|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2016 8:24:04 GMT
I despair also floozie. The link to the Daily Mail has been up ten hours and not one person has said 'bloody Daily Mail' yet. Why say what we all know everyone is thinking?
|
|
1,306 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Aug 13, 2016 9:15:05 GMT
There's a comment on the theatres Facebook page (can't cut and past from the doings I'm tapping on). Says 3 patrons asked for screaming baby to be removed, nothing about her breastfeeding which they are fine with.
I have a 'friend' on Facebook who is in regular contact with an agency that works on non stories like these, the stuff that's found in magazines of a certain genre, "my husband slept with my sister and my mum", sort of stuff. They get the stories and sell them on to whatever publication will buy it.
Slow news day
|
|
1,578 posts
|
Post by anita on Aug 13, 2016 9:42:17 GMT
I don't have a problem with the breast feeding but I certainly do about taking a baby to the theatre when it's not a children's show. People have paid alot for tickets & don't want their enjoyment ruined by a baby screaming [ or all the other problems in the "Bad behaviour" thread].
|
|
19,663 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 13, 2016 9:52:01 GMT
The ginger gene runs strong! Adorable baby but keep them out of theatres please.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2016 11:46:08 GMT
there's a time and place for everything and in the middle of a show is probably not a place I'd think of feeding my kid. Sorry to bore you - I've told this here before - but I remember a storytelling session where the storyteller breastfed her son mid-performance, quite naturally and without any disruption to the flow of the story and without anyone in the audience batting an eyelid. I suppose that it all depends on how adept the mother is at behaving confidently and proficiently.
|
|
144 posts
|
Post by lou on Aug 13, 2016 22:49:14 GMT
I've had quite a lot of small children and babies at shows this week (the children well-behaved, the babies unsurprisingly noisy). These were shows that aren't engaging for small children - it's kids week/month isn't it, so cheaper than a babysitter?!
|
|
2,452 posts
|
Post by theatremadness on Aug 13, 2016 22:54:15 GMT
I've had quite a lot of small children and babies at shows this week You must be exhausted!!! Taxi....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 13:42:57 GMT
Goodness. What are all these people doing, taking children to the theatre nowadays? Shouldn't they be, oh I don't know, up chimneys or down mines or something?
What *is* the world coming to?
|
|
4,977 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Aug 14, 2016 14:44:52 GMT
This woman entitlement runs very deep. If this baby turns out to be clever, it certainly didn't come from the mother's gene pool.
Breast feeding shouldn't be allowed in the theatre, Starbucks fine, but if a child needs breast feeding then it's too young to be in the theatre period, even for Peppa Pig,
Also never understood why theatre has baby changing facilities, this encourages the little brats. Suppose this ticks an Arts Council political correctness box.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 15:08:19 GMT
Also never understood why theatre has baby changing facilities, this encourages the little brats. Perhaps you're misunderstanding it, and the baby changing facilities are there so if you find your kid doesn't know how to act in public you can trade it in for one that's better behaved.
|
|
19,663 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 14, 2016 15:29:26 GMT
What's wrong with plonking them in front of a telly and teaching them the remote control? That's "learning" isn't it?
|
|
631 posts
|
Post by ncbears on Aug 14, 2016 17:55:29 GMT
Our first time at The Woman in Black, we had back of the stalls seats on the right. The rest of the audience seemed to be school classes - probably 14-16 - lots of preshow giggling in anticipation - lots of teasing by boys to get "scares" out of the girls. So, when the first real scare happens in the show, there were real screams and then lots of nervous laughter. The ushers ran up and down the aisles loudly exclaiming "Shhhh! Shhhh! Shhhh!" instead of letting the audience react to the play they were seeing. The screaming and nervous laughter was not distracting - it was part of the experience. Indeed, the ushers were more distracting than the school kids! But, the ushers were determined to keep the school group(s) quiet and continued the shushing throughout Act One.
|
|
19,663 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Aug 14, 2016 18:00:51 GMT
I enjoyed The Woman In Black as a play but it did not make me jump once. And I'm a jumper, believe me. Don't see a horror film with me 'cos I'll be in your lap and I'm quite big so you don't want that. I found TWIB very lame, fright-wise.
|
|
|
Post by Coated on Aug 14, 2016 19:55:27 GMT
What's wrong with plonking them in front of a telly and teaching them the remote control? That's "learning" isn't it? You'll make an excellent Papa Bear, having figured out the basics of child rearing already. 😉 Once they are 2 or 3, they can graduate to YouTube on a tablet...
|
|
1,306 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Aug 15, 2016 11:53:04 GMT
Saturday night. Cast change / last night of Kinky Boots for Killian etc, I'm firmly ensconced in my Row B stalls.
Row C behind me, seats 1 and 2 with two guys in. 2 women dressed up to the nines arrive from the bar with prosecco five mins to curtain up - these men are in their seats, bit of cackling and threats to sit on their laps .. Usher called, examines both sets of tickets, calls supervisor. Supervisor arrives and examines both sets of tickets. Ladies, you are booked for Wednesday 24 August.
Comedy jaw drop!
Left with supervisor who I think was going to try and find them somewhere else to sit.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Aug 15, 2016 12:38:46 GMT
The issue of turning up on the wrong night is more prevalent than you might think! As is an inability for some folk to find the correct row betwenn A-Z or seats from 1-35! How do these people manage to live in the world? Finding their way to work must be very challenging and then having to find their way home again!!!
|
|
1,306 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Aug 15, 2016 13:11:03 GMT
I get the wrong night thing, but booked for a Wednesday and turning up on the Saturday 10 days before ..
They had to get through the whole scanning the ticket thing to get into the auditorium too ..
|
|
341 posts
|
Post by adrianics on Aug 15, 2016 13:21:32 GMT
We had that at Memphis; a group walked up to us and, without even giving us a chance to check, said "you're in our seats so you need to leave and find your actual seats". I said "no, we're in the right seats" and when they eventually checked, we found that they were in Stalls row CC and not row C... Their faces when they found out they weren't at the front!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2016 22:07:36 GMT
One which springs to mind was at Miss Saigon where the man in front of me literally ate his girlfriend throughout the whole of act 1. He wouldn't leave her neck alone!! Then there was cuddling and arm around her and head on her shoulder thus literally blocking my view of the stage. I'm all for affection but not during a show and when you're trying to eat someone
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Aug 15, 2016 22:27:04 GMT
One which springs to mind was at Miss Saigon where the man in front of me literally ate his girlfriend throughout the whole of act 1. He wouldn't leave her neck alone!! Then there was cuddling and arm around her and head on her shoulder thus literally blocking my view of the stage. I'm all for affection but not during a show and when you're trying to eat someone Shame it wasn't 'Alive! The Musical.'
|
|
1,102 posts
|
Post by zak97 on Aug 16, 2016 12:19:19 GMT
More than a year ago now, but when at Gypsy at the Savoy there was a man and partner in dress circle row A complete centre (I was row E centre) and this man and his partner were dressed as if they could be regular theatregoers, they didn't bring in shopping bags like a tourist might. But even for what could be a regular theatregoer I was surprised by the bad behaviour. The couple spent the first twenty minutes mimicking the conductor and waving their hands about. It was blocking my view, and with them being row A I wouldn't be shocked if it was slightly annoying for the actors. It was only when a gentleman behind them appeared to have a stern word they stopped and thankfully were respectful and remained still.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Aug 16, 2016 14:13:07 GMT
I have been both intrigued and horrified to read these behavioural stories - it's something that makes me so mad at the theatre and I have registered to tell this story.
I was recently at a show at the Barbican in which Guildhall music composition students had written for short, 1930s 'special effects' (of the day!) films. The audience would have consisted of friends and relatives of Guildhall students and anyone interested in the very niche theme or time period of the films being shown. The composition student-writers were either performing their own pieces live or had enlisted other student musicians to do so for them.
The woman directly behind me (maybe early twenties) removed her shoes and placed her bare feet up on the top of the seat to my right, which was vacant. Her feet were literally next to my ear. After a couple of looks at her, which produced evil stares back, I moved past my husband on my left (the end of the row) and into the seat in front of him. There was an audible "Oh good!" from behind and the woman actually moved her vile, stinky feet to the top of the seat I'd vacated so they were now right next to my husband's face. I just do not understand how some people have absolutely no care whatsoever for those around them.
Rant over. And I should add that I have been to several London shows recently and have been amazed at the impeccable behaviour of the audiences. Long may it last!
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Aug 16, 2016 14:18:05 GMT
I feel bad about this but I have a good friend who does stuff like this. She's a lovely person, she just has zero self-awareness. I think she may be on the autistic spectrum (not defending bad behaviour, or saying people on the autistic spectrum can't be perfectly well-behaved).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 14:18:52 GMT
In my experience, friends and family are THE WORST people to have in an audience. Not all of them, obviously, as many people who are friendly with or related to performers are able to sit and watch the show respectfully. But SOME people who are friends and family are far more likely to overreact when their friend/relative is on stage (taking photos, giggling, pointing, waving, chattering), and far more likely to zone out entirely when their friend/relative isn't on stage (giggling and chattering may apply here too). And some of THOSE are even worse than the otherwise well-meaning chatterers, because they feel like their friendship or relatedness gives them leeway to behave as though they are at home in their own living room as well. So given the choice, I'd run a MILE from an audience that promised to be mostly friends and family. Otherwise you can end up with stinky feet in your ear.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2016 15:39:04 GMT
But SOME people who are friends and family are far more likely to overreact when their friend/relative is on stage (taking photos, giggling, pointing, waving, chattering), and far more likely to zone out entirely when their friend/relative isn't on stage (giggling and chattering may apply here too). My own experience is that friends and family tend to be overenthusiastic but are generally well-behaved, probably because they've heard many of this thread's sort of stories and know what not to do. When it comes to zoning out when a particular person isn't on stage superfans have friends and family beaten nearly every time. (The thread's too long to search back, but I'm sure I've mentioned before the Darren Day fan who ate her lunch when he wasn't on stage in the tour of Carousel, and couldn't understand why anyone around her was upset because if He wasn't on the stage then what was the point of looking at it?)
|
|