even have recourse to tribunal action in such an event.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 16:50:29 GMT
Just wait til Cameron & Andrew find out the latest digital sound desk have 'automix' functions and follow spots can be automated based on tracking markers inside costumes. 3 from Sound sacked and 3 from LX. Soon enough it'll be the DSM pressing go for LX & Sound and a guy running the orchestra off his keyboard.
Who was it called shows like these 'machines'? This isnt "art".
|
|
|
Post by danb on Apr 25, 2021 16:55:04 GMT
Our Vax has “automix technology”, they say so on the advert...pretty sure that me pouring the liquid into the water was the only mixing that went on but I’ll believe them. It does an ok job if the cat has yakked up a hairball and thats all we need.
|
|
44 posts
|
Post by theatremole on Apr 25, 2021 17:31:56 GMT
Automated followspot systems aren't yet anywhere near as good as an operator, Robert Juliat have a very nice system (called SpotMe) which is similar to BlackTrax but still uses an actual operator.
On the International tour I believe they use one of the remote operation followspot systems but I'm not sure which one.
That said, if Phantom utilised BlackTrax or SpotMe you could get some absolutely beautiful effects.
|
|
|
Post by scarpia on Apr 25, 2021 17:57:28 GMT
Matt Hemley has been very vocal about the cuts in The Stage, and the war of words seems to be escalating:
|
|
|
Post by danb on Apr 25, 2021 18:27:03 GMT
I’ve no idea what the process is when you get to the end of a contract. Do you have to re-audition? Do they ask you if you want to stay on? What happens?
I don’t have to re-apply for my job every year but I’m certainly assessed constantly, and have a review every year. He should be doing the same with his employees, especially if he wants to boot some out.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Apr 25, 2021 19:33:25 GMT
It's not so much the act of cutting musicians, though I think he's wrong. It's the way he's gone about it. The complete lack of empathy. "I'm sorry they are upset" is not an apology. No words of regret. No words of sympathy for those he's left without work. Nothing.
|
|
|
Post by inthenose on Apr 25, 2021 19:36:28 GMT
Cameron's comments are completely tone deaf and hypocritical. Artists have to work, they have mortgages, families and responsibilities. Nobody owes them a living any more than ASDA owes the checkout staff a living, this is true. But his justification is outrageous.
Philip Griffiths has been with the show since 1990. Scott Davies for 20 years on and off. John Owen Jones played the role thousands of times. They obviously have no artistic pride either.
If he'd have just stuck to the official line about the post-Covid world he could've prevented another PR disaster.
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Apr 25, 2021 19:41:18 GMT
Also does he think musicians will be queuing up to work with/for him after this? Knowing that he will drop them in a second?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2021 7:12:28 GMT
Also does he think musicians will be queuing up to work with/for him after this? Knowing that he will drop them in a second? The sad thing is they will. The Musicians Union holds absolutely no weight, their pr response is testimony to this 'sad and disappointed' nothing more. No requests for meetings to resolve, no suggestion of a strike or boycott. Unfortunately as a result of the pandemic hundreds of musicians will be looking to finally return to a job they know and love, bills have got to be paid, mouths fed. For the current and next round of graduates, unaware of the politics of this situation, the accolade of going on to work at a CML production is the golden goose on the CV. They'll do it without batting an eyelid and probably accept a fee deduction in the process.
|
|
2,012 posts
|
Post by distantcousin on Apr 26, 2021 9:30:11 GMT
I LOVE his comments! You go, sister!
I can hear certain people's heads exploding simultaneously with rage!!!!!!!!!
|
|
3,470 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Apr 26, 2021 9:32:33 GMT
Our Vax has “automix technology”, they say so on the advert...pretty sure that me pouring the liquid into the water was the only mixing that went on but I’ll believe them. It does an ok job if the cat has yakked up a hairball and thats all we need. Reviving Cats? Cool!
|
|
3,470 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Apr 26, 2021 9:49:49 GMT
It's not so much the act of cutting musicians, though I think he's wrong. It's the way he's gone about it. The complete lack of empathy. "I'm sorry they are upset" is not an apology. No words of regret. No words of sympathy for those he's left without work. Nothing. We recently did some cuts in a client of mine. When making difficult decisions, sometimes it is better to be clinical and business-like. That said, most folk leave a job, whine in private, dust themselves down and move on to the next one whenever it arises. Still not sure why folk see dome roles as "a job for life". As Csmeron said, it's not the civil service. If folk want safety and security, performance art is probably not the right career choice. Tough, but true. So, are producers slaying the golden goose, or did the goose get too fat and need slimming down? Should bloated costs be the burden of one or two wealthy producers? Perhaps other shows could be slimmed down too? "Cat"? "2nd Street"? "Hadesvillage"? "Jesus Christ Star"? "La Miserable"? "Joseph and his Monocolor Waistcoat"? "The Chapter of Mormon"? "Only Fool and Donkey"? "Mary Poppin"? "Kinky Boot"? "Jersey Boy"? "Somebody's Talking About Jamie"? Think of the savings, then add in the follow-spot options... it's a producer's dream.
|
|
|
Post by 141920grm on Apr 26, 2021 9:50:11 GMT
"Am I sorry? I'm sorry they're upset, but I do find it odd why musicians would want to keep doing the same thing year after year. I believe we should not be holding jobs for actors or musicians ad infinitum. This is not the Civil Service, we're creating art." I'm with Cameron on this. It's business. What artist would paint or play the same thing over and over ad nauseum? Unless Phantom was their real-life muse. Life moves on - looking forward to seeing the new production. My God. I have never heard anything more arrogant, narrow-minded and contemptuous of the arts as this comment of Cameron's. And then to be able to pick out this singularly tone-deaf and insensitive comment and specifically say one agrees with it. Check. Your. Privilege. If the musicians had been getting sick of their jobs, they would have resigned. If their lack of enthusiasm for the show had shown through their playing, Cameron could have sacked them citing poor performance. But no. Instead he acts like he's doing them a god damned favour by sacking them. This is enough to unite those who are specifically unhappy with what's going on at Phantom, and those who simply want the arts sector to be given the value and respect it deserves. Cancel culture will do its job soon enough.
|
|
3,470 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Apr 26, 2021 10:44:21 GMT
"Am I sorry? I'm sorry they're upset, but I do find it odd why musicians would want to keep doing the same thing year after year. I believe we should not be holding jobs for actors or musicians ad infinitum. This is not the Civil Service, we're creating art." I'm with Cameron on this. It's business. What artist would paint or play the same thing over and over ad nauseum? Unless Phantom was their real-life muse. Life moves on - looking forward to seeing the new production. My God. I have never heard anything more arrogant, narrow-minded and contemptuous of the arts as this comment of Cameron's. And then to be able to pick out this singularly tone-deaf and insensitive comment and specifically say one agrees with it. Check. Your. Privilege. If the musicians had been getting sick of their jobs, they would have resigned. If their lack of enthusiasm for the show had shown through their playing, Cameron could have sacked them citing poor performance. But no. Instead he acts like he's doing them a god damned favour by sacking them. This is enough to unite those who are specifically unhappy with what's going on at Phantom, and those who simply want the arts sector to be given the value and respect it deserves. Cancel culture will do its job soon enough. Yes, I agree with this comment by CM. Why does that cause me to "Check. My. Privilege."? Check. Your. Cliché.
|
|
|
Post by 141920grm on Apr 26, 2021 11:07:35 GMT
One of my issues with the 2020 (non)Touring Production was that it was relit too brightly, in part a result of the change from Tungsten lighting sources to LED. Although that change was necessary (and due in London for longevity) the lighting re-design was cumbersome, distracted heavily at times and certain darker scenes felt over exposed. The vulnerability and romance of the plot was reduced. The production as a whole felt less honest to the era in which it is set and more of a concert or tribute. The same goes for the sound. The inherent issue with upgrading to shiny new, super, digital audio system is that it every element is exhibited in finer detail. There's only so much reverb you can put on one violin before its swallowed up into it's own ether. If this is bigger, brighter, better than the original to you, fine, but to me this is a pale imitation and a very sad reduction passed off, neither brilliant nor original. www.dropbox.com/s/mitem1jckbwkw79/ahem.mp3?dl=0(for clarity, that is the 14 piece orchestration) In my opinion. This was also one of the biggest aspects that jumped out at me in Leicester, thank you for phrasing it so well. In my mind I called it "original-ish production but in shiny HD", but the photographic metaphor- "overexposed"- is very appropriate. An overabundance of detail, all of the time, can get distracting. (The same reason why I rarely see an example of HDR photography that truly elevates the picture.) The Point of No Return scene was one that particularly stuck out, the painted inn backdrop was so brightly lit, it did no favours for the busy foreground props and Christine moving across the stage in her equally patterned dress. Hopefully they will have tweaked it by the time it reopens in London. Good framing is knowing how to isolate background noise from your focal point. The pureness of concept, translated so well to real life, is what makes Maria Bjornson's black box sets so famed. It's also what makes the Masquerade scene so breathtaking and unforgettable- the sudden reveal of richness and textures in a lavish presentation of cast and costumes, after the darker, single-point-focus Rooftop scenes first with R & C traversing an almost empty stage, and then with the golden angel suspended against the cloudy night. I suppose the older technology facilitated the look & feel of the original production, which had so much patina and depth precisely because it transported us away from the crispness and sharpness we have become used to everywhere else. Now every scene is bright, bright, bright, the lighting and framing so rigid that it wouldn't have been able to visually blend with the varying negative space had the production/sets continued to tour the UK. I was sitting dead centre for a performance and I could clearly see the crash mat structure that rolled out to catch the Raoul actor after Down Once More, you couldn't brush it off as a cheap seats angle that they hadn't accounted for. I was not sitting as close to the orchestra as you were but I also noted that the new orchestrations sounded more synthesised, to a point and crispness that is obviously not achievable by non-virtual instruments. Again, I hope everything is mixed better at HMT.
|
|
|
Post by 141920grm on Apr 26, 2021 11:11:46 GMT
That said. If there's someone musically inclined out there, who is familiar enough with the London and Tour scores, and is curious enough to play Spot the Difference between the two. You are welcome to give me the specific places/bars you'd like to hear compared, there's enough on Youtube and elsewhere for me to sample/clip from. Ideally orchestra-only selections, no sung parts to distract...! Maybe that can be a reference for how the revival might sound.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2021 11:18:04 GMT
Bloody artists wanting to eat, start families. How bloody dare they pour sweat into a physically demanding job 6 days a week and want to get paid for it. The leeches.
They should of resigned and busked in the street in the recessions of the eighties and the noughties.
Job security isn’t for artists and they should resign every year and go into audition for new shows.
£70 is enough to eat, pay rent and travel to auditions in London.
After all they shouldn’t have children or partners as artists, they chose to be musicians they can’t have everything.
Parasites living off billionaire producers.
|
|
5,868 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Apr 26, 2021 11:34:57 GMT
I’d still love Mr M to explain how this, the BIGGEST GROSSING ENTERTAINMENT IN THE WORLD cannot afford a larger orchestra.
What a way to ruin his career and reputation at this late stage.
As if the way he’s treated the staff at his theatres since the pandemic wasn’t bad enough.
|
|