|
Post by max on Dec 6, 2024 17:21:23 GMT
I can't say I like Angela Rayner's decision to approve the demolition of the Art Deco M&S building on Oxford Street. I don't buy the idea M&S couldn't recondition the building. Pleased with the decision, M&S they say they can now "get on with the job of helping to rejuvenate the UK's premier shopping street through a flagship M&S store and office space, which will support 2,000 jobs and act as a global standard-bearer for sustainability".
That's not going to revitalise Oxford Street. Who cares about a flagship store? You either want to go to Marks & Spencer or you don't.
Would two or three theatres along Oxford Street transform it?
There's enough dead space for exciting new builds as well as boutique studio theatres. Immersive theatre experiences could work alongside one of two big shows finding a permanent home. Willy Wonka's chocolate factory experience etc.
|
|
7,251 posts
|
Post by Jon on Dec 6, 2024 18:19:54 GMT
The rent would be far too high for a commercial theatre to be viable. The exception to that rule is the London Palladium but that's on Argylle Street.
|
|
|
Post by SilverFox on Dec 6, 2024 20:04:56 GMT
There was a long-standing and successful theatre on Oxford Street which opened in 1840 in a converted building and was known as the Princess's Theatre. It was closed and demolished in 1880, rebuilt and reopened the same year to the design of C J Phipps, with a stated capacity (not to modern standards) of 1,750. But by the end of the century it was struggling and closed in 1902, partly in respect of new LCC safety requirements. It was demolished in 1931 to be replaced by a Woolworths store. No new theatre could afford the rent.
A major musical house could IMO assist in the rejuvenation of Oxford Street, attracting more bars and restaurants to cater for the theatre crowd, and extend the footfall hours of the street. But it will never happen.
|
|