19,797 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jun 21, 2016 11:27:40 GMT
Look down, I see one of those small "ladies' hairbands," you know the ones, like little rubber bands covered in black material. Scrunchie?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2016 11:59:09 GMT
Nothing so fancy by the sound of it - you could also call it a hair bobble or a hair elastic.
|
|
19,797 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jun 21, 2016 12:01:22 GMT
Nothing so fancy by the sound of it - you could also call it a hair bobble or a hair elastic. Do you favour a scrunchie or a bobble Baemax? Or are you an Alice band maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2016 13:04:11 GMT
Nothing so fancy by the sound of it - you could also call it a hair bobble or a hair elastic. Do you favour a scrunchie or a bobble Baemax? Or are you an Alice band maybe? That's sweet that you imagine I'm relatively well-groomed. Truth be told, I rarely even drag a brush through my hair.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2016 13:25:59 GMT
Nothing so fancy by the sound of it - you could also call it a hair bobble or a hair elastic. I have a pack of two dozen bobbles. They're useful for all sorts of situations where you need to hold a cluster of small things together. Bobbles for times when you can fit a loop over the end, gear ties for when you can't.
|
|
889 posts
|
Post by longinthetooth on Jun 25, 2016 19:50:27 GMT
Well, it all kicked off at Titanic this afternoon. Mum & two teenage daughters decide to take a pic of the stage before the show started. For those who haven't seen it, there is an actor sitting at a table on stage (the designer of the ship, studying the plans) while everyone takes their seats. Cue usher coming over to tell them not to take pictures and to delete the one they had taken. Profuse apologies, then I heard, "he thinks I've deleted it, but I haven't."
Halfway through the first half the nose bags came out. Each one of them had one, I assume popcorn or something similar, judging from the rustling and prolonged munching. Come the interval, a man leaned over to them and in no uncertain terms told them it was disrespectful and rude to be eating in front of the actors, due to the noise and smell (of the food, I hasten to add, they weren't that bad). They were in the second row, and in a small theatre like the Charing Cross I would imagine they were visible from the stage. More profuse apologies, then Mum got up and disappeared. "It's ok, Mum's gone to sort it." In the meantime someone else had got involved and a debate was under way on to eat or not to eat. Mum duly comes back. "It is ok to eat, I've checked and they say we can. Well, we did buy it here." Thankfully, though, I think they got the message.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2016 21:15:08 GMT
I dont know why some people get so angry over people taking pictures before a show begins. I always take pictures of the curtain before or the set if there is no curtain. I understand if actors are onstage before the show though. I certainly agree about not taking pictures during a show, but I like to look back at my day at the theatre and to have a view from my seat.
I would never do this and would be shocked if I saw it happening, but I know people complain of videos of a show but I would be so lost if there wasn't videos of songs from shows on YouTube! Has anyone ever seen someone go on a phone in the audience. At Annie in Wimbledon, man went on phone all performance. He was on his own and didn't look up once! What's the point of paying lots of money and then not even watch a show! I dont know get and it annoys me so much!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 0:26:40 GMT
The curtains are one thing, George, but the set design is copyrighted by the designer, and once you set foot in a theatre, you agree to abide by their rules, which somewhere include "please do not take unauthorised photographs of the copyrighted material". Just so you know for the future. And all that aside, you never ever ever take a photograph of the stage if there's an actor on it, even if the show hasn't started yet, so these ladies were doing a double-wrong.
|
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Jun 26, 2016 4:31:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 7:29:43 GMT
The curtains are one thing, George, but the set design is copyrighted by the designer, and once you set foot in a theatre, you agree to abide by their rules, which somewhere include "please do not take unauthorised photographs of the copyrighted material". Just so you know for the future. And all that aside, you never ever ever take a photograph of the stage if there's an actor on it, even if the show hasn't started yet, so these ladies were doing a double-wrong. Yes I do know all this. I have been to the theatre loads of times (probably more times than you think I have) and I know the rules about photography. I would never take a photo of an actor on stage anyway! If a show has got a nice, lavish curtain before the show with say the shows name written across it, then I usually take a picture. But it's not just me, if you go on social media, loads of people have got pictures of the auditorium beforehand.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 9:00:03 GMT
Woman at the ENO in one of the boxes in the dress circle using her phone during act one - well done to the usher who went to the box and intervened
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 9:05:40 GMT
Woman at the ENO in one of the boxes in the dress circle using her phone during act one - well done to the usher who went to the box and intervened I really don't like it when people record an actual show! I also don't like it when people just go on their phone during a show! How can they not last 2 and a half hours without looking at their phone?!
|
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Jun 26, 2016 15:28:05 GMT
Woman at the ENO in one of the boxes in the dress circle using her phone during act one - well done to the usher who went to the box and intervened I was at a show at the Forrest Theatre in Philadelphia and saw someone doing this -- I told a super nice usher and it turns out it was actually a member of the production team taking notes but didn't realize his screen was so bright or that he could be seen from where I was (rear mezz). Oops!
|
|
98 posts
|
Post by stanne on Jun 27, 2016 16:24:28 GMT
Well, it all kicked off at Titanic this afternoon. Mum & two teenage daughters decide to take a pic of the stage before the show started. For those who haven't seen it, there is an actor sitting at a table on stage (the designer of the ship, studying the plans) while everyone takes their seats. Cue usher coming over to tell them not to take pictures and to delete the one they had taken. Profuse apologies, then I heard, "he thinks I've deleted it, but I haven't." Halfway through the first half the nose bags came out. Each one of them had one, I assume popcorn or something similar, judging from the rustling and prolonged munching. Come the interval, a man leaned over to them and in no uncertain terms told them it was disrespectful and rude to be eating in front of the actors, due to the noise and smell (of the food, I hasten to add, they weren't that bad). They were in the second row, and in a small theatre like the Charing Cross I would imagine they were visible from the stage. More profuse apologies, then Mum got up and disappeared. "It's ok, Mum's gone to sort it." In the meantime someone else had got involved and a debate was under way on to eat or not to eat. Mum duly comes back. "It is ok to eat, I've checked and they say we can. Well, we did buy it here." Thankfully, though, I think they got the message. Is it possible that people don't realise that it's not a good idea to stuff your face in the middle of a show - especially in a theatre this size where you must be fully visible to the cast as you sit there and cram food down your face??? Not to mention how irritating it is to the other members of the audience as you sit there rustling and chomping?
Ignorance, stupidity or bad manners....or a combination of all three??
|
|
1,064 posts
|
Post by bellboard27 on Jun 27, 2016 18:32:05 GMT
Foolish usher at the National tried to stop a woman taking a very small bag into the theatre, on the grounds it was a "backpack" - in as much as she had a shoulder strap. She protested it was her handbag, and eventually he let her in. OK, but here's the good one. Actually on my way back to Waterloo station, but I'm SO glad it happened... Crowded pavement, but folk started to scatter a bit... I could see a wheelchair coming towards me, and weaving all over the place - hence the nimble avoiding moves... ... as the chair got closer, I could see the occupant. An attractive young lady... ... chair wheel in one hand... ... Using her mobile phone with the other!!!!!! I absolutely love it. A real triumph for Equality. Negotiating a busy London pavement while on your phone and without consideration for other people is now, officially AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES event. Ain't the 21st century wonderful?! I took a carrier bag to the National to put my small back pack in. Box office staff approved! Door staff quite happy. I refuse to have to queue afterwards and miss my train (esp the long queues at the Dorfmann).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2016 19:23:27 GMT
I had a sense of humour failure at the NT the other week when I was forced to put my fairly small backpack in the cloakroom then a woman with a much bigger shopping bag was let in no problem. Thanks for the carrier bag tip, I will do this next time! Just checked and my backpack fits nicely in a Waitrose bag-for-life
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Jun 27, 2016 22:14:38 GMT
The NT cloakroom once let me store two huge suitcases, so I feel slightly indebted to defend them.
|
|
857 posts
|
Post by stuartmcd on Jun 27, 2016 22:38:58 GMT
Foolish usher at the National tried to stop a woman taking a very small bag into the theatre, on the grounds it was a "backpack" - in as much as she had a shoulder strap. She protested it was her handbag, and eventually he let her in. Do many theatres ban bags? I had my bag checked on the way into Aladdin but I've never been told I can't have it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 7:13:19 GMT
The NT cloakroom once let me store two huge suitcases, so I feel slightly indebted to defend them. I don't think anyone's dissing the cloakroom, just the weird rules the ushers are using to send some people and not others off to use them. The only theatre I've ever been to that banned bags outright is certain immersive and site-specific pieces - The Drowned Man, Sleep No More, and Cart Macabre are the ones that spring instantly to mind. Other theatres don't like larger bags and ask that you use cloakrooms for them, as much for safety as anything else (try evacuating a theatre when half the aisles are clogged with suitcases or, less alarmist, try getting to your seat in the middle of the row when the first three people all have huge backpacks on the floor between their feet), but I don't think a standard theatre would insist you leave your bag behind if it was a reasonable size. I always feel that if a theatre is going to insist on you leaving a particular bag in the cloakroom, then the cloakroom shouldn't charge. I don't mind that there's a charge for some cloakrooms if it's my own choice to use it, but I'd definitely argue if I was ordered to leave a bag in the cloakroom then told I had to pay for the privilege as well.
|
|
|
Post by firefingers on Jun 28, 2016 7:35:33 GMT
Foolish usher at the National tried to stop a woman taking a very small bag into the theatre, on the grounds it was a "backpack" - in as much as she had a shoulder strap. She protested it was her handbag, and eventually he let her in. Do many theatres ban bags? I had my bag checked on the way into Aladdin but I've never been told I can't have it. Ventilation is under the seats at the NT. Large bags under seats block it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 8:18:46 GMT
They take in service dogs if the owner prefers not to have them in the auditorium during the show for whatever reason. Those must be the best days to work in the NT cloakroom.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 8:30:04 GMT
I once was asked to put a rather small backpack into the cloakroom, which I did. Then as I walked into the theatre there was a woman with a handbag twice the size of my backpack strolling in with no-one batting an eyelid.
At this point in time I should point out that I'd had a very bad day and was not in the greatest of moods.
This really bugged me because her bag was twice the size of mine (literally).
Off I went back to the cloakroom and asked for my backpack to be returned as I was taking it in with me. I was told I couldn't so I politely asked if we could talk about the NT's equal opportunities policy and the fact that they appear to have a policy but don't apply it fairly and equally. I suggested they go into the auditorium and ask the lady with the large handbag to put it into the cloakroom or they could return my bag.
Backpack was returned.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 8:46:42 GMT
We demand equality for manbags!! The Barbican has also tightened up its policy on bags - they have signs up saying bags over a certain size have to be put in the cloakroom so presumably the same applies to shopping bags / huge handbags / backpacks. They ushers at the door to the auditorium will also offer to collect the bag there and give out a cloakroom ticket, rather than forcing you to take the walk of shame to the cloakroom. The other thing that pissed me off in my recent experience is that I was there for a 6:00 platform, had actually tried to leave my bag in the cloakroom at 5:50 but it wasn't open. Let's have a day of action where we all turn up with one of those tartan shopping trolleys. "It's alright dear, I don't need to put it in the cloakroom, its a shopping bag"
|
|
1,325 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Jun 28, 2016 8:59:17 GMT
They take in service dogs if the owner prefers not to have them in the auditorium during the show for whatever reason. Those must be the best days to work in the NT cloakroom. My son worked at the Royal Albert Halls through Prom Season a few years ago and was tasked to care for a service dog while the patron enjoyed the music. Walked, watered, fussed the beastie and got paid for it.
|
|
|
Post by firefingers on Jun 28, 2016 10:00:19 GMT
Ventilation is under the seats at the NT. Large bags under seats block it. I've always wondered why the heck the architects did that - along with concreting seats in the front rows of the Lyttelton in place so they can't be removed for an apron if required. Back when it was built, air-conditioning was very loud (still is in some venues). It has the benefit of actually changing the temperature where the patrons are. And not the empty space above the seats. It's a great idea that doesn't take into account human nature.
|
|