19,799 posts
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 18:10:39 GMT
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 5, 2019 18:10:39 GMT
Theresa May intends to stay on as an MP unless she’s had a change of heart. She looked very comfy next to Ken Clark on the back benches this week. She'll have a bit more room now too. Theresa May to stay as Conservative MP after quitting No 10 www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48611703
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2019 18:20:20 GMT
Disenfranchising yourself isn’t the answer though. Or spoiling ballot papers. You just leave the decisions with the extremists on all sides who WILL vote come what may. Yes, and I’m wrestling with that, but frankly I voted in a referendum and parliament is trying to overturn the result of that vote (Chuka Umunna at least having the decency to be honest about that, even if some of the others won’t). What’s the point in voting if all they’re going to do is overturn the electoral decisions they don’t like? Having a vote has always been very important to me but I’m feeling decidedly *shrug* about it at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by missthelma on Sept 5, 2019 18:54:49 GMT
I'm seriously thinking of declaring "political bankruptcy" over all of this, now. As in, "I'll never align myself with any political party ever again, and visit the polls only to mark my paper 'none of the above.'" I actually cannot believe or forgive the behaviour of anybody on any side of the house any longer. Not a single member (and they are now all members to me) deserves to be where they are or are fit to run this country in any way. Yes, I'm angry now, just angry. I have had a similar feeling for a few years now. The political class is currently appalling and shame inducing in equal measure.
I have some residual respect still for Caroline Lucas despite her recent gaff. But beyond that it's a struggle to find anyone.
I will though always vote as people in the past have fought and died to get me that right. For a few years now I have voted Green which in our electoral system is a total waste of time where I live. But I've voted, even if it gets no notice taken of it. I wonder if all the 'leavers' in the advisory referendum know that feeling. Gets easier to cope with over time.
|
|
2,342 posts
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 18:59:00 GMT
Post by theglenbucklaird on Sept 5, 2019 18:59:00 GMT
I'm seriously thinking of declaring "political bankruptcy" over all of this, now. As in, "I'll never align myself with any political party ever again, and visit the polls only to mark my paper 'none of the above.'" I actually cannot believe or forgive the behaviour of anybody on any side of the house any longer. Not a single member (and they are now all members to me) deserves to be where they are or are fit to run this country in any way. Yes, I'm angry now, just angry. I know the feeling! I know why you are angry Jean, why is the monkey angry at this time? I reckon Jean should back Jezza if you want to leave. Corbyn led government will be leaving the EU as he can't nationalise the railways in the EU
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Sept 5, 2019 19:03:54 GMT
I saw earlier that 25% of current Lib Dem MPs were elected as members of another party.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2019 19:26:22 GMT
What’s the point in voting if all they’re going to do is overturn the electoral decisions they don’t like? Because their job is to act in the best interests of the country as a whole, not just a tranche of it. And the best interest of the country as a whole is not to create an entirely avoidable economic catastrophe by claiming people voted for a crash exit that wasn't an option on the ballot paper or a risk properly explained by those advocating leaving the EU. Parliament is entitled to correct mistaken decisions, and this is the biggest mistake in history...
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 19:49:49 GMT
sf likes this
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2019 19:49:49 GMT
I saw earlier that 25% of current Lib Dem MPs were elected as members of another party. 2 from Labour and 2 from the Conservatives. Given the way those parties have both become wedded to ideological purity, it’s not surprising that, despite it hurting their chances of re election, they clearly see themselves as a better fit in a broader tent. Luciana Berger, from today, was hounded by anti semites in the Labour party, so hardly surprising she left.
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 19:57:22 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Sept 5, 2019 19:57:22 GMT
The Government is acting on the will of the people.
On analysis of the manifesto’s of all the Parties at the last election - 52% of voters voted for Parties which clearly stated that they would NOT leave without a Deal.. - 48% of voters voted for Parties which said leave on any terms.
None of this week’s shenanigans has changed that, all that has happened is the electoral majority for leaving without a Deal has been protected and is why it is important that the General Election, (which will come ) is after the will of the people to leave with a Deal has been enacted and why the opposition Parties should not give in on Monday.
At the moment we are democratically bound to leave the EU as per the referendum as both Labour and Conservatives went to the electorate on a Leave platform.
The fun starts with the proposed General Election, all Parties other than Labour are going to clearly state Leave / People’s Vote / Remain. The only one we have no indication for is Labour and their manifesto will be when we find out and personally believe it will be a People’s Vote as they are unlikely to go on a clear Remain platform.
The other thing to remember is that the Tory/DUP coalition were the majority Party, if the ERG, Johnson included had voted with their Party this mess could have been avoided and we would have left by now no matter what the other Parties did.
What I have found over the last week is that we need to be more engaged when we vote, I am undecided on which of the Remain Parties I will vote for as it will be on their Manifesto which I will read this time and the particular voting pattern to achieve Remain in my Constituency with the Manifesto being the primary driver.
The sadness in all this is the amount of time it has taken me to understand all the minutia around leaving the EU and try to make sense of it, the digging to get the above analysis has been difficult, if only it was the duty of the mainstream press to clarify rather than listen to who shouts louder or pays the reporters.
Brexit keeps on moving at a break neck speed, I have tried to minimise my involvement in this thread (wasn’t planning to post today) and keep as factual as possible as most people are understandably tired of it all and once I have digested days events.
We now move onto Monday where - The No-Deal Bill should get Royal Assent. - The request for a General Election by the Government will be heard. - A possible vote of No Confidence, with the Prorogation this will naturally move the Election after the extension is in place as per the No-Deal Bill or may not even be started as usually goes to Parliament the day after it is requested and at the moment the Governments Prorogation request will close Parliament on Monday and ironically to stop this the Government will have to eat into the Prorogation time table they have set out.
Thought yesterday would be my last day at College Green now looks as if there will be an encore on Monday as everything comes to a head and then (maybe) everyone goes to their Party Conferences.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 20:03:32 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2019 20:03:32 GMT
What’s the point in voting if all they’re going to do is overturn the electoral decisions they don’t like? Because their job is to act in the best interests of the country as a whole, not just a tranche of it. And the best interest of the country as a whole is not to create an entirely avoidable economic catastrophe by claiming people voted for a crash exit that wasn't an option on the ballot paper or a risk properly explained by those advocating leaving the EU. Parliament is entitled to correct mistaken decisions, and this is the biggest mistake in history... If I believed they were simply trying to stop no deal, I might agree with you. If I thought by blocking no deal we could still get a decent agreement with the EU, I might agree with you. That’s not what’s happening here. Some people have a mighty funny idea of democracy, that’s all I can say!
|
|
5,066 posts
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 20:12:35 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Sept 5, 2019 20:12:35 GMT
Theresa May intends to stay on as an MP unless she’s had a change of heart. She looked very comfy next to Ken Clark on the back benches this week. She'll have a bit more room now too. Theresa May to stay as Conservative MP after quitting No 10 www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48611703That news article is from June this year and refers to whether Ms May will stand down immediately after quitting being kicked out from being Prime Minister. It doesn't say that she won't quit in the general election.
|
|
5,066 posts
|
Brexit
Sept 5, 2019 20:16:01 GMT
Post by Phantom of London on Sept 5, 2019 20:16:01 GMT
so I mentioned earlier why can there not be a grand coalition and had interesting responses. Jeremy Corbin and Jo Swinson can stand aside from being Prime Minister sayiny that when they become Prime Minister it will be by the election box. Have Ken Clarke as the interim Prime Minister with a coalition government cabinet, standing against a no deal Brexit and get us a deal in Brussels.
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Sept 5, 2019 20:31:22 GMT
Because their job is to act in the best interests of the country as a whole, not just a tranche of it. And the best interest of the country as a whole is not to create an entirely avoidable economic catastrophe by claiming people voted for a crash exit that wasn't an option on the ballot paper or a risk properly explained by those advocating leaving the EU. Parliament is entitled to correct mistaken decisions, and this is the biggest mistake in history... If I believed they were simply trying to stop no deal, I might agree with you. If I thought by blocking no deal we could still get a decent agreement with the EU, I might agree with you. That’s not what’s happening here. Some people have a mighty funny idea of democracy, that’s all I can say! The thing is that if you accept that the public voted for Brexit, but didn't vote on a No Deal leave (certainly, my view is that the public was largely being sold on 'we'll get a great deal', but I accept that's not what everyone thinks), then it's similarly true that the precise nature of any deal wasn't part of the referendum either.
Thus, even if all the MPs worked towards the goal of Brexit, we'd still get lots of different ideas of what is or isn't acceptable in any deal. And that probably reflects to some extent differences in what different Brexiteers want. I mean, I suppose as a Remainer it's easy for me to say, but I can imagine that across the general public who voted (and still want) Brexit, there'll be wildly differing views on the things like the Irish border, the likelyhood of Scottish independence, how money might be redistributed, our ongoing agreements with the EU, any final exit payments to the EU and so on.
And that's before we even get to the fact that the EU will have their own interests too.
|
|
754 posts
|
Post by Latecomer on Sept 5, 2019 21:24:10 GMT
No-ne has taken the trouble to work out what people actually wanted when they voted Leave. I shall leave aside the fact that there was proven electoral fraud and the overspending (illegal) in the last few days probably made enough difference to the vote to change the result. I have to acknowledge that lots of people just “wanted to leave” but when challenged on this most of the people I have talked to either wanted to “shake things up” or have swallowed the Daily Mail hate rhetoric and wanted someone (preferably another group) to blame for the lack of high wages/public services but I may be wrong.....
We need to go back to the beginning and have public assemblies throughout the country to work out what people want....until we do this will not be settled. And stop calling it Clean Break or No Deal, call it No idea deal.....as if we left with no arrangements we would then just have to negotiate in a panic from a position far weaker as we are hit far harder as a proportion of our economy. It will not be the end of anything....
Personally I think if they offered the deal we have now (opt outs whenever we want of things like Schengen, the Euro, rebate etc) we would love it!!!!
Revoke A50 with promise of proper consultation by people’s assemblies with strict timetable and then we can always resubmit if at a later date we work out what relationship we actually want that is better and will keep Ireland and Northern Ireland safe!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2019 0:17:03 GMT
Some people have a mighty funny idea of democracy, that’s all I can say! And some people care about the future and avoiding chaos and an economic crisis that I will likely spend a great deal of my working life paying taxes and higher prices to resolve. I voted to Remain, I believe passionately in Remain even though I am not blind to the EU's inefficiencies (no institution is perfect, but a framework is workable and malleable whereas nothing is just nothing) and I very much begrudge my future being gambled on a knife edge by people who campaigned on lies and claim legitimacy from a vote where it is crystal clear that many, and possibly a majority, of those who voted and those who did not were fed and blindly believed that misinformation. That I cannot and will not look past. But despite that, I will take leaving with a deal because that is currently the least worst potentially achievable option. And because I have done enough reading and know enough from past studies to understand the depths of trouble that a no deal crash out would bring, without seeing any cogent argument in its favour. The people who have a funny idea about democracy are the people who think that an effective negotiating tactic is to threaten to throw their toys out of the pram and threaten to trigger the outcome which leaves the UK in the worst possible situation. The fact that they actually seem to think that would ever work in any context shows both their lack of intelligence and their arrogant self-importance. They are not my government and they never will be, and as far as I'm concerned they have no legitimacy - their party membership do not speak for me, in fact they speak for less than 1% of the population, that is how wafer thin the current government's mandate actually is.
|
|
952 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Sept 6, 2019 5:49:04 GMT
It's also ludicrous to describe leaving without a deal as an end point or getting Brexit over with. Whatever happens we will need to negotiate our future relationship with the EU as they are our biggest trading partners and neighbours. Currently we're doing that with the cushion of EU membership but after no deal we won't have that certainty.
Of course we are in a situation where the government expect us to believe that no deal is a big enough threat to force the EU to concede to our demands but at the same time something we have completely under control.
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Sept 6, 2019 7:44:34 GMT
Disenfranchising yourself isn’t the answer though. Or spoiling ballot papers. You just leave the decisions with the extremists on all sides who WILL vote come what may. Spoiling a paper isn't disenfranchising. The spoilt papers are shown to the candidates and are recorded as such. It is a legitimate vote the same as all others - it is a means of voting without giving your vote to a particular candidate. I will though always vote as people in the past have fought and died to get me that right. For a few years now I have voted Green which in our electoral system is a total waste of time where I live. But I've voted, even if it gets no notice taken of it. I wonder if all the 'leavers' in the advisory referendum know that feeling. Gets easier to cope with over time. That's the attitude I take, and it is why I go to vote and will spoil, rather than not vote at all, for reasons as above. I get that, but even if over fifty percent of people spoiled their ballots in a particular constituency, it would surely be the unspoiled votes that were counted to determine the result? I’m genuinely asking because if it could actually make a difference then I’d consider doing it.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 6, 2019 11:57:09 GMT
Post by missthelma on Sept 6, 2019 11:57:09 GMT
Is it just me or does Johnson seem rather at a loss at present? Of course it could all be part of the ongoing 'Bumbling Boris, your pal' schtick but he genuinely seems out of sorts and blindsided by the vicissitudes of politics. Now for somebody like Trump who was a political novice that attitude was to be expected but Johnson has been in and around politics for close to three decades so it seems bizarre that he is behaving as he is.
Was his privilege so ingrained that he expected everybody to just do what he said/wanted? Presumably whilst a heavenly choir serenaded. Or as I said before is this all some subterfuge? But he managed to make Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May look competent in comparison which surely can't have been the agenda. But mainly it's the public who seem to be throwing him off kilter.
For years we have been told the bumbling clown act was just that, an act, and underneath beat the heart of a true master of political acumen. So, what do people think is going on?
|
|
1,863 posts
Member is Online
|
Brexit
Sept 6, 2019 12:04:45 GMT
Post by NeilVHughes on Sept 6, 2019 12:04:45 GMT
To quote Margaret Atwood, The Blind Assassin
“She (He) knows herself (himself) to be at the mercy of events, and she (he) knows by now that events have no mercy.”
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Sept 6, 2019 12:14:19 GMT
|
|
562 posts
|
Post by jadnoop on Sept 6, 2019 12:26:45 GMT
Is it just me or does Johnson seem rather at a loss at present? Of course it could all be part of the ongoing 'Bumbling Boris, your pal' schtick but he genuinely seems out of sorts and blindsided by the vicissitudes of politics. Now for somebody like Trump who was a political novice that attitude was to be expected but Johnson has been in and around politics for close to three decades so it seems bizarre that he is behaving as he is. Was his privilege so ingrained that he expected everybody to just do what he said/wanted? Presumably whilst a heavenly choir serenaded. Or as I said before is this all some subterfuge? But he managed to make Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May look competent in comparison which surely can't have been the agenda. But mainly it's the public who seem to be throwing him off kilter. For years we have been told the bumbling clown act was just that, an act, and underneath beat the heart of a true master of political acumen. So, what do people think is going on? I wonder if it's not simply the slow realisation that his current situation (hated by huge portions of the population, unable to do anything he wanted to, likely to out of the job very soon, and in this bind about stating never to ask for an extension, but with no one to pick up the batton before Oct 31st) is pretty much what he's been working towards for his entire life. This short, painful few weeks will be the pinnacle of his career. I don't really see why anyone who wasn't completely deluded or happy to sacrifice themselves completely to whichver side they believe in would want to be PM right now.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 6, 2019 14:22:31 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Sept 6, 2019 14:22:31 GMT
He certainly looks to Churchill in what might seem to many an irrational way, perhaps rather as the boy or girl in the playground 'bends it like Beckham'.
I suppose there is a chance he has substance to him but he's via Eton - so almost by definition a snake oil salesmen in a very expensive suit. Cameron was the same.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 6, 2019 16:05:28 GMT
Because their job is to act in the best interests of the country as a whole, not just a tranche of it. And the best interest of the country as a whole is not to create an entirely avoidable economic catastrophe by claiming people voted for a crash exit that wasn't an option on the ballot paper or a risk properly explained by those advocating leaving the EU. Parliament is entitled to correct mistaken decisions, and this is the biggest mistake in history... If I believed they were simply trying to stop no deal, I might agree with you. If I thought by blocking no deal we could still get a decent agreement with the EU, I might agree with you. That’s not what’s happening here. Some people have a mighty funny idea of democracy, that’s all I can say! People didn't vote for Brexit in the spirit of wanting to leave the EU, come what may, at the expense of the economy, whatever it takes. All of the pro-Brexit campaigning was predicated on the idea that we'd have more money afterwards - more money for the NHS specifically. People voted for a deal - an advantageous deal, the easiest in history. Now obviously, those campaigns were lying - and anyone who'd done their homework knew they were lying. But a lot of people didn't. So it's the age old question that anyone in a service role faces - do you give the customer what they asked for, even though you know that's terrible, and deal with their inevitable complaints afterwards by saying 'but I gave you what I asked for!' Or do you attempt to get them what they actually want, even though it's not what they asked for? Democracy has to include the ability to change your mind when you get more information, and hold the people you elect to account when they don't keep their promises. The pro-Brexit campaigns made a lot of promises that couldn't be kept.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2019 16:40:20 GMT
Is it just me or does Johnson seem rather at a loss at present? Of course it could all be part of the ongoing 'Bumbling Boris, your pal' schtick but he genuinely seems out of sorts and blindsided by the vicissitudes of politics. Now for somebody like Trump who was a political novice that attitude was to be expected but Johnson has been in and around politics for close to three decades so it seems bizarre that he is behaving as he is. Was his privilege so ingrained that he expected everybody to just do what he said/wanted? Presumably whilst a heavenly choir serenaded. Or as I said before is this all some subterfuge? But he managed to make Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May look competent in comparison which surely can't have been the agenda. But mainly it's the public who seem to be throwing him off kilter. For years we have been told the bumbling clown act was just that, an act, and underneath beat the heart of a true master of political acumen. So, what do people think is going on? “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time”. Some said, ‘it’s just an act, he’ll be different in the job’ about Trump and now Johnson. How, despite all evidence to the contrary, can people be conned so easily?* Confidence in a character whose limited repertoire is exposed brutally by twenty four hour news, quickly dissipates.** * & ** because they rely on people not really paying attention to that news.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 6, 2019 18:29:01 GMT
Post by londonpostie on Sept 6, 2019 18:29:01 GMT
People didn't vote for Brexit in the spirit of wanting to leave the EU, come what may, at the expense of the economy, whatever it takes. All of the pro-Brexit campaigning was predicated on the idea that we'd have more money afterwards - more money for the NHS specifically. People voted for a deal - an advantageous deal, the easiest in history. It doesn't matter how often this is repeated, it isn't the case, it never was, and this relentless revisionism is embarrassing to witness.
As well as being factually inaccurate, it denies the basis of populism. After three years of ever-increasing evidence, it's unfortunate to still see this regurgitated.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 6, 2019 18:42:51 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2019 18:42:51 GMT
Some people have a mighty funny idea of democracy, that’s all I can say! And some people care about the future and avoiding chaos and an economic crisis that I will likely spend a great deal of my working life paying taxes and higher prices to resolve. I hate to break it to you, but that’s what’s coming if we get a Labour government anyway! The chances of which are (potentially) increasing by the day. Agree a deal is the best option, but have always thought we need to maintain the leverage of a no deal threat to get one. And act on it if needed. It will be slightly hilarious if May’s deal, moderately tweaked, comes back round again and the bunch of hopeless non-entities actually vote for it this time...
|
|